臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

校園除了是提供師生之間學習的環境，也是災難發生時居民的臨時避難所。然而，建築的安全性能會隨著使用年限的增加、自然災害與人為破壞等因素而逐漸下降。而此類之損壞難以透過人眼辨識，經過時間的累積後，易造成不可預期的建築安全災害，因此，校園的建築結構健康檢查與監控可謂非常重要。目前大部分的建築結構分析結果都是以繁雜的數值資料呈現，對缺乏專業知識的營繕管理人員而言，難以直覺性地理解。此外，校園擁有許多除了建築結構以外的安全資訊，如：防災、逃生空間、消防資訊…等，惟缺少能夠整合並提升校園安全監測與管理效率的視覺展示平台。因此，本研究設計並建置一個能整合結構分析資料與校園安全資訊的三維模型展示平台，透過實際案例實行驗證，藉由該平台的協助，可提醒校園營繕人員定期執行安全檢查。此平台主要著重於「資料視覺化」與「異質資料整合」。前者透過多元的顏色與幾何圖形等視覺化方式，提供非結構專業領域的使用者直觀地了解建築安全狀況；後者則解決了彙整不同來源與格式資料時的相容性問題。此研究結合BIM（Building Information Modeling, BIM）與GIS（Geographic Information System, GIS）系統，不只可以展示眾多來自不同資源的資料，也可以協助校園營繕管理人員監控與管理各類安全資訊。

University campus provides a learning environment for students and teachers, moreover it is also an emergency shelter for residents when disasters occur. But building safety performance is gradually declining due to use period, disaster and vandalism. The above-mentioned damages can’t be identified by human with the naked eye. The accumulation of these small damages can cause a huge building safety disaster. So building health checking and monitoring are very important. However, most of structure analysis results were always present with complicated data in the normal way. People who lack expertise are less to understand. In addition, university campus have more extra safety information(fire and evacuation spaces), but they don’t have a integration and visualization platform for campus building safety monitoring and management. Therefore, this study designs and implements a platform which integrated and visualized the structure analysis results and safety information to remind university to execute regular safety inspection. This platform focus on data visualization and integration. First one is the data visualization, we hope users, who aren't structural professionals, can comprehend the condition about campus building safety directly through color and geometry presentation. The second one is data integration, this platform consider the heterogeneous data from different systems, so this research develop some toolkit to figure out the problem with incompatible format. This research integrated BIM and GIS system, it not only can demonstrate a lot of data from different resource, but also can assist building administrator monitor and manage the building safety information from different buildin

第一章 緒論
1.1 研究背景與動機
1.2 研究目的
1.3研究方法與步驟
1.4 研究範圍
1.5 論文架構
第二章 結構安全評估方法與相關平台之應用
2.1 結構耐震能力評估方法介紹
2.2 資料視覺化之重要性
2.2.1 一維資料之視覺化呈現
2.2.2 二維資料之視覺化呈現
2.2.3三維資料之視覺化呈現
第三章 「SUFS」校園建築安全與管理平台需求分析
3.1 介面設計層面
3.1.1 使用者需求彙整
3.2 異質資料之選用
3.2.1 結構分析結果
3.2.2 地圖
3.2.3 建築資訊模型
3.3 資訊視覺化
3.3.1 三維資訊內容
3.3.2 二維資訊內容
3.3.3 一維資訊內容
3.4 小結
第四章 「SUFS」校園建築安全與管理平台設計
4.1 「SUFS」平台之架構
4.2 異質資料整合之格式轉換
4.2.1 建築資訊模型
4.2.2 地圖底圖
4.2.3 結構分析結果
4.3 「SUFS」之介面設計
4.3.1 地圖底圖顯示控制
4.3.2 耐震性能初步評估
4.3.3 模態分析
4.3.4 檢視
第五章 案例分析與應用
5.1 「SUFS」平台環境建置
5.1.1 三維BIM模型建置
5.1.2 二維地圖建置
5.2 「SUFS」平台功能測試與資料視覺化之成果
5.2.1 耐震性能初步評估
5.2.2 模態分析
5.2.3 檢視所有分析結果
第六章 結論與建議
6.1 結論
6.2 建議
參考文獻

[1]Zhijun Li, Maria Q. Feng, Longxi Luo, Dongming Feng, Xiuli Xu, 2018, “Statistical analysis of modal parameters of a suspension bridge based
on Bayesian spectral density approach and SHM data”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 98, pp. 352-367, January.
[2]Basuraj Bhowmik, Tapas Tripura, Budhaditya Hazra, Vikram Pakrashi,
2020, “Real time structural modal identification using recursive canonical correlation analysis and application towards online structural damage detection”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 468, pp. 1-22, March.
[3]Hyoung-Chul Kim, Moo-Hyun Kim, Do-Eun Choe, 2019, “Structural health monitoring of towers and blades for floating offshore wind turbines using operational modal analysis and modal properties with numerical-sensor signals”, Ocean Engineering, vol. 188, pp. 1-13, September.
[4]Dawid Augustyn, Ronnie R. Pedersen, Ulf T. Tygesen, Martin D. Ulriksen, John D. Sørensen, 2021, “Feasibility of modal expansion for virtual sensing in offshore wind jacket substructures”, Marine Structures, vol. 79, pp. 1-17, September.
[5]內政部營建署，2019，都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建條例。檢自
https://www.cpami.gov.tw/最新消息/法規公告/28022-都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建條例.html（Jan. 26, 2022）。
[6]內政部營建署，2017，建築物耐震能力評估及補強方案。檢自 https://www.cpami.gov.tw/最新消息/業務新訊/39-建築管理組/18043-建築物實施耐震能力評估及補強方案（公有建築物）.html（Jan. 28, 2022）。
[7]宋裕祺、蔡益超、陳建忠、賴明俊、邱毅宗、陳俊榕、陳長佑、林宏軒、顏志良，2017，鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力初步評估系統 PSERCB 之建置與應用，結構工程，32卷，4期，頁 60-87 ，12月。
[8]陳俊榕，2016，鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力初步評估（PSERCB）之雲端平台研究與開發，國立台北科技大學，碩士論文。
[9]陳建忠、宋裕祺、蔡益超、陳長佑、李台光、謝宗興、邱毅宗、顏志良，2016，鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力初步評估平台開發與應用，內政部建築研究所協同研究報告。檢自 https://9lib.co/document/nzw4p8gq-鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力初步評估平台開發與應用.html（Mar. 28, 2022）。
[10]葉勇凱、蕭輔沛、沈文成、楊耀昇、黃世建，2009，鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力詳細評估分析方法（推垮分析），國家地震工程研究中心研究 報 告 （ 編 號 ： NCREE-2009-015) 。 檢 自 https://www.ncree.narl.org.tw/accomplishment/technicalreports/page/10669（Jan. 4, 2022）。
[11]葉錦勳，2003，台灣地震損失評估系統-TELES，國家地震工程研究中 心 研 究 報 告 （ 編 號 ： NCREE-03-002) 。 檢 自 https://www.ncree.narl.org.tw/accomplishment/technicalreports/page/10359 （ Feb. 14, 2022）。
[12]Mahmoud Sherif Zakaria PhD, 2021, “Data visualization as a research support service in academic libraries: An investigation of world-class universities”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47, pp. 1-9, September.
[13]Hongling Guo, Yantao Yu, Martin Skitmore, 2017, Visualization technology-based construction safety management: A review, Automation in Construction, vol. 73, pp 135-144, January.
[14]Bing Wang, Yuanjie Wang, Fang Yan, Wei Zhao, 2022, “Safety intelligence toward safety management in a big-data environment: A general model and its application in urban safety management”, Safety Science, vol.
154, pp. 1-17, October.
[15]Stephen R. Midway, 2020, “Principles of Effective Data Visualization”, Patterns, vol. 1, pp. 1-7, December.
[16]Ayşe Elif Özsoy Özbay, Işıl Sanrı Karapınar, Hüseyin Can Ünen, 2020, “Visualization of seismic vulnerability of buildings with the use of a mobile data transmission and an automated GIS-based tool”, Structures, vol. 24, pp. 50-58, April.
[17]Mohammad Al-Hamaydeh, Ghaith Al-Shamsi, Nader Aly, Tarig Ali, 2021, “Seismic risk quantification and GIS-based seismic risk maps for Dubai- UAE_Dataset”, Data in Brief, vol. 39, pp. 1-5, December.
[18]Azarakhsh Rafiee, Pim Van der Male, Eduardo Dias, Henk Scholten, 2017, “Developing a wind turbine planning platform: Integration of “sound propagation model–GIS-game engine” triplet”, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol 95, pp. 326-343, September.
[19]Maria Insa-Iglesias, Mark David Jenkins,Gordon Morison, 2021, “3D visual inspection system framework for structural condition monitoring and analysis”, Automation in Construction, vol. 128, pp. 1-9, August.
[20]Xiu-Shan Chen, Chi-Chang Liu, I-Chen Wu, 2018, “A BIM-based visualization and warning system for fire rescue”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 37, pp. 42-53, August.
[21]Zhen Xu, Zongcai Zhang, Xinzheng Lu, Xiang Zeng, Hong Guan, 2018, “Post-earthquake fire simulation considering overall seismic damage of sprinkler systems based on BIM and FEMA P-58”, Automation in Construction, vol. 90, pp. 9-22, June.
[22]蕭貴霙，2018，互動介面設計與評估－以高齡者資訊介面設計為例，
長庚大學，碩士論文。
[23]蔡季新、游豐銘、林士哲，2018，三維建物模型建置方式之研究，內 政 部 國 土 測 繪 中 心 研 究 報 告 。 檢 自 https://www2.nlsc.gov.tw/Business/Research?type=1&level=835（Jul.23, 2022）。
[24]Rufu Qin, Bin Feng, Zhounan Xu, Yusheng Zhou, Lixin Liu, Yineng Li, 2021, “Web-based 3D visualization framework for time-varying and large- volume oceanic forecasting data using open-source technologies”, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 135, pp. 1-10, January.
[25]江曜新、黃智遠、周毅、張子瑩、林祺政，2018，“物聯網服務及三
維城市模型之開放標準整合探討－以室內即時火災逃生路線規劃為例”，
2018臺灣災害管理研討會，頁153 – 168，新北市，11月9日。
[26]Liang-feng Zhu, Xi-feng Wang, Xin Pan, 2014, “Moving KML geometry elements within Google Earth”, Computers & Geosciences, vol. 72, pp. 176-183, November.
[27]Jadwiga R. Ziolkowska, Reuben Reyes, 2016, “Geological and hydrological visualization models for Digital Earth representation, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry”, Computers & Geosciences, vol. 94, pp. 31-39, September.
[28]Mahdi H. Miraz, Maaruf Ali, Peter S. Excell, 2021, “Adaptive user interfaces and universal usability through plasticity of user interface design”, Computer Science Review, vol. 40, pp. 176-183, May