本文對工業界最常使用之加工材料AL6061 作為研究對象。探討使用銑刀銑削孔洞時，不同參數之間的參數最佳化問題。本文應用反應曲面法(Response Surface Methodology, RSM)，選定三個參數銑削深度、螺旋角度、進給來研究關鍵影響因子，進行最佳化實驗分析。通過對這些參數的探討，我們可以更全面地了解影響鋁合金銑削孔洞加工質量的因素，進而提出更精確的加工參數設計方案。本文將利用商用最佳化分析軟體Design
Expert ® 進行最佳化分析實驗，並探討如何進一步優化加工參數以獲得最佳的表面粗造度、加工效率和真圓度。這將有助於提高鋁合金銑削孔洞加工的質量和效率，滿足不同工業領域的需求，為鋁合金銑削孔洞加工提供更有效的解決方案。

This study focuses on the commonly used industrial material, AL6061, as the research subject. It investigates the parameter optimization problem in milling holes using milling cutters. The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is applied in this study to analyze the optimal experimental parameters by selecting three key influencing factors: milling depth, helix angle, and feed rate. Through the exploration of these parameters, a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting the machining quality of aluminum alloy hole milling can be achieved, leading to more precise design of machining parameter schemes. The commercial optimization analysis software, Design-Expert®, will be utilized for conducting optimization analysis experiments and exploring further optimization of machining parameters to obtain the best surface roughness, machining efficiency, and circularity. This research aims to enhance the quality and efficiency of aluminum alloy hole machining, meeting the demands of various industrial fields, and providing more effective solutions for aluminum alloy hole machining.

摘要...i
Abstract...ii
誌謝...iii
目錄...iv
表目錄...vi
圖目錄...vii
第一章 緒論...1
1.1前言...1
1.2研究動機與目的...1
1.3本文貢獻...2
第二章 文獻探討...3
第三章 實驗設計與研究方法...6
3.1實驗設置...6
3.2實驗分析理論...6
3.2.1 實驗設計法...6
3.2.2反應曲面法(RSM)...6
3.2.3統計檢定...7
3.2.4變異數分析(ANOVA)...7
3.2.4迴歸分析...8
3.2.5殘差分析...9
3.3實驗規劃...9
3.4實驗設備...12
3.4.1 CNC 銑床切削機台...12
3.4.2 刀桿與刀具...13
3.4.3 量測設備...14
3.5 實驗分析工具...15
3.5.1 Design-Expert® [24]...15
3.5.2 Minitab® [25]...15
第四章 實驗結果與分析...16
4.1 反應曲面法分析結果...16
4.1.1 ANOVA 變異數分析...17
4.1.1.1 粗糙度之ANOVA 變異數分析...17
4.1.1.2 真圓度之ANOVA 變異數分析...18
4.1.1.3 加工時間之ANOVA 變異數分析...19
4.1.2 迴歸模型建構...20
4.1.2.1 粗糙度之迴歸模型...20
4.1.2.2 真圓度之迴歸模型...20
4.1.2.3 加工時間之迴歸模型...21
4.1.3 殘差分析...21
4.1.3.1 常態檢定與對稱性檢測...22
4.1.3.2 殘差與實驗順序檢驗（Residuals vs. Run）...25
4.1.3.3 適配值檢驗（Residuals vs. Predicted）...26
4.1.3.4 預測值與實際值關係檢測(Predicted vs. Actual)...28
4.1.3.5 Box-Cox檢查...30
4.1.3.6 殘差與變數關係檢測 (Residuals vs. 變數因子)...34
4.1.3.7影響度分析 (Externally Studentized)...39
4.1.3.8影響度分析 (Leverage vs. 變數因子)...40
4.2 最佳化參數分析結果與驗證...42
第五章 結論...44
參考文獻...45
附錄 A CNC銑床詳細規格...48
附錄 B刀桿與刀具詳細規格...49
附錄 C量測設備詳細規格...50
附錄 D正負向開口趨勢示意圖...51
Extended Abstract...52

[1].Goyal, K.K., V. Jain, and S. Kumari, Prediction of optimal process parameters for abrasive assisted drilling of SS304. Procedia materials science, 2014. 6: p. 1572-1579.
[2].Kabakli, E., M. Bayramoglu, and N. Geren, Evaluation of the surface roughness and geometric accuracies in a drilling process using the Taguchi analysis. Materials and technology, 2014. 48(1): p. 91-98.
[3].Sanjay, C. and C. Jyothi, A study of surface roughness in drilling using mathematical analysis and neural networks. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006. 29(9-10): p. 846-852.
[4].Kannan, T.D.B., et al., Application of genetic algorithm technique for machining parameters optimization in drilling of stainless steel. Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, 2019. 23(1): p. 271-276.
[5].Prakash, S. and K. Palanikumar, Modeling for prediction of surface roughness in drilling MDF panels using response surface methodology. Journal of Composite Materials, 2011. 45(16): p. 1639-1646.
[6].Balaji, M., B. Murthy, and N.M. Rao, Multi response optimization of cutting parameters in drilling of AISI 304 stainless steels using response surface methodology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2018. 232(1): p. 151-161.
[7].Abdulwahhab, A.B., M.A. Abdullah, and A.R. Mohammed, Optimization of Drilling Parameter on Surface Roughness using Taguchi Method. International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 2016. 4(4): p. 786-790.
[8].Prakash, S., et al., Experimental Studies on Surface roughness in drilling MDF composite panels using Taguchi and Regression Analysis Method. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2012. 12(10): p. 978-984.
[9]. V.N. Gaitonde, S.R. Karnik, B.T. Achyutha, B. Siddeswarappa, “Genetic Algorithm-based Burr Size Minimization in Drilling of AISI 316L Stainless Steel”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 197, 2008, 225–236.
[10]. J.R. Ballou, S.S. Joshi, R.E. DeVor, S.G. Kapoor, “Burr Formation in Drilling Intersecting Holes with Machinable Austempered Ductile Iron (MADITM) ”, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 9, 2007, 35–46.
[11]. R. Li, P. Hegde, A.J. Shih, “High-throughput drilling of titanium alloys”, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 47, 2007, 63–74.
[12]. E. Kilickap, “Optimization of Cutting Parameters on Delamination Based on Taguchi Method During Drilling of GFRP Composite”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2010, 6116–6122.
[13]. B.Y. Lee, H.S. Liu, Y.S. Tarng, “Modeling and Optimization of Drilling Process”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 74, 1998, 149–157.
[14]. R.Q. Sardinas, P. Reis, J.P. Davim, “Multi-Objective Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Drilling Laminate Composite Materials by using Genetic Algorithms”, Composites Science and Technology, 66, 2006, 3083–3088.
[15]. V.N. Gaitondea, S.R. Karnik, B.T. Achyutha, B. Siddeswarappa, “Taguchi Optimization in Drilling of AISI 316L Stainless Steel to Minimize Burr Size using Multi-Performance Objective Based on Membership Function”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 202, 2008, 374–379.
[16]. V.N. Gaitondea, S.R. Karnik, J. Paulo Davimc, “Taguchi Multiple Performance Characteristics Optimizationin Drilling of Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) to Minimize Delamination using Utility Concept”,Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 196, 2008, 73–78.
[17]. J.C. Dai(戴金琪), Research for Cu Wafer Packaging Wire Bonding Process Using Response Surface Methodology (以反應曲面方法改善銅導線晶圓封裝之銲線製程問題), Yuan Ze University(元智大學), Master Thesis, 2003.
[18]. W.C. Chen, P.H. Tai, M.W. Wang, W.J. Deng and C.T. Chen, “A Neural Network-Based Approach for Dynamic Quality Prediction in a Plastic Injection Molding Process” , Expert Systems, 35, 2008, 843–849.
[19]. C. Shen, L. Wang and Q. Li, “Optimization of Injection Molding Process Parameters Using Combination of Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm Method” , Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 183, 2007, 412–418.
[20]. F.B. Jorge, E.M. Hazim and M. Snehasis, “Selecting an Artificial Neural Network for Efficient Modeling and Accurate Simulation of the Milling Process”, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 42, 2002, 663–674.
[21]. M. Cöl , H.M. Ertunç, M. Yılmaz, “An Artificial Neural Network Model for Toughness Properties in Microalloyed Steel in Consideration of Industrial Production Conditions”, Materials and Design, 28, 2007, 488–495.
[22]. P.G. Benardos and G.C. Vosniakos, “Prediction of Surface Roughness in CNC Face Milling Using Neural Networks and Taguchi’s Design of Experiments”, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18, 2002, 343–354.
[23]. B. Ozcelik, T. Erzurumlu, “Comparison of the Warpage Optimization in the Plastic Injection Molding Using ANOVA, Neural Network Model and Genetic Algorithm”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 171, 2006, 437–445.
[24]. Design-Expert, Stat-Ease, Inc.2021 East Hennepin Ave., Suite 480 Minneapolis, MN 55413.
[25]. Minitab Inc. Quality Plaza, 1829 Pine Hall Road, State College, Pennsylvania 16801-3008, USA.