臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文探究 基於多媒體學習認知理論 (Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, CTML)製作 全景實境 (Panorama-based Virtual Reality, PVR)教材 對學習成效的影響。在本研究中這類教材被稱為 CTML-PVR-based多媒體 教材。本研究採準實驗設計，將參與者分成實驗組與對照組，在教學實驗中，實驗組導入 CTML-PVR-based多媒體 教材，利用頭戴式虛擬實境設備來觀看教材，對照組觀看 Youtube影片教材。觀察實驗數據得知，在互動、感知的愉悅、自我效能評估、 沉浸感 、學習動機 -專注度、學習動機 -信心、態度 -學 習行為與多媒體教材學習行為上有顯著差異，而在學習動機、認知負荷、學習動機-滿足感、態度 -感知控制與態度 -感知有用性上無顯著差異。

This thesis investigates the impact on learning effectiveness while learning multimedia materials that are developed by Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) and the technique involved by Panorama-based Virtual Reality (PVR). Hereafter, teaching units are called CTML-PVR-based multimedia materials. This study adopts a quasi-experimental design. Participants are divided into an experimental group and a control group. In the teaching experiment, the experimental group receives CTML-PVR-based multimedia materials. Participants of the experimental group wear a head-mounted virtual-reality device to watch CTML-PVR-based multimedia materials. The control group receives video on YouTube. Observing the experimental results, there are significant differences on interaction, perceived enjoyment, self-efficacy, immersion, presence, motivation for attention, motivation for confidence, attitude for learning behavior, and behavior for learning multimedia materials. There are not statistically significant on cognitive load, motivation for satisfaction, attitude for perceived control, and attitude for perceived usefulness.

摘要..........................................i
Abstract......................................ii
誌謝..........................................iv
目錄..........................................v
表目錄........................................vii
圖目錄........................................viii
第一章 研究動機目的............................1
1.1研究動機...................................1
1.2研究目的...................................2
1.3研究流程...................................2
第二章 相關文獻回顧............................4
2.1虛擬實境(Virtual Reality)與全景實境.........4
2.2多媒體學習認知理論..........................8
2.3多媒體教學設計原則..........................9
2.4導入梅爾多媒體設計原則之比較................18
第三章 系統架構...............................20
3.1系統架構與設計概述..........................20
3.2導入梅爾多媒體教材設計原則...................22
3.3教材觀看流程設計............................27
3.4系統操作流程................................28
3.4.1多媒體教材設計原則與對應步驟...............34
第四章 研究方法................................35
4.1研究架構...................................35
4.2參加人員...................................37
4.3 研究流程..................................37
4.4 問卷出處與構面.............................39
4.5研究假設...................................41
第五章 研究結果與討論..........................45
5.1 問卷信度分析..............................45
5.2 整份問卷前後測獨立樣本T檢定.................49
5.3兩大構面前後測獨立樣本T檢定..................51
5.4單一構面前後測獨立樣本T檢定..................55
5.5結果與討論..................................68
第六章 結論與未來研究..........................71
6.1 結論......................................71
6.2 未來研究..................................71
參考文獻......................................72
Extended Abstract............................77

[1] 「滑世代」，你跟上了嗎？ - 網路素養 - 數位素養 . (2020). Retrieved 17 May 2020, from https://eteacher.edu.tw/Article_m.aspx?id=2986
[2] Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia Learning. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139164603
[3] Mayer, R. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12197
[4] Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory and E-Learning. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, 5-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_3
[5] ROGERS, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
[6] Pensieri, Claudio & Pennacchini, Maddalena. (2014). Overview: Virtual Reality in Medicine. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research. 7. 10.1007/978-3-319-22041-3_14.
[7] Eiris, R., Gheisari, M., & Esmaeili, B. (2020). Desktop-based safety training using 360-degree panorama and static virtual reality techniques: A comparative experimental study. Automation In Construction, 109, 102969. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102969
[8] Mehryar, N., Ron, W., & Tek, N. (2004). The use of virtual reality in education.
[9] Kuchelmeister, V. (2018). Virtual Immersion: Simulating Immersive Experiences in VR. 2018 IEEE Conference On Virtual Reality And 3D User Interfaces (VR). doi: 10.1109/vr.2018.8446124
[10] Microsoft. (2020). Immersive Experiences in Education.
[11] Snelson, C., & Hsu, Y. (2019). Educational 360-Degree Videos in Virtual Reality: a Scoping Review of the Emerging Research. Techtrends. doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00474-3
[12] Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wüensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2016). Creating 360° educational video. Proceedings Of The 28Th Australian Conference On Computer-Human Interaction - Ozchi '16. doi: 10.1145/3010915.3011001
[13] Argyriou, L., Economou, D. and Bouki, V. 2017. 360-degree interactive video application for Cultural Heritage Education. 3rd Annual International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network. Coimbra, Portugal 29 Jun - 26 Jul 2017 Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz. https://doi.org/10.3217/978-3-85125-530-0
[14] Tran, H., Ngoc, N., Pham, C., Jung, Y., & Thang, T. (2017). A subjective study on QoE of 360 video for VR communication. 2017 IEEE 19Th International Workshop On Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP). doi: 10.1109/mmsp.2017.8122249
[15] Santano, D., See, Z., Fong, C., & Thwaites, H. (2017). Aerial virtual reality 360 research-creation. 2017 23Rd International Conference On Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM). doi: 10.1109/vsmm.2017.8346262
[16] Fan, C., Lee, J., Lo, W., Huang, C., Chen, K., & Hsu, C. (2017). Fixation Prediction for 360° Video Streaming in Head-Mounted Virtual Reality. Proceedings Of The 27Th Workshop On Network And Operating Systems Support For Digital Audio And Video - NOSSDAV'17. doi: 10.1145/3083165.3083180
[17] Broeck, M., Kawsar, F., & Schöning, J. (2017). It's All Around You. Proceedings Of The 2017 ACM On Multimedia Conference - MM '17. doi: 10.1145/3123266.3123347
[18] Lin, Y., Liao, Y., Teng, S., Chung, Y., Chan, L., & Chen, B. (2017). Outside-In. Proceedings Of The 30Th Annual ACM Symposium On User Interface Software And Technology. doi: 10.1145/3126594.3126656
[19] Higuera-Trujillo, J., López-Tarruella Maldonado, J., & Llinares Millán, C. (2017). Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison between Photographs, 360° Panoramas, and Virtual Reality. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.006
[20] Reyna, J. (2018). THE POTENTIAL OF 360-DEGREE VIDEOS FOR TEACHING, LEARNING AND RESEARCH. INTED2018 Proceedings. doi: 10.21125/inted.2018.0247
[21] Feurstein, Michael Sebastian (2018) Towards an Integration of 360-Degree Video in Higher Education. Workflow, challenges and scenarios. In: Proceedings of DeLFI Workshops 2018 co-located with 16th e-Learning Conference of the German Computer Society (DeLFI 2018). Vol-2250, CEUR WS, Frankfurt a.M.. pp. 1-12. ISBN 1613-0073
[22] Nuñez Velasco, J., Farah, H., van Arem, B., & Hagenzieker, M. (2019). Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 66, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.015
[23] Shin, M., Song, S., Kim, S., & Biocca, F. (2019). The effects of 3D sound in a 360-degree live concert video on social presence, parasocial interaction, enjoyment, and intent of financial supportive action. International Journal Of Human-Computer Studies, 126, 81-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.02.001
[24] Mouratidis, K., & Hassan, R. (2020). Contemporary versus traditional styles in architecture and public space: A virtual reality study with 360-degree videos. Cities, 97, 102499. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102499
[25] Argyriou, L., Economou, D., & Bouki, V. (2020). Design methodology for 360° immersive video applications: the case study of a cultural heritage virtual tour. Personal And Ubiquitous Computing. doi: 10.1007/s00779-020-01373-8
[26] Eiris, R., Gheisari, M., & Esmaeili, B. (2020). Desktop-based safety training using 360-degree panorama and static virtual reality techniques: A comparative experimental study. Automation In Construction, 109, 102969. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102969
[27] Hallberg, S., Hirsto, L., & Kaasinen, J. (2020). Experiences and outcomes of craft skill learning with a 360° virtual learning environment and a head-mounted display. Heliyon, 6(8), e04705. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04705
[28] Ferdig, R., & Kosko, K. (2020). Implementing 360 Video to Increase Immersion, Perceptual Capacity, and Teacher Noticing. Techtrends. doi: 10.1007/s11528-020-00522-3
[29] Hoehler, M. (2020). On the development of a transparent enclosure for 360° video cameras to observe severe fires in situ. Fire Safety Journal, 103024. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103024
[30] Eiris, R., Jain, A., Gheisari, M., & Wehle, A. (2020). Safety immersive storytelling using narrated 360-degree panoramas: A fall hazard training within the electrical trade context. Safety Science, 127, 104703. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104703
[31] Mayer, R. (2003). Elements of a Science of E-Learning. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 297-313. doi: 10.2190/yjlg-09f9-xkax-753d
[32] Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013
[33] Colliot, T., & Jamet, É. (2018). Understanding the effects of a teacher video on learning from a multimedia document: an eye-tracking study. Educational Technology Research And Development, 66(6), 1415-1433. doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9594-x
[34]Korakakis, G., Pavlatou, E., Palyvos, J., & Spyrellis, N. (2009). 3D visualization types in multimedia applications for science learning: A case study for 8th grade students in Greece. Computers & Education, 52(2), 390-401. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.011
[35] Morett, L., Clegg, B., Blalock, L., & Mong, H. (2009). Applying multimedia learning theory to map learning and driving navigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 12(1), 40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.07.001
[36] McTigue, E. (2009). Does multimedia learning theory extend to middle-school students?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.003
[37] Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., & Hesse, F. (2014). Extending multimedia research: How do prerequisite knowledge and reading comprehension affect learning from text and pictures. Computers In Human Behavior, 31, 73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.022
[38] Kennedy, M., Thomas, C., Aronin, S., Newton, J., & Lloyd, J. (2014). Improving teacher candidate knowledge using content acquisition podcasts. Computers & Education, 70, 116-127. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.010
[39] Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2015). Signals foster multimedia learning by supporting integration of highlighted text and diagram elements. Learning And Instruction, 36, 11-26. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.002
[40] Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T., & Mayer, R. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning And Instruction, 60, 225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
[41] Liu, Y., Jang, B., & Roy-Campbell, Z. (2018). Optimum input mode in the modality and redundancy principles for university ESL students' multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 127, 190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.025
[42] Chan, K., Lyons, C., Kon, L., Stine, K., Manley, M., & Crossley, A. (2020). Effect of on-screen text on multimedia learning with native and foreign-accented narration. Learning And Instruction, 67, 101305. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101305
[43] Yang, J., Li, Y., Calic, G., & Shevchenko, A. (2020). How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information. Journal Of Business Research, 117, 6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.008
[44] Tarchi, C., Zaccoletti, S., & Mason, L. (2021). Learning from text, video, or subtitles: A comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 160, 104034. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104034
[45] Witmer, B., & Singer, M. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators And Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240. doi: 10.1162/105474698565686
[46] Tokel, S., & İsler, V. (2013). Acceptance of virtual worlds as learning space. Innovations In Education And Teaching International, 52(3), 254-264. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2013.820139
[47] Witt-Rose, D. L. (2004). Student self-efficacy in college science: an investigation of gender, age, and academic achievement. Unpublished Master’s degree project, University of Wisconsin-Stout.
[48] Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
[49] Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1994). Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2(3), 221–233.
[50] Herbst, P., Aaron, W., & Erickson, A. (2013). How preservice teachers respond to representations of practice: A comparison of animations and video. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco: CA.
[51] Schuemie, Martijn & Straaten, Peter & Krijn, Merel & Mast, C. (2001). Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey. Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society. 4. 183-201. 10.1089/109493101300117884.
[52] Georgiou, Yiannis & Kyza, Eleni. (2017). A design-based approach to augmented reality location-based activities: Investigating immersion in relation to student learning. 1-8. 10.1145/3136907.3136926.
[53] Ferdig, R., & Kosko, K. (2020). Implementing 360 Video to Increase Immersion, Perceptual Capacity, and Teacher Noticing. Techtrends, 64(6), 849-859. doi: 10.1007/s11528-020-00522-3
[54] Seidel, D. J., B. Sun, M. Pettey, and A. Reale (2011), Global radiosonde balloon drift statistics, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D07102, doi:10.1029/2010JD014891.
[55] Cheng, K. (2016). Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology. doi: 10.14742/ajet.2820