臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著現今競爭激烈的全球供應鏈市場環境中，消費者選擇產品的需求考量，從以往傳統上注重的「價格導向」漸漸改變為現代的「品質導向」，除了產品價格以外，產品的品質是目前消費者在採購需求時考量的因素之一，供應商需滿足市場要求的高品質產品評估，以及產品提交於客戶端達到協同商定的品質水準共識，建立長期供應商(賣方)與客戶端(買方)關係之永續可靠供應鏈越來越受到市場重視。

目前統計品質管制方式中，驗收抽樣檢驗(Acceptance Sampling Inspection)為重要之檢驗手法，主要目的為執行供應商所提交的貨批批次檢驗有無規定於買賣雙方的品質標準評估，確保提交的產品符合客戶端的需求，是目前業界品質管制和保證的有用工具。然現今供應商送驗貨批於客戶端產品檢驗與驗收抽樣看似操作流程簡單，但業界幾乎都誤解表格使用方式或錯用抽樣計畫類型，認為了解各種「驗收抽樣計畫表」就可以上手，但若供應商提供產品時於驗收檢驗品管人員未確實實施及屬於保安部品未確實判定優劣，其最終結果產品品質不好，導致不良品流出至消費者，則公司投入許多資源其想改善產品品質，而客戶卻沒感受品質改善有改進目標，其最大因素為沒有正確的品質管理觀念及產品驗收手法。

本研究以探討企業使用三種美軍標準驗收抽樣計畫的執行過程進行彙整，以計數型MIL-STD-105E驗收抽樣計畫表、計量型MIL-STD-414驗收抽樣計畫表及計數型和計量型MIL-STD-1916驗收抽樣計畫表於不同實際案例產業中分析差異性，讓使用者了解如何採用合適的驗收抽樣表訂定驗收抽樣計畫來有效執行抽樣檢驗來區別允收貨批亦或是拒收貨批之決策，並規劃預防型驗收抽樣計畫持續產品製程改善及品質控管，最後以實際案例說明其應用。

In today's highly competitive global supply chain market environment, consumers' consideration of commodity demand has gradually changed from the traditional "Price Orientation" to the current "Quality Orientation". In addition to price, product quality has long been one of the key points considered by customers when purchasing. Suppliers need to meet the high-quality product evaluation required by the market and submit products to the customers to reach a consensus on the quality level agreed by coordination, the establishment of a sustainable and reliable supply chain with the long-term supplier (seller) and customers (buyer) relationship has attracted more and more attention.

Among the current statistical quality control methods, Acceptance Sampling Inspection is an important inspection method. Its main purpose is to evaluate whether the batch inspection of the goods submitted by the supplier is stipulated in the quality standards of the buyer and the seller, so as to ensure that the submitted products meet the needs of the customers. It is a useful tool for quality control and assurance in the industry at present. However, nowadays, it seems that the operation process of product inspection and acceptance sampling by suppliers sending inspection batches to customers is simple, but the industry almost misunderstands the use of forms or the type of sampling plans, and thinks that it is possible to start by understanding various "acceptance sampling plans-". However, if the quality control personnel of the acceptance inspection and the security parts do not judge the quality of the products when the suppliers provide the products, the final result is that the product quality is not good, As a result, defective products flow out to consumers, and the company invests a lot of resources to improve product quality, but customers do not feel that there is an improvement goal for quality improvement. The biggest factor is that there is no correct quality management concept and product acceptance methods.

The purpose of this study is to explore the implementation process of enterprises using three American standard acceptance sampling plans, and analyze the differences in different real case industries with attributes MIL-STD-105E acceptance sampling plan, variables MIL-STD-414 acceptance sampling plan, and attributes and variables MIL-STD-1916 acceptance sampling plan., Let users know how to use the appropriate acceptance sampling table to formulate the acceptance sampling plan to effectively implement the sampling inspection to distinguish the decision of accepting or rejecting the goods, and plan the preventive acceptance sampling plan for continuous the product process improvement and quality control. Finally, an actual case is given to illustrate its application.

摘要 ii
Abstract iii
誌謝 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 ix
壹、緒論 1
一、研究背景與動機 1
二、研究目的 2
三、論文架構 3
貳、文獻探討 6
一、驗收抽樣計畫 6
(一) 驗收抽樣計畫簡介 6
(二) 驗收抽樣計畫之分類 9
(三) 驗收抽樣計畫績效評估 14
二、計數型與計量型驗收抽樣計畫 16
(一) 計數型驗收抽樣計畫之文獻發展及應用 16
(二) 計數型MIL-STD-105E驗收抽樣計畫表介紹 19
(三) 計量型驗收抽樣計畫之文獻發展及應用 23
(四) 計量型MIL-STD-414驗收抽樣計畫表介紹 26
(五) MIL-STD-1916驗收抽樣計畫表介紹 30
參、研究方法 38
(一) 研究對象之案例數據 38
(二) 計數型MIL-STD-105E驗收抽樣計畫表之執行步驟 38
(三) 計量型MIL-STD-414驗收抽樣計畫表之執行步驟 40
(四) MIL-STD-1916驗收抽樣計畫表之執行步驟 44
肆、實例驗證 47
(一) 單晶矽晶圓製造商之產品數據案例分析 47
(二) 單晶矽晶圓之數據套用MIL-STD-105E驗收抽樣計畫表 48
(三) 單晶矽晶圓之數據套用MIL-STD-414驗收抽樣計畫表 50
(四) 單晶矽晶圓之數據套用MIL-STD-1916驗收抽樣計畫表 51
(五) 超小型片式電阻器之產品數據案例分析 51
(六) 電阻器之數據套用MIL-STD-105E驗收抽樣計畫表 52
(七) 電阻器之數據套用MIL-STD-414驗收抽樣計畫表 54
(八) 電阻器之數據套用MIL-STD-1916驗收抽樣計畫表 55
(九) 真空吸塵器的吸塵電機之產品數據案例分析 56
(十) 吸塵電機之數據套用MIL-STD-105E驗收抽樣計畫表 57
(十一) 吸塵電機之數據套用MIL-STD-414驗收抽樣計畫表 60
(十二) 吸塵電機之數據套用MIL-STD-1916驗收抽樣計畫表 60
(十三) MIL-STD-105E、MIL-STD-414與MIL-STD1916之差異 61
伍、結論與建議 64
一、研究結果與討論 64
二、未來研究與方向 65
文獻參考 66
中文文獻 66
驗收產品文獻 66
英文文獻 67

中文文獻
1.鄭春生(2008)。品質管理：修訂版。新北市：全華圖書。
2.李友錚、賀力行(2008)。品質管理：整合性思維 = Quality management：an integrative approach。新北市：前程文化。
3.楊義明、盤天培、鄭鴻業(2005)。MIL-STD-105E、414與1916抽樣計畫之運用。品質月刊，41(11)，73-78。
4.張有成(2013)。抽樣檢驗。臺北市：中華民國品質學會。
5.張有成(2000)。抽樣檢驗。臺北市：中華民國品質學會。
6.沈盈志(1984)。考慮檢驗誤差之計數抽樣計畫的分析與研究。國立中央大學機械工程系碩士班，桃園市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r389q9。
7.張勝立、陶阿倫(1999)。MIL-STD-105E抽樣計畫在醫療衛材驗收實務之應用。醫療品質雜誌，2(4)，19-30。
8.曾豪傑(2003) 。計數值驗收抽樣資訊系統。國立臺灣科技大學工業管理系碩士班，臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m38wrg。
9.杜宥菖(2012)。選別抽樣之經濟性設計。華梵大學工業工程與經營資訊學系碩士班，新北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8rausp。
10.吳祥愷(2006) 。國內企業實施進料抽樣計畫現況之探討。元智大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，桃園市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ruv882。
11.陳漢棟(2009)。品質檢驗作業。桃園市：科建管理顧問股份有限公司。
12.陳君菱(2012)。進料檢驗MIL-STD-1916抽樣計畫之導入－以某公司為例。國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士班，雲林縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a46xbf。
13.劉和泰(2011)。MIL-STD-1916計數值抽樣計畫驗證水準對某電子公司的影響研究。世新大學國際經營管理碩士學位學程碩士班，臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/564w7v。

驗收產品文獻
1.Hsu, B. M., Wang, T. C., & Shu, M. H. (2020). Lot-dependent sampling plans for qualifying long-term production capability with a one-sided specification. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 146, 106583.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106583
2.Hsu, B. M., Shu, M. H., & Wang, T. C. (2020). Variables adjustable multiple dependent state sampling plans with a loss-based capability index. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 107(5), 2163-2175.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05137-9
3.Samsung Electro-Mechanics.(2019). Passive Component/Chip Resistor. Retrieved December 1.
doi:http://www.samsungsem.co.kr/global/product/passive-component/chip-resistor/general-resistor/index.jsp
4.Wu, C. W., Shu, M. H., Nugroho, A. A., & Kurniati, N. (2015). A flexible process-capability-qualified resubmission-allowed acceptance sampling scheme. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 80, 62-71.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.11.015

英文文獻
1.American Society for Quality Control, & American National Standards Committee Z-1 on Quality Assurance. (1981). Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes American National Standard Sampling Procedures and Tables for Insp. American Society for Quality Control.
2.Aslam M., Wu C. W., Azam M. & Jun CH(2013). Variable sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index〖" C" 〗_"pk" for normally distributed items. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(3), 667-675.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.048
3.Bartky, W. (1943). Multiple Sampling With Constant Probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14(4), 363-377.
4.Bai, D. S., & Hong, S. H., (1990). Economic design of sampling plans with multi-decision alternatives. Naval Research Logistics, 37, 905-918.
5.Borget, I., Laville, I., Paci, A., Michiels, S., Mercier, L., Desmaris, R. P., & Bourget, P.(2006). Application of an acceptance sampling plan for post-production quality control of chemotherapeutic batches in an hospital pharmacy. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, (64)1, 92-98.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.04.002.
6.Cheng, Tao-ming & Chen, Yen-liang. (2007). A GA mechanism for optimizing the design of attribute double sampling plan. Automation in Construction, 16(3), 345-353.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.07.003
7.Department of Defense. (1996). MIL‐STD‐1916: DoD preferred methods for acceptance of product
8.Dodge, H. F. & Roming, H. G. (1929). A method of sampling inspection. Bell System Technical Journal, 8(4), 613-631.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1929.tb01240.x
9.Dodge, H.F., & Roming, H.G., (1959). Sampling Inspections Tables – Single and Double Sampling, 2d ed., Johan Wiley＆Sons, New York.
10.Dodge, H.F. (1969). Note on the Evolution of Acceptance Sampling Plans Part 1. Journal of Quality Technology, 1(2), 77-88.
11.Dodge, H.F. (1969). Note on the Evolution of Acceptance Sampling Plans Part 2. Journal of Quality Technology, 1(3), 155-162.
12.Dodge, H.F. (1969). Note on the Evolution of Acceptance Sampling Plans Part 3. Journal of Quality Technology, 1(4), 225-232.
13.Duncan, A. J. (1986). Quality control and industrial statistics, 5th ed., Irwin, Illinois.
14.Deros, B. M., Peng, C. Y., Ab Rahman, M. N., Ismail, A. R., & Sulong, A. B. (2008). Assessing acceptance sampling application in manufacturing electrical and electronic products. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 31(2), 622-628.
15.Das, N. G., & Mitra, S. K. (1964). Effect of non-normality on plans for sampling inspection by variables. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 169-176.
16.Evans, J. R. (2005). Total Quality – Management, Organizations and Strategy, 4th ed., Thomson, Edmonton.
17.Fu, H. H., Tsai, H T., Lin, C. W., & Wei, D. (2004). Application of a single sampling plan for auditing medical-claim payments made by Taiwan National Health Insurance. Health Policy, 70(2), 185-195.
18.Hamaker, H.C. (1979). Acceptance sampling for percent defective by variables and by attributes. Journal of Quality Technology, 11, 39-48.
19.Hailey W. A. (1980). Minimum sample size single sampling plans: a computerized approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 12(4), 230-235.
20.Jennett, W. J. & Welch, B. L. (1939). The Control of Proportion Defective as Judged by a Single Quality Characteristic Varying on a Continuous Scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 6, 80-88.
doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2983626.
21.Juran, J. M. (1974). Quality Control Handbook:McGraw-Hill.
22.Kao, J. H. K. (1971). Sampling procedures and tables for inspection by variables for percent defective. Journal of Quality Technology, 3, 28-37.
23.Kane V. E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18 (1),41-52.
24.Kobilinsky, A., & Bertheau, Y. (2005). Minimum cost acceptance sampling plans for grain control, with application to GMO detection, Chemometrics Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 75, 189-200.
25.Lieberman, G. J. & Resnikoff, G. J. (1955). Sampling Plans for Inspection by Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50(270), 457–516.
26.Liu, Shu-Ing & Liu Ho-Tai(2012). Cost-Benefit Analysis for the MIL-STD-1916: A Case Study. Management Science and Engineering, 6(1), 1-10.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.mse.1913035X20120601.1901
27.Lee. H. L., & Tagaras, G. (1992). Economic acceptance sampling plans in complex multi-stage production systems. International Journal of Production Reasearch, 30(11), 2615-2632.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549208948180.
28.Ming-Hsien Caleb Li, Chao-Hsiung Benjamin Yeh & Abbas Al-Refaie(2013). The AQL and RQL of the attributes sampling plans in MIL-STD-1916. Quality & Quantity, 47, 2617-2635.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9675-6
29.Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to statistical quality control. John Wiley & Sons.
30.Markowski, E. P., & Markowski, C. A. (2002). Improved attribute acceptance sampling plans in the presence of misclassification error. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(3), 501-510.
31.Milligan, G. (1991). “Is sampling really dead?”. Quality Progress, 24(4), 77‐81.
32.Mohammed, N., & Tomas, V. (1993). Knowledge-based approach to quality control assurance using bar code identification systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 25(1-4), 41-44.
33.Owen D. B. (1967). Variables sampling plans based on the normal distribution Technometrics, 9, 417-423.
34.Ronen, B., & Spector, Y. (1995). Evaluating sampling strategy under two criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 80, 59-67.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0177-Y
35.Schilling, E.G. & Neubauer, D.V. (2008). Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control(2nd Edition). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
36.Seidel, W. (1997). Is Sampling by Variables Worse than Sampling by Attributes? A Decision Theoretic Analysis and a New Mixed Strategy for Inspecting Individual Lots. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B (1960-2002), 59(1), 96–107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25052983
37.Soundararajan, V. (1981). Single Sampling Attributes Plans Indexed by AQL and AOQL. Journal of Quality Technology, 13(3), 195-200.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1981.11978753.
38.Soundararajan, V., & Vijayaraghavan, R., (1981). Procedures and tables for the construction and selection of conditional double sampling plans. Journal of Applies Statistics, 19(3), 192-194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769200000030.
39.Schilling, E. G., & Neubauer, D. V. (2009). Acceptance sampling in quality control. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
40.Starbird, S. A., & Amanor-Boadu, V. (2006). Do inspection and traceability provide incentives for food safety?. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31(1), 14-26.
41.Sultan, T. I. (1994). Optimum design of sampling plans in electronic industry. Microelectronics Reliability, 34(8), 1369-1373.
42.Squeglia, N. L. (2008). Zero acceptance number sampling plans (5th ed.), ASQ Quality Press.
43.Starbird, S. A. (1997). Acceptance sampling, imperfect production, and the optimality of zero defects. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 44 (6), 515-530.
44.US Department of Defense. (1963). Military Standard, Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes (MIL-STD-105D)
45.Wald, A. (1947). Sequential Analysis. New York: Jon Willey & Sons. Inc. WaldSequential Analysis1947.
46.Wu C. W., Aslam M. , Jun CH. (2012). Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index "C" _"pk" . European Journal of Operational Research, 217, 560-566.