臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文主旨在提出一個以最佳檢查方式作為經濟成本考量的決策模式，研究中以TFT-LCD某一零組件為例，其產品具有不可修復之特性，發生缺點後，無法加以重工的方式來降低或使缺點消失，因此，產品於生產線上製作到包裝完成後，最終再出貨至客戶手中，這一段的過程中如何能使產品支出的期望總成本為最佳。模式考量產品檢驗成本、抽樣資訊以及產品失效成本，可選擇行動方案分兩階段：(一)決定抽樣數，(二)根據抽樣結果對批量剩餘組件之最佳處置。研究方法以決策樹為工具，來建立問題決策模式，並以決策樹理論推導出整體決策目標函數，並據此分析模式性質，再以C++語言撰寫模式程式。
報告中以某公司為研究案例，提供以實際之檢驗數據，並透過自行撰寫之程式來計算期望最小之支出成本。因此，本研究期望在建立一個適用於TFT-LCD偏光板缺點具有不可修復特性的最佳經濟型抽樣檢驗計畫，提供相關業界在進行檢驗時的參考決策使用，用以避免人力及檢驗成本的浪費。

This thesis presents an inspection sampling economic optimization model for TFT-LCD polarizer products from the supplier’s view point using decision tree approach. Inspections are taken at both the supplier’s and its manufacturer’s phases. At the supplier’s phase, the inspection is destructive and after observing the sampling outcome, the supplier has to decide whether or not to send the remainder of the polarizer products to its downstream manufacturer. If the decision is rejecting, the lot will be discarded or sold at a cheap price. The inspection at the manufacturer’s phase is nondestructive and imperfect, that is, inspection errors of types 1 and 2 may occur. All polarizer products judged to be nonconforming by the manufacturer will be sent back to the supplier. The inspection cost and additional cost, such as repair and shipment, are also charged to the supplier. The model assumes that the nonconforming products will be complemented by the supplier until all of the complmented products are accepted by the manufacturer. In the model, only the sampling information obtained at the destructive inspection phase is used in the original lot. No sampling information is used for the complemented products. The cost to be considered includes the destructive and nondestructive inspection cost and product failure cost.
The study utilizes the decision tree theory to construct the economic inspection sampling model with the objective of minimizing the expected total cost. Some properties of the model using Beta prior for the product quality are derived, and such findings are used to facilitate the computation for finding an optimal solution. A computer program coded in Visual C++ is written for solving the model. A real life case is studied in the thesis, and the effects of the model parameters, such as prior parameters, inspection cost, and lot size, are also analyzed and discussed. The results provide a good reference for the management in making operational decisions.

第一章 緒論...............................1
1.1研究背景與研究動機.....................1
1.2 研究範圍..............................2
1.3 研究目的..............................2
1.4 研究架構..............................3
第二章 文獻探討...........................5
2.1 決策樹................................5
2.2 抽樣檢驗模式..........................6
2.3 偏光板相關參考文獻...................12
第三章 問題模式與產品概述................14
3.1問題描述..............................14
3.2變數符號說明..........................16
3.3問題的研究方法........................18
3.4偏光板概述............................24
3.4.1偏光板製程..........................25
3.4.2偏光板常見之異常缺點項目............27
3.5薄膜液晶顯示器製程概述................29
3.5.1薄膜電晶體陣列(TFT Array)製程.......30
3.5.2液晶面板組立製程 (Cell Assembly)....31
3.5.3模組組裝製程(Module Assembly).......32
第四章 實驗結果分析......................34
4.1 實驗所使用之電腦設備及軟體...........34
4.2最小成本決策模式之解算................34
4.3 案例公司之實例說明...................35
4.4期望支出成本與決策之影響..............38
第五章 目前成果與後續研究................41
參考文獻.................................43

1.張有成，「抽樣檢驗」，中華民國品質管制學會，1980。
2.林鴻欽，「貝氏檢驗計劃之設計」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，1992 年6 月。
3.林世偉，「不可修復產品原料供應商之選擇─貝氏決策模式」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，1998 年6 月。
4.邵嘉瑀，「變異數不確定下計量型戴明抽樣檢驗模式之貝氏分析」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2002年6月。
5.劉采筠，「集體決策在經驗貝氏抽樣檢驗計畫之應用」。真理大學數理科學研究所碩士論文，2002年6月。
6.陳慧雯，「貝氏方法應用於計量型戴明檢驗模式」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2003年6月。
7.黃乾怡，「電子產品可靠度預估與逐次抽樣計畫─以數位相機為例」，華梵大學工業管理學系碩士論文，2004年6月。
8.黃珮菁，「模糊理論在單次抽樣檢驗計畫之應用」，國立成功大學統計學系碩士論文，2005年6月。
9.郭權興，「品質監控系統應用於偏光板裁斷製程之改善研究」，元智大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，2005年7月。
10.沈政諭，「精實生產與六標準差整合模式之研究-以光電零組件偏光板為例」，中原大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2006年6月。
11.周雅君，「以資料探勘為基建構偏光板品質異常診斷系統」，元智大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，2006年7月。
12.方麗如，「光電零組件:偏光板產業之經營績效分析 以O公司為例」，中山大學高階經營碩士班碩士論文，2006年7月。
13.邱垂宏，「偏光板外觀檢查作業時間對檢驗結果影響之研究」，義守大學管理研究所碩士班碩士論文，2006年7月。
14.賴政昌，「利用決策樹模式評估TFT-LCD產品出貨之最佳處置方案」，元智大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，2007年7月。
15.徐振洲，「LCM製程技術」，科學工業園區管理局，2007年7月。
16.Lorenzen, T.J.,“ Minimum Cost Sampling Plan Using Bayesian Methods,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp.57-69, 1985.
17.Papadakis, E. P.,” The Deming Inspection Criterion for Choosing Zero or 100 Percent Inspection,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.121-127, 1985.
18.Barlow, R. E. and X. Zhang,” Bayesian Analysis of Inspection Sampling Procedures Discussed by Deming,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol.16, North-Holland, 1987.
19.Moskowitz, H. and K. Tang,” Bayesian Variables Acceptance- Sampling Plans: Quadratic Loss Function and Step-Loss Function,” Technometrics, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp.340-347, 1992.
20.Kirkwood. C.W., “An Algebraic Approach to Formulating and Solving Large Models for Sequential Decisions under Uncertainty,” Management Science, 39:pp.900-914, July 1993。
21.Burke, R. J., D.D. Hobert and F.C. Kaminsky,” The (k1, k2) game,” Quality Progress, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.49-53, 1993..
22.Schnoy P.P., “A Comparison of graphical Techniques for Decision Analysis ,” European Journal of Operational Research,78:pp.1-21, Oct.13, 1994.
23.Vander Wiel, S. A. and S. B. Vardeman,” A Discussion of All-or-None Inspection Policies,” Technometrics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.102-109, 1994
24.Rigdon, S. E.,” Mood’s Theorem, Deming’s kp Rule, and The Death of Acceptance Sampling,” Quality Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.129-136, 1995
25.Kaminsky F. C. and Haberle K. R.” Probability Distributions for the Deming Cost Models,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.355-362, 1995.
26.Sheil, J.,” Towards economically optimal first-off inspection,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 94, pp.179-185, 1996.
27.Lam, Y. and C. V. Lam,” Bayesian double-sampling plans with normal distributions,” The Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.193-207, 1997.
28.Anderson, M. T., B. S. Greenberg and S. L. Stokes,” Acceptance Sampling With Rectification When Inspection Errors Are Present,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp.493-505, 2001.
29.Hillson. David（2005年，12月）， http://www.risk-doctor.com/pdf-briefings/risk-doctor18c.pdf
30.Humberto Gutiérrez-Pulido, Víctor Aguirre-Torres, and J. Andrés Christen, “A Practical Method for Obtaining Prior Distributions in Reliability”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2005, 54(2), 262-269