|
1.Dong, X., et al. An improved YOLOv5 network for lung nodule detection. in 2021 International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering and Computer Science (EIECS). 2021. IEEE. 2.Nguyen, C.C., et al., Pulmonary nodule detection based on faster R-CNN with adaptive anchor box. Ieee Access, 2021. 9: p. 154740-154751. 3.Chamberlin, J., et al., Automated detection of lung nodules and coronary artery calcium using artificial intelligence on low-dose CT scans for lung cancer screening: accuracy and prognostic value. BMC medicine, 2021. 19(1): p. 1-14. 4.Naqi, S.M., M. Sharif, and A. Jaffar, Lung nodule detection and classification based on geometric fit in parametric form and deep learning. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020. 32: p. 4629-4647. 5.Al-Shabi, M., et al., Lung nodule classification using deep local–global networks. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. 14: p. 1815-1819. 6.Onishi, Y., et al., Multiplanar analysis for pulmonary nodule classification in CT images using deep convolutional neural network and generative adversarial networks. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. 15: p. 173-178. 7.Gao, C., et al., The growth trend predictions in pulmonary ground glass nodules based on radiomic CT features. Frontiers in oncology, 2020. 10: p. 580809. 8.Tao, G., et al., Prediction of future imagery of lung nodule as growth modeling with follow-up computed tomography scans using deep learning: a retrospective cohort study. Translational Lung Cancer Research, 2022. 11(2): p. 250. 9.Yang, R., et al., Prediction of single pulmonary nodule growth by CT radiomics and clinical features—a one-year follow-up study. Frontiers in Oncology, 2022. 12. 10.Xu, J., et al., Federated learning for healthcare informatics. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 2021. 5: p. 1-19. 11.Antunes, R.S., et al., Federated learning for healthcare: Systematic review and architecture proposal. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 2022. 13(4): p. 1-23. 12.Li, T., et al., Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE signal processing magazine, 2020. 37(3): p. 50-60. 13.Nguyen, D.C., et al., Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2022. 55(3): p. 1-37. 14.Patrício, C., J.C. Neves, and L.F. Teixeira, Explainable Deep Learning Methods in Medical Diagnosis: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.04766, 2022. 15.Xue, Q. and M.C. Chuah, Explainable deep learning based medical diagnostic system. Smart Health, 2019. 13: p. 100068. 16.Choo, J. and S. Liu, Visual analytics for explainable deep learning. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 2018. 38(4): p. 84-92. 17.Setio, A.A.A., et al., Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge. Medical image analysis, 2017. 42: p. 1-13. 18.Li, A.-H.A., et al. A deep learning approach to Lung Nodule Growth Prediction using CT image combined with Demographic and image features. in Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics. 2023. 19.Giger, M.L., Introduction to the LUNGx challenge. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2015. 2(2). 20.Armato III, S.G., et al., The lung image database consortium (LIDC) and image database resource initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Medical physics, 2011. 38(2): p. 915-931. 21.Van Ginneken, B., et al., Comparing and combining algorithms for computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography scans: the ANODE09 study. Medical image analysis, 2010. 14(6): p. 707-722. 22.Biessmann, F., et al., DataWig: Missing Value Imputation for Tables. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2019. 20(175): p. 1-6. 23.Carion, N., et al. End-to-end object detection with transformers. in European conference on computer vision. 2020. Springer. 24.Tan, M. and Q. Le. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. in International conference on machine learning. 2019. PMLR. 25.Yang, Q., et al., Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 2019. 10(2): p. 1-19. 26.Moshawrab, M., et al., Reviewing Federated Learning Aggregation Algorithms; Strategies, Contributions, Limitations and Future Perspectives. Electronics, 2023. 12(10): p. 2287. 27.Qi, P., et al., Model aggregation techniques in federated learning: A comprehensive survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2023. 28.Sannara, E., et al. A federated learning aggregation algorithm for pervasive computing: Evaluation and comparison. in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). 2021. IEEE. 29.Gupta, R. and T. Alam, Survey on federated-learning approaches in distributed environment. Wireless personal communications, 2022. 125(2): p. 1631-1652. 30.Bonawitz, K., et al. Federated learning with autotuned communication-efficient secure aggregation. in 2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. 2019. IEEE. 31.Holzinger, A., et al. Explainable AI methods-a brief overview. in International Workshop on Extending Explainable AI Beyond Deep Models and Classifiers. 2020. Springer. 32.Cian, D., J. van Gemert, and A. Lengyel, Evaluating the performance of the LIME and Grad-CAM explanation methods on a LEGO multi-label image classification task. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.01584, 2020. 33.Selvaraju, R.R., et al. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2017. 34.Ribeiro, M.T., S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. " Why should i trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 2016. 35.Vedaldi, A. and S. Soatto. Quick shift and kernel methods for mode seeking. in Computer Vision–ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part IV 10. 2008. Springer. 36.Pedregosa, F., et al., Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research, 2011. 12: p. 2825-2830. 37.Drake Jr, F. and G. Van Rossum, Python Reference Manual. Amsterdam: Centrum voor wiskunde en informatica, 1995. 38.Abadi, M., et al. {TensorFlow}: a system for {Large-Scale} machine learning. in 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16). 2016. 39.Gietema, H.A., et al., Pulmonary nodules: interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT—influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance. Radiology, 2007. 245(3): p. 888-894. 40.Xu, D.M., et al., Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung cancer, 2006. 54(2): p. 177-184. 41.Shi, Z., et al., Quantitative features can predict further growth of persistent pure ground-glass nodule. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. 9(2): p. 283. 42.Xiao, Y., et al., A review of object detection based on deep learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020. 79: p. 23729-23791. 43.Zhao, Z.-Q., et al., Object detection with deep learning: A review. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2019. 30(11): p. 3212-3232. 44.Ho, T.K. Random decision forests. in Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition. 1995. IEEE. 45.Friedman, J.H., Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, 2001: p. 1189-1232. 46.Cho, K., et al., Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078, 2014. 47.Joshi, G., R. Walambe, and K. Kotecha, A review on explainability in multimodal deep neural nets. IEEE Access, 2021. 9: p. 59800-59821. 48.Rodis, N., et al., Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review of Methodological Advances and Future Research Directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05731, 2023.
|