參考書目
一、中文部分
王瓊珠（民81）。國小六年級閱讀障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀認知能力之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。王英君（民89）。國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。王佳玲（民90）。國小不同閱讀理解能力學生在不同難度、文體文章閱讀理解表現及方式之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。邱上真、洪碧霞（民88）。國民小學語文低成就學童的篩選。學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會論文。
吳武典等（民85）。托尼非語文智力測驗指導手冊。台北：心理出版社。
吳麗寬（民89）。合作學習對國小學習障礙學生閱讀理解效果與同儕社會關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。吳訓生（民89）。國小低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解策略教學效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之博士論文。李俊仁（民88）。聲韻處理能力和閱讀理解能力的關係。國立中正大學心理學研究所未出版之博士論文。李映伶（民91）。聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解策略之個案研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。何素玲(民91)。國小資源班教師實施交互教學法之實務知識探究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。何嘉雯(民92)。交互教學法對國小閱讀困難學生教學成效之研究。國立台南師範學院特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。林國花（民79）。國小閱讀障礙兒童成就與能力差距鑑定方式之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。林建平(民83)。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版之博士論文。林玟慧（民84）。閱讀理解策略教學對國中閱讀障礙學生閱讀效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。林宜真（民87）。閱讀障礙學生與普通學生閱讀理解方式之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。林佩欣（民93）。交互教學法對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解學習效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。林寶貴、錡寶香（民89）。中文閱讀理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，19，79-104。林寶貴、錡寶香（民91）。中文閱讀理解測驗指導手冊。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育中心印行。
林慧芳（民91）。國小六年級低閱讀能力學生工作記憶與推論能力之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。林惠芬、林宏熾（民89）。國小學習障礙學生聽覺理解錯誤類型分析研究。特殊教育學報，14，233-256。柯華葳(民81)。台灣地區閱讀研究文獻回顧。輯於國立中正大學（主編），中國語文心理學第一年度結案報告（頁31-76）。嘉義：國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
柯華葳(民86)。中文閱讀歷程成分研究：兒童在閱讀理解上的困難。輯於第五屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集，教學應用組（頁399-405）。
柯華葳（民88）。閱讀能力的發展。輯於曾進興（主編），語言病理學基礎，第三卷（頁83-119）。台北：心理出版社。
柯華葳、李俊仁（民88）。閱讀困難的理論架構及驗證。輯於國立中正大學（主編），學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會論文集（頁114-128）。嘉義：國立中正大學。
柯華葳(民90)。語文科的閱讀教學。輯於李永吟（主編），學習輔導：學習心理學的應用（頁307-349）。台北：心理出版社。
洪碧霞、邱上真（民86）。國民小學國語文低成就學童篩選工具系列發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，15，83-107。洪慧芳（民82）。文字組合規則與漢語閱讀障礙—對漢語閱讀障礙學生的一項追蹤研究。國立中正大學心理學研究所未出版之碩士論文。洪蘭、曾志朗、張稚美（民82）。閱讀障礙兒童的認知心理學基礎。輯於台北市教師研習中心（主編），學習障礙與資源教室（頁74-86）。台北：台北市教師研習中心。
洪麗瑜（民84）。學習障礙者教育。台北：心理出版社。
胡永崇（民84）。後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之博士論文。胡志偉、楊乃欣（民81）。閱讀中文的心理歷程：80年代研究的回顧與展望。輯於國立中正大學（主編），中國語文心理學第一年度結案報告。嘉義：國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
胡志偉（民84）。中文字的心理歷程。輯於曾進興（主編），語言病理學基礎：第一卷（頁31-76）。台北：心理出版社。
涂志賢（民87）。相互教學法對國小六年級學童國語科閱讀理解、後設認知、自我效能影響之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
徐麗球（民88）。國語文低成就學童閱讀能力亞型探討。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。許淑玫(民89)。國小六年級閱讀小組實施交互教學之個案研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。連啟舜（民91）。國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之綜合分析。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版之碩士論文。教育部（民91）。特殊教育統計年報。http：//www.set.edu.
tw 。台北：教育部。
教育部統計處（民92）。國民小學概況統計。http：//www.
edu.tw/statistics/index.htm。台北：教育部。
陳一平（民88）。閱讀障礙之Magno功能障礙假說。輯於國立中正大學（主編），學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會論文集（頁197-224）。嘉義：國立中正大學。
陳秀芬（民87）。中文一般字彙知識教學法在增進國小識字困難學生識字學習成效之探討。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系未出版之碩士論文。陳美芳（民86）。國小學童聽覺理解與聽覺記憶能力之研究：不同國語文程度學生的比較，特殊教育研究學刊，15，293-305。陳美芳（民87）。國小學童口語語言理解與閱讀理解能力之關係，特殊教育研究學刊，16，171-184。陳美芳（民88a）。國語文低成就學童口語理解能力的發展，特殊教育研究學刊，17，189-204。陳美芳（民88b）。學童口語理解能力之研究。學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會論文。
陳美芳（民92）。語文理解能力測驗之發展與效度分析，特殊教育研究學刊，24，1-14。陳淑麗（民85）。閱讀障礙學童聲韻能力發展之研究。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳姝嫈（民87）。叫名速度、工作記憶與國語文能力相關研究。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。陳慶順(民89)。識字困難學生與普通學生識字認知成分之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系未出版之碩士論文。郭生玉(民78)。心理與教育測驗。台北：精華。
黃瓊儀(民85)。相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。張春興（民82）。現代心理學。台北：東華書局。
雲林縣（民90）。雲林縣九十學年度心理評量教師研習手冊。雲林縣特殊學生鑑定及就學輔導委員會。
曾世杰（民85a）。閱讀障礙：研究方法簡介。輯於曾進興（主編），語言病理學基礎，第二卷（頁323-369）。台北：心理出版社。
曾世杰（民85b）。閱讀低成就學童及一般學童的閱讀歷程成份分析研究。國科會專題研究報告。
曾世杰（民86）。國語文低成就學生之工作記憶與聲韻處理能力之研究。國科會專題研究報告。
曾陳密桃(民79)。國民中小學童後設認知及其閱讀理解相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。楊榮昌（民91）。相互教學法對國小五年級學童閱讀理解、後設認知及閱讀動機之影響。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。錡寶香（民92）。國小低閱讀能力學童與一般閱讀能力學童的敘事能力：篇章凝聚之分析。特殊教育研究學刊，24，63-84。溫詩麗（民85）。北市國小閱讀障礙資源班學生認知能力組型之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系未出版之碩士論文。饒華真（民86）。國小閱讀低成就學生在朗讀測驗上錯誤訊息分析之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。詹文宏（民84）。後設認知策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解能力之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。詹文宏（民92）。交互教學法對高職特教班學生閱讀理解能力之研究。輯於國立彰化師範大學（主編），第八屆特殊教育課程與教學學術研討會論文集（頁1-28）。彰化：國立彰化師範大學。
廖凰伶（民89）。直接教學與全語教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解表現之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。鄭昭明（民70）。漢字認知的歷程。中華心理學刊，23（2），137-153。鄭昭明（民85）。認知心理學：理論與實踐。台北：桂冠出版社。
劉玲吟（民82）。後設認知閱讀策略的教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀效果的研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。劉信雄、曾世杰（民85）。閱讀低成就學童及一般學童的閱讀成果報告。（國科會補助專題研究報告微縮片NSC
83-0301-H-024-009）
蔡韻晴(民91)。雙缺陷假說在中文閱讀障礙之檢驗：各亞型認知成分之比較。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。藍慧君(民80)。學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構文章之閱讀理解策略的比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。蘇宜芬(民80)。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版之碩士論文。蘇淑貞、宋維村、徐澄清（民73）。中文閱讀障礙之類型及智力測驗。中華心理學刊，26（1），14-48。二、英文部分
Aaron, P. G. (1989). Dyslexia and hyperlexia. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academics.
Aaron, P. G., & Joshi, R. M. (1992). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation. New York: The Guilford Press.
Adams, M.J. (1994). Modeling the connections between word recognition and reading. In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal,35, 309-332.
Anderson, R.C., & Biddle, W.B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.9) ( pp.90-129). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, R.C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. Lesgold, J. Pellegrino, S. Fokkema & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction (pp.67-82).New York: Plenum.
Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In Pearson, P.D., Barr,R., Kamil, M.L. and Mosenthal, P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research . New York: Longman.
Barchers, S.I. (1998). Teaching reading from process to practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Bateman, B. (1992). Learning disabilities: The changing landscape. Journal of learning disabilities, 25, 29-36.
Bender, W.N.(2004). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A.L., & Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),Cognition and instruction: Issues and agendas (pp.393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carr, T.H., Brown, T.L., Vavrus, L.G., & Evans, M.A. (1990).Cognitive skill maps and cognitive skill profiles: Componential analysis of individual differences in children’s reading efficiency. In T. H. Carr & B.A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development. New York: Academic Press.
Clark, D.B. (1988). Dyslexia: Theory and practice of remedial instruction. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Clark, D.B. (1992). Beginning reading instruction for reading disabled and at-risk students. In S. A. Vogel (Ed.), Educational alternatives for students with learning disabilities (pp.67-90). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cunningham, A.E., Stanovich, K.E., & Wilson, M.R. (1990). Cognitive variation in adult college students differing in reading ability. In T.H. Carr & B.A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. New York: Academic Press.
Curtis, M.E. (1980). Development of components of reading skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656-669.
Deshler, D., Ellis, E., & Lenz, S. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver: Love.
Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J.B., Lenz, B. K., & Eillis, E. S. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for learning disabled adolescents: Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities,17, 170-187.
Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Donahue, P.L., Voekl, K.E. Campbell, J.R. & Mazzeo, J. (1999). The NAEP 1998 reading report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., & Mason, J. (1984). Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions. New York: Longman Inc.
Durkin. D. (1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 518-544.
Ellis, A.W. (1984). Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis. London: Erlbaum.
Ekwall,E., & Shanker, j. (1988). Diagnosis and remediation of the disabled reader (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Ekwall, E.E., & Shanker, J. L. (1989). Teaching reading in the elementary school. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. ( 1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fletcher, J., & Forman, B. (1994). Issues in definitions and measurement of learning disabilities. In G. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of children with learning disabilities (pp.185-202). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Gagne, E.D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown.
Gagne, E.D., Yekovich, C.W., & Yekovich, F.R. (1993).The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Williams, J.P., & Baker, S.(2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71 (2), 279-320.
Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. American psychologist, 45, 29-39.
Golinkoff, R.M. (1976). A comparison of reading com-
prehension processes in good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly.11, 623-669.
Hacker, D. J. & Tenent, A. (2002). Implementing Reciprocal Teaching in the Classroom: Overcoming Obstacles and Making Modifications. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 699-718.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (1992).Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Hammill, D.D. (1990).On defining learning disabilities: An emerging onsensus. Journal of learning disabilities, 23(2), 74-84.
Hannon, B. & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology,93 (1), 103-128.
Kaluger, G., & Kolson, C. J. (1978). Reading and learning disabilities(2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2000).Educating Exceptional Children(9th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kolligian, J., & Stermberg, R. J. (1987). Intelligence, information processing, and specific learning disabilities: A triarchic synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities,20(1), 8-17.
Kuncan, L., & Beck, I. L. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, Instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research,67(3), 271-299.
Lederer, J.M. (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities,33(1), 91-106.
Lerner, J.W. (2000). Learning disabilities：Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies(8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mjfflin Co.
Li, L. (2002). The role of phonology in reading Chinese single characters and two-character words with high, medium and low phonological regularities by Chinese grade 2 and grade 5 students. Reading Research Quarterly,37(4), 372-374.
Mandler, J.M. (1983). Representation. In J.H. Flavell & E.M. Markman (Eds.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology(vol.3). (pp.420-494). New York: Wiley.
Markman, E.M. (1979).Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child development, 50, 643-655.
Markman, E.M.(1981). Comprehension Monitoring. In W.P. Dickson(ed.), children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic press.
Marks, M., Pressley, M., Coley, J.D., Craig, S., Gardner, R., DePinto, W., Rose, W., et al.(1993). Three teachers’ adaptations of reciprocal teaching in comparison to traditional reciprocal teaching. The Elementary School Journal,94, 267-283.
Marsh ,G., Friedman ,M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental approach to reading acquisition. In T. G. Waller and G. E. MacKinnon(eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol.3, pp.23-45). New York: Academic Press.
McGuire, K.L., & Yewchuk, C.R. (1996). Use of metacognitive reading strategies by gifted learning disabled students: An exploratory study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,19(3), 293-314.
McLaughlin, M., & Allen, M.B. (2002).Guided comprehension: A teaching model for grades 3-8. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
McNeil, J. D. (1992). Reading comprehension: New direction for classroom practice. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
Myers, M., & Paris, S.G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000).Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No.00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Neuman, S.B., & McCormick, S. ( 2000).A case for single-subject experiments in literacy research. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R.Barr (eds.), Handbook of reading research volume III (pp.181-194), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Oczkus, L.D. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Palincsar, A. S. (1984). Reciprocal teaching: working within the zone of proximal development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED246385.)
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1&2), 73 - 98.
Palincsar, A. S. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students to read. In D. K. Reid（Ed.）, Teaching the learning disabled: A cognitive developmental approach (pp.190-214). Boston：Allyn and Bacon.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, D.A. (1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension- monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction,1 (2),117-175.
Palincsar, A. S., David, Y. M., Winn, J.A., & Stevens, D.D. (1991). Examining the context of strategy instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 43-53.
Palincsar, A. S., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 211-225, 229.
Paris, S.G., and Jacobs, J.E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children，s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child development, 55, 2083-2093.
Pearson, D.(1984). A context for instructional research on reading comprehension. In J. Flood (Ed.), Promoting reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Pick, A.D., Unze, M.G., Brownell, C.A., Drozdal, J.G., & Hopmann, M.R.(1978).Young children’s knowledge of word structure. Child Development, 49, 669-680.
Pressley, M., & NcCormick, C.B.(1995). Cognition, teaching and assessment. NT: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A.(1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Richards, S.B., Taylor, R.L., Ramasamy, R., & Richards, R.Y.(1999).Single subjects research: Applications in educational and clinical settings. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Richek, M., Caldwell, J., Jennings, J., & Lerner, J.(1996). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C.(1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research Review of Educational Research, 64,479-530.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S.(1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66,181-221.
Royer, J. M., Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, J.B., & Peterson, S.E.(1986). The sentence verification technique as a measure of listening and reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Research, 6, 299-314.
Rupley. W. H. & Wilson, V. L.(1995). Contribution of phonemic knowledge, prior knowledge, and listening comprehension to elementary-age children reading comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading(2nd ,San Francisco, CA, April 21-23).
Ryan, E.B.(1982). Identifying and remediating failures in reading comprehension: Toward an instructional approach for poor comprehenders. In G.E. Mackinnon and T.G. Waller(Eds.), Advances in reading research(Vol 3). New York: Academic Press.
Satz, P., Taylor, H.G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J.M.(1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disabilities: A six years follow-up. In A.L. Benton and D. Pearl(Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Silberberg, N., & Silberberg, M.(1967). Hyperlexia: Specific word recognition skill in young children. Exceptional Children,34, 41-42.
Snowling, M.J.(1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,29, 294-305.
Speece, D.L., MacDonald, V., Kilsheimer, L., & Krist, J. (1997). Research to practice: preservice teacher reflect on reciprocal teaching. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,12 (3), 177-187.
Stein, N.L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). What’s in a story: Critical issues in comprehension and instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol.2, pp.271-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stevenson, K.E., Stigler, J.W., Lucker, G.W., Lee, S.Y., Hsu, C. C. & Kitamura, S. (1982).Reading disabilities: The case of Chinese, Japanese and English. Child Development, 53, 1164-1181.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research：Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Swaby, B. (1989). Diagnosis and correction of reading difficulties. MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Taylor, B., Harris, L. A., Pearson, P. D. & Garcia, G. (1995).Reading difficulties: Instruction and assessment (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Taylor. R. (2000). Assessment of exceptional students：Educational and psychological procedures（5th ed.）. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tryon, W.W. (1982). A simplified time-series analysis for evaluation treatment interventions. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 15, 423-429.
van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K.E.(2000). The Mind in Action: What It Means to Comprehension During Reading. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for Meaning: Fostering Comprehension in The Middle Grade (pp.1-31). NT: Teachers College.
Waters, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adult’s use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory & Cognition,12, 293-305.
Williams, J. P. (1998). Improving comprehension of disabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 213- 238.
Wolery, M. (1992). Preschoolers with learning disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,12 (2).
Wolf, M. (1999). What Time May Tell: Towards a New Conceptualization of Developmental Dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia，49, 3-28.
Wren, S. (2003). The cognitive foundations of learning to read: A framework. Retrieved October 3,2003, from http：//www. sedl. org/reading/framework.