臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究採用「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫研究第一波至第四波」會員版資料，從
社經地位路徑與父母參與路徑切入探討國中一年級、國中三年級、高中二年級及高
中三年級學生學習成就的影響，並採用潛在成長曲線模型探討臺灣青少年潛在成
長軌跡，研究發現父母參與對子女學習成效影響是存在的，而父母社經地位需透過
父母參與對子女學習成效才產生影響，換言之高社經地位的父母雖擁有良好資源，
須運用 Coleman 的社會資本概念，透過父母高度參與子女學習活動提高子女學習
成效，這說明父母參與的重要性。
研究結果發現：臺灣青少年學習成長軌跡的發展是一種非線性遞增的成長曲
線；學生的學習起始狀態會影響學習成長速率；父母參與對子女學習成效有顯著正
向的影響；父母社經地位透過父母參與間接效果對子女學習成效有顯著正向的影
響。

This study adopts membership data, collected from first to forth wave of Taiwan Education Panel Survey. And subject to the affection of socioeconomic status and parents’ participation to academic performance of students from first and second grade in junior high school and second and third grade from senior high school. By disposing the Latent Growth Curve Modeling, the trace of adolescent latent growth has indicated an affection of parents’ participation to their offspring. However regarding to parents’ socioeconomic status, according to the concept of Coleman’s social cost, a high status will only be effective when parents have involved the education of their offspring which emphasize the importance of parents’ participation.
The result shows the trace of Taiwan Adolescent Learning Growth Curve posse the property of nonlinear increasing curve and the initial status will affect the growth rate. Also a positive significant relationship exists between parents’ participation and their offspring’s performance. And through participation, a positive effect between the indirect effect of parents’ socioeconomic status and the performance of their offspring is also significant.

目 錄
頁次
謝辭 ................................................................................................................................... i
中文摘要 .......................................................................................................................... ii
英文摘要 ......................................................................................................................... iii
第一章 緒論 .................................................................................................................... 1
第二章 文獻探討 ............................................................................................................ 3
2.1 父母參與定義與衡量面向之相關研究探討 ................................................... 3
2.2 學習成效定義與衡量之相關研究探討 ........................................................... 4
2.3 父母社經地位與子女學習成效之相關研究探討 ........................................... 5
2.4 父母參與與子女學習成效之相關研究探討 ................................................... 6
2.5 父母社經地位與父母參與關係之相關研究探討 ........................................... 7
第三章 資料來源與分析 ................................................................................................ 9
3.1 資料來源與說明 .............................................................................................. 11
3.2 變數定義與測量 ............................................................................................. 13
第四章 研究方法 .......................................................................................................... 21
4.1 潛在成長曲線模型 ......................................................................................... 21
4.2 研究模式設計 ................................................................................................. 24
第五章 實證結果與分析 .............................................................................................. 31
第六章 結論 .................................................................................................................. 43
參考文獻 ........................................................................................................................ 45

參考文獻
一、 中文部份
史書華（2013），「全球 PISA 最新評比：台灣學生快樂，但數學學習 M 型化」，《親
子天下雜誌》，第 35 期。
余民寧（1987），《考試焦慮、成就動機、學習習慣與學業成績之關係》，國立
政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
李敦仁（2010），《 父母參與對青少年學習成長軌跡的影響之貫時追蹤研究：以TEPS
資料分析為例》，國立政治大學教育學系教育心理與輔導組博士論文，未出版，
台北。
吳明隆（2013），《結構方程模式─潛在成長曲線分析》，台北：五南。
吳慧虹（2007），《國小學童家庭社經地位、學習壓力、課後輔導與學業成就之研
究》，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
林生傳（2000），《教育社會學》，台北：巨流。
張春興（1996），《教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐》，台北：東華。
張苙雲（2003）， 台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：資料使用手冊【2011.12.01 版】，取
自中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
郭春悅（2006），《家庭社經地位、同儕闢係與學業成就之相關研究》，國立屏東
教育大學社會科教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
黃富順（1974），「影響國中學生學業成就的家庭因素」，《教育研究所集刊》，
16，383-486。
黃毅志 （2002），《社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識：臺灣地區不公平的社會階
層體系之延伸》，台北：巨流。
楊孟麗、譚康榮、黃敏雄等（2003）， 台灣教育長追蹤料庫：心理計量報告：TEPS
2001分析能力測驗，取自中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。

楊國樞（1986），「家庭因素與子女行為：臺灣研究的評析」，《中國心理月刊》，
28（1），7-28。
劉明松、張韶霞 （2001），「國小學童家庭結構及父母教養方式與學業成就關係
之研究」，《樹德科技大學學報》，39（1），61-78 。
蔡文輝（1985），《社會學》，台北：三民。
繆敏志（1990），《單親兒童學業成就、人格適應及其相關因素之研究》，國立政治
大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
二、英文部份
Balli, S. J., Demo, D. H., & Wedman, J. F. （1998）. “Family involvement with children’s
homework: An intervention in the middle grades.” Family Relations, 47（2）, 149-
157.
Barnard, W. M. （2004）. “Parent involvement in elementary school and educational
attainment.” Children and Youth Services Review, 26（1）, 39-62.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bloom, B.S. （1980）. “The new direction for educational research: Alterable variables,”
Phi Delta Kappan 61: 382–385.
Bronstein, P., Ginsburg, G. S., & Herrera, I. S. （2005）. “Parental predictors of
motivational orientation in early adolescence: A longitudinal study,” Journal of
Youth and Adolescence, 34, 559–575.
Byer, J. L. （1999）. “The effects of absences and involvement in unit plan preparation
on academic achievement in a teacher education class,” Louisiana Education
Research Journal, 34（1）, 95-109.


Byrne, B. M. （2010）. “Structural equation modeling with ANMOS: Basic concept,
applications, and programming （_secomd ed.）.” London： Routledge.
Coleman, J. S.（1988） . “Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal
of Sociology.” 94, s95-120.
Curran, P. J.（2000）. “A latent curve framework for the study of developmental
trajectories in adolescent substance use.” In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin. C. C. Presson.
& S. J. Sherman （Eds）. Multivariate applications in substance use research
（pp. 1-42）. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dearing, E., Kreider, H., Simpkins, S., & Weiss, H. B. （2006）. “Family involvement
in school and low-income children’s literacy: Longitudinal association between and
within families,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 653–664.
Domina, T. （2005）. “Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of
parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education,” 78（3） , 233-
249.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C, Strycker, L. A., Li, F. & Alpert, A. （1999） . An introduction
to latent variable growth curve modeling：Concepts, issues, and applications.
Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, J. L. （1991）. “Effects on student achievement of teachers’ practices of parent
involment. Advances in Reading/Language Research: Literacy Through Family,
Community, and School Interaction, Greebwich,” CT, JAI Press, Vol. 5, pp. 261–
276.
Fan, X. T. （2001） . “Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A growth
modeling analysis,” Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 27-61.
Fan, X., & Chen, M. （2001） . “Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement：
A meta-analysis,” Educational Psychology Review, 13（1）, 1–22.
Friedman, P., Rodriguez, F., & McComb, J. （2001） . “Why students do and do not attend


classes,” College Teaching, 49（4）, 124-133.
Gang, I. N., & Zimmennann, K. F. （2000）. “Is child like parent? Educational attainment
and ethnic origin.” Journal of Human Resources, 35（3）, 550-569.
Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. （1994）. “Parents’ involvement in children’s
schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model,” Child
Development, 65, 237–252.
Hampton, F. M., Mumford, D. A., & Bond, L. （1998）. “Parental involve- ment in inner
city schools: The Project FAST extended family approach to success,” Urban
Education, 33, 410–427.
Hara, S. R. （1998）. “Parent involvement: The key to improved student achievement,”
School Community Journal, 8（2）, 9–19.
Hill, N. E. & Chao, R. K. （2009）. “Families， schools， and the adolescent：
Connecting research， policy, and practice,” New York：Teachers College Press.
Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. （2004）. “Parental school involvement and children's aca-
demic achievement-Pragmatics and issues,” Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 13, 161-164.
Hill, N. E., Castellino, D. R., Lansford, J. E., Nowlin, P., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., &
Pettit, G. S. （2004）. Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior,
achievement, and aspirations: Demographic variations across adolescence. Child
Development, 75, 1491–1509.
Hill, N. E., Tyson, D. F., & Bromell, L. （2009） . “Parental involvement in middle school：
Developmentally appropriate strategies across SES and ethnicity,” In N. E. Hill &
R. K. Chao （Eds.）, Families, schools, and the adolescent: Connecting research,
policy, and practice （pp. 53–72）. New York：Teachers College Press.
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with
SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. C., Bickley, P. G., Trivette, P. S. & Singh, K.
（1993）. “Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement?
Structural analysis of national data,” School Psychol. Rev. 22：474–496.
Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., & Aubey,L.W. （
1986）. “Parental involvement， homework， and TV times：Directand indirect
effects on high school achievement,” J. Ed. Psychol. 78: 373–380.
Keith, T. Z. （1991）. Parent involvement and achievement in high schools. In Silvern,
S. （Ed.）, Advances in Reading/Language Research: Literacy Through Family,
Community, and School Interaction（Vol. 5）, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
Lareau, A. （2002）. “Invisible inequality： Social class and child reading in black
families and white family, ” American Sociological Review, 67, 747-776.
Lee, J. S., & Bowen, N. K. （2006）. “Parent involvement， cultural capital, and the
achievement gap among elementary school children,” American Educational
Research Journal, 43（2）, 193-218.
Marjoribanks, K. （1983）. “The evaluation of a family learning model,” Studies Ed.
Eval. 9: 343–351.
Mcardle, J. J., & Bell, R. Q. （2000）. An introduction to latent growth models for
developmental data analysis. In T. D. Little, K. U. Sxhnabel, & J. Baumert （Eds） ,
Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data： Practical issues, applied approaches,
and specific examples （pp.51-108）. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McWayne, C., Hampton, V., Fantuzzo, J., Cohen, H. L., & Sekino, Y. （2004）. “A
multivariate examination of parent involvement and the social and academic
competencies of urban kindergarten children,” Psychology in the Schools, 41, 363-
377.
Melnick, D. H. （1992）. “Adjustment transitions in early adolescence （junior high
school）, ” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Long Island University, Brooklyn,

NY.
Park, H. （2008）. “The varied educational effects of parent-child communication： A
comparative study of fourteen countries,” Comparative Education Review, 52（2） ,
219-243.
Rao, C. R. （1958）. Some statistical models for comparation of growth curves.
Biometrics, 14, 1-17.
Seginer, R. （2006）. “Parents’ educational involvement： A developmental ecological
perspective,” Parenting: Science and Practice, 6, 1–48.
Singh, K., Bickley, P. G., Trivette, P., Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., & Anderson, E. （1995）.
“The effects of four components of parental involvement on eight-grade student
achievement: Structural Analysis of NELS-88 data,” School Psychology Review,
24（2）, 299-317.
Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. （1987）. “The family–school relation and the child’s
school performance,” Child Development, 58, 1348–1357.
Stevenson, D. L., and Baker, D. P. （1987）. “The family-school relation and the child’s
school performance.” Special issue: Schools and development. Child Devel. 58:
1348–1357.
Ho Sui-Chu, E., & Willms, J. D. （1996）. “Effects of parental involvement on eighth-
grade achievement,” Sociology of Education, 69, 126–141.
Tucker, L. R. （1958）. Determination of paramters of a functional relation by factor
analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 19-23.
Walberg, H. J. （1986）. Synthesis of research on teaching. In Wittrock, M. C. （Ed.）,
Handbook of Research on Teaching （3rd ed.） , New York： MacMillan pp. 214–
229.
Wyatt, G. （1992）. Skipping class: An analysis of absenteeism among first-year college
students. Teaching Sociology, 20, 201-207.