|
中文文獻 中文專書 王澤鑑,侵權行為法,自版,增訂新版,2015。 古明地正俊,長谷佳明 著;沈鄉吟,郭漢遜 譯,AI大局:鳥瞰人工智 慧技全貌,重塑AI時代的領導力,旗標出版社,初版,2020。 呂太郎,民事訴訟法,元照出版社,2 版,2019。 李淑明,民事訴訟法,第四冊,元照出版社,2019。 洪誌宏,消費者保護法,五南出版社,第四版,2019。 陳聰富,醫療責任的形成與展開,台大出版中心,修訂版,2019。 中文論文 吳淑莉,從美國商品責任法論我國消保法商品責任之客觀歸責事由,中 原財經法學,第35期,頁1-46,2015。 林欣柔,伴侶風險告知侵害感染者隱私? 論愛滋接觸者追蹤與公衛人員 之保密義務,疫情報導,第30 卷,第23 期,頁480-488,2014。 姜世明,表見證明之研究,政大法學評論,104 期,頁183-276,1998。 柯成國、范碧玉、孫茂勝、林佩萩,病例寫作與POMR-SOAP,醫院, 台灣醫院協會出版,頁20-29,2008。 廖建瑜,醫療法第82 條修正帶來新變局?!,月旦裁判時報,74 期,頁 60-71,2018。 94 中文網路資源 5 月醫材新法上路,食藥署研擬3指引要鬆綁AI智慧醫材和軟體上市前 申辦作業 https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/142045 (accessed, 2021/5/23) 智慧醫材專案辦公室啟動典禮 https://www.cde.org.tw/news/activity_more?id=427 (accessed, 2021/5/23) 外文文獻 外文專書 日文 笠原毅彦(著)、佐藤健(著)、西貝吉晃(著)、新田克己(著)、福澤一吉 (著)、太田勝造(編集),AI時代の法学入門-学際的アプローチ, 弘文堂,初版,2020。 松尾豊,人工知能は人間を超えるか,角川出版,初版,2015。 人工知能法務研究会 編,AIビジネスの法律実務,日本加除出版株式会 社,初版,2017。 福岡真之介,AIの法律,商事法務,初版,2020。 米村滋人,医師法講義,日本評論社,第一版,2016。 外文論文 日文 加藤慎、米村俊彥,診療ガイドラインと医療訴訟,消化器內視鏡,30 期,東京医学社,頁1127~1133,2018。 山口斉昭,要件事実論的視点から見た医療水準論について,4 Law & Practice 117~144, 2010。 松尾剛行,健康医療分野におけるAI の民刑事責任に関する検討―AI 画像診断(支援)システムを中心に,13 Law & Practice 151~181, 2019。 95 外文論文 英文 Abbott, Ryan, The Reasonable Computer: Disrupting the Paradigm od Tort Liability. 86 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 1-45 (2018). Allain, Jessica S., From Jeopardy! to Jaundice: The Medical Liability Implications of Dr. Watson and Other Artificial Intelligence Systems, 73 LA. L. REV. 1049-1079 (2013). Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 17-28 Bambauer, Jane R., Dr. Robot, 51 U.C. DAVIS L. REV., 383-398 (2017). Bisschops, Raf, et al. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: ESGE Guideline – Update 2019, 51 ENDOSCOPY 1155-1179 (2019). Chagal-Feferkorn, Karni A., Am I an Algorithm or a Product? When Products Liability Should Apply to Algorithmic Decision-Makers, 30 STAN. L. & POL'Y REV. 61-114 (2019). Chen, Peng-Jen, Lin, Meng-Chiung, Lai, Mei-Ju, Lin, Jung-Chun, Lu, Henry Horng-Shing, Tseng, Vincent S, Accurate Classification of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Computer-Aided Analysis, 154 GASTROENTEROLOGY 568-575 (2018). Chung, Jason, Zink, Amanda, “Hey Watson, Can I Sue You for Malpractice? Examining the Liability of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.” 11 JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW 5-80 (2017). Ely, John W., Harts, Arthur J., James, Paul A., Johnson, Cynda A., Determining the standard of care in medical malpractice: the physician’s perspective, 37 WAKE FOR. LAW REV. 86-875 (2002). Froomkin, A. Michael, Kerr, Ian, R., & Pineau, Joelle, When AIs Outperform Doctors: confronting the Challenges of a Tort-Induced Over-reliance on Machine Learning, 61 ARIZ. L. REV. 33-99 (2019). Geis, J. Raymond, Brady, Adrian, Wu, Carol C, Spencer, Jack, Ranschaert, Erik, Jaremko, Jacob L., Langer, Steve G., Kitts, Andrea Borondy, Birch, Judy, Shields, William F., van den Hoven van Genderen, Robert, Kotter, Elmar, Gichoya, Judy Wawira, Cook, Tessa S., Morgan, Matthew B., Tang, An, Safdar, Nabile M. and Kohli, Marc, Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint Europnea and North 96 American multisociety statement, 16 AM COLL RADIOL 1516-1521 (2019). Hoffman, William C., Unavoidably Unsafe Products--The Comment K Defense to Strict Liability for Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, and... What Else? 1 NFT 55-62 (1993). Jaremko, Jacob L., Azar, Marleine, Bromwich, Rebecca, Lum, Andrea, Cheong, Li Hsin Alicia, Gibert, Martin, Laviolette, Francois, Gray, Bruce, Reinhold, Caroline, Cicero, Mark, Chong, Jaron, Shaw, James, Rybicki, Frank J., Hurrell, Casey, Lee, Emil, Tang, An, Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on Ethical and Legal Issues Related to Artificial Intelligence in Radiology, 70 Can Assoc Radiol J. 107-118 (2019). Kim, Sunghyo, Crashed Software: Assessing Product Liability for Software Defects in Automated Vehicles, 16 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 300-317 (2018). Lewis, Michelle Huckaby, Gohagan, John K., Merenstein, Daniel J., The Locality Rule and the Physician’s Dilemma: Local Medical Practice vs the National Standard of Care, 297 JAMA 2633-2637 (2007). Luxton, David D., Should Watson Be Consulted for a Second Opinion? 21 AMA JOURNAL OF ETHICS 131-137 (2019). Marchisio, Emiliano. In support of “no-fault” civil liability rules for artificial intelligence. 54 SN SOC SCI 1-25 (2021). Murray Jr., James T., The State of the Art Defense in Strict Products Liability, 57 MARQ. L. REV. 649-660 (1974). Owen, David G., Design Defects, 73 MO. L. REV. 291-368 (2008). Price II, Nicolson W, Gerke, Sara, Cohen, I. Glenn, Potential Liability for Physician Using Artificial Intelligence, 322 JAMA 1765-1766 (2019). Spradley, Garey B., "Defensive Use of State of the Art Evidence in Strict Products Liability" (1983). 67 MINN. L. REV. 343-439 (1983). Tobia, Kevin, Nielsen, Aileen, and Stremitzer, Alexander, When Does Physician Use of AI Increase Liability? 62 J NUCL MED. 17-21 (2021). 97 Urban, Gregor, Tripathi, Priyam, Alkayali, Talal, Mittal, Mohit, Jalali, Farid Karnes, William, Baldi, Pierre, Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy, 155 Gastroenterology 1069-1078 (2018). 外文網頁 日文 医用画像診断支援システム(人工知能技術を利用するものを含む)開 発ガイドライン2019(手引き),経済産業省/国立研究開発法 人日本医療研究開発,令和元年12月 https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/mono_info_service/healthcare/iryou/downlo adfiles/pdf/47_guideline.pdf (accessed, 2021/08/08) 日本で承認されている2つのAI医療機器についてまとめてみた! https://hiroakikato.hatenablog.jp/entry/2019/10/16/033027 (accessed, 2021/5/10) 日本消化器病學會 內視鏡的廣場 AIを使用した内視鏡 https://www.jsge.or.jp/citizens/hiroba/backnumbers/hiroba16/hiroba16_0 5 (accessed, 2021/5/10) AIを搭載した内視鏡画像診断支援ソフトウェア『EndoBRAIN®』シリ ーズに、2製品が新登場 https://www.cybernet.jp/company/about/news/press/2021/20210127.html?_ fsi=Ua4LdvZl (accessed, 2021/5/10) 「富岳」で新型コロナ飛沫の大量計算を実施、感染リスクはどこにあ る? https://monoist.atmarkit.co.jp/mn/articles/2012/08/news007.html (accessed, 2021/6/22) 98 外文網頁 英文 BMJ Best Practice, What is GRADE? https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/what-is-grade/ (accessed, 2021/5/19) De Novo Classification Request (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/ premarket-submissions/de-novo-classificationrequest# What_is_a_De_Novo_Classification_Request_ (accessed, 2021/5/10) Exclusive: In boost to self-driving cars, U.S. tells Google computers can qualify as drivers https://www.reuters.com/article/us-alphabet-autos-selfdriving-exclusiveidUSKCN0VJ00H (accessed, 2021/5/16) IBM big data used for rapid diagnosis of rare leukemia case in Japan, Japan Times, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/08/11/national/sciencehealth/ ibm-big-data-used-for-rapid-diagnosis-of-rare-leukemia-case-in-japan/ (accessed, 2020/10/4) IMDRF International Medical Device Regulators Forum: Final Document Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Key Definitions, IMDRF SaMD Working Group, 9 Dec., 2013 http://www.imdrf.org/workitems/wi-aimd.asp (accessed, 2021/5/10) IMDRF Work Items, Artificial Intelligence Medical Devices (AIMD),http://www.imdrf.org/workitems/wi-aimd.asp (accessed, 2021/5/10) Regulatory Control, https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/overview-deviceregulation/ regulatory-controls , (accessed, 2021/5/10) Software as a Medical Device: Possible Framework for Risk Categorization and Corresponding Considerations, IMDRF SaMD Working Group, 18 Sep. 2014 http://www.imdrf.org/docs/imdrf/final/technical/imdrf-tech-140918-samdframework- risk-categorization-141013.pdf (accessed, 2021/08/08) 99 外國判決 Ault v. International Harvester Co.13 Cal.3d 113 (1974). Hall v. Hilbun, 466 So. 2d 856 (Miss. 1985). Taaffe v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust (2012). Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P2d. 334, 131 Cal. Rptr, 14 (Cal 1976). 日本東京地裁平成14 年12月13 日(イシガキダイ料理食中毒事件) 日本東京高判平成17 年1月26 日(イシガキダイ料理食中毒事件) 日本最判昭36 年2月16 日(東大梅毒事件) 日本最判昭57 年3月30 日(日赤高山事件) 日本最判平7 年6 月9 日(日赤姬路事件) 日本最判平13 年11月27日(乳房溫存療法事件)
|