臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

圖書館網站是一個圖書館服務的延伸，其扮演著圖書館與讀者溝通的重要橋樑。在一個網站中，標籤設計的良窳會影響使用者是否能準確且有效的獲取資訊。因此本研究以台灣之大學校院圖書館網站標籤為探討個案，將網站標籤透過索引典的方式建構，以達標籤中的詞彙控制以及語意間關係建立的目的，幫助使用者更為清楚的了解網站標籤各組詞彙的涵義，進而提升使用者資訊搜尋效率以及網站尋獲度。
本研究設計主要分為三個階段，第一個階段為底層標籤認知調查訪問，藉以瞭解圖書館員、專業使用者以及一般使用者對於網站標籤的認知異同;第二階段為專業使用者建構網站標籤索引典，建立圖書館網站標籤彼此間語意關係;第三階段為一般使用者進行卡片分類法實驗，運用網站標籤索引典，協助其進行卡片分類法。最後透過群集分析圖比較三種身分所選定的標籤組在索引典的輔助下其尋獲度效益為何?
經研究結果顯示，可以支持建置索引典確實能夠為使用者帶來實質上網站標籤認知效益的提升，同時也可以提升使用者進行卡片分類法的信心。而群集分析樹狀圖取得研究結果，可得圖書館網站的使用者，透過索引典的輔助於一般使用者所選定的標籤組進行卡片分類時最有效益。

Library website is an extension of a library service, which plays an important bridge of communication between the library and readers. The quality of the label designin a library websitewill affect the user on acquiringaccurate and valid information.Therefore, this study took all of the Taiwan’s university libraries’ website labels for study case. In this study, researchers constructedthe library website labels thesaurus, and controlledthe vocabulary of the labels and the relations of semantic in order to help the users get more clearly understand to the website labels, and thus enhance the efficiency of finding information.
This research is investigated in three stages, the first stage is the investigation of bottom label recognizationwhich is aimed atrealizingthe differencesof website recognization among library employees, researchers and general users.The second stageis for the researchers, who set up website label thesaurus in order to build the connection between the library website labels.The third stage is the experiment of cards sorting for general users. Using website label thesaurus to assist the users in conducting the cards sorting experiment.In the end, the research compares the findability with assistance from thesaurus oflabel teams, which are picked up by three identification through the experiment results.
The study shown that website label thesaurus can not onlyprovide users with better understanding of the labels but alsoenhance users’ confidence when they were conducting card sorting tests. The results of the experimentalso indicated thatthe label team which is chosen from the general users presentedthe best findability by taking the thesaurus for sorting reference.

摘要..................................................................................................... I ABSTRACT............................................................................................II
目次.................................................................................................... IV
表次..................................................................................................... V
圖次.................................................................................................... VI
第一章 緒論 ..........................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機.....................................................................................1 第二節 研究目的與問題............................................................................3 第三節 研究範圍與限.制...........................................................................3 第四節 名詞解釋.....................................................................................4
第二章 文獻探討 ....................................................................................6 第ㄧ節 網站構........................................................................................6 第二節 索引典.......................................................................................10 第三節 卡片分類法.................................................................................15 第四節 網站架構評估..............................................................................22
第三章 研究設計與實施 ............................................................................25 第一節 研究個案及研究對象......................................................................26 第二節 研究方法與步驟.............................................................................28
第四章 研究結果與分析 ............................................................................35 第一節 網站底層標籤認知調查訪問結果.......................................................35 第二節 大學圖書館網站標籤索引典建置.......................................................39 第三節 卡片分類法實施階段討論................................................................51 第四節 網站架構分類結果..........................................................................55
第五章 結論與建議 ..................................................................................61 第一節 結論.............................................................................................61 第二節 建議.............................................................................................65
參考文獻.................................................................................................67

表次
表 2- 1 學者對卡片分類法的相關見解 .......................................................16 表 2- 2 研究者於卡片分類法建議使用卡片數量 ...........................................20 表 2- 3 研究者於卡片分類法建議之受試人數 ..............................................21 表 4- 1 底層標籤認知調查受訪者背景 .......................................................36 表 4- 2 底層標籤認知受試者討論時間 .......................................................36 表 4- 3 卡片分類法之受試者詳細資料 .......................................................51 表 4- 4 各組受試者詳細的分類時間 ..........................................................52 表 4- 5 索引典參照符號 ..........................................................................41 表 4- 6 網站標籤索引典 ..........................................................................44 表 4- 7 群集分析樹狀圖分析結果 .............................................................59
v
圖次
圖 3- 1 研究流程與步驟 ..............................................................................29 圖 4- 1 網站底層標籤認知清單範例 ..............................................................37 圖 4- 2 索引典建構程序 ..............................................................................41 圖 4- 3 群集分析樹狀圖,架構 A ...................................................................56 圖 4- 4 群集分析樹狀圖,架構 B.....................................................................57 圖 4- 5 群集分析樹狀圖,架構 C....................................................................58

中文部分
呂智惠、謝建成、楊康苓（2014）。階層標籤建構者對大學圖書館網站尋獲度影響之研究。圖書資訊學研究，9(1)，131-170。
李連揮（1977）。索引典與索引方法。圖書資訊科學，3，192-202。
林信成、歐陽慧、歐陽崇榮（2003年5月）。主題地圖及其在索引典之應用。2003年資訊科技與圖書館學術研討會，台北淡水。
陳建勳（譯）（2007）。資訊架構學：網站應用，第三版（原作者：P. Morville & L. Rosenfeld）。臺北市：美商歐萊禮。（原著出版年：2006）
蔡維君（2006）。大學圖書館網站好用性評估—以臺灣大學圖書館網站為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
鄭美玲（2000）。以《心經》為基礎建置般若經索引典之探討(碩士論文)。淡江大學，新北市。
蕭潔（2012）。基於索引典概念探討大學圖書館網站標籤之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
謝建成、丁依玲、陳慧倫（2011）。大學圖書館網站資訊尋獲度之研究。資訊管理學報，18(3)，25-49。
謝建成、吳怡青（2010）。改進修正型德菲式卡片分類法探討大學圖書館網站尋獲度之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，47(3)，245-281。
魏澤群（2005）。使用者最大：從優使性（Usability）出發的網站設計原則。台北市：網弈資訊科技
 
西文部分
Aitchison, J. , Gilchrist, A., & Bawden, D. (2000).Thesaurus Construction and Use: A Practical Manual(4th ed).London: ASLIB/IMI, 5-14.
Boulton, M. (2004). Card sorting. Part 1. In D. Spencer & J. J. Garrett (Eds.), Card sorting: designing usable categories. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.
Courage, C., & Baxter, K. (2004). Understanding your users: A practical guide to user requirements methods, tools, and techniques. San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Coxon, A. P. M. (1999). Sorting data: collection and analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Deaton, M. (2002). Sorting techniques for user-centered information design.
Deaton, M. (2003). The elements of user experience: user-centered design for the Web. Interactions, 10(5), 49-51.
Denton, W. (2003).How to make a faceted classification and put it on the Web. Retrieved from http://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-web-howto.html
Dixon, K., & Lowcay, B (2007).Creating a great website. Retrieved from http://www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php?file=/elib/lib/downloaded_files/publications/pdfs/phcris_pub_1214.pdf
Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems, 22(3), 89-93.
Fox, R. (2008). Weaving the digital library web.OCLC Systems & Services, 24(1), 8-17.
Fuccella, J., & Pizzolato, J. (1998). Creating web site designs based on user expectations and feedback. Paper presented at the Internetworking.
Genius, S. K. (2004). Web site usability testing: a critical tool for libraries. Feliciter, 50(4), 161-164.
Hahsler, M., & Simon, B. (2001). User-centered navigation re-design for web-based information systems. Retrieved from http://www.wu.ac.at/usr/wi/bsimon/publikationen/navigation_re-design_amcis.pdf
Kaufman, J. (2006). Card sorting: An inexpensive and practical usability technique. Retrieved from http://unraveled.com/publications/assets/card_sorting/Card_Sorting-Kaufman.pdf
Martin, S., & Kidwell, D. K. (2001). A case study in cluster analysis for intranet organization. Paper presented at the Engineering Management for Applied Technology, 2001. EMAT 2001. Proceedings. 2nd International Workshop on.
Mcgaw, J. (2009). Search Engine Optimization. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/k5x797x36222m808/fulltext.pdf
Morville.,P.& Rosenfeld.,L. (2006).Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
Nielsen, J. (2009). Card Sorting: Pushing Users Beyond Terminology Matches. Retrieved from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/word-matching.html
Robertson, J. (2001). Information design using card sorting. Retrieved from http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cardsorting/index.html
Rugg, G., & McGeorge, P. (2005). The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Systems, 22(3), 94-107.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability: context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (Eds.), Human factors for informatics usability, (pp. 21-37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Soergel, D. (1974). Indexing Language & Thesaurus: Construction & Maintenance.Melville Pub.Co.
Spencer, D., & Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: a definitive guide. Retrieved from http://boxesandarrows.com/card-sorting-a-definitive-guide
Toub, S. (2000). Evaluating information architecture : a practical guide to assessing web site organization. Retrieved from http://argus-acia.com/white_papers/evaluating_ia.pdf
Tullis, T., & Wood, L. (2004). How many users are enough for a cardsorting study? Retrieved from http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/UPA2004CardSorting.pdf
Upchurch, L., Rugg, G., & Kitchenham, B. (2001). Using card sorts to elicit web page quality attributes. Ieee software, 18(4), 84-89.
Walbridge, S. (2000). Usability testing and libraries: The WSU experience. The Washington Library Association Journal, 16(3), 23-24.
Zimmermann, T. (2005). Information Architecture. Retrieved from http://www14.in.tum.de/konferenzen/Jass05/courses/6/Papers/03.pdf