當科技發展到至極致，人們的消費觀已然改變，開始追求展現個人風格與創意設計的產品，因而導致手感產品大受歡迎，市場進入一個新的消費時代，一個追求個性的年代。
手感產品業者發揮自己的創造力製作產品，但一味的創作、生產，對於消費者的購買決策因素不了解，將造成製造後產品無法銷售。因此，手感產品製造者的問題已不是如何做好商品，而是如何掌握消費者需求，了解商品帶給顧客的感受，進而有效影響顧客最終的消費者策，這才是當前手感產品業者最重要的工作。
本研究經由相關文獻探討，以消費者行為中的Engel – Kollat - Blackwell Model，提出消費者購買決策三大構面（產品訊息、顧客價值與溝通管道），透過專家討論，建立家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策衡量構面及層級架構。之後製作AHP層級分析問卷，以直接面對消費者、對消費者有整體性了解之消費新聞記者及家飾業業主為問卷發放對象，問卷回收後運用層級分析法(AHP)進行量化分析。
本研究結果發現，消費者之家飾類手感產品購買決策中，第一層要素中權重最重者為產品訊息，其次依序為顧客價值與溝通管道。「產品訊息」評估要素相對權重分析結果，外在訊息最高之前4項，依重要性排序分別為品牌、保證、價格、商品來源，內在訊息則為品質、功能；「顧客價值」前4項依序為功能性、情感性、社會性、享受性；「溝通管道」部份，口碑比廣告重要，至於通路則實體通路為主要選擇。
依據本文研究結果可知，對於家飾類手感產品，消費者之顧客價值仍是理性（功能性）與感性（情感性）並重，並且須透過實體產品之體驗及前人經驗傳遞，方能進行購買決策。

In the past decades, the consumer’s needs have changed radically. They are eager to get not only innovative but also individual style products. That is why the hand-touching products are welcome in this consumptive era.
The hand-touching products makers always design and manufacture goods depending on their own ideas. These ideas perhaps do not meet the customer’s requirements for neglecting customers’ purchasing decision-making elements.
Nowadays the problems for hand-touching products makers are not only to know how to make the best goods but also to know well the customers’ needs. That means the most important jobs for these makers are to understand the customers’ purchasing decision-making elements.
Deriving from Engel-Kollat-Blackwell Model, purchasing decision-making elements of home-decorate products are classified to three dimensions: Product Information, Customers Value and Communication Channels. Under these dimensions, hierarchical dimensions are developed by expert panel discussion and designed as AHP questionnaire delivered to those who well know products and customers’ habits, including fashion-news journalists and shop owners.
Survey data are analyzed by expert choice 2000, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) software to get the following results.
When the customer purchase the home-decorate products. The most important element in the First-Level of decision-making is Products Information, Customers Value and Communication Channels in the next place.
The Second-Level elements under the Products’-Information are divided to Internal Information and External Information. The importance sequence of Internal Information are brand, guarantee, price and source, and quality and function for the External Information.
The importance sequence of the Second-Level elements under Customers Value are functional, emotional, socialize and enjoyable. In the Second-Level elements under Communication Channels, public praise is more important than advertisement, and physical channel is more important than virtual channel under Communication Channels.
According to this study, when customers want to purchase a home-decorate products, they will focus on both rational and emotional feeling. They prefer physical store to have a purchase experience and will be easily influenced by the public praise.

摘 要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌 謝 IV
目 次 V
表目次 VI
圖目次 VIII
第一章 緖論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 手感產品 5
第二節 消費者行為 7
第三節 本研究組成要素評估 14
第三章 研究設計 36
第一節 研究方法及研究工具 36
第二節 問卷發放對象 44
第三節 研究架構 45
第四節 問卷設計 48
第五節 本章小結 49
第四章 研究結果 50
第一節 問卷基本資料分析 50
第二節 整體家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策要素之評析 51
第三節 家飾店業者針對家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策要素之評析 58
第四節 消費新聞記者針對家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策要素之評析 65
第五節 綜合分析比較 72
第五章 結論與建議 78
第一節 結論 78
第二節 研究建議 80
參考文獻 82
附 錄 92
表 目 次
表2- 1各學者對消費者行為定義 8
表2-2學者對顧客價值匯整表 28
表2-3本研究組成要素文獻歸納 33
表3- 1層級分析法之評量尺度定義與說明 40
表3- 2 隨機指標表 42
表3- 3層級分析法之優、缺點 44
表3- 4家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策構面及要素評估準則 47
表4- 1整體家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策要素第二層次構面權重表 51
表4- 2「產品訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 51
表4- 3「溝通管道」項下各評估因素權重表 52
表4- 4「產品外在訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 52
表4- 5「產品內在訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 53
表4- 6「顧客價值」項下各評估因素權重表 53
表4- 7「溝通媒介」項下各評估因素權重表 54
表4- 8「通路特性」項下各評估因素權重表 54
表4- 9「實體商店」項下各評估因素權重表 54
表4-10「網路商店」項下各評估因素權重表 55
表4-11第四層級各因素標準化之整體相對權重及排序表 56
表4- 12第五層級各因素標準化之整體相對權重及排序表 57
表4- 13家飾店業者針對手感產品消費者購買決策要素第二層次構面權重表 58
表4- 14「產品訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 58
表4- 15「溝通管道」項下各評估因素權重表 59
表4- 16「產品外在訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 59
表4- 17「產品內在訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 60
表4-18「顧客價值」項下各評估因素權重表 60
表4- 19「溝通媒介」項下各評估因素權重表 61
表4- 20「通路特性」項下各評估因素權重表 61
表4- 21 「實體商店」項下各評估因素權重表 62
表4- 22「網路商店」項下各評估因素權重表 62
表 目 次
表4- 23第四層級各因素標準化之整體相對權重及排序表 63
表4- 24第五層級各因素標準化之整體相對權重及排序表 64
表4-25消費新聞記者針對手感產品消費者購買決策要素第二層級構面權重表 65
表4- 26「產品訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 65
表4- 27「溝通管道」項下各評估因素權重表 66
表4- 28「產品外在訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 66
表4- 29「產品內在訊息」項下各評估因素權重表 67
表4- 30「顧客價值」項下各評估因素權重表 67
表4- 31「溝通媒介」項下各評估因素權重表 68
表4- 32「通路特性」項下各評估因素權重表 68
表4- 33「實體商店」項下各評估因素權重表 68
表4- 34「網路商店」項下各評估因素權重表 69
表4- 35第四層級各因素標準化之整體相對權重及排序表 70
表4- 36第五層級各因素標準化之整體相對權重及排序表 71
表4- 37消費新聞記者與家飾業主購買決策要素第二層次構面權重表比較 72
表4- 38消費新聞記者與家飾業主針對「產品訊息」權重比較表 73
表4- 39消費新聞記者與家飾業主針對「溝通管道」權重比較表 73
表4-40消費新聞記者與家飾業主針對「產品外在訊息」要素權重比較表 73
表4-41消費新聞記者與家飾業主針對「產品內在訊息」要素權重比較表 74
表4-42消費新聞記者與家飾業主針對「顧客價值」要素權重比較表 74
表4- 43消費記者與家飾業主對「溝通管道」「通路特性」要素權重比較表 75
表4-44消費新聞記者與家飾業主對「實體商店」要素權重比較表 75
表4-45消費新聞記者與家飾業主對「實體商店」要素權重比較表 75
表4-46消費新聞記者與家飾業主針對第四層級權重比較表 76
表4-47消費新聞記者與家飾業主針對第四層級權重比較表 77
圖 目 次
圖1- 1研究流程 4
圖2- 1 EKB消費者決策程序模式 11
圖2- 2家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策要素第二層構面 14
圖2- 3家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策產品訊息要素 22
圖2- 4顧客附加價值的決定因素 24
圖2- 5消費價值的理論模式 26
圖2- 6家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策顧客價值要素 29
圖2- 7家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策溝通媒介要素 30
圖2- 8家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策特路特性要素 33
圖3- 1 AHP完整層級示意圖 38
圖3- 2 AHP不完整層級示意圖 39
圖3- 3手感產品消費者購買決策要素層級分析圖 46
圖3- 4家飾類手感產品消費者購買決策要素問卷 49

一、中文部分
1.朱俐穎(2007)。「手感如何經濟－台灣創意市。集的消費、經營及其問題」。碩士論文，臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所，台北。
2.金玉梅、李仁芳、吳昭怡、陳俊良（2006）。手感經濟。台北：天下雜誌股份有限公司。
3.黃淑琴、賴志松(2008)。「手感產品之價值與利益評價力分析」。聯大學報，第五卷，第1期，第 159-179頁。
4.祝鳳岡(1998)，廣告策略之研討-系統建構觀點，廣告學研究，第十集，國立政治大學廣告系。
5.陳正男、丁學勤(2001)。「融入技術服務、功能服務於顧客滿意度模式之研究」。交大管理學報，第21卷第2期，第113-146頁。
6.呂玉華(1990)。「產品特質」、「資訊價值」與「企業行銷策略」關係之研究。碩士論文，國立政治大學企管研究所。台北。
7.今川淳(1989)。「感性消費、理性消費─你是哪一種消費者？」，鄭美秀譯業強出版社。
8.湯重熹、曹瑞忻(1999)。「設計力就是競爭力－品設計理念與實務」，淑馨出版社。
9.黃俊霖 (2001)，「產品設計、美感價值與消費者反應階層模式間關係之研究」。碩士論文，第一科技大學行銷與流通管理學研究所, 高雄。
10.陳定國(1992)。「行銷管理導論」，五南圖書出版。
11.鄭兆龍(2000)。「消費價值與設計風格偏好性之研究-以家具為例」。碩士論文，大葉大學工業設計研究所，彰化。
12.林素吟(2005)。產品保證與品牌知名度對顧客忠誠度的影響之研究，中華管理評論國際學報，第8卷，第1期，第1-19頁。
13.宋伊可(2002)。「消費者對產品外觀價值感認知差異之研究-以行動電話為例」。碩士論文，國立台北科技大學創新設計研究所，台北。
14.古庭諭、陳建宇(2007)。「網路商店與實體商店開店決策」。2007決策分析研討會，元智大學工業工程與管理學系，桃園。
15.秦兆瑋(2002)，「製造來源國形象、消費者心理認知與知覺價格對消費者購買行為之影響─以兩岸都會區消費者為例」。碩士論文，長榮管理學院經營管理研究所，台南。
16.張峻榮(2002)。「擔保可信度、保證明確度對產品保證效用與購買意願之影響—考慮產品類別及產品知識之干擾效果」。碩士論文，國立政治大學企業管理學系，台北。
17.林連宗(2002)。「連鎖經營與影響顧客消費相關因素之調查研究」。碩士論文，大葉大學事業經營研究所，彰化。
18.李振妮（1999）。「網路消費者購買決策行為之研究」。碩士論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。高雄。
19.鄭力嘉(1998)。「影響網路使用者採行線上購物因素之研究」。碩士論文，國立屏東大學資訊管理研究所，屏東。
20.袁平成(1997)，經營網路購物成功的法則，貿易週刊，1772期，第10-11頁。
21.張紹勳(2001)，企業對消費者電子商務之關係品質模式，廣告學研究，16集，第55-81頁。
22.楊宙航(2002)。「產品品牌造形風格之識別研究-以行動電話為例」。碩士論文，銘傳大學設計管理研究所，台北。
23.李奇勳(2001) 。「價格、保證及來源國形象對產品評價與購買意願的影響」。碩士論文，國立成功大學企業管理學系，台南。
24.鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989)。「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」。中國統計學報，第二十七卷，第六期，第5-22 頁。
25.鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989)。「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)」。中國統計學報，第二十七卷，第七期，第1-20 頁。
二、英文部分
1.Kahle, L. R., & Kennedy, P. (1989). Using the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2 (4), 49-56.
2.Kotler, P. and Gertner D. (2002). Country as Brand, Product, and Beyond: APlace marketing and Brand Management Perspective. Journal of BrandManagement, Vol. 9, No. 4/5, April, pp.249-261.
3.Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Managemen. Prentice Hall, USA.
4.Schmitt(1999)，體驗行銷，經典傳訊，pp.176.
5.Walters,C.Glenn & Paul W.Gordon(1970)，Consumer Behaviors：an Intergrated Framework，Richard D. Irwin Inc.
6.Schiffman, Leon G. and Leslie Lazar Kanuk (1991), Consumer Behavior, Seventh Edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
7.Engel, J.F., R. D. Blackwall, and P. W. Miniard (1990), Consumer Behavior (6th ed.). The Dryden Press, pp.482.
8.Pratt, J. W. (1974), Measuring Purchase Behavior in Handbook of Marketing. Robert Ferber ed., McGraw-Hill Co.
9.Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., 及 Blackwell, R. D. (1993). Consumer behavior 7th ed. Orlando Florido: Dryden Press.
10.Engel,J.F., et al. (1993)，Consumer Behavior，7th ed.，Chicago Dryden
11.Schiffman,L.G. & Kanuk,L.L(1991)，Consumer Behavior，2nd ed.，New JerseyPrentice-Hall，pp.4-5.
12.Gerald, Z. & Melanie, W. (1987). Consumer behavior:Basic finding and management implications. NY:JohnWily and Sons.
13.Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impacts on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 223-231.
14.Brucks,M. (1985), “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior.” Journalof Consumer Research, 12, No.1, pp.1-16.
15.Marks, L.J. and J.C. Olson (1981), “Toward a Cognitive Structure Conceptualization of Product Familiarity.”Advances in Consumer Research, 8, No.1, pp.145-151.
16.Monroe, K.B. (1976), “The Influence of Price Differences and Brand Familiarity on Brand Preferences.”Journal of Consumer Research, 3, No.1, pp.42-49.
17.Gardner, M.P. (1984), “Advertising Effects on Attributes Recalled and Criteria Used for Brand Evaluations.”Journal of Consumer Research, 10, No.3, pp.310-318.
18.Staelin, R. (1978), “The Effects of Consumer Education on Consumer Product Safety Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research, 5, No.1, pp.30-40.
19.Russo, J.E. and J.J. Eric (1980), “What Do Consumers Know About Familiar Produces ?” Advancesin Consumer Research, 7, pp.417-424.
20.Kanwar, R., J.C. Olson and L.S. Sims (1981), “Toward Conceptualizing and Measuring CognitiveStructures.” Advances in Consumer Research, 8, No.1, pp.122-128.
21.Moorthy, Sridhar ,Brian T. Ratchford and Debabrata Talukdar(1997)”Consumer Information Search Revisited: Theory and Empirical Analysis“ Journal of Consumer Research Vol. 23 pp263-277
22.Sharon, E. Betty and Scott, M. Smith（1987），“External Search Effort：An Investigation Across Several Product Categories“，Journal of Consumer Research，Vol.14，83-95。
23.Loudon, D. and A. J. D. Bitta (1988)，Consumer Behavior：Concepts & Applications，3 rd ed.，N.Y.：McGraw-Hill.
24.Nicosia, F.M. (1968), “Consumer Decision Process”, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
25.Howard, J. A. (1989). Customer Behavior in Marketing Strategy.Prentice-Hall Inc.
26.Howard, J. A., and Sheth, J. A. (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior.New York, John Wiley & Sons.
27.Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer Behavior as Risk-taking. In Hancock, R. S.(ed.), Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Chacigo: AMA,pp.389-398.
28.Fisk,George.(1961) “A Conceptual Model for Studying CustomerImage,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.37,No.4,Winter,pp.1-8.
29.Martineau,Pierre.(1958). “The Personality of the Retail store ,” Harvard Business Review. Vol.36,pp.47-55.
30.Hoffman, D.L. and Novak, T.P. (1996), Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments：Conceptual Foundations, Journal of Marketing, 60（Jul.）, pp.50-68.
31.Szymamski, D.M. and Hise, R.T. (2000), E-Satisfaction：An Initial Examination, Journal of Retailing, 76（3）,pp.309-322.
32.Liang, T. P. and Lai, H. J. (2001), Effect of Store Design on Consumer Purchases：on Empirical Study of on-line Bookstores, Information and Management, 39（6）, pp.431-444.
33.Sandra, M. F. and Bo, S. (2003), Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping, Journal of Business Research, 56, pp. 867-875.
34.Herr P. M., Kardes F. R., Kim J.(1991). Effects of Word-of-Mouth andProduct-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17, No.4,March, pp.454-462.
35.Feldman, Sidney P. and Spencer, M. C. (1965). The Effect of PersonalInfluence in the Selection of Consumer Services. in Proceedings of the FallConference of the American Marketing Association, Chicago: AmericanMarketing Association, pp.440-452.
36.Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative Word-of –Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: APilot Study. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47, Winter, pp.68-78.
37.Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., and Gross, B. L.(1991). Why We Buy What WeBuy: A Theory of Consumption Values. Journal of Business Research,Vol.22, Iss.2, pp.159.
38.Holbrook, M. B.(1994). The Nature of Customer Value: An Axiology ofServices in the Consumption Experience. in R. T. Rust and R. L. Oliver(eds) Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, ThousandOaks, CA: Sage, pp.21-71.
39.Holbrook, M. B.(1996). Customer Value-A Framework for Analysis andResearch. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.23, pp.138-142.
40.Holbrook, M. B.(1999). Introduction to Consumer Value. in Morris B. Holbrook(eds) Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research, New York:Routledge, pp.1-28.
41.Leavitt, H. J. (1954). A Note on Some Experimental Findings About the Meaning of Price. Journal of Business, Vol. 27, July, pp.205-210.
42.Levitt T. (1960). Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38, July-August,pp.24-47.
43.Olson, J. C. and Jacoby J. (1972). Cue Utilization in the Quality PerceptionProcess. in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of the Associationfor Consumer Research, pp.167-179.
44.Oxenfeldt, A. R.(1974). Developing a Favorable Price-Quality Image. Journalof Retailing , Winter , Vol. 50 , No.4 , pp. 8-14.
45.Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an Information Cue: Effect on Product Evaluations.Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior, pp.267-286.
46.Olshavsky, R. W. (1985). Perceived Quality in Consumer Decision Making: AnIntegrated Theoretical Perspective. in Perceived Quality: How ConsumerView Stores and Merchandise, pp.3-29.
47.Bishop, W. R., Jr. (1984). Competitive Intelligence. Progressive Grocer (March),pp.19-20.
48.Doyle, M. (1984). New Ways of Measuring Value. Progressive Grocer-Value,Executive Report, pp.15-19.
49.Shimp, A. and Bearden W. O. (1982). Warrant and Other Extrinsic Cue Effect onConsumer Risk Perception. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9, June,pp.38-46.
50.Lincoln, C.W.(1965). Total Brand Indentification Through Packaging. NewDirections in Marketing, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
51.Semenik, R. J. (2002). Promotion and Integrated Marketing Communication.Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern, Thomson Learning.
52.Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: AMeans-Ends Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing,Vol.52, July, pp.2-22.
53.Banks, S. (1950). The Measurement of the Effect of a New Packaging MaterialUpon Preference and Sales. Journal of Business, Vol. 23, pp.71-80.
54.Brown, R. L. (1958). Wrapper Influence on the Perception of Freshness in Bread.
55.Bloch, P. H. (1995), Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response, Journal of Marketing, Vol.59(3), pp.16-29.
56.Gardner, B. B. (1967). The Package as a Communication. Marketing forTomorrow –Today, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association
57.Raphael, H. J. and Olsson D. (1978). Package Production Management.Connecticut: Avi Publishing Company, Inc.
58.Rosenfeld, J. (1987). Packaging Wraps Up Sales. Marketing Communications,Vol.12, pp.43-48.
59.Prone, M. (1993). Package Design has Stronger ROI Potential Than ManyBelieve. Marketing News, October, pp.13.
60.Udell, J. G. & E. E. Anderson(1968), “The Product Warranty as an Element ofCompetitive Strategy,” Journal of Marketing, 32, pp.1-8.
61.Innis & Unnava,(1991),” The Usefulness of Product Warranties for Reputable and New Brands,” Advance in Consumer Research, Vol.18, pp.317-322.
62.Blair, E.E. & innis D.E.(1996). The Effof Product knowledge on the Evaluation of Warranteed Brands. Psychology & Marketing, 13 August, p445-456.
63.Han, C.M. and V. Terpstra(1988), “Country-of-Origin Effect for Uni-National and Bi-NationalProducts,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.19(Summer), pp.235-253.
64.Ahmed, Sadrudin A. and Alain d’Astous , (1996), “Country-of-Origin and Brand Effects: AMulti- Dimensional and Multi- Attribute Study,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing.,Vol. 9(2), pp.93-115.
65.Nagashima, A. (1970), “A comparison of Japanese and U.S. Attitudes toward Foreign Products,”Journal of Marketing, Vol.34 (January), pp.68-74.
66.Baxter, M. (1995). Product Design-Practical methods for the systematic development of new products. Chapman & Hall.
67.Ferebee, A. (1970). A history of design from the Victorian era to the present.Journal of Marketing, Vol.45,pp.8.
68.Crosby, P. B.(1979)， Quality is Free： The art of making quality certain. New York： New American Library.