臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

特殊教育長期資料庫(SNELS)是國內第一個以身心障礙兒童為核心資料庫，資料涵蓋全國。本研究運用SNELS資料庫的優點，希望能夠透過SNELS資料的分析及報導，了解目前國內就讀高中職普通班及特教班之身障學生學習成果概況，並能探討那些學校因素有助於學生的學習成果，是未來特教政策推動或教學介入的重點。此外，有鑑於過去探討身障學生學習成果影響因素的研究，經常受限於身障學生的樣本特質與教育介入有共線性的問題，導致研究結果顯示教育介入愈多，學生的學習成果反而愈差。所以本研究透過階層迴歸分析，以學生個人家庭因素為控制，探討學校因素對身障學生學習成果的影響，以釐清那些學校因素才是特教政策推動或教學介入的重點。本研究結果如下:
一、就讀高中職普通班及特教班的身障學生都有不錯的學習成果(學習參與、學業表現、社會適應、獨立自主和家長滿意度)表現，家長及老師的填答都有偏正向的描述。
二、學生的個人家庭背景因素(能力問題、障礙程度、自我概念、家庭社經地位及家庭參與)是影響其學習成果的主要因素，可以解釋身障學生的學習成果的百分之8到45。
三、排除個人家庭背景之後，學校因素因素對學習成果的影響很小，約占百分之2到7，所納入之各學校因素變項中，能夠在排除個人家庭因素之外，還能對身障學生的學習成果有額外解釋力的變項包括：學校公私立、學校規模 、學校氣氛、教師專業能力、普特教合作及補救教學。
最後，本研究針對實務及研究提出建議。

Special Needs Education Longitudinal Study(SNELS),which is the first national longitudinal database targeted on gathering data from children with special needs in Taiwan. The present research aimed at getting a better understanding of the present outcomes of special needs in regular classes and self-contained special classes of secondary schools and probing into the school factors associated with better learning outcomes by analyzing the data from this database.
There were some researches about learning outcomes of special needs came out with an ironic conclusion that the more special education one received, the worse outcomes one get. The result is not because that the special programs were harmful for the special needs. It is because of collinear problems between the intervention and the characteristic of the students with special needs. Therefore, the present research try to avoid the collinear problem by using Hieratical Regression Analysis. In the analysis , the factors that affect learning outcomes are divided into two factors: the personal-family factors and school factors. The personal-family factors were forced to enter the regression model during step one as control factors. Then, the school factors were entered during step two as predict factors of learning outcomes.
The research outcomes are as the follows.
First, the learning outcomes (school engagement, academic achievement, social adjustment, independence and parental satisfaction) of special needs in regular classes and in self-contained special classes of secondary schools are positive.
Second, The main factors that affect learning outcomes of students with special needs in secondary schools are personal-family factors(ability problems, levels of disabilities, self-concept, family socioeconomic status and parental involvement in education). The personal-family factors can explained 8 to 45 percent of the variations of learning outcomes of special needs in secondary schools.
Third, the school factors can explain 2 to 7 percent of variations of learning outcomes after the personal-family factors were partial out. The school factors that still hold significant extra contribution were school type (private versus public), school size, school staff cooperation, special education professional competency, general-special education cooperation, and remedial teaching.
Implications for educational applications and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………1
第二節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………7
第三節 研究目的、問題與假設…………………………………9
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 學習成果的意涵與界定…………………………………10
第二節 影響學習成果的因素……………………………………19
第三節 身心障礙學生的學習成果情形…………………………36
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………44
第二節 資料來源…………………………………………………46
第三節 研究樣本…………………………………………………48
第四節 研究變項定義與測量……………………………………52
第五節 資料處理與分析…………………………………………66
第四章 研究結果
第一節 高三組普通班樣本與特教班樣本之學
習成果情形………………………………………………72
第二節 高三組普通班樣本與特教班樣本之學
習成果影響因素…………………………………………80
第五章 討論與建議
第一節 討論………………………………………………………95
第二節 研究限制 ………………………………………………104
第三節 建議………………………………………………………106
參考文獻………………………………………………………….…108

丁芳敏、潘正德、楊慶麟 (2008)。大學生全人教育目標知覺、校園參與經驗及學習成果之相關研究－以中原大學為例，通識教育學刊(1)，97-124。
王天苗 (2009)。「特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫」簡介。人文與社會科學簡訊，10(3)，108-116。
王天苗 (2012)。特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫：98學年度資料使用手冊（電子檔）。桃園: 中原大學。
王天苗 (2013)。特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫：99學年度資料使用手冊（電子檔）。桃園: 中原大學。
王天苗、邱上真、莊妙芬、鄭麗月、葉瓊華、孫淑柔 (1997 )。特殊教育法修正案評估。中華民國立法院法規小組專題研究成果報告。
王天苗、黃俊榮 (2011)。國內身心障礙教育概況之指標項目分析。教育實踐與研究， 24(1)，107-134。
王天苗、劉凱 (2007)。幼托園所普通班實施融合教育的現況分析。取自http://snels.cycu.edu.tw/。
王文珊 (2009)。 中部地區高中職學習障礙學生教育需求現況調查研究 (未出版之
碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
王文科、蕭金土、張昇鵬、李乙明 (1999)。我國特殊教育指標建構之研究。文章發表於：第四屆特殊教育課程與教學學術研討會, 彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
王淑惠 (2011)。由特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫分析國小階段身障生在普通班接受教學調整與考試調整情形。雲嘉特教期刊，(13)，23-30。
王瓊珠 (2007)。身心障礙學生家長對特殊教育之滿意度調查報告。取自：http://snels.cycu.edu.tw/POLL/upload_doc/ULDOC/身心障礙學生家長對特殊教育之滿意度調查.pdf
朱尹安 (2011)。臺北市特殊教育相關專業人員服務模式初探。特殊教育季刊，(120), 45-52。
呂宜臻 (2009)。第一代及非第一代大學生的校園經驗、學習成果與教育抱負之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
呂威廉 (2008)。美國大學生學習成果評鑑模式分析。評鑑雙月刊，(15)， 17-19。
巫有鎰 (2005)。學校與非學校因素對台東縣國小學生學業成就的影響：結合教育機會均等與學校效能研究的分析模式(未出版之博士論文)。屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
李靜怡, &; 劉明松 (2011)。高雄市國中學習障礙學生自我概念與學校適應。東臺灣特殊教育學報(13), 99-126。
周艾縈 (2011)。國小特教班學生家長對學校特教服務品質滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
林利真 (2005)。國中學障生自我概念與生活適應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 臺灣師範大學，台北市。
林怡慧 (2006)。高中職普通班身心障礙學生學校生活適應之研究(未出版之
碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
林俊瑩 (2008)。家長對學校滿意度因果模型之建構與檢驗。教育與社會研究(15), 23-52。
林俊瑩、吳裕益。 (2007) 。家庭因素, 學校因素對學生學業成就的影響--階層線性模式的分析。 教育研究集刊, 54(3)， 107-144。
林敬修 (2009)。一般與身心障礙大學生的個人、家庭及學校經驗因素對學習成果之影響(未出版之博士論文)。高雄師範大學。高雄市。
林義宸 (2012)。影響國中普通班身心障礙學生學習成果之個人、家庭因素研究-以特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫為例(未出版之碩士論文)， 國立臺南大學，台南市。
林碧芳 (2011)。家庭文化資本與個人學習動機對青少年學習成就影響之貫時研究。 (未出版之博士論文)， 國立政治大學， 台北市。
孫淑柔 (1999)。身心障礙學生學習成果評鑑之研究(未出版之博士論文)， 臺灣師範大學，台北市。
孫淑柔， &; 王天苗 (2000)。國民教育階段身心障礙學生學習成果評鑑之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，19，215-234。
翁鴻勳 (2011)。新北市國民小學特教班家長參與及特殊教育服務滿意度之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北教育大學，台北市。
國立台中啟聰學校 (2012)。聽障生支援服務手冊 國立台中啟聰學校 (Ed。) 取自http://www.thdf.tc.edu.tw/Site16/downloads/2011/100.09.15.book.pdf
張汶樺 (2010)。特殊需求學生家長對國中資源教室方案之滿意度調查 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺北教育大學，台北市。
張昇鵬 (2003)。我國特殊教育指標在資賦優異教育與身心障礙教育之比較研究。特殊教育學報(18)， 55-84。
張金淑 (2007)。中央對地方特殊教育行政績效評鑑之評析。教育研究與發展期刊， 3(3)，165-196。
張英鵬 (2001)。原住民特殊教育學童之調查研究。 特殊教育與復健學報，9， 1-27。
張婉玟 (2009)。影響學生學業成就之家庭、學校、個人與背景因素—長期追蹤資料的分析(未出版之碩士論文)， 國立政治大學。
張聖莉、王文科、張昇鵬 (2008)。台東縣高中職接受融合教育身心障礙學生學校適應之研究。台東特教，28，1-6。
張萬烽 (2009)。學習障礙十二年就學安置的現況與改進之道，屏師特殊教育，17， 1-8。
張萬烽、鈕文英 (2010)。美國身心障礙學生考試調整策略成效之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊，35(3)， 27-50。
教育部 (1995)。中華民國身心障礙教育報告書。教育部，台北市。
教育部特殊教育通報網 (2012)。一般學校身心障礙類高中階段學生安置概況。取自：https://www。set.edu.tw/sta2/contact/101學年上度統計概況/10110_3_5.htm
陳正昌 (1998)。國小學生學業成就影響因素之階層線性分析教育機會均等觀點。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告: 國立屏東師範學院初等教育學系。
陳信智 (2009)。評論十二年國教追求促進教育機會均等，社會公平“正義”目的之理論適當性。學校行政，(62)， 31-43。
陳清溪 (2010)。美國教育科學院簡介。 國家教育研究院電子報， 4。
陳揚盛 (2000)。12年國教 身心障礙生先實施， 台灣立報。 取自：http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-51863
陳麗如、陳清溪、鐘梅菁、江麗莉、陳惠茹 (2007)。高中職特殊教育教師專業評鑑規準之意見及其選取研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報(9)， 125-147。
彭森明 (2003)。如何建置全國性教育資料庫，使其發揮最大價值與功能。文章發表於2003台灣與國際教長期追蹤資料庫中南部工作坊，台中市。
黃盈瑄 (2012)。國中身心障礙學生自我決策及相關因素之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
黃淑玲 (2010)。學其所做、做其所學－以CHEA傑出校院學生學習成效執行獎為例。 評鑑雙月刊，25。
黃毅志 (2008)。如何精確測量職業地位?[改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表] 之建構。台東大學教育學報，19(1)，151-160。
溫國珍 (2012)。不同教育安置環境下國小學習障礙學生學習態度與自我概念之初探。 東華特教(47)， 15-19。
詹文宏 (2005)。高中職學習障礙學生自我概念、因應策略、學校適應及其因果模式之研究(未出版之博士論文)，國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
蔡瑞美 (1999)。普通高中職提供身心障礙學生資源服務之現況調查研究(未出版之博士論文)。臺灣師範大學，台北市。
鄭淑芬、王天苗、洪永泰、蔡欣玶 (2011)。特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫失敗樣本分析研究──以96學年度調查資料為例。特殊教育學報，100(33)，125-150。
蕭文龍 (2007)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書: SPSS+ LISREALΔΚ。 台北市: 碁峰資訊。
蕭金土、汪成琳(2003)。高中職校長教學領導、特教班教師教學效能及其關係之研究。特殊教育學報(17)， 147-176。
謝亞恆 (2008)。影響國中階段學生學業成就成長量的個人、家庭及學校因素之研究(未出版之博士論文) 。高雄師範大學，高雄市。
Achilles, G. M., Mclaughlin, J., &; Croninger, R. G. (2007). Sociocultural correlates of disciplinary exclusion among students with emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities in the SEELS national dataset. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15(1), 33-45.
Allen, R. (2006). National Pupil Database from http://nationalpupildatabase.wikispaces.com/home
Arnold, M., &; Lassmann, M. E. (2003). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education. Education-Indilanapolis Then Chula Vista, 24(2), 230-236.
Baker, J. T. A., &; Bosman, A. M. T. (2003). Self-Image and peer acceptance of dutch students in regular and special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(1), 5.
Bidwell, C.E., &; Kasarda, J.D. (1980). Conceptualizing and Measuring the Effects of School and Schooling. American Journal of Education, 88(4), 401-430.
Blackorby, J., Knokey, A. M. , Wagner, M. , Levine, P., Schiller, E., &; Sumi, C. (2007a). What Makes a Difference? Influences on outcomes for students with disabilites. In L. Holden-Pitt (Ed.). Menlo Park, CA.: SRI International.
Blackorby, J., Knokey, A. M. , Wagner, M. , Levine, P., Schiller, E., &; Sumi, C. (2007b). What makes a differecne? influences on outcomes for students with disabiliities. In L. Holden-Pitt (Ed.). Menlo Park, CA.: SRI International.
Blackorby, J., &; Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399-413.
Bouck, E. C. (2011). A snapshot of secondary education for students with mild intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(3), 399-409.
Bouck, E. C. (2012). Secondary students with moderate/severe intellectual disability: considerations of curriculum and post-school outcomes from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 56(12), 1175-1186.
Bouck, E. C., Maeda, Y., &; Flanagan, S. M. (2012). Assistive Technology and Students With High-incidence Disabilities: Understanding the Relationship Through the NLTS2. Remedial &; Special Education, 33(5), 298-308.
Brandi, S., Lucille, E., Black, A. C. , Sugai, G., Lewandowski, H., Sims, B., &; Myers, . (2012). Illinois Statewide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Evolution and Impact on Student Outcomes Across Years. The journal of positive behavior interventions, 14(1), 5.
Butler, A. L. (2011). Secondary transition experiences: Analyzing perceptions, academic self-efficacy, academic adjustment and GPA for college students with learning disabilities pursuing postsecondary education. (Ph.D. 3461499), University of Maryland, College Park, United States -- Maryland.
Cameto, R., Wagner, M., Newman, L. , Blackorby, J. , &; Javitz, H. . (2000). National longitudinal transition study-2(NLTS2) study design, timeline, and datacollection plan. Menlo Park, ca.: SRI International and the Research Triangle Institute.
Cameto, R., Levine, P., &; Wagner, M. (2004). Transition Planning for Students with Disabilities: A Special Topic Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (pp. 89-89): National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC 20202.
Canto, A. I., Proctor, B. E., &; Pervatt, F. (2005). Educational Outcomes of Students First Diagnosed with Learning Disabilites in Postsecondary School. Journal of College Admission, 187, 8-13.
Carpenter, C. D., Bloom, L. A., &; Boat, M. B. (1999). Guidelines for special educators: Achieving socially valid outcomes. Intervention in School &; Clinic, 34(3), 143.
Chiang, H-M, Cheung, Y-K, Hickson, L., Xiang, R., &; Tsai, L-Y. (2012). Predictive Factors of Participation in Postsecondary Education for High School Leavers with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(5), 685-696.
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity study. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).
Florian, L., Rouse, M., Black-Hawkins, K., &; Jull, S. (2004). What can national data sets tell us about inclusion and pupil achievement? British Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 115-121.
Frieden, Lex (2004). Improving Educational Outcomes for Students with Disabilities. Washington, DC: Retrieved from http://www.ncd.gov/policy/education.
Furney, K. S., Hasazi, S. B., Keefe, K. C. , &; Hartnett, J.(2003). A longitudinal analysis of shifting policy landscapes in special and general education reform. Exceptional Children, 70(1), 81.
Gallagher, P. A. , &; Lambert, R. G. (2006). Classroom Quality, Concentration of Children With Special Needs, and Child Outcomes in Head Start. Exceptional Children, 73(1), 31-52.
Garza, N. M. (2006). SEELS: The Outcomes of Elementary and Middle School Students with Disabilities. in Forum (pp. 9-9): Project Forum. , Alexandria, VA.
Giesen, M. J., Cavenaugh, B. S., &; McDonnall, M. C.(2012). Academic Supports, Cognitive Disability and Mathematics Acheivement for Visually Imparied Youth: A Multilevel Modeling Approach. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 17-26.
Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: some questions. American Psychologist, 18, 519-521.
Gonzalez, P. (2006). School Behavior and Disciplinary Experiences of Youth With Disabilities. Facts From The National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (pp. 8-8): ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398.
Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate behavioral research, 26(3), 499-510.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., &; Rivkin, S. G. . (2002). Inferring program effects for special Populations: does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities? Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 584-599.
Harris, R. J. (2001). A primer of multivariate statistics: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hernandez, J. E., Harry, B., Newman, L., &; Cameto, R. (2008). Survey of family involvement in and satisfaction with the Los Angeles unified school district special education processes. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 21(2), 84-93.
Hocutt, A. M. (1996). Effectiveness of special education: is placement the critical factor? The Future of children 6(1), 77-102.
Jimerson, S., &; Egeland, B. (1999). A longitudinal study of achievement trajectories: Factors associated with change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 116.
Jones, K. R., &; Ezeife, A. N.(2011). School size as a factor in the academic achievement of elementary school. Students Psychology, 2(8), 859-868.
Ju, S., Zhang, D., &; Katsiyannis, A.. (2013). The causal relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement for students with disabilities: an analysis of SEELS data. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 24(1), 4-14.
Kaprolet, C.M. (2011). Social-Emotional Predictors of Postsecondary Enrollment for Students with Disabilities. (Ph.D. 3456390), Arizona State University, United States -- Arizona.
Kelly, N. &; Norwich, B.(2004). Pupils' perceptions of self and of labels: Moderate learning difficulties in mainstream and special schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 411-435.
Keslair, F., &; McNally, S. (2009). Special Educational Needs in England Final Report for the National Equality Panel London, UK. : Centre for Economic Performance.
Kirchner, C. &; Smith, B.2005). Transition to what? education and employment outcomes for visually impaired youths after high school. Journal of Visual Impairment &; Blindness, 99(8), 499-504.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford press.
LaBarbera, R. (2008). Perceived social support and self-esteem in adolescents with learning disabilities at a private school. Learning Disabilities -- A Contemporary Journal, 6(1), 33-44.
Levenson, N. (2012). Boosting the Quality and Efficiency of Special Education. Washington, D.C. : The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Levine, P., Marder, C., &; Wagner, M. (2007). Services and supports for secondary school students with disabilities: a special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (pp. 101-101): National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC.
Lindley, D. V, &; Smith, A. FM. (1972). Bayes estimates for the linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1-41.
Lipsky, D. K., &; Gartner, A. (1996). Achieving full inclusion: Placing the student at the center of educational reform. . In W. Stainback &; S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 3-15). Boston: Allyn &; Bacon.
Maas, C. J., &; Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86-92.
McDonnell, L., McLaughlin, M. J., Morison, P.(1997). National research council committee on, goals, the inclusion of students with, disabilities, &; NetLibrary, Inc. (1997). Educating one &; all students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
McLaughlin, M. J., &; Warren, S. H.(1992). Outcomes assessment for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 36(4), 29.
Miceli, M. A.(2008). The associations among youth characteristics, secondary school experiences, and enrollment in two- and four-year colleges among youth with disabilities. (Ph.D. 3339490), University of Maryland, ML.
Mondofacto. (2006). Dictionary of Education: Definition of Learning Outcomes. Retreive from http://www.mondofacto.com/facts/dictionary?query=learning+outcomes&;action=look+it+up
Monson, M. R. (2009). The expanded core curriculum and its relationship to postschool outcomes for youth who are visually impaired. (AAI3372720)
NCSER. (2005). High school completion by youth with disabilities. facts from NLTS2 (pp. 7-7): National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC.
Newman, L. (2005a). Changes in postsecondary education participation of youth with disabilities. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 27(2), 30-38.
Newman, L. (2005b). Parents' satisfaction with their children's schooling. facts from OSEP's National Longitudinal Studies (pp. 7-7).
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Huang, T., Shaver, D., Knokey, A. M., Yu, J., . . . Cameto, R. (2011). Secondary school programs and performance of students with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2).
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A. M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., . . . Ferguson, K. (2011). Post-High school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: a special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2).
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., &; Knokey, A. M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A Report From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2).
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M., &; Shaver, D. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2010-3008 (pp. 163-163): National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2011). Comprehensive assessment and evaluation of students with learing disabiliries. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 3-16.
Ofsted. (2010). The special educational needs and disability review- A statement is not enough Manchester, UK.
Phillips, D. M. (2012). The relationship between educational placement, instructional practices, and achievement gains of Black students with specific learning disabilities in secondary urban school settings. (Ed.D. 3517034), Florida International University, Miami, FL.
Raudenbush, S.W, &; Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (second edition). California: Sage publication, Inc.
Sanford, C., Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M., &; Shaver, D.(2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school: Key Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2011-3004 (pp. 106-106): National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC.
Shaver, D., Newman, L., Huang, T., Yu, J., &; Knokey, A.-M. (2011). The secondary school experiences and academic performance of students with hearing impairments. Facts from NLTS2. NCSER 2011-3003 (pp. 29-29): National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC.
Smith, T. J., &; Wallace, S.(2011). Social Skills of Children in the U.S. with Comorbid Learning Disabilities and AD/HD. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 238-247.
Spady, W. G., &; Marshall, K. J. (1991). Beyond traditional outcome-based education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 67.
Stufflebeam, D. (1983). The CIPP Model for Program Evaluation Evaluation Models (Vol. 6, pp. 117-141): Springer Netherlands.
Thompson, S. J., Johnstone, C. J., Thurlow, M. L., &; Altman, J. R. . (2005). 2005 State special education outcomes: Steps forward in a decade of change. Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Tzeng, S-J. (2007). Learning disabilities in Taiwan: A case of cultural constraints on the education of students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research &; Practice (Blackwell Publishing Limited, 22(3), 170-175.
Wagner, M, Newman, L, Cameto, R , Levine, P, &; Garza, N. (2006). An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Wagner, M., Marder, C., Blackorby, J., Cameto, R., Newman, L., Levine, P., . . . (with Chorost, M., Garza, N., Guzman, A., &; Sumi, C.). (2003). The achievements of youth with ddisabilities during secondary school. A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., &; Levine, P. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities. A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2006-3000 (pp. 112-112).
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., &; Garza, N. (2006). Overview of findings from wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2).
Wagner, M. (2005). Youth with disabilities leaving secondary school. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 27(2), 24-29.
Wagner, M., Cadwallader, T. W., Garza, N., &; Cameto, R. (2004). Social activities of youth with disabilities. NLTS2 Data Brief. Volume 3, Issue 1 (pp. 4-4): National Center on Secondary Education and Transition, Institute on Community Integration (UCEDD), University of Minnesota, MN.
Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., &; Epstein, M. H. (2005). The special education elementary longitudinal study and the National Longitudinal Transition Study: study designs and implications for children and youth with emotional disturbance. Journal of Emotional &; Behavioral Disorders, 13(1), 25-41.
Wagner, M., Marder, C., &; Blackorby, J. (2002). The children we serve: the demographic characteristics of elementary and middle school students with disabilities and their households. SEELS (Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study) (pp. 65).
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Javitz, H., &; Valdes, K.(2012). A national picture of parent and youth participation in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(3), 140-155.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., &; Levine, P.(2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities . A Report From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2006-3000: A Special Topic Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). : National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., &; Cameto, R. (2004). Changes over time in the secondary school experiences of students with disabilities. A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (pp. 154-154).
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., &; Levine, P.(2005). Changes over tme in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. A Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (pp. 113-113).
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., &; Marder, C.(2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities. A Special Topic Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). National Center for Special Education Research. Washington, DC.
Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J. C., &; Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52-69.
Yorke, M.(2011). Analysing existing datasets: some considerations arising from practical experience. International Journal of Research &; Method in Education, 34(3), 255-267.
Ysseldyke, J. E, Algozzine, B., &; Thurlow, M. L. (2000). Critical issues in special education. James E. Yesseldyke, Bob Algozzine, Martha Thurlow: Boston : Houghton Mifflin.