臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著全球暖化與氣候變遷、環境保護之相關議題，永續發展與溫室氣體盤查越來越受到各界之嚴重關注。經由環境部氣候變遷署公開資料，了解溫室氣體盤查與活動需要將廠商進行溫室氣體排放管理，並且每年必須經過第三方驗證公司查證，並上傳至環境部氣候變遷署官方網站，調查並量化廠商溫室氣體排放量及能源耗用，以減緩全球暖化趨勢。本研究應用層級分析(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)來探討企業盤查的過程並找出其影響成敗的關鍵因素並將結果整合至營運策略中。案例廠將此調查結果作為企業經營策略的重要指標。以導入溫室氣體盤查重要性對企業永續績效的主要準則與次要關鍵因素。透過文獻回顧，此研究整合了永續發展(Sustainable Development, SD)、溫室氣體盤查與AHP，以制定排放標準與企業策略的重要指標。AHP確定了SD中的環境、經濟、社會以及加入管理等準則，以及在這些準則中探討企業實施溫室氣體盤查中的相對重要性。協助企業實施溫室氣體排放的過程中，並找出成功關鍵因素應優先考慮的方面，此研究也應用AHP整合SD與溫室氣體盤查，幫助利害關係者有效平衡經濟發展、社會福祉與環境保護。研究結果顯示，溫室氣體盤查成功的主要準則包括環境、管理與經濟指標。次要因素包括能源管理、有害廢棄物控制、防止污染環境、避免徵收碳稅以及高層管理支持。這項研究成果可作為企業引入溫室氣體盤查與SD提供參考依據，以促進環境、經濟與社會發展的均衡。

With the increasing attention on issues related to global warming, climate change, and environmental protection, sustainable development and greenhouse gas inventory are becoming increasingly important. According to public data from the Climate Change Agency of the Environmental Protection Administration, it is necessary for activities involving greenhouse gas emissions to be managed by the responsible companies, undergo annual third-party verification, and upload the results to the official website of the Environmental Protection Administration. Investigating and quantifying the greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption of the case company is essential to mitigate the trend of global warming. The results of this investigation are considered as important indicators for the company's business strategy.This study utilizes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to explore the process of greenhouse gas inventory in enterprises, identify key factors influencing success or failure, and integrate the results into operational strategies. Through a literature review, this study integrates Sustainable Development (SD), greenhouse gas inventory, and AHP to establish important indicators for emission standards and corporate strategies. AHP determines criteria within SD, such as environmental, economic, social, and governance factors, and explores the relative importance of these criteria in implementing greenhouse gas inventory in enterprises. Assisting enterprises in the process of implementing greenhouse gas emissions and identifying aspects that should be prioritized for successful key factors, this study also applies AHP to integrate SD and greenhouse gas inventory to help stakeholders effectively balance economic development, social welfare, and environmental protection.The research findings indicate that the main criteria for the successful greenhouse gas inventory include environmental, management, and economic indicators. Secondary factors include energy management, hazardous waste control, pollution prevention, avoidance of carbon taxes, and senior management support. These research findings can provide reference for enterprises to introduce greenhouse gas inventory and SD, promoting balanced development of the environment, economy, and society.

摘要..........i
Abstract..........ii
誌謝..........iv
目錄..........v
表目錄.......... vii
圖目錄.......... viii
第一章 緒論..........1
1.1研究背景..........1
1.2研究動機與目的..........3
1.3研究流程..........4
1.4研究範圍與限制..........6
第二章 文獻探討..........7
2.1永續發展..........7
2.1.1永續發展構面準則介紹..........8
2.1.2環境準則..........9
2.1.3社會準則..........10
2.1.4經濟準則..........11
2.1.5管理準則..........12
2.2溫室氣體盤查介紹..........13
2.2.1 何謂溫室氣體..........13
2.2.2 何謂溫室氣體盤查..........13
2.3溫室氣體盤查標準與規範..........14
2.4層級分析法文獻整合及說明..........15
第三章 研究方法..........17
3.1研究流程..........17
3.2研究架構..........19
3.3層級分析法..........20
3.3.1 層級分析法內容..........20
3.3.2 應用問題範圍..........20
3.3.3 層級結構.......... 21
3.4 層級分析法步驟..........22
3.5盤查邊界設定..........28
3.6擬定盤查基準年..........29
3.7排放源鑑別..........30
3.8排放源計算量化方法..........31
3.8.1排放係數選用原則..........31
3.8.2 排放係數管理..........32
3.9盤查數據不確定性及品質管理..........34
3.9.1不確定性來源..........34
3.9.2排放來源數據品質管理..........35
第四章 研究結果..........36
4.1問卷調查者基本資料..........36
4.2建立層級分析法-層級架構..........37
4.3案例計算–層級分析法流程..........38
4.4層級分析法研究結果..........42
4.5溫室氣體盤查廠商結果..........44
第五章 結論與建議..........45
5.1結論..........45
5.2研究建議..........46
參考文獻 ..........47
Extended Abstract..........55

中文文獻
1.吳啟瑞 (2023)。精實製造、永續發展及韌性供應商評選模型之建立與分析–以汽車製造業為例 國立虎尾科技大學] 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 雲林縣。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4r2u5c
2.曾俊瑋 (2022)。 溫室氣體盤查作業與減量評估–以加工紙製造業為例 國立中山大學] 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 高雄市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j5v97t
3.曾國雄與鄧振源 (1989)。層級分析法 (AHP) 的內涵特性與應用 (上) 中國統計學報。
4.賴梅鈞 (2021)。養菇生產工廠溫室氣體盤查與分析 國立屏東科技大學] 屏東縣。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v3r7w3
5.世界企業永續發展委員會與世界資源研究所倡議之溫室氣體盤查議定書企業會計與報告標準第二版。民國113年2月22日。
取自:https://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/Message/MessageView?id=1199&mid=106
6.2023台歐盟碳邊境調整機制研討會。民國112年4月27日。
取自:https://www.ebrctw.org/chi/events/events_content_20230427.aspx
7.ISO 14064-1:2018 組織層級溫室氣體排放與移除之量化及報告指引規範。民國113年2月22日，取自:
https://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/Article/ArticleView/16?mid=93&page=1&groupid=21&subgroup=20
8.ISO 14064-3:2019 溫室氣體主張之確認與查證附指引之規範。民國113年2月22日，取自: https://proj.ftis.org.tw/isdn/Article/ArticleView/16?mid=93&page=1&groupid=21&subgroup=20
9.聯合國氣候變化政府間專家委員會(IPCC)評估報告。民國113年2月22日，取自:
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
10.行政院環境部氣候變遷暑(2019)，溫室氣體排放係數管理表(6.0.4版本)。民國113年2月21日，取自: https://ghgregistry.moenv.gov.tw/epa_ghg/Downloads/FileDownloads.aspx?Type_ID=1
11.行政院環境部氣候變遷暑(2023)，溫室氣體盤查作業指引。民國113年2月21日，取自: https://ghgregistry.moenv.gov.tw/epa_ghg/GuideAndCalculation/GuideAndCalculation.aspx
12.ISO/CNS 14064-1標準。民國113年2月22日，
取自:https://ghgregistry.moenv.gov.tw/epaper/issue05/feature/feature.pdf
13.油量計檢定檢查技術規範(CNMV 117，第3版)。民國113年2月23日，
取自:
https://www.bsmi.gov.tw/wSite/laws/review.jsp?lawId=2c9081fe1cb5eda4011cb67791ad05f2&mp=1
英文文獻
14.Ali, M., Malik, M., Yaqub, M. Z., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., & Latan, H. (2023). Green means long life - green competencies for corporate sustainability performance: A moderated mediation model of green organizational culture and top management support. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, 139174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139174
15.Alqudah, S., Shrouf, H., Suifan, T., & Alhyari, S. (2020). A moderated mediation model of lean, agile, resilient, and green paradigms in the supply chain. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 158-172.
16.Biswas, M. K., Azad, A. K., Datta, A., Dutta, S., Roy, S., & Chopra, S. S. (2024). Navigating Sustainability through Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory: ESG Practices and Energy Shift in Bangladesh’s Textile and Readymade Garment Industries. Environmental Pollution, 345, 123392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123392
17.Boks, C., & Stevels, A. (2007). Essential perspectives for design for environment. Experiences from the electronics industry. International journal of production research, 45(18-19), 4021-4039.
18.Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248-264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005
19.Chen, T.-L., Hsu, H.-M., Pan, S.-Y., & Chiang, P.-C. (2019). Advances and challenges of implementing carbon offset mechanism for a low carbon economy: The Taiwanese experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 117860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117860
20.Chen, W., Tang, H., He, L., Zhang, Y., & Ma, W. (2022). Co-effect assessment on regional air quality: A perspective of policies and measures with greenhouse gas reduction potential. Science of The Total Environment, 851, 158119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158119
21.Cherrafi, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Mishra, N., Ghobadian, A., & Elfezazi, S. (2018). Lean, green practices and process innovation: A model for green supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 206, 79-92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.031
22.Dai, J., Montabon, F. L., & Cantor, D. E. (2015). Reprint of “Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 74, 124-138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.003
23.Du, P., Zhou, B., & Yang, M. (2024). Carbon emission reduction contribution analysis of electricity enterprises in urban green development: A quantum spherical fuzzy sets-based decision framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123181
24.Engin, B. E., Martens, M., & Paksoy, T. (2019). Lean and Green Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Review. In T. Paksoy, G.-W. Weber, & S. Huber (Eds.), Lean and Green Supply Chain Management: Optimization Models and Algorithms (pp. 1-38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97511-5_1
25.Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Lean and green – a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064
26.Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 603-626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012
27.Kennedy, C., Steinberger, J., Gasson, B., Hansen, Y., Hillman, T., Havránek, M., Pataki, D., Phdungsilp, A., Ramaswami, A., & Mendez, G. V. (2010). Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4828-4837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.050
28.Khurana, S., Haleem, A., Luthra, S., & Mannan, B. (2021a). Evaluating critical factors to implement sustainable oriented innovation practices: An analysis of micro, small, and medium manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 125377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125377
29.Khurana, S., Haleem, A., Luthra, S., & Mannan, B. (2021b). Evaluating critical factors to implement sustainable oriented innovation practices: An analysis of micro, small, and medium manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125377
30.Kongboon, R., Gheewala, S. H., & Sampattagul, S. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions inventory data acquisition and analytics for low carbon cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 343, 130711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130711
31.Kuo, T. C., Hong, I. H., & Lin, S. C. (2016). Do carbon taxes work? Analysis of government policies and enterprise strategies in equilibrium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 337-346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.164
32.Liang, J., Wang, S., Liao, Y., & Feng, K. (2024). Carbon emissions embodied in investment: Assessing emissions reduction responsibility through multi-regional input-output analysis. Applied Energy, 358, 122558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122558
33.Long, Y., Liu, L., & Yang, B. (2024). The effects of enterprise digital transformation on low-carbon urban development: Empirical evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123259
34.Lu, J., & Li, H. (2024). The impact of ESG ratings on low carbon investment: Evidence from renewable energy companies. Renewable Energy, 223, 119984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.119984
35.Maktabifard, M., Al-Hazmi, H. E., Szulc, P., Mousavizadegan, M., Xu, X., Zaborowska, E., Li, X., & Mąkinia, J. (2023). Net-zero carbon condition in wastewater treatment plants: A systematic review of mitigation strategies and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 185, 113638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113638
36.Maktabifard, M., Zaborowska, E., & Makinia, J. (2018). Achieving energy neutrality in wastewater treatment plants through energy savings and enhancing renewable energy production. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 17(4), 655-689.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-018-9478-x
37.Marchi, M., Pulselli, F. M., Mangiavacchi, S., Menghetti, F., Marchettini, N., & Bastianoni, S. (2017). The greenhouse gas inventory as a tool for planning integrated waste management systems: a case study in central Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 351-359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.035
38.Ozorhon, B., Batmaz, A., & Caglayan, S. (2018). Generating a framework to facilitate decision making in renewable energy investments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 95, 217-226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.035
39.Ruiz-Pérez, F., Lleo, A., & Ormazabal, M. (2021). Employee sustainable behaviors and their relationship with Corporate Sustainability: A Delphi study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, 129742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129742
40.Saadeh, I. M., & Suifan, T. S. (2020). Job stress and organizational commitment in hospitals. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(1), 226-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2018-1597
41.Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Co. New York.
42.Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
43.Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSci.2008.01759
44.Siddik, A. B., Khan, S., Khan, U., Yong, L., & Murshed, M. (2023). The role of renewable energy finance in achieving low-carbon growth: contextual evidence from leading renewable energy-investing countries. Energy, 270, 126864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126864
45.Silvério, A. C., Ferreira, J., Fernandes, P. O., & Dabić, M. (2023). How does circular economy work in industry? Strategies, opportunities, and trends in scholarly literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137312
46.Sonar, H., Mukherjee, A., Gunasekaran, A., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Sustainable supply chain management of automotive sector in context to the circular economy: A strategic framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3635-3648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3112
47.Sun, H., Mulindwa Bahizire, G., Bernard Pea-Assounga, J. B., & Chen, T. (2024). Enhancing Employee Green Performance through Green Training: The Mediating Influence of Organizational Green Culture and Work Ethic in the Mining Sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141105
48.Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J.-F., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 407-418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013
49.Tung, Y.-T., Pai, T.-Y., Lin, S.-H., Chih, C.-H., Lee, H.-Y., Hsu, H.-W., Tong, Z.-D., Lu, H.-F., & Shih, L.-H. (2014). Analytic Hierarchy Process of Academic Scholars for Promoting Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction in Taiwan. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 526-532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.065
50.Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2007). Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration. International journal of production research, 45(2), 401-423.
51.Wang, F., Ma, J., Lu, M., & Sun, Y. (2023). Unleashing the wind: The role of carbon reduction revenue in Shanghai's distributed wind power investments. Heliyon, 9(11), e21490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21490
52.Wang, F., Sun, J., & Liu, Y. S. (2019). Institutional pressure, ultimate ownership, and corporate carbon reduction engagement: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 104, 14-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.003
53.Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012). A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595-606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.021
54.WCED, S. W. S. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our common future, 17(1), 1-91.
55.Wind, Y., & Saaty, T. (1980). Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 26, 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641
56.Yuyin, Y., & Jinxi, L. (2018). The effect of governmental policies of carbon taxes and energy-saving subsidies on enterprise decisions in a two-echelon supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 675-691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.188
57.Zhang, C., Fang, J., Ge, S., & Sun, G. (2024). Research on the impact of enterprise digital transformation on carbon emissions in the manufacturing industry. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 211-227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.009
58.Zhang, L., Ren, J., & Zhang, G. (2024). Optimal dynamic strategy for emission reduction and operation considering hybrid carbon policy with carbon tax and cap-and-trade. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 187, 109820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109820
59.Zhang, Q., & Pinto, J. M. (2022). Energy-aware enterprise-wide optimization and clean energy in the industrial gas industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 165, 107927. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107927
60.Zheng, X., & Lam, K. L. (2024). An overview of environmental co-benefits and trade-offs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in municipal wastewater management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 46, 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.002