臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究為次級資料分析，運用「台灣長期教育追蹤資料庫」中接受四波次追蹤調查的樣本資料。本研究以家庭中父母是否曾發生離婚或分居事件，及其發生之時間點，作為區分不同組別的方式。將家庭結構組別區分為雙親家庭、高中時期成為單親家庭、國中階段成為單親家庭，以及國中之前成為單親家庭。在本研究中運用家庭系統、家庭內教育資源及家庭歷程等理論觀點，並在研究設計上，使用長期追蹤資料，並以固定效果模型及潛在成長模型進行研究分析。探究家庭結構的改變，對不同階段青少年子女之學習成就的影響。而所獲得相關分析結果亦驗證本研究之研究假設。
茲將本研究之重要發現摘要如下：
一、家庭結構的改變對子女學習具有負面影響。
二、當家庭結構發生改變之時點，如果是在子女幼年時期，會對子女學業能力後續發展會產生長期持續累積的負面影響，並與雙親家庭子女學習成就差距持續擴大。
三、子女在國中階段成為單親家庭對學習成就影響最大。
四、高中階段單親家庭組則存在當下近期效果之影響。
五、家庭結構亦會透過家庭資源、父母教育期望與家庭教育歷程，發揮間接影響青少年子女學習成就效果。
六、運用固定效果模型與傳統迴歸模型進行比較，固定效果模型所獲得之估計值較小，縮減了傳統迴歸模型之估計誤差。
綜合言之，本研究將時間概念納入家庭結構之動態分析，克服了過往研究所存在的內生性偏誤，並強化因果之說明，並補充過往理論觀點不足之處。

The method to carry out this study was using secondary data, which included four waves with the same participants. The purpose of this study is to explain the effect of family structure the change were related to adolescent learning achievement. The secondary data is adapted from Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS).
This study by family in parents whether once to have the divorce event and the event timing takes the discrimination different groups. Family structure groups divide into “the intact family”, “the senior high school stage becomes the single-parent family”, “the junior high school stage becomes the single-parent family” and “early life becomes the single-parent family”.
The research viewpoint is from family system theory, family educational resources theory and family process theory proposed. Inquires into the family structure the change, how to influence children learning achievement in different life cycle? The research was longitudinal study design. The study used the fixed effect model and latent growth model to carry on the research analysis. Accordingly, the results support our proposed model and its connection with academic achievement of students. Author summarizes the findings as follows:
1. Family structure's change for the children has the negative influence in learning achievement.
2. When the family structure change time point was in children childhood time. IT has the negative accumulates influence. And the learning achievement disparity with the intact family children to expand continually.
3. The children become the single-parent family in junior high school stage to learning achievement influence to be biggest.
4. The high school stage single-parent family group will have immediately in the near event influence of the effect.

5. The family structure will also penetrate the family resources, the parental educational expectation and the family process , make indirect influence on adolescent’s the learning achievement.
6. The fixed effects model and the tradition regression model carries on the comparison. The fixed effect model obtains the estimated value to be small. The fixed effect model reduced of error of estimation the tradition regression model.

To sum up, this research integrates the time concept with the family structure in the dynamic analysis. Explanation of the strengthened causes and effects, the outcome supplements the passing theory viewpoint deficiency.

第一章 緒論--------------------------------------------------------------1
第一節 問題背景-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究觀點-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
第三節 研究目的與重要性---------------------------------------------------------------------15
第二章 家庭結構與子女學業影響相關理論與研究----------17
第一節 家庭結構定義與台灣現況-----------------------------------------------------------17
第二節 相關理論觀點與研究-----------------------------------------------------------------29
第三節 家庭結構的變遷對子女學業之影響----------------------------------------------42
第四節 台灣之家庭結構與子女學業相關之研究----------------------------------------46
第三章 研究方法------------------------------------------------------49
第一節 研究對象與資料來源-----------------------------------------------------------------49
第二節 研究架構---------------------------------------------------------------------------------53
第三節 研究假設---------------------------------------------------------------------------------56
第四節 變項測量與定義------------------------------------------------------------------------58
第五節 資料分析方式---------------------------------------------------------------------------64
第四章 研究結果與發現--------------------------------------------72
第一節 家庭結構各組別學習成就平均數分析-------------------------------------------72
第二節 迴歸模型與固定效果模型比較-----------------------------------------------------80
第三節 家庭結構、家庭內教育資源與家庭教育歷程對子女學習成就之影響--105
第四節 潛在成長模型分析結果-------------------------------------------------------------117


第五章 結論與討論-------------------------------------------------128
第一節 家庭結構改變對學習成就之負面影響因素-----------------------------------128
第二節 子女於不同階段，家庭結構改變之影響效果差異---------------------------133
第三節 本研究之貢獻與限制----------------------------------------------------------------138
第四節 相關建議--------------------------------------------------------------------------------143

參考書目-----------------------------------------------------------------149

附錄-----------------------------------------------------------------------159
附錄一、有效樣本數與家庭結構類型區分說明------------------------------------------159
附錄二、相關變項描述性統計-----------------------------------------------------------------161













表 次
表2-1：十五歲以上人口婚姻狀況比例分配概況-------------------------------------------20
表2-2：我國人口離婚率歷年變遷---------------------------------------------------------------21
表2-3：台灣地區狹義單親戶比例按性別分，1991-1998及2001年----------------------23
表2-4：臺灣地區單親家庭及其子女推估比例-----------------------------------------------24
表2-5：再婚率歷年變遷狀況---------------------------------------------------------------------25
表2-6：我國家庭居住型態變遷-----------------------------------------------------------------26
表2-7：臺閩地區受訪兒童父母親婚姻狀況與共同居住狀況----------------------------27
表3-1：樣本資料收集時程表---------------------------------------------------------------------50
表3-2：公共使用版釋出資料說明---------------------------------------------------------------52
表4-1:樣本基本資料表----------------------------------------------------------------------------73
表4-2：各組別次數（％）---------------------------------------------------------------------------74
表4-3:家庭結構各組別各波段綜合能力分數-----------------------------------------------76
表4-4：家庭結構對各波段綜合能力分數之迴歸模型（一）-------------------------------81
表4-5：家庭結構對各波段綜合能力分數之迴歸模型（二）-------------------------------83
表4-6：Wave4綜合能力分數之迴歸模型（三）-----------------------------------------------84
表4-7：固定效果模型（一）------------------------------------------------------------------------91
表4-8：固定效果迴歸模型------------------------------------------------------------------------96
表4-9:傳統迴歸模型與固定效果模型比較---------------------------------------------------99
表4-10:傳統迴歸模型與固定效果模型比較（二）-----------------------------------------102
表4-11固定效果模型（二）----------------------------------------------------------------------107
表4-12：固定效果模型（三）---------------------------------------------------------------------112
表4-13：與時間共變之變項平均數、標準差------------------------------------------------114
表4-14：與爸爸發生衝突之原因項目排序前三名----------------------------------------115
表4-15：與媽媽發生衝突之原因項目排序前三名----------------------------------------115
表4-16：潛在成長模型—模型Ⅰ---------------------------------------------------------------119
表4-17：「潛在成長模型」與「潛在成長伴隨時間不變與時間變遷共變數模型」之結果-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------123
表4-17：模型Ⅰ、模型二與模型Ⅲ適配度指標---------------------------------------------126
























圖 次
圖1-1：將家庭結構視為外生變項----------------------------------------------------------------9
圖1-2：家庭結構為內生變項-----------------------------------------------------------------------9
圖2-1：家庭系統圖---------------------------------------------------------------------------------30
圖3-1：固定效果模型架構圖---------------------------------------------------------------------53
圖3-2：潛在成長模型------------------------------------------------------------------------------54
圖3-3：潛在成長伴隨時間不變與時間變遷共變數模型---------------------------------55
圖3-4：實驗法圖示-----------------------------------------------------------------------------67
圖3-5：Difference-in-Difference estimates--------------------------------------------------------69
圖4-1：各家庭結構分組各波段綜合能力分數(加權後)1----------------------------------77
圖4-2：各家庭結構分組各波段綜合能力分數(加權後)2----------------------------------78
圖4-3：各家庭結構分組各波段綜合能力分數(加權後)3----------------------------------79
圖4-4：潛在成長伴隨時間不變與時間變遷共變數模型--------------------------------121

中文書目
王鍾和，1992，家庭結構、父母管教方式與子女行為表現。政治大學，教育學系博士論文。
伊慶春，1991，〈家庭問題〉。頁223-258，收錄於《台灣的社會問題》，楊國樞，葉啟正主編，台北：巨流出版社。
巫有鎰，2005，學校與非學校因素對台東縣國小學生學業成就的影響：結合教育機會均等與學校效能研究的分析模式。屏東師範學院，教育行政研究所博士論文。
李芊蒂、吳齊殷、關秉寅，2005，母親教養行為對青少年子女學業成就的影響：婚姻衝突的效果。台灣社會學會及國立台北大學主辦之2005年台灣社會學會年會暨「社會學與台灣社會的反思」研討會論文。
李敦仁、余民寧，2006，〈社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證：以TEPS資料庫資料為例〉。《台灣教育社會研究》，5(2)：1-47。
李敦仁，2007，〈人力資本、財務資本、社會資本與教育成就關聯性之研究：Coleman家庭資源理論模式之驗證〉。《教育與心理研究》，30(3)：111-141。
吳齊殷，2000，〈家庭結構、教養實施與青少年的問題行為〉。《台灣社會學研究》，4：51-95。
吳齊殷、李文傑，2003，〈青少年憂鬱症狀與偏差行為之關連機制〉。《台灣社會學》，6：119-175。
吳齊殷、張明宜、陳怡蒨，2008，尋找機制與過程：長期追蹤研究的功用。《αβγ量化研究學刊》，第二卷，第一期。
吳靜樺，1994，離婚家庭青少年子女生活適應之分析研究。東吳大學，社會工作系碩士論文。
侯崇文，2001，〈家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行為探討〉。《應用心理研究》，11：25-43。
黃慧如，2002，影響單親家庭生活品質相關因素之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文
張如杏、胡幼慧，1994，〈青少年心理衛生與社會心理因素之探討—北市高職五專學生憂鬱症狀、自殺意念與自殺企圖之研究〉。《中華醫務社會工作學學刊》，3：77-92。
張怡華，2005，國中生親子衝突及因應策略之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張苙雲，2008，台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：第一波(2001) 、第二波(2003)、第三波(2005)、第四波(2007)資料使用手冊【公共使用版電子檔】。中央研究院調查研究專題中心【管理、釋出單位】。
黃淑芳，2005，不同家庭結構之國小高年級學童家庭功能與生活適應模式探究。嘉義大學，家庭教育研究所博士論文。
黃毅志，1993，社經背景與地位取得過程之結構機制:教育，社會資源及文化資本。東海大學，社會學系博士論文。
楊志堅、劉心筠、楊志強，2004，〈縱貫研究以潛在成長模型分析之樣本數與檢定力研究〉，《教育與心理研究》，27(3)：603-626。
楊靜利、董宜禎，2007，〈台灣的家戶組成變遷：1990—2050〉。《台灣社會學刊》。38：135-173。
郭靜晃、吳幸玲，2002，〈臺灣社會變遷下之單親家庭困境〉。《社區發展季刊》，102：144-161。
勞賢賢，2006，〈單親家庭及父母資源對國中生學習成就的影響〉。《中華家政學刊》，39：65-81。
關秉寅、李敦義，2008，補習數學有用嗎？一個「反事實」的分析。《台灣社會學刊》，41，97-148。
歐仁榮，1993，家庭環境、家庭結構對高職生學業成就影響之研究—以台南市高級職業學校為例。中正大學，犯罪防制研究所碩士論文。
賴佩祺，2004，家庭結構對學習成就的影響。台灣大學，經濟學碩士論文。
薛承泰，2002，〈臺灣地區單親戶的變遷：1990年與2000普查的比較〉。《台大社工學刊》，6：1-34。
謝亞恆，2007，影響國中階段學生學業成就成長量的個人、家庭及學校因素之研究。高雄師範大學，教育系博士論文。
蔡毓智，2008，台灣地區國中生家庭教育資源結構之探究及其與學業表現之關連。政治大學，社會學系博士論文。
藍采風，1996，婚姻與家庭。台北：幼獅出版社。
內政部戶政司統計處，中華民國統計資訊網http://www.stat.gov.tw。
內政部兒童局，2001，民國九十年臺閩地區兒童生活狀況調查報告分析(摘要版)，台中：內政部兒童局。http://www.cbi.gov.tw/all-demo.php。
內政部兒童局，2006，民國九十五臺閩地區兒童及少年生活狀況調查報告分析(摘要版)，台中：內政部兒童局。http://www.cbi.gov.tw/all-demo.php。
行政院主計處，2006，家庭型態組成變遷。
內政部主計處，2007，2007年人口統計年報。http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/year.aspx。
離婚協商服務網站。http://www.goodbye.org.tw/。

西文書目
Acock A. C. and Kiecolt k. J., 1989, “Is IT Family Structure or Socioeconomic Status？ Family Structure during Adolescence and Adult Adjustment.”Social Forces, Vol.68, 2, 553-571.
Allison, P. D. 1994，“Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Eevents”Socioloical methods and Research ,23 , 174-199.
Amato, P., Rezac, S., and Booth A. 1995, “Helping Between Parents and Young Adult Offspring: The Role of Parental Quality, Divore, and Remarriage. ”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 363-374.
Amato, P. and Booth A. 1996, “AProspective Study of Divorce and Parent-children Relationships.”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 356-365.
Amato, P., 1999, “Children of Divorced Parents as Young Adults.” In E. M. Hetherington Ed., Coping with Divorce, Single Parenting, and Remarriage: a Risk and Resiliency Perspective. 147-163. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Aschaffenburg, Karen, and Ineke Maas, 1997, “Cultural and Educational Careers: The
Dynamics of Social Reproduction. ” American Sociological Review 62(4):573-58
Becker Gary S. and Nigel Tomes., 1986,“Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families.”Journal of Labor Economics 4:S1-S39.
Beller, A. and Chung, S. S., 1992, “Family Structure and Educational Attainment of Children: Effect of Remarriage. ”Journal of Population Economics, 5, 309-320.
Biblarz J. Timothy and Raftery E. Adrian, 1999,“Family Structure, Educational Attainment, and Socioeconomic Success: Rethinking the Pathology of Matriarchy.”The American Journal of Sociology; 105, 2, 321-365.
Blake J., 1989, Family size and Achievement. California: University of California Press.

Block, J. H., Block, J., and Gjerde, P. F. “The personality of children prior to divorce: A Prospective study.”Child Development, 57, 827-840.
Bronfenbrenner U. and Crouter A.C., 1983, “The Evolution of Environmental Models in Developmental Research.” In E. M. Hetherington Ed., P.H. Musen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Socialization, personality and social development ,357-414.New York:Wiley.
Coleman James S., Cambell, E., Hobson, c., McPartland, J., Mood, A. Weinfield, F., and York, r., 1966, The Equality of Educational Opportunity . Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
Coleman,James S., 1981, The Adolescent Society. Greenwood Press.
Coleman James S., 1988, “Social Capital in the Creation of human Capital.”American Journal of Sociology, 94:S95-S120 .
Coleman James S., 1990, Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Currie, J. and Cole N., 1993, “Welfare and child Health: The Link Between AFDC Participation and Birth Weight.” American Economic Review 83:971-85.
Dornbusch, S. M. and Wood K. D., 1989, “Family Processes and educational achievement.” In W. J. Weston ED. , Education and American Family- A Research Syntheses. 66-95. New York: New York University Press.
Downey D. B., 1995, “Understanding Academic Achievement among Children in Stephouseholds : The Role of Parental Resource, Sex of Stepparent and Sex of children. ”Social Force 73(3):875-894.
Duncan Beverly, 1967,“Education and Social Background.”American Journal of Sociology 72:363-372.

Duncan T. E. , Duncan S. C., Strycker L. A., and Alpert A. 1999 , An introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling : Concept, issues, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Erel, E., and Burman, B. 1995, “Interrelatedness of Marital Relations and Parent-Child Relations: A Meta-Analytic Review. ” Psychological Bulletin, 118, 108-132.
Erikson, E. H., 1968, Identity, Youth and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
Feldman, S. S., and Elliott G. R. 1990, At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge , MA: Harvard University Press.
Finkel, S. E., 1995, Causal analysis with panel data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ginther K. Donna and Pollak A. Roberta, 2004,“Family Structure and Children’s Educational Outcomes: Blended Families, Stylized Facts, and Descriptive Regressions.”Demography, 41, 4, 671-696.
Graaf, Nan Dirk, Paul M. de Graaf, and Gerbert Kraaykamp, 2000, “Parental Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment in the Netherlands: A Refinement of the Cultural Capital Perspective. ” Sociology of Education 73(2):92-111.
Guidubaldi J. and Perry J. D., 1984, “Divorce, Socioeconomic Status, and Children’s Cognitive-Social Competence at School Entry.”American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 3,459-468.
Hetherington, E. M. 1999, “Should We Stay Together for the Sake of the Children?” In E. M. Hetherington(Ed.), Coping with Divorce, Single Parenting and Remarriage: A Risk and Resiliency Perspective, pp. 93-116. Mahwab NL:Erlbaum.
Hao Lingxin and Xie Guiha, 2002, “The Complexity and Endogeneity of Family Structure in Explaining Children’s Misbehavior. ” Social Science Research, 31, 1-28.

Johnson, David R., 1995, “Alternative Methods for the Quantitative Analysis of Panel Data in Family Research: Pooled Time-Series Models.”Journal of Marriage and the family. Vol57, 4, 1065-1077.
Kalter N. and Rembar J., 1981, “The Significance of a Child’s Age at the Time of Parental Divorce.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 1, 85-100.
Keith V. M. and Finlay Barbara, 1988,“The Impact of Parental Divorce on Children's Educational Attainment, Marital Timing, and Likelihood of Divorce.”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 797-809.
Kuan Ping-Yin (關秉寅), Yang Meng-Li（楊孟麗）, 2004, Educational Achievement and Family Structure: Evidence from Two Cohorts of Adolescents in Taiwan. Spring Meeting on Social Stratification, Mobility, and Exclusion, the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC28), International Sociological Association, May 7-9, 2004, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Jekielek Susan M., 1998,“Parental conflict, Marital Disruption, and Children’s Emotional Well-Being.”Social Forces, 76, 905-935.
Jeynes William., 2002, Divorce, Family Structure, and the Academic Success of Children. The Haworth Press.
Johnson David R., 1995, “Alternative Methods for the Quantitative Analysis of Panel Data in Family Research: Pooled Time-Series Models . ”Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 1065-1077.
Lynn W., 1994, “Growing up with Single Parents and Stepparents: Long-term effects on family.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 935-948.
McGue, M. and D. T. Lykken, 1992, "Genetic influence on risk of divorce." Psychological Science, 3(6): 368.

McNeal, Jr., and B. Ralph, 1999, “Parental Involvement as Social Capital: Differential Effectiveness on Science Achievement, Truancy, and Dropping Out.” Social Forces, 78(1):117-144.
Marks N. Gary, 2006,“Family Size, Family Type and Student Achievement: Cross-national Differences and the Role of Socioeconomic and School Factors.”Journal of Comparative Family Studies; 37, 1, 1-24.
McLanahan S. S., 1985, “Family Structure and the reproduction of poverty. ”American Journal of Sociology, 90, 873-901.
McLanahan S. S. and Booth Karen, 1989,“Mother-Only Families: Problems, Prospects, and Politics.”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 557-580.
McLanahan S. S. and Gary, Sandefur, 1994, Growing up with a Single Parent. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
Miles D. R. and Carey, G., 1997,“Genetic and Environmental Architecure of Human Agression.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 207-217.
Milne A. M., Myers D. E., Rosenthal A.S. and Ginsburg A., 1986, “Single Parents, Working Mothers, and the Educational Achievement of School Children.” Sociology of education, 59, 125-139.
Muller, Chandra, 1993, "Parent Involvement and Academic Achievement: An Analysis of Family Resources Available to the Child." Pp. 77-113 in Parents , Their Children, and School., edited by Barbara Schneider, and James S. Coleman. New York: Westview Press.
Olson D. H. , Russell C. and Sprenkle D. H., 1983, “Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems : Ⅴ:Theorretical update .” Family Process, 22, 69-83.
Painter Gary and Levine I. David, 2000,“Family Structure and Youths’ Outcomes: which correlations are causal.”The Journal of Human Resource, 35, 524-549.
Parsons, T.,1949. “The social structure of family.” in Anshen, R. N.(ed.), The Family : Its Function and Destiny, New York, Haprper and Row.
Parsons, T.,1955. “The American Family : Its Relations to Personality and to social structure.”, in Parsons T. and Bales, R. F., Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, New York Free Press.
Parsons T., 1964, “The Kinship System of Contemporary Unites States and Age and Sex in Social Structure of the United States.” in Parsons, T. Essays in Sociological Theory, rev. ed., New York, Free Press.
Roscigno, Vincent J., and James W. Ainsworth-Darnell, 1999, "Race, Cultural Capital, and Educational Resources: Persistent Inequalities and Achievement Returns." Sociology of Education 72(3):158-178.
Shui Fong Lam, 1997, How the Family Influences Children’s Academic Achievement. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
Sui-Chu, Esther Ho, and J. Douglas Willms, 1996, "Effects of Parental Involvement on Eighth-Grade Achievement." Sociology of Education 69(2):126-141.
Sutherland, H.E.G., 1930,“The Relationship Between I.Q. and Size of Family in the Case of Fatherless Children.”Journal of Genetic Psychology, 38, 1-4,161-170.
Teachman, Jay D., 1987, “Family Background, Educational Resources, and Educational Attainment. ” American Sociological Review 52(4):548-557.
Thompson R. A., and Amato P. R., 1999, The Postdivorce Family. Sage Publications.
Twaite J. A., Silitsky, D., and Luchow, 1998, Children of Divorce: Adjustment, Parental Conflict, Custody, Remarriage, and Recommendations for clinicians. Norvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Wallstein J. S. 1984, “Children of Divorce: Preliminary Report of a Ten-Year Follow-Up of Young Children .” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 444-458.
Wallstein J. S. and Lewis J., 1998, “The Long-term Impact of Divorce on Children: A First Report from A 25-Year Study.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 36, 3, 368-383.
WEI-HSIN YU and KUO-HSIEN SU, 2006, “Gender, Sibship Structure, and Educational Inequality in Taiwan: Son Preference Revisited.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1057–1068.
Whitchurch Gail G. and Constantine L. L. “Systems Theory.”in Boss P. G. et al. ed. Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods a Contextual Approach. Ch14,325-352, New York, Plenum Press.