臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

行銷傳播資訊爆炸的今日，廠商不斷以新奇屬性來吸引消費者目光並改善產品評價，如行動通信i-mode系統或優酪乳的各種乳酸菌，這些運用創新技術的新奇屬性對消費者是不熟悉的，甚至不知其功能。過去研究顯示，對低複雜度的產品，廣告中增加新奇屬性，可以顯著改善產品評價。故本研究目的為探討個體差異變數，如個人產品涉入和消費者創新性，對新奇屬性與產品評價間的關係之影響。
研究結果顯示在低複雜度產品下，個人產品涉入會干擾新奇屬性與產品評價的關係，其中對於高個人產品涉入者，廣告增加新奇屬性會顯著改善產品評價；而對於低個人產品涉入者，則否。且在低複雜度產品下，消費者創新性會干擾新奇屬性與產品評價的關係，其中對於高消費者創新性者，廣告增加新奇屬性會顯著改善產品評價；對於低消費者創新性者，則否。
新奇屬性並非萬靈丹，唯有在消費者知覺到新奇屬性存在的情況下，才會改善產品評價，且推論過程中會產生學習成本，廠商應試著透過廣告降低學習成本。亦可配合市場區隔內消費者的個人產品涉入與消費者創新性之程度，進行新奇屬性的廣告策略應用。

The purpose of this research is to investigate how the individual differences affect the relationship between novel attributes and product evaluation. Many companies try to improve or differentiate their products by introducing new attributes. Theses additional attributes are technological innovations and novel or completely unknown to large number of consumers. Such as GPS in car or i-mode in cell phone are novel to consumers. Past researches suggest that the addition of novel attributes is likely to improve product evaluation since the products are of low-complexity.
Our results show that the personal product involvement moderates the relationship of novel attributes and product evaluation in the case of low-complexity products. For high personal product involvement consumers, the addition of novel attributes will improve product evaluation. Consumer innovativeness also moderates the relationship of novel attributes and product evaluation in the case of low-complexity products. For high consumer innovativeness subjects, the addition of novel attributes will improve product evaluation.
A key marketing implication of our finding is that advertising introduces novel attributes may cause learning cost. Firms need to decrease the learning cost by convenient and friendly interface. When firms use novel attributes in advertisement, individual differences could use to choose target market and segmentation

第一章 緒論........................1
1.1 研究動機與研究背景.............1
1.2 研究目的.......................2
1.3 研究流程.......................4
第二章 文獻探討....................5
2.1 新奇屬性和產品評價.............5
2.1.1 價值推論.....................7
2.1.2 學習成本推論.................7
2.2 個人產品涉入...................9
2.2.1 涉入的定義...................9
2.2.2 涉入的分類...................9
2.2.3 涉入的衡量..................10
2.2.4 小節........................13
2.3 消費者創新性..................15
2.3.1 消費者創新性的定義..........15
2.3.2 消費者創新性的衡量方式......15
2.3.3 小節........................17
第三章 研究方法...................18
3.1 研究架構.......................18
3.2 假設推論.......................19
3.3 變數的操作性定義...............21
3.4 實驗設計.......................24
3.4.1 實驗設計方式 .................24
3.4.2 實驗進行方式 .................25
3.4.2 實驗對象.....................25
3.4.3 研究材料的選擇與前測結果.....26
3.5 分析工具與方法 .................30
第四章 研究結果分析...............31
4.1 樣本結構.......................31
4.2 假設檢定.......................33
4.2.1 實驗一.......................33
4.2.2 實驗二.......................38
4.3 研究結果與討論.................45
第五章 結論與建議.................48
5.1 研究結論.......................48
5.2 研究貢獻.......................49
5.2.1 學術上的意涵................49
5.2.2 管理上的意涵................49
5.4 未來研究方向...................52
參考文獻...........................53
附錄...............................56

中文文獻
1.黃俊英與賴文彬(1990)。涉入的理論發展與實務應用。管理科學學報，第7卷，第1期 ，15-30頁。
2.黃俊英，多變量分析，第七版，華泰書局，台北，民國89年。
英文文獻
1.Bauer, R. A. (1967), “Consumer Behavior as Risk-taking,” in R. Hancock(Ed.) Dynamic Marketing for a changing world: Proceeding of the 43rd Conference of the American Marketing Association, 389-398
2.Berlyne, D. E., (1970), “Novelty, Complexity and Hedonic Value,” Perception and Psychophysics, 8(November), 279-286
3.Broniarczyk, S. M. & Alba, J. W. (1994), “The Role of Consumers’ Intuitions in Inference Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (December), 393-407
4.Carpenter, G.. S., Glazer, R. & Nakamoto K. (1994), “Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(August), 339-350
5.Dick, A., Chakravarti, D. A. & Biehal, G. (1990), “Memory-Based Inference During Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (June), 82-93
6.Farrell, J. & Shapiro, C. (1988), “Dynamic Competition with Switching Costs,” Rand Journal of Economics, 19(Spring), 123-137
7.Feldman, J. M. & Lynch, J. G. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Efforts of Measurement on Belief. Intention and Behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421-435
8.Foxall, G. R. (1984), Corporate Innovation: Marketing and Strategy, St. Martin’s Press, New York
9.Foxall, G. R. (1988), “Consumer Innovativeness: Novelty-seeking, Creativity and Cognitive Style”, in Hirschman, E.C. and Sheth, J. (Eds), Research in Consumer Behavior, 3, 79-113
10.Freedman J. L. (1964), “Involvement, Discrepancy, and Change,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 290-295
11.Friestad, M. & Wright, P. (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (June), 1-31
12.Goldsmith, R. E. & Hofacker, C. (1991), “Measuring Consume Innovativeness,” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 209-221
13.Hirschman, E. C. (1980), “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity”, Journal of Consumer Research, 7(No.3), 283-295
14.Houston, M. J. & Rothschild, M. L. (1978), “Conceptual and Methodological Perspective in Involvement,” in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Direction, ed. Jain, S., Chicago: American Marketing Association, 184-187
15.Johnson, E. J. & John, W. P. (1985), “Effort and Accuracy in Choice,” Management Science, 31(April), 395-414
16.Karders, F. R. (1999), Consumer Behavior and Managerial Decision Making, Addision Wesley Longman, New York
17.Kirton, M. (1976), “Adapters and innovators: a Description and Measure,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629
18.Klemperer, P. (1987), “Markets with Consumer Switching Costs,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(May), 375-394
19.Laurent, G. & Kapferer, J. (1985), “Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22(Feburary), 41-53
20.McCullough, J. L. & Ostrom, T. (1974), “Repetition of Highly Similar Message and Attitude Change” Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(June), 395-397
21.Midgley, D. F. & Dowling, G. R. (1978), “Innovativeness: The Concept and it’s Measurement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 4(No.2), 229-242
22.Mukherjee, A & Hoyer, W. D. (2001), “The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (December), 462-472
23.Nowlis, S. M. & Simonson, I. (1996), “The Effect of New Product Feature on Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32(February), 36-43
24.Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986), Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971), Communication and Innovation, New York: The Free Press.
26.Ross, W. T. & Creyer, E. H. (1992), “Making Inference about Missing Information: The Effect of Existing Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19(June), 14-25
27.Shugan, S. (1980), “The Costs of Thinking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (September), 99-111
28.Simonson, I., Carmon, Z. & O’Curry, S. (1994), “Experimental Evidence on the Negative Effect of Product Features and Sales Promotions on Brand Choice,” Marketing Science, 13(Winter), 23-40
29.Wright, P. L. (1973), “The Cognitive Process Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10(February), 53-62
30.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (December), 341-351
31.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986), “Conceptualizing Involvement,” Journal of Advertising, 15 (No. 2), 4-14