當建築物發生火災時，空間裡面的人能不能全數安全逃出一直是規範容留人數基準最大的考量因素。倘若收容的人數太多，導致避難時發生逃生不及，最後釀成人員重大的死傷。內政部雖有訂頒空間容留人數管制法規，因各種因素及執行檢查的人力資源不足，因此目前也僅有少數縣市政府制定容留人數的法規，是否落實執行更是一大疑慮。
本研究探討國內容留人數的規範現況，探討高雄市10家酒吧與飲酒店，在容留規範內所核定管制量之下的實際結果。研究以高雄市前金區10家特定娛樂場所為研究對象，採用煙層簡易二層驗證法來討論避難容許時間。研究分別以台北市與高雄市的容留法規為基準，依照法規核定量的人數，進行現場實際模擬，以兩造時間做比對，來驗證容留法規制定的合宜性。
本研究重要的發現如下：1.本次實驗的 10 家場所現場的內部裝修材料，均未符合相關法規所要求的內部裝修需耐燃三級以上。2.不論是高雄還是台北的容留法規核定人數，當室內裝修材料為非耐燃材質時，其核定的容留人員皆無法在避難容許時間內全數逃出。3. 當室內裝修材料為耐燃三級材質時，以高雄容留法規核定的人數，亦無法在避難臨界時間內逃出場所；以台北容留法規核定的人數，10家場所中也僅有4家的驗證結果為安全。
本研究建議容留人數的計算，應重新考慮，先排除非消費性面積，再行乘上場所收容係數，確保收容人數能在逃生臨界時間內全數安全逃生。本研究也建議未來容留人數的核定，應加入建管與工務機關，或是統整在同一個主管機關底下來督辦執行，在管理上，能讓容留人數規定不至於因為其他因素而落空，以保障消費民眾的安全。

When a building is on fire, whether all people inside can be safely evacuated has always been the greatest consideration in regulating the number of people to be accommodated. If the people are too many to evacuate from the fire, it might result in a great number of victims. Although the Ministry of Internal Affairs has already regulated the allowed number of people accommodated in the commercial spaces, due to various reasons and insufficient manpower for inspection, only a few local governments have setup the regulations. Even this, the implementation of this regulations is still a major concern.
This study explored the current implementation of the allowed number of people accommodation in the commercial space, and sampled 10 bars in the Qianjin District, Kaohsiung City. Smoke simple two-layer method was used to determine the critical time needed for people’s evacuation. Based on the regulations of the allowed number of people accommodation in Taipei city and Kaohsiung city, this study conducted on-site simulations to verify the appropriateness of the people accommodation in the commercial space for both cities.
The findings of this study are as follows: 1. The interior decoration materials used by the 10 bars did not meet the government relations that materials need to be at least flame-resistant class III. 2. No matter Taipei or Kaohsiung, the allow accommodated people in 10 bars cannot escape in the critical time if the interior decoration material is not flame-resistant. 3. When the interior decoration material is flame-resistant grade 3, Under the scenario that 10 bars used flame-resistant class III decoration materials, the allowed accommodated people in bars in Kaohsiung cannot escape in the critical time. In Taipei, only 4 out of 10 bars were verified as safe.
Based on the findings, this study suggests that the allowed number of people accommodation in the commercial spaces should be calculated by excluding the non-commercial spaces first and then multiple the available space by the onsite occupancy factor. Therefore, the allowed accommodated people can escape safely in the critical time.
The study also suggests that in the future, the approval authority of the allowed number of people accommodation should added the department of construction management and public works, or under one authority to supervise the implementation. In terms of management, the regulations regarding the allowed number of people accommodation should not fall through due to other reasons, in order to protect the safety of consumers.

摘要
ABSTRACT
誌謝
目錄
表目錄
圖目錄
壹、 緒論
1.1 研究背景及動機
1.2 研究目的
1.3 研究方法
1.4 研究流程
貳、 文獻回顧
2.1 容留人數與場所安全
2.1.1容留人數之意義
2.1.2 容留人數管制
2.1.3 場所安全與火災
2.1.4 火災的發生與危害
2.2 公共場所容留人數與安全法規
2.2.1 國內容留人數法規
2.2.2 國內特定場所的其他管理規定
2.3 建築物防火避難安全性能驗證
2.4. 煙層驗證與避難時間計算方法
2.5. 煙層簡易二層法
2.5.1 煙層簡易二層法發展
2.5.2 煙層簡易二層法定義與分類
參、 研究場地及方法
3.1 研究材料實驗場所地點
3.1.1 實驗場所行政區特性
3.1.2 抽樣準則
3.1.3 研究對象
3.1.4 研究材料描述
3.1.5 資料收集方法
3.2 分析方法
3.2.1 描述性統計分析
3.2.2 模擬計算實驗
3.2.3 煙層簡易二層驗證法
肆、 結果與討論
4.1 田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.1 CASE 1田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.2 CASE 2田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.3 CASE 3田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.4 CASE 4田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.5 CASE 5田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.6 CASE 6田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.7 CASE 7田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.8 CASE 8田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.9 CASE 9田野調查及實驗結果
4.1.10 CASE 10田野調查及實驗結果
4.2 煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.1 CASE 1煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.2 CASE 2煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.3 CASE 3煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.4 CASE 4煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.5 CASE 5煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.6 CASE 6煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.7 CASE 7煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.8 CASE 8煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.9 CASE 9煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.2.10 CASE 10煙層簡易二層驗證法計算煙層下降時間結果
4.3 討論
4.3.1非耐燃材質為裝修材料測試
4.3.2以耐燃三級為裝修材料驗證結果
4.3.3 容留人數核算方式調整之驗證
伍、 結論與建議
5.1 結 論
5.2 研究限制與未來研究建議
5.2.1研究限制
5.2.2 未來研究建議
5.3 實務建議
參考文獻
附錄一 研究個案資料表
附錄二 相關法規

Alpert, R. L. (1972). Calculation of response time of ceiling-mounted fire detectors. Fire technology, 8(3), 181-195.
Alpert, R. L. (1975). Turbulent ceiling-jet induced by large-scale fires. Combustion science and technology, 11(5-6), 197-213.
Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., Sarshar, M., & Newton, R. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach. Work study, 51(1), 17-31.
Babrauskas, V. (1979). COMPF2, A Program for Calculating Post-Flashover Fire Temperatures. National Bureau of Standards.
Babrauskas, V. (1996). Fire modeling tools for FSE: Are they good enough?. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 8(2), 87-93.
Bounagui, A., & Benichou, N. (2003). Literature review on the modeling of fire growth and smoke movement. National Research Council Canada.
Chen, T., Pan, L., Zhang, H., Narayanan, S., & Soldner, N. (2013). Experimental study of evacuation from a 4-storey building. Procedia Engineering, 62, 538-547.
Chow, W. K. (1995). Use of computational fluid dynamics for simulating enclosure fires. Journal of Fire Sciences, 13(4), 300-334.
Chow, W. K., Yi, L., Shi, C. L., Li, Y. Z., & Huo, R. (2006). Mass flow rates across layer interface in a two-layer zone model in an atrium with mechanical exhaust system. Building and Environment, 41(9), 1198-1202.
Cuesta, A., & Gwynne, S. M. V. (2016). The collection and compilation of school evacuation data for model use. Safety science, 84, 24-36.
Delichatsios, M. A. (1981). The flow of fire gases under a beamed ceiling. Combustion and Flame, 43, 1-10.
Ding, Y., & Weng, F. (2016). A comparative study of evacuation strategies for high-rise building via combination of stair and elevator based on computer simulation. International Journal of Emergency Management, 12(1), 41-54.
Friedman, R. (1992). An international survey of computer models for fire and smoke. Journal of fire protection engineering, 4(3), 81-92.
Fu, Z., & Hadjisophocleous, G. (2000). A two-zone fire growth and smoke movement model for multi-compartment buildings. Fire Safety Journal, 34(3), 257-285.
Hassanain, M. A., & Hafeez, M. A. (2005). Fire safety evaluation of restaurant facilities. Structural Survey, 23(4), 298-309.
Hassanain, M. A., Hafeez, M. A., & Sanni-Anibire, M. O. (2017). A ranking system for fire safety performance of student housing facilities. Safety science, 92, 116-127.
Heskestad, G., & Delichatsios, M. A. (1979). The initial convective flow in fire. In Symposium (International) on Combustion. 17(1), 1113–1123.
Hong, W., Liu, W. Y., & Chen, C. J. (2018). The Development of a Simple Two-Zone Smoke Filling Model for a Fire Compartment. Procedia engineering, 211, 113-123.
Jones, W., Peacock, R., Forney, G., & Reneke, P. (2009). CFAST: Consolidated Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport (Version 6). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Khorasani, N. E., Garlock, M., & Gardoni, P. (2014). Fire load: Survey data, recent standards, and probabilistic models for office buildings. Engineering Structures, 58, 152-165.
Luo, M. (1997). One zone or two zones in the room of fire origin during fires? The effects of the air-handling system. Journal of Fire Sciences, 15(3), 240-260.
Manchester, S., & Bardos, P. (2004). Fire Hazards from self-heating at Composting and Waste Processing Sites. Environmental Technology Limited, 1(1), 1-9.
McDermott, R., McGrattan, K., & Hostikka, S. (2008). Fire dynamics simulator (version 5) technical reference guide. NIST Special Publication, 1018-5.
Meng, L., & Chow, W. K. (2002). Mathematical analysis and possible application of the two-layer zone model FIRM. International Journal of Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes, 4(1), 13-22.
Mirahadi, F., McCabe, B., & Shahi, A. (2019). IFC-centric performance-based evaluation of building evacuations using fire dynamics simulation and agent-based modeling. Automation in Construction, 101, 1-16.
Motevalli, V., & Marks, C. H. (1991). Characterizing the unconfined ceiling jet under steady-state conditions: a reassessment. Fire Safety Science, 3, 301-312.
Murakami, S., Kato, S., & Yoshie, R. (1995). Measurement of turbulence statistics in a model fire room by LDV. ASHRAE TRANS, 101, 287-301.
Nishino, T. (2017). Two-layer zone model including entrainment into the horizontally spreading smoke under the ceiling for application to fires in large area rooms. Fire Safety Journal, 91, 355-360.
Olenick, S. M., & Carpenter, D. J. (2003). An updated international survey of computer models for fire and smoke. Journal of fire protection engineering, 13(2), 87-110.
Quintiere J.G., Wade C.A. (2016) Compartment Fire Modeling. In: Hurley M.J. et al. (eds) SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Springer, New York, NY.
Remesh, K., & Tan, K. H. (2007). Performance comparison of zone models with compartment fire tests. Journal of fire sciences, 25(4), 321-353.
Sanni-Anibire, M. O., & Hassanain, M. A. (2015). An integrated fire safety assessment of a student housing facility. Structural Survey, 33(4/5), 354-371.
Savilonis, B., & Richards, R. (1988). Survey and evaluation of existing smoke movement models. Fire safety journal, 13(2-3), 87-97.
Tanaka, T. (2008). Risk-based selection of design fires to ensure an acceptable level of evacuation safety. Fire Safety Science, 9, 49-61.
Tashrifullahi, S. A., & Hassanain, M. A. (2013). A simulation model for emergency evacuation time of a library facility using EVACNET4. Structural Survey, 31(2), 75-92.
Ulriksen, L., & Dederichs, A. S. (2014). Evacuation of day care centres for children 0–6 years: Simulations using simulex. In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012, 959-969.
Wu, Y., Kang, J., & Wang, C. (2018). A crowd route choice evacuation model in large indoor building spaces. Frontiers of architectural research, 7(2), 135-150.V
Yao, J., Fan, W., Kohyu, S., & Daisuke, K. (1999). Verification and application of field-zone-network model in building fire. Fire safety journal, 33(1), 35-44.
Yi, L., Chow, W. K., Li, Y. Z., & Huo, R. (2005). A simple two-layer zone model on mechanical exhaust in an atrium. Building and environment, 40(7), 869-880.
Yi, L., Gao, Y., Niu, J. L., & Yang, S. J. (2013). Study on effect of wind on natural smoke exhaust of enclosure fire with a two-layer zone model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 119, 28-38.
Zhang, W., Hamer, A., Klassen, M., Carpenter, D., & Roby, R. (2002). Turbulence statistics in a fire room model by large eddy simulation. Fire Safety Journal, 37(8), 721-752.
Zhang, X., & Hadjisophocleous, G. (2012). An improved two-layer zone model applicable to both pre-and post-flashover fires. Fire Safety Journal, 53, 63-71.
Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Fu, M., & Chen, Y. (2020). New approaches to determine the interface height of fire smoke based on a three‐layer zone model and its verification in large confined space. Fire and Materials, 44(1), 130-138.
內政部建築研究所(2008)。建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊修訂之研究。
內政部建築研究所(2009)。弱勢人員防火避難等待空間規劃原則初探。
內政部消防署(2013)。消防月刊。
李忱為(2015)。簡易二層之自然補氣口與夾層研究。國立交通大學機械工程系所碩士論文，新竹市。
易逸波、王子俞、劉怡君(2019)。以 FDS 探討正壓通風對於風驅動高樓火災之消防效果。勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊，27(1)，47-57。
易逸波、張嘉成、鄭達鴻(2019)。FDS 軟體對於透天厝火災模擬之差異性分析。勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊，27(1)，77-85。V
陳盈月、林慶元、李昀潔(2017)。建築物防火避難性能設計評定認可之使用安全查核驗證研究。委託研究成果報告。
游惟翔(2014)。居室夾層簡易二層法之研究。國立交通大學機械工程系所碩士論文，新竹市。
黃奕豪、易逸波(2010)。三維火災風險分析技術之開發及其在建築物火災模擬之應用。鑛冶：中國鑛冶工程學會會刊，54(2)，138-153。V
高李新(2012)。避難安全性能驗證技術-高度性能設計法(Route C)與簡單性能設計法(Route B)之煙層下降時間比較研究
江崇誠(2008)。防火避難性能設計煙層下降評估方法探討之研究，研究成果報告(精簡版)。
內政部建築研究所(2016)。建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊。
內政部建築研究所(2016)。煙層簡易二層驗證法軟體操作手冊2016版。