臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來，政府推出一系列有關於創新創業的政策，社會引起一股「創業」熱潮，新創團隊如雨後春筍般出現。然而，創業成功率低，真正能夠存活下來並順利成長的新創團隊甚少；新創團隊低存活率限制了創業活動的發生，也抑制了許多創業者的創業動機。因此本研究欲透過研究四個創業支持組織（Entrepreneurial Support Organization, 簡稱ESO）亦即Appworks、FITI、Garage+、與TIEC，與其所培育的新創團隊作為研究對象，了解不同ESO對新創團隊存活率與募資狀況之影響，以及參加ESO參加次數多寡是否對新創團隊存活率、募資與否、募資階段之影響。本研究仰賴公開資料進行分析，研究結果發現，新創團隊存活率在第一年皆有90%以上，逐年下降，直到第十年後之存活率約為40%；新創團隊參與競賽獲取創投的創業資源不一定會比沒參加競賽的存活率高，累積存活時間也不一定比較高；以及，參加次數的多寡不會影響到新創團隊的成功機率，因此，有加速器的支持是否為新創團隊的重要組成部分，還需要進行更深入的研究與探討；募資方面，參與競賽是可以為新創團隊提供資金並且提升募資階段；接者，參與多個風險發展計劃的新創團隊比參與少數的新創團隊更有可能募到資；以及對提升募資階段有影響，有助於自身團隊的商業模式、建立聲譽和信任以及網絡的多樣性等。

Recently, the government has launched a series of policies related to innovation and entrepreneurship, sparking a wave of entrepreneurship. However, the low survival rate of startups has constrained entrepreneurial activity and dampened the motivation of entrepreneurs. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of four Entrepreneurial Support Organizations （ESOs） – namely, Appworks, FITI, Garage+, and TIEC – on the survival and fundraising outcomes of the startups they incubate.
By analyzing publicly available data, this study reveals that the survival rate of new startups is over 90% in the first year, gradually declining to around 40% by the tenth year. Participation in ESOs to secure fund raising does not necessarily result in higher survival rates compared to non-participants, and the cumulative survival time may not be significantly different. Additionally, the more participation in ESOs does not benefit the survival rate of startups.In terms of fundraising, participating in ESOs can provide funding and enhance fundraising successful rate for new startups. Teams engaging in multiple ESOs are more likely to secure funding compared to those involved in one ESO.

中文摘要......i
英文摘要......ii
誌謝......iii
目錄......iv
表目錄......vi
圖目錄......viii
第一章 緒論......1
1.1. 研究背景與動機......1
1.2. 研究目的與問題......3
1.3. 論文架構......4
第二章 文獻回顧......6
2.1. 創業支持組織......6
2.1.1 育成中心......6
2.1.2 科學園區......7
2.1.3 加速器......7
2.1.4 創客空間......8
2.1.5 共創空間......8
2.2. 新創團隊創新性......9
2.3. 新創團隊存活率......10
2.3.1 創業家基本資料與個人特質......10
2.3.2 新創團隊成立時機......10
2.3.3 營運狀況與公司成長......11
2.3.4 進入市場時機......11
2.3.5 參與創業支持組織......12
2.4. 新創團隊成長所需資源......13
第三章 研究設計......16
3.1. 研究對象......16
3.1.1 Appworks......16
3.1.2 創新創業激勵計畫（From IP to IPO, FITI）......16
3.1.3 新創育成加速器Garage+......17
3.1.4 台灣創新創業中心（Taiwan Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center, TIEC）......17
3.2. 研究方法......18
3.2.1 資料收集......18
3.2.2 描述性統計......19
3.2.3 Kaplan-Meier統計......22
3.2.4 簡單線性迴歸分析（Simple regression analysis）......22
3.2.5 多元線性迴歸分析（Multiple regression analysis）......22
3.3. 研究流程......23
3.4. 變數......25
第四章 研究結果......26
4.1. 參加ESO與參加次數對新創團隊存活率之影響......26
4.1.1 Appworks分析結果......26
4.1.2 FITI分析結果......28
4.1.3 Garage+分析結果......31
4.1.4 TIEC分析結果......34
4.1.5 參加次數分析結果......37
4.2. 參加ESO與參加次數對新創團隊募資之影響......40
4.2.1 參加ESO對有無募資之影響......40
4.2.2 參加ESO對募資階段之影響......42
4.2.3 參加次數對有無募資之影響......44
4.2.4 參加次數對募資階段之影響......45
第五章 結論與建議......47
5.1. 結論......47
5.2. 研究貢獻......49
5.3. 研究限制......50
5.4. 未來研究建議......51
參考文獻......52
Extended Abstract......61

1.陳鈺淳, 陳旻男, & 潘冠穎. （2022）. 同中求異: 創業支持組織善用與新創團隊之關係. 組織與管理, 15（2）, 113-159.
2.經濟部中小企業處（2022）。2022臺灣創育產業關鍵報告。數位時代。2022年8月，取自https://edm.bnext.com.tw/annual_report2022/
3.Caliendo, M., Goethner, M., & Weißenberger, M. （2020）. Entrepreneurial persistence beyond survival: Measurement and determinants. Journal of Small Business Management, 58（3）, 617-647.
4.Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. （1997）. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative science quarterly, 750-783.
5.Holland, D. V. （2011）. Utility maximization? An expectancy view of entrepreneurial persistence. Management Research Review.
6.Holland, D. V., & Shepherd, D. A. （2013）. Deciding to persist: Adversity, values, and entrepreneurs’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 37（2）, 331-358.
7.Yan, J., & Williams, D. W. （2021）. Timing is everything? Curvilinear effects of age at entry on new firm growth and survival and the moderating effect of IPO performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 36（5）, 106020.
8.Capinzaiki Ottonicar, S. L., & Pomim Valentim, M. L. （2021）. Industry 4.0 and open innovation in startups accelerators. Atoz-novas Praticas Em Informacao E Conhecimento, 10.
9.Baum, J. A., & Silverman, B. S. （2004）. Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of business venturing, 19（3）, 411-436.
10.Aldrich, H. （1999）. Organizations evolving. Sage.
11.Rasmusen, E. （1988）. Entry for buyout. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 281-299.
12.Parker, G., Petropoulos, G., & Van Alstyne, M. （2021）. Platform mergers and antitrust. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30（5）, 1307-1336.
13.Puranam, P. （2015）. Mergers and acquisitions. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1-1.
14.Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. （2008）. Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28（1-2）, 20-28.
15.Aaboen, L. （2009）. Explaining incubators using firm analogy. Technovation, 29（10）, 657-670.
16.Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. （2007）. Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27（5）, 254-267.
17.Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. （2005）. Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of business venturing, 20（2）, 165-182.
18.Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Alegre, I., & Guerrero, A. （2020）. Mission statements and performance: An exploratory study of science parks. Long Range Planning, 53（5）, 101932.
19.Crișan, E. L., Salanță, I. I., Beleiu, I. N., Bordean, O. N., & Bunduchi, R. （2021）. A systematic literature review on accelerators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 62-89.
20.Bańka, M., Salwin, M., Waszkiewicz, A. E., Rychlik, S., & Kukurba, M. （2021）. Startup Accelerators. International Journal of Management and Economics, 58（1）, 80-118.
21.Uhm, C. H., Sung, C. S., & Park, J. Y. （2018）. Understanding the accelerator from resources-based perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
22.Goswami, K., Mitchell, J. R., & Bhagavatula, S. （2018）. Accelerator expertise: U nderstanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the B angalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12（1）, 117-150.
23.Timmons, J. A.（1990）. New business opportunities: getting to the right place at the right time. Acton, Mass.: Brick House Publishing Company.
24.van Rijnsoever, F. J.（2020）. Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research policy, 49（1）, 103884.
25.van Rijnsoever, F. J.（2022）. Intermediaries for the greater good: How entrepreneurial support organizations can embed constrained sustainable development startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 51（2）, 104438.
26.Amezcua, A. S., Grimes, M. G., Bradley, S. W., & Wiklund, J. （2013）. Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of management journal, 56（6）, 1628-1654.
27.Patton, D., Warren, L., & Bream, D.（2009）. Elements that underpin high-tech business incubation processes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 621-636.
28.Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A.（2012）. The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32（2）, 110-121.
29.Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Van Weele, M. A., & Eveleens, C. P.（2017）. Network brokers or hit makers? Analyzing the influence of incubation on start-up investments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, 605-629.
30.van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Eveleens, C. P.（2021）. Money Don't matter? How incubation experience affects start-up entrepreneurs' resource valuation. Technovation, 106, 102294.
31.Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P.（1958）. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American statistical association, 53（282）, 457-481.
32.Karim, S., Iqbal, M. S., Ahmad, N., Ansari, M. S., Mirza, Z., Merdad, A., ... & Kumar, S.（2023）. Gene expression study of breast cancer using Welch Satterthwaite t-test, Kaplan-Meier estimator plot and Huber loss robust regression model. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 35（1）, 102447.
33.Vivekanandan, T., & Narayanan, S. J.（2019）. A hybrid risk assessment model for cardiovascular disease using cox regression analysis and a 2-means clustering algorithm. Computers in biology and medicine, 113, 103400.
34.Wahid, A., Khan, D. M., Khan, S. A., Hussain, I., & Khan, Z. （2021）. Robust regularization for high-dimensional Cox’s regression model using weighted likelihood criterion. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 213, 104285.
35.Browder, R. E., Aldrich, H. E., & Bradley, S. W.（2019）. The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34（3）, 459-476.
36.Bianchini, M., & Maffei, S. （2012）. Could design leadership be personal? Forecasting new forms of “Indie Capitalism”. Design Management Journal, 7（1）, 6-17.
37.Bergman Jr, B. J., & McMullen, J. S. （2020）. Entrepreneurs in the making: Six decisions for fostering entrepreneurship through maker spaces. Business Horizons, 63（6）, 811-824.
38.Wijngaarden, Y., Hitters, E., & Bhansing, P. V.（2020）. Cultivating fertile learning grounds: Collegiality, tacit knowledge and innovation in creative co-working spaces. Geoforum, 109, 86-94.
39.Fiorentino, S.（2018）. Re-making urban economic geography. Start-ups, entrepreneurial support and the Makers Movement: A critical assessment of policy mobility in Rome. Geoforum, 93, 116-119.
40.Rutten, P., & Koops, O. （2017）. Monitor creatieve industrie 2016: Nederland, top-10 steden, ontwikkelingen. Hogeschool Rotterdam.
41.Fuzi, A. （2015）. Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales. Regional studies, regional science, 2（1）, 462-469.
42.Fiorentino, S.（2019）. Different typologies of ‘co-working spaces’ and the contemporary dynamics of local economic development in Rome. European Planning Studies, 27（9）, 1768-1790.
43.Ohnmacht, T., Z’Rotz, J., & Dang, L.（2020）. Relationships between Coworking Spaces and CO2 emissions in work-related commuting: first empirical insights for the case of Switzerland with regard to urban-rural differences. Environmental Research Communications, 2（12）, 125004.
44.Bosworth, G., Whalley, J., Fuzi, A., Merrell, I., Chapman, P., & Russell, E. （2023）. Rural co-working: New network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 550-559.
45.Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. （2003）. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of management, 29（6）, 963-989.
46.Lichtenstein, B. M. B., & Brush, C. G. （2001）. How do “resource bundles” develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 25（3）, 37-58.
47.Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. （2004）. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research policy, 33（1）, 147-175.
48.Wright, M., & Stigliani, I. （2013）. Entrepreneurship and growth. International small business journal, 31（1）, 3-22.
49.Barney, J. B. （2001）. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of management, 27（6）, 643-650.
50.Amezcua, A. S., Grimes, M. G., Bradley, S. W., & Wiklund, J. （2013）. Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of management journal, 56（6）, 1628-1654.
51.Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. （2012）. The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32（2）, 110-121.
52.Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. （2017）. How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 676-713.
53.Van Weele, M., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Nauta, F. （2017）. You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness. Technovation, 59, 18-33.
54.Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. （2016）. Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24.
55.Rubin, T. H., Aas, T. H., & Stead, A. （2015）. Knowledge flow in technological business incubators: evidence from Australia and Israel. Technovation, 41, 11-24.
56.Mian, S. A. （1996）. Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research policy, 25（3）, 325-335.
57.Tötterman, H., & Sten, J. （2005）. Start-ups: Business incubation and social capital. International small business journal, 23（5）, 487-511.
58.Van Weele, M. A., Steinz, H. J., & Van Rijnsoever, F. J. （2018）. Start‐up communities as communities of practice: Shining a light on geographical scale and membership. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109（2）, 173-188.
59.Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. （2017）. How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 676-713.
60.Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. （1994）. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of management review, 19（4）, 645-670.
61.Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. （2010）. Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34（3）, 421-440.
62.Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. （1986）. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative science quarterly, 171-193.
63.Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. （2008）. The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72（4）, 58-75.
64.Patton, D. （2014）. Realising potential: The impact of business incubation on the absorptive capacity of new technology-based firms. International Small Business Journal, 32（8）, 897-917.
65.Patton, D., & Marlow, S. （2011）. University technology business incubators: Helping new entrepreneurial firms to learn to grow. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29（5）, 911-926.
66.Rice, M. P. （2002）. Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 17（2）, 163-187.
67.Sullivan, R. （2000）. Entrepreneurial learning and mentoring. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6（3）, 160-175.
68.van Weele, M. A., & van Rijnsoever, F. J. （2017）. Between a soft landing and a hard place: How silicon valley software and life sciences business incubators facilitate learning. Technology-Based Nascent Entrepreneurship: Implications for Economic Policymaking, 167-201.
69.Mason, C., & Brown, R. （2014）. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final report to OECD, Paris, 30（1）, 77-102.
70.Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. （2019）. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of technology transfer, 44, 313-325.
71.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. （2000）. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29（2）, 109-123.
72.Miller, D. J., & Acs, Z. J. （2013）. Technology commercialization on campus: twentieth century frameworks and twenty-first century blind spots. The Annals of Regional Science, 50, 407-423.
73.Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. （2015）. Public sector entrepreneurship: US technology and innovation policy. Oxford University Press, USA.
74.Hayter, C. S., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. （2018）. Public-sector entrepreneurship. Oxford review of economic policy, 34（4）, 676-694.
75.Robertson, J., Pitt, L., & Ferreira, C. （2020）. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the public sector: A bibliographic analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100862.
76.Timmons, J. A., Spinelli, S., & Tan, Y. （2004）. New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century （Vol. 6）. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
77.Mintzberg, H. （1990）. Strategy formation: Schools of thought. Perspectives on strategic management, 1968, 105-235.
78.Fredland, J. E., & Morris, C. E. （1976）. A cross section analysis of small business failure. American Journal of Small Business, 1（1）, 7-18.
79.Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. （1986）. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative science quarterly, 171-193.
80.Shepherd, D. A., & Shanley, M. （1998）. New venture strategy: Timing, environmental uncertainty, and performance. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
81.Hisrich, R. D., & Jankowicz, A. D. （1990）. Intuition in venture capital decisions: An exploratory study using a new technique. Journal of business venturing, 5（1）, 49-62.
82.Park, G., Shin, S. R., & Choy, M. （2020）. Early mover （dis） advantages and knowledge spillover effects on blockchain startups’ funding and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 109, 64-75.
83.Boulding, W., & Christen, M. （2009）. Pioneering plus a broad product line strategy: Higher profits or deeper losses?. Management Science, 55（6）, 958-967.
84.Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. （1992）. First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of marketing, 56（4）, 33-52.
85.Park, G., & Kang, J. （2010）. Entry conditions, firm strategies and their relationships to the innovation performance of an emerging green industry: the case of the solar cell industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 18（2）, 21-42.
86.Bayus, B. L., & Agarwal, R. （2007）. The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Science, 53（12）, 1887-1902.
87.Bellavitis, C., Filatotchev, I., & Souitaris, V. （2017）. The impact of investment networks on venture capital firm performance: A contingency framework. British Journal of Management, 28（1）, 102-119.
88.Vanacker, T. R., & Manigart, S. （2010）. Pecking order and debt capacity considerations for high-growth companies seeking financing. Small Business Economics, 35, 53-69.
89.Hogan, T., Hutson, E., & Drnevich, P. （2017）. Drivers of external equity funding in small high‐tech ventures. Journal of Small Business Management, 55（2）, 236-253.
90.Shepherd, D. A., Wennberg, K., Suddaby, R., & Wiklund, J. （2019）. What are we explaining? A review and agenda on initiating, engaging, performing, and contextualizing entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 45（1）, 159-196.
91.Baraldi, E., Havenvid, M. I., Linné, Å., & Öberg, C. （2019）. Start-ups and networks: Interactive perspectives and a research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 58-67.
92.Granovetter, M. （1992）. Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta sociologica, 35（1）, 3-11.
93.McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. （1999）. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic management journal, 20（12）, 1133-1156.
94.Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. （2014）. Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of business venturing, 29（1）, 152-173.
95.Park, G., & Kim, K. （2023）. Impacts of startup founders’ personal and business networks on fundraising success by mediating fundraising opportunities: Moderating role of firm age. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9（2）, 100063.
96.Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Van Tilburg, A., & Van De Bunt, G. G. （2010）. How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25（3）, 245-260.
97.Lans, T., Blok, V., & Gulikers, J. （2015）. Show me your network and I'll tell you who you are: social competence and social capital of early-stage entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27（7-8）, 458-473.
98.Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. （2004）. Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15（2）, 159-172.
99.Aljalahma, J., & Slof, J. （2022）. An updated systematic review of business accelerators: functions, operation, and gaps in the existing literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8（4）, 214.
100.Banerji, D., & Reimer, T. （2019）. Startup founders and their LinkedIn connections: Are well-connected entrepreneurs more successful?. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 46-52.
101.Ramos-Rodriguez, A. R., Medina-Garrido, J. A., Lorenzo-Gómez, J. D., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. （2010）. What you know or who you know? The role of intellectual and social capital in opportunity recognition. International small business journal, 28（6）, 566-582.
102.Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. （2003）. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of business venturing, 18（3）, 301-331.
103.Shepherd, D. A., Douglas, E. J., & Shanley, M. （2000）. New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies. Journal of business venturing, 15（5-6）, 393-410.
104.Lai, W. H., & Lin, C. C. （2015）. Constructing business incubation service capabilities for tenants at post-entrepreneurial phase. Journal of Business Research, 68（11）, 2285-2289.
105.Van Weele, M., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Nauta, F. （2017）. You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness. Technovation, 59, 18-33.
106.Amezcua, A. S., Grimes, M. G., Bradley, S. W., & Wiklund, J. （2013）. Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of management journal, 56（6）, 1628-1654.
107.Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. （2005）. Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business venturing, 20（2）, 183-216.
108.Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. （2017）. How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 676-713.
109.Mian, S., Lamine, W., & Fayolle, A. （2016）. Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50, 1-12.
110.Van Weele, M., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Nauta, F. （2017）. You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness. Technovation, 59, 18-33.
111.Hausberg, J. P., & Korreck, S. （2020）. Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 151-176.
112.Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. （2016）. Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24.
113.Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. （2019）. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of technology transfer, 44, 313-325.
114.Ratinho, T., Amezcua, A., Honig, B., & Zeng, Z. （2020）. Supporting entrepreneurs: A systematic review of literature and an agenda for research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119956.
115.Van Weele, M., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Nauta, F. （2017）. You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness. Technovation, 59, 18-33.
116.van Weele, M. A., van Rijnsoever, F. J., Groen, M., & Moors, E. H. （2020）. Gimme shelter? Heterogeneous preferences for tangible and intangible resources when choosing an incubator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 984-1015.
117.Yusubova, A., Andries, P., & Clarysse, B. （2019）. The role of incubators in overcoming technology ventures’ resource gaps at different development stages. R&D Management, 49（5）, 803-818.
118.Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., Valliere, D., Singh, R. M., & Hassannezhad Chavoushi, Z. （2022）. How incubation creates value for early-stage entrepreneurs: the People-Place nexus. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34（9-10）, 868-889.
119.Belsley, D. A. （1991）. A guide to using the collinearity diagnostics. Computer Science in Economics and Management, 4（1）, 33-50.
120.Munari, F., & Toschi, L. （2015）. Assessing the impact of public venture capital programmes in the United Kingdom: Do regional characteristics matter?. Journal of Business Venturing, 30（2）, 205-226.