臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

機車普遍盛行的台灣，機車的使用率一直位居著全世界之冠，而台灣的機車車種繁多，各車種維修改裝更是一大問題，一般民眾為想增進自身車輛保養及維修知識，但苦於資訊知識無法取得，資訊正確性未被確認，無法有效查詢改裝或相通零件等，使得成效無法擴大。為此本研究將提出「以科技接受模式探討機車資訊網架構之研究」以(1)加速正確改裝資訊及知識的傳播，(2)避免錯誤不實的資訊造成傷害(3)資訊方便查詢及諮詢(4)零件的快速取得之服務。
為了使機車資訊服務網架構能正確且有效地進行，本研究將透過(1)「科技接受模式Technology Acceptance Model」探討使用者對於使用「機車資訊服務網」之行為意圖並提出知覺有用性、知覺易用性、主觀規範、自能效能、行為意圖五個項目，在網站建置後進行驗證之評估;(2)進行蒐集改裝或維修機車保養知識等相關文獻，歸納，轉化資料成資訊內容；(3)根據機車相關知識建立階段架構表(4)依影響行為意圖之要因及架構表開發系統並建置八大系統(5)驗證其科技接受模式之問卷調查。
本研究結果發現，科技接受模式下各項假設在滿意度調查結果中顯示均為成立，且(a)知覺有用性對行為意圖有正向影響；(b)知覺易用性對行為意圖有正向影響；另外兩個外部變數；(External Variables)；(c)自我效能(Self-Efficacy)對知覺易用性有正向影響；(d)主觀規範(Subjective Norm) 對知覺有用性有正向影響，故驗證科技接受模式是適用於「機車資訊服務網」之建置。

In Taiwan, where locomotives are prevalent, the locomotive usage rate has always ranked first in the world, and there are many types of locomotives in Taiwan, and the maintenance and modification of various types of vehicles is a major problem. Information knowledge cannot be obtained, the accuracy of the information has not been confirmed, and it is impossible to effectively query the modified or connected parts, etc., so that the effectiveness cannot be expanded. To this end, this study will propose "Research on the structure of the locomotive information network in the mode of technology acceptance" to (1) accelerate the dissemination of correct modification information and knowledge, (2) avoid harm caused by incorrect and false information, and (3) facilitate information inquiry and Consultation (4) Service for quick acquisition of parts.
In order to enable the locomotive information service network structure to be carried out correctly and effectively, this study will explore the user's intention to use the "locomotive information service network" through (1) "Technology Acceptance Model" and propose perceptual usefulness and perception The five items of ease of use, subjective norms, self-efficiency, and behavioral intentions are evaluated after the website is built; (2) Collect relevant documents such as knowledge of modification or maintenance of locomotive maintenance, summarize and convert the data into information content; (3) Establish a stage structure table based on locomotive-related knowledge (4) A questionnaire survey to verify its technology acceptance model based on factors affecting the behavioral intention and structure table development system (5).
The results of this study found that all the assumptions under the technology acceptance model were found to be true in the satisfaction survey results, and (a) the usefulness of perception has a positive effect on behavioral intention; (b) the ease of perception has a positive effect on behavioral intention Influence; two other external variables; (External Variables); (c) Self-Efficacy has a positive effect on the ease of perception; (d) Subjective Norm has a positive effect on the usefulness of perception Therefore, the verification technology acceptance model is suitable for the construction of "locomotive information service network".

摘要..............................................................i
Abstract.........................................................ii
誌謝............................................................iii
目錄.............................................................iv
表目錄...........................................................vi
圖目錄..........................................................vii
第一章 緒論.......................................................1
1.1研究動機.......................................................1
1.2研究目的.......................................................1
1.3研究流程.......................................................2
第二章 文獻探討...................................................3
2.1科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Models，TAM)................3
2.2主觀規範(Subjective Norm)......................................4
2.3自我效能(Self Efficacy)........................................4
2.4質性訪談法(Qualitative Interview)..............................4
2.4.1 KJ法(KJ Method)............................................4
2.4.2 焦點團體訪談法(Focus Group Interviews, FGI).................4
2.4.3 德爾菲法(Delphi Method).....................................5
第三章 研究方法...................................................6
3.1研究方法與步驟.................................................6
3.2 科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Models，TAM)架構...........7
3.2.1影響行為意圖之架構設計........................................7
3.3 透過KJ法確立系統雛型架構表.....................................8
3.4 透過焦點團體訪談法確認KJ法之結果...............................10
3.5 透過德爾菲法確認焦點團體訪談法之結果...........................13
3.6 根據機車資訊網架構表進行資料蒐集...............................16
3.7 透過ECRS(Eliminate,Combine,Rearrange,Simplify)整理機車資訊....16
第四章 實證研究成果...............................................18
4.1 建置機車資訊服務網............................................18
4.2 系統架構開發.................................................18
4.3.1 系統開發語言與前端技術......................................18
4.3.2 系統開發語言與後端技術......................................18
4.4 系統架構.....................................................19
4.5.1 首頁介紹...................................................20
4.5.2 會員管理系統...............................................21
4.5.3 文章管理系統...............................................23
4.5.4 商品管理系統...............................................25
4.5.5 訂單管理系統...............................................28
4.5.6 金流管理系統...............................................31
4.5.7 物流管理系統...............................................31
4.5.8 數據管理系統...............................................31
4.5.9 其他外部串接系統............................................32
4.6 網站滿意度問卷調查............................................33
4.7 網站滿意度問卷分析............................................33
4.7.1信度分析....................................................34
4.7.2效度分析....................................................34
4.7.3相關分析....................................................34
4.8 問卷結論.....................................................34
第五章 結論......................................................37
5.1研究成果......................................................37
5.2本研究之貢獻..................................................38
5.3未來研究方向與限制.............................................38
參考文獻.........................................................38
附錄一、建立機車資訊服務網架構表之第一次德爾菲問卷..................41
附錄二、建立機車資訊服務網架構表之第二次德爾菲問卷..................44
附件三、透過ECRS整理機車資訊之項目.................................47
附件四、滿意度調查問卷............................................52
Extended Abstract................................................54

[1]中華民國交通部，2018，交通統計要覽。
https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=2051&parentpath=0,6,2050
[2]中華民國交通部，2020，公路總局機關簡介。
https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=850&parentpath=0,1&unitid=27
[3]行政院環境保護署，2019，空氣品質保護及噪音管制處。
https://www.epa.gov.tw/Page/F3943FF90E87A7BA/1e9b2ffa-c9e1-4e72-858
[4]中華民國機車研究發展協會，2020，關於我們。
http://www.motorsafety.org.tw/about
[5]Davis,F.d.,Bagozzi,R.P. and Warshaw, P.R.,1989,'User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theortical models',Management science.
[6]Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I.,1975 'Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research'.
[7]Szajna, B., 1996, “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Management science, 42(1), 85-92.
[8]Ajzen, I. , 1991, “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
[9]Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., 2000, “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”, Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
[10]Park, S. Y., 2009, “An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning”,Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 150.
[11]Bandura, A. , 1986, “Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory”, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[12]Grandon, E.E., Alshare, K. and Kwun, O., 2005, “Factors influencing student intention to adopt online classes: A cross-cultural study”, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20(4), 46-56.
[13]維基百科-卡片分類法 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8D%A1%E7%89%87%E5%88%86%E9%A1%9E%E6%B3%95
[14]Krueger, R. A., 1994, “Focus Groups a Practical Guide to Applied Research”, Sage Publications.
[15]Sutton, S. G. and Arnold, V., 2011, “Focus Group Methods: Using Interactive and Nominal Groups to Explore Emerging Technology-driven Phenomena in Accounting and Information Systems”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(2), 81-88.
[16]維基百科-德爾菲法
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BE%B7%E5%B0%94%E8%8F%B2%E6%B3%95
[17]Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T. and Krahn, J., 2007,” The Delphi method for graduate research”, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6, 1-21.
[18]Kwon, N. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J.,2005, “Modeling the factors affecting individuals' use of community networks: A theoretical explanation of community-based information and communication technology use”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(14),1525-154 3.
[19]Compeau,D.R. and Higgins,C.A.,1995,Computerselfefficacy :Development of a measure and initial test”, MIS quarterly, 189 -211.
[20]Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N. and Rook, D.W., 2007, “Conducting the focus group”, Focus Groups.
[21]Holden, M. C. & Wedman, J. F., 1993., Future issues of computer mediated communication: The results of a delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4): 5-24.
[22]Likert, R., 1932, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes”, Archives of psychology