Barabasi, A. L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3-4), 590-614.
Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377.
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895.
Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79.
Britannica, Encyclopadia. (2013). Claude Shannon. Retrieved 13 January, 2013, from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/538577/Claude-Shannon
Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187-203.
Education Association of Library and Information Science. (2010). LIS Research Areas Classification Scheme. Retrieved Dec. 27, 2012, from http://www.alise.org/classification-scheme
Franceschet, Massimo, & Costantini, Antonio. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540-553. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.003
Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, 257-276.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
Hellsten, I., Lambiotte, R., Scharnhorst, A., & Ausloos, M. (2007). Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists'' field mobility? Scientometrics, 72(3), 469-486. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1680-5
Isaac, P. D., Quinlan, S. V., & Walker, M. M. (1992). Faculty perceptions of the doctoral dissertation. Journal of Higher Education, 63(3), 241-268
Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31-43. doi: 10.1007/bf02018100
Kretschmer, H., Liming, L., & Kundra, R. (2001). Chinese-Indian-German collaboration results that provided the impetus for the foundation of COLLNET. Scientometrics, 52(3), 445-456
Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5200-5205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307545100
Ni, C., & Sugimoto, C. (2012). Using doctoral dissertations for a new understanding of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. Paper presented at the ASIST 2012 Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD.
Price, D. J. D., & Beaver, D. D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011-1018.
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
Stokes, T. D., & Hartley, J. A. (1989). Coauthorship, social-structure and influence within specialties. Social Studies of Science, 19(1), 101-125. doi: 10.1177/030631289019001003
Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C. Q., Russell, T. G., & Bychowski, B. (2011). Academic Genealogy as an Indicator of Interdisciplinarity: An Examination of Dissertation Networks in Library and Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1808-1828. doi: 10.1002/asi.21568
Tang, R. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 54-63. doi: 10.1002/meet.1450410107
Urata, H. (1990). Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. Scientometrics, 18(3-4), 309-319. doi: 10.1007/bf02017767
White, H. D., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 111-126. doi: 10.1002/asi.10369
王梅玲(2005)。臺灣圖書資訊學系所教師專調查報告。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊, 25, 27-71. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2013)。吉尼係數 (Gini coefficient)。經濟小辭典。取用於民101年一月十三日,取自http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0001246
何蕙菩(2008)。圖書資訊學知識來源與知識擴散學科之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。余詠南(2008)。傳播學門碩士論文相關指導教師與研究主題之網絡分析研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。李亮、朱庆华(2008)。社会网络分析方法在合著分析中的实证研究。情報科學,26(4),549-555。
林頌堅(2010)。以詞語共現網絡分析探勘資訊傳播學領域的研究主題與關係。圖書資訊學研究,4(2),123-148。徐欣儀(2009)。1999-2009年我國圖書資訊學碩士論文調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。袁大鈺、唐牧群(2010)。跨領域學術社群之智識網絡結構初探:以臺灣科技與社會研究為例。圖書資訊學刊,8(2),125-163。張郁蔚(2009)。以直接引用、書目耦合及共同作者探討圖書資訊學跨學科之變遷(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。梁瓊方(2005)。臺灣圖書資訊學跨學科交流之分析:以「臺灣人文學引文索引資料庫」為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。陳昭珍、林承儀。(2012)。大學學術合作活躍度與學術生產力關係之探討。台灣資訊傳播學會年會暨研討會發表之進行中論文,臺北市世新大學。
陳馥蓉(2011)。圖書資訊領域2006-2010年跨機構知識擴散之研究(未出版之碩士論文)國立臺灣大學,臺北市。楊美華(2006)。台灣圖書資訊學門研究成果探析。數位傳播時代圖書資訊學研究與教育學術研討會發表之論文,國家圖書館。
歐陽崇榮、關中、童瓊慧、薛志峰(2006)。從期刊及碩博士論文分析探討台灣圖書資訊學之研究。教育資料與圖書館學, 43(4), 389-411。歐陽崇榮、羅麗莉、劉昌柏(Dec. 17, 2011)。從博碩士論文分析探討台灣圖書資訊學之研究。資訊科學與圖書館學進行中論文發表會發表之論文,淡江大學,新北市。羅思嘉、陳光華、林純如。(2001)。圖書資訊學學術文獻主題分類體系之研究,圖書資訊學刊, 16, 123-140.國家圖書館臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/
世新大學網站。http://www.shu.edu.tw/
交通大學網站。http://www.nctu.edu.tw/
淡江大學網站。http://www.tku.edu.tw/
中興大學網站。http://www.nchu.edu.tw/index1.php
政治大學網站。http://www.nccu.edu.tw/
臺灣大學網站。http://www.ntu.edu.tw/
臺灣師範大學網站。http://www2.ntnu.edu.tw/
輔仁大學網站。http://www.fju.edu.tw/