近年來，大氣層中溫室效應氣體(greenhouse gases)含量逐年增加進而
導致全球暖化及氣候變遷議的議題普遍受到國際間的重視。人工溼地為
一種低成本、省能源、容易操作、且兼具生態保育及景觀價值的廢水處
理程序，然而在淨化水質的生化程序中，無可避免的也會產生甲烷
(CH4)、氧化亞氮(N2O)溫室效應氣體而引起關切。人工溼地在國內外應
用的數目及面積規模均有逐年成長的趨勢，因此溫室氣體排放造成衝擊
的相關研究有其迫切需要。
本研究繼賴建志(2008)於民國96 年12 月~97 年6 月的7 個月期間調
查了嘉南藥理科技大學校園人工濕地N2O 與CH4 釋放通量研究之後，
持續以該溼地為調查對象，使用密閉罩法測量濕地不同位置點的溫室氣
體釋放通量，並同時監測濕地的廢水處理操作條件及監測濕地的水質變
化與環境條件。直到98 年6 月止，每個月採樣分析一次，本文因此收
集了該人工濕地為連續19 個月的溫室氣體長期監測資料進行統計分
析。本研究人工濕地系統由一個表面下流動式(SSF)溼地連結一個表面流
(FWS)溼地所構成，總濕地面積約3,800m2，收集經污水處理廠二級處理
後的放流水，研究期間平均日處理量317m3 / d。本年度的主要研究目的
包括：(1)調查人工溼地N2O 及CH4 釋放通量的時間與季節變化；(2)探
討人工溼地N2O 和CH4 釋放通量的空間分布變化；(3)探討N2O 和CH4
釋放通量與環境因子及水質間的關係；(4)有水生植物覆輓L植物覆
區域之氣體通量的比較；(5)探討日夜間變化對人工溼地溫室效應氣體產
量的影響；(6)比較不同類型人工溼地(FWS 與SSF 溼地)溫室氣體排放量
的差異，並與國內已建立的天然溼地溫室氣體排放資料進行比較。
II
研究結果顯示，SSF 濕地對N2O與CH4的釋放通量分別為3.83~87.37
μg N2O m-2 h-1 及-1.09~55.36 mg CH4 m-2 h-1，而FWS 濕地的釋放通量分
為−6.1~128.78 μg N2O m-2 h-1 及-4.17~28.86 mg CH4 m-2 h-1。氣體通量的
月份變化觀察結果顯示，SSF 及FWS 兩者濕地的最高N2O 通量都發生
在2008 年3 月與10 月，最低N2O 通量都發生在2008 年2 月；而兩者
濕地的最高CH4 通量都發生在2008 年9 月，SSF 濕地的最低CH4 通量
發生在2008 年2 月，FWS 濕地的最低通量則出現在2008 年1 月。若以
季節進行平均統計，發現冬季整個溼地的N2O 與CH4 平均通量明顯低
於春、夏或秋季的平均值(p<0.05)，而春、夏及秋季之間的通量並無明
顯差異(p>0.05)。在空間變化方面，N2O 的平均釋放通量沿著人工濕地
的流動距離而顯著下降(p<0.05)；CH4 的平均釋放通量隨人工濕地流動距
離的下降趨勢較不明顯，僅發現在SSF 單元進流端的CH4 通量明顯高
於出流端(p<0.05)。
本研究以單變數線性回歸將不同位置及不同時間所調查的氣體通量
與各項水質參數及氣溫的監測結果進行交叉分析，結果發現氣溫、水溫
及FWS 單元底泥溫度對三種溫室氣體通量有最一致的顯著正相關。同
時也發現氣體通量與氣溫的關係遵循著名的modified Arrhenius
equation(R=0.703~0.912, p<0.01)，N2O 與CH4 釋放通量的溫度校正係數
分別為1.042~1.098 及1.087~1.170。此結果說明季節變化導致的濕地溫
度變化，進而影響人工濕地中有關碳與氮物質的微生物轉化程序，會顯
著影響溼地N2O 及CH4 的釋放。
有水生植物存在的溼地區域，其N2O 與CH4 通量平均值均高於無水
生植物存在的溼地區域，其中以在SSF 單元所測的N2O 通量的差異性
最顯著(p<0.05)。本研究所調查的N2O 及CH4 通量值落於文獻中有關人
III
工溼地處理廢水所報導通量的範圍。若與國內天然溼地溫室氣體通量的
文獻值比較，本研究人工濕地的N2O 通量略高於、CH4 通量則明顯高於
天然溼地。

Because global warming and climate changes are following upon an
increase in atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases, there is intense concern
with the sources and emissions of the gases. Constructed wetland technology
is a natural treatment system for wastewater engineering and is characterized
by the advantages of moderate capital costs and very low energy
consumption and maintenance requirements. However, constructed wetlands
are inherently the net source of greenhouse gases such as methane (CH4),
nitrous oxide (N2O), and Carbon dioxide (CO2). Wetland construction and
the area covered by constructed wetlands are increasing domestically and
globally, thus there is an urgent need to elucidate the impact of constructed
wetlands on atmospheric burden of these gases.
Following the study conducted by Chien-Chih Lai in 2008, this study
monitored emission rates of nitrous oxide and methane as well as several
parameters of water quality simultaneously and monthly at various sampling
locations of a practical-scale constructed wetland system located in
Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science during the period from
December 2007 to February 2009. The constructed wetland system has been
operated for tertiary treatment of campus wastewater for over three years,
and consists of a subsurface flow (SSF) wetland and followed by a free
water surface flow (FWS) wetland with a total surface area of 3,800 m2. The
objectives of the study were to: (1) investigate the spatial and temporal
variations in emission rate of greenhouse gases; (2) investigate the
relationship between gas emissions and water quality of the constructed
wetland to elucidate possible factors that can affect greenhouse gas emission;
(3) examine the differences in greenhouse gas emissions between in
V
vegetated and non-vegetated area in constructed wetlands; (4) investigate
variation of gas emission rate during a day-night cycle; (5) compare the
results obtained from the study with results of domestic natural wetlands
from literature and with results of constructed wetlands from literature.
The monitored results showed that gas emission fluxes ranged from
3.83~87.37 μg N2O m-2 h-1 and -1.09~ 55.36 mg CH4 m-2 h-1 for the SSF
wetland, and from −6.1~128.78 μg N2O m-2 h-1 and -4.17 ~ 28.86 mg CH4
m-2 h-1 for the FWS wetland. The N2O emission fluxes of the both wetlands
recorded in March and October 2008 were greater than that recorded in other
months, while their CH4 fluxes observed in September 2008 was highest
among the data monthly observed. The lowest flux of either N2O or CH4 was
measured in February 2008. When looking at the seasonal difference in N2O
and CH4 flux, we found that the gas flux determined in months of winter
season was significantly lower than those of spring, summer or fall (p<0.05),
and the difference in the gas flux among the spring, summer and fall was
insignificant (p>0.05).
The average emission flux of either N2O or CH4 was found to be
decreased (p<0.05) along the flow path of the SSF and FWS unit. There was
significant difference (p<0.05) in N2O flux between inlet and outlet of the
both wetlands as well as in CH4 flux between inlet and outlet of the SSF
units.
A variety of water quality parameters and air temperature were further
correlated with gas emission fluxes by using single variable linear regression
method. It was found that gas fluxes of N2O and CH4 correlated significantly
and positively with ambient temperature, water temperature and temperature
of the FWS sediment. Additionally, the relationship between the gas fluxes
and ambient temperature strongly followed the modified Arrhenius equation
VI
(R=0.703~0.912, p<0.01), with a temperature coefficient ranging from 1.042
~ 1.098 and 1.087 ~ 1.170 for N2O and CH4 emission, respectively. These
findings indicate that temperature variation caused by seasonal change
affected the biological processes responsible for carbon and nitrogen
transformation, which in turn influenced the gas emission in wetlands.
The average fluxes of N2O and CH4 measured in vegetated areas of both
the SSF and FWS units were greater than those in unvegetated area, in
which difference in N2O flux between vegetated and unvegetated area in the
SSF unit was most significant (p<0.05). The gas fluxes reported in this study
fall within the gas flux values reported by literature regarding constructed
wetlands for wastewater treatment. As compared to the reported values of
domestic natural wetlands from previous studies, the values of constructed
wetlands in the study showed slightly higher in N2O flux, considerably
higher in CH4 flux, and about the same order of magnitude in CO2 flux.

中文摘要...................................................................................................... I
英文摘要................................................................................................... IV
誌謝..........................................................................................................VII
目錄.....................................................................................................VVIIII
表目錄.........................................................................................................X
圖目錄......................................................................................................XII
照片目錄................................................................................................ XVI
第一章前言............................................................................................. 1
1-1 研究動機....................................................................................... 1
1-2 研究方向與目的.......................................................1
第二章文獻回顧..................................................................................... 5
2-1 環境變遷...................................................................................... 5
2-1-1 溫室氣體的種類.................................................................. 5
2-1-2 何謂溫室效應..................................................................... 5
2-1-3 全球暖化淺勢..................................................................... 7
2-1-4 溫室效應造成的影響.......................................................... 9
2-1-5 溫室氣體排放現況.............................................................. 9
2-2 溼地簡介.....................................................................................11
2-2-1 溼地的定義........................................................................11
2-2-2 人工溼地的種類及發展沿革.............................................11
2-2-3 國內人工溼地技術的發展及應用.................................... 13
2-3 溼地環境中溫室氣體的形成機制........................................ 14
2-4 影響溼地溫室氣體釋放的因子........................................... 17
2-5 國外溼地釋放溫室氣體之文獻........................................... 21
2-6 國內溼地釋放溫室氣體之文獻........................................... 29
第三章研究設備與方法........................................................................ 33
3-1 溼地場址敘述.............................................................................. 33
3-1-1 嘉南藥理科大人工溼地...................................................... 34
3-1-2 鳥松溼地............................................................................. 34
3-1-3 安順人工溼地...................................................................... 35
3-2 溼地場址溫室氣體及水質現地採樣........................................... 40
3-2-1 採樣點的選擇..................................................................... 40
3-2-2 溫室氣體採樣法................................................................. 40
3-2-3 溫室氣體採樣材料............................................................. 41
3-2-4 採樣點環境因子及水質的採樣.......................................... 43
3-3 溫室氣體分析方法...................................................................... 43
3-4 溫室氣體體釋放通量率之估算................................................... 47
3-5 水質分析...................................................................................... 49
3-6 溼地場址操作條件的紀錄........................................................... 53
3-7 統計分析...................................................................................... 53
3-8 溫度變化對釋放速率常數的影響............................................... 53
第四章結果與討論............................................................................... 55
4-1 溫室氣體釋放通量之時間與季節變化....................................... 55
4-2 溫室氣體釋放通量之空間變化................................................... 94
4-3 溫度變化對溫室氣體釋放速率常數的影響..............................106
4-4 有種植植物與無種植植物溫室氣體釋放通量比較...................118
4-5 不同溼地之比較.........................................................................124
4-6 溫室氣體日變化.........................................................................135
第五章結論與建議..............................................................................144
5-2 建議.............................................................................................146
第六章參考文獻..................................................................................147

1. Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, J.R.,
Xiaosu, D. (Eds.), 2001.The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. 楊盛行、劉清標、陳顗竹、張讚昌、魏嘉碧、賴朝明、王銀波、趙震
慶、張哲明、王樹倫、陳鎮東。2003。台灣河川湖泊溼地甲烷及氧化
亞氮排放量測。全球變遷通訊雜誌40: 59-71。
3. 張翊峰, 林素貞, 陸喬克, 2005,「1991 ～ 2001 年台灣地區產業CO2
排放趨勢與關鍵因素分析」, 能源季刊, 第三十五卷, 第四期,
pp.2-15。
4. 楊盛行、林良平、劉清標、陳顗竹、賴朝明、王一雄、楊秋忠、趙震
慶、譚鎮中、李春芳、洪肇嘉。2003。台灣農業生產時二氧化碳排放
量測及減量對策。全球變遷通訊雜誌40:1-14。
5. 楊盛行、劉清標、賴朝明、黃山內、陳顗竹、魏嘉碧、王銀波、楊秋
忠、譚鎮中、劉瑞美、張讚昌。2003。台灣農業生產時甲烷排放量測
及減量對策。全球變遷通訊雜誌40: 15-35。
6. 洪肇嘉、張純庸、廖文彬、周奮興。1997。台灣地區垃圾掩埋場之甲
烷排放統計推估。第十屆環境規劃與管理研討會論文集。P.175-181，
逢甲大學環境工程科學系，台中，台灣。
7. 郭坤土、張哲明、王鯤生。2000。掩埋場甲烷通量及周界大氣甲烷濃
度之研究。溫室氣體通量測定及減量對策(II)。P.192-204，楊盛行編，
國立台灣大學全球變遷中心、農業化學系、農業陳列館。台北、台灣。
8. 郭坤土、張哲明、王鯤生。2001。掩埋場甲烷通量及周界大氣甲烷濃度之研究(II)。溫室氣體通量測定及減量對策(III)。P.193-204，楊盛
行編，國立台灣大學全球變遷中心、農業化學系、農業陳列館。台北、
台灣。
9. 楊盛行。1998。台灣北部掩埋場及溼地之甲烷釋放及減量對策(I)，國
家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，國立台灣大學農業化學系，台
北，台灣。
10.賴建志，2008，人工溼地之甲烷及氧化亞氮釋放研究嘉南藥理科技大
學環境工程與科學系碩士論文。
11.全民二氧化碳減量資訊站，http://co2.saveoursky.org.tw/。
12.氣候變化綱要公約全球資訊網，
http://sd.erl.itri.org.tw/fccc/APP_/index_c.asp
13.香港天文台，
http://www.hko.gov.hk/wxinfo/climat/greenhs/c_grnhse.htm
14.經濟部產業溫室氣體減量資訊網，http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/tigo/。
15.劉雅章，2007，全球暖化問題的科學認識，二十一世紀雙月刊，總第
一○二期，第15-24頁。
16.Gitay, H., Suárez, A., Watson, R. T., Jon Dokken, D., 2002, Climate
Change and Biodiversity, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Technical Paper V.
17.陵抾砥A淺談氣候變遷的科學，科學發展月刊 29，P867-878。
18.陳韋志，2004，環境因子的變化對人工溼地硝酸鹽去除弁鉏v響，
嘉南藥理科技大學環境工程與科學系碩士論文。
19.Mitsch, W. J., Gosselink, J. G., 1993, “Wetlands 2 ed,” Van Nostrand
Reinhold, N. Y.
20.國際濕地保護公約，1971，Ramsar Convention。
21.陳易佐，2007，大型校園人工溼地實場操作模式探討，嘉南藥理科技
大學環境工程與科學系碩士論文。
22.Tchobanoglous, G., 1993. Constructed wetlands and aquatic plant system:
research, design, operational, and monitoring issues. In G.A. Moshiri, Ed.,
Constructed Wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis.
23.Alm, J., 1997. CO2 and CH4 fluxes and carbon balance in the
atmospheric interaction of boreal peatlands, Publications in Sciences No.
44. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Joensuu, University of Joensuu, Joensuu,
Finland.
24.曾智鉉，2007，廢水場污泥及酒糟廢液複合基質之能源化可行性研
究，國立台中教育大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
25.黃山內、劉瑞美、林經偉，1999，台灣南部水稻田之甲烷釋放與減量
對策，國科會專題研究計畫成果報告書，計畫編號：NSC
88-EPA-Z-067F-001
26.Liikanen, A., Huttunen, J. T., Karjalainen, S.M., Heikkinen, K., Vaisanen,
T.S., Nykanen, H, Martikainen, P.J., 2006. Temporal and seasonal
changes in greenhouse gas emissions from a constructed wetland
putifying peat mining runoff waters. Ecological Engineering 26, 241-251.
27.錢元皓，2003，台灣水田、旱田與濕地土壤氧化亞氮之釋放通量及其
減量對策，國立台灣大學農業化學研究所碩士論文。
28.Dobbie K. E., and K. A. Smith. 2001. The effects of temperature,
water-filled pore space and land use on N20 emissions from an
imperfectly drained gleysol. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52:667-673.
29.van Hulzen, J.B., Segers, R., van Bodegom, P.M. , Leffelaar, P.A.,1999,Temperature effects on soil methane production: an explanation for
observed variability, Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31,1919-1929.
30.Inamori, R., Gui, P., Dass, P., Matsumura, M., Xu, K.-Q., Kondo, T., Ebie,
Y., Inamori, Y.,2007, Investigating CH4 and N2O emissions from
eco-engineering wastewater treatment processes using constructed
wetland microcosms, Process Biochemistry 42, 363–373.
31.Beauchamp, E. G.., 1997, Nitrous oxide emission from agriculture soils,
Can. J. Soil Sci. 77, 113-123.
32.Moore, T.R., Dalva, M., 1993. The influence of temperature and water
table position on carbon dioxide and methane emissions from laboratory
columns of peatland soils, J. Soil Sci. 44, 651–604.
33.Kiener, A., Leisinger, T., 1983, Oxygen sensitivity of methanogenic
bacteria, Systematic and Applied Microbiology 4, 305-312.
34.Wang, Z. P., DeLaune, R. D., Patrick, W. H., Masscheleyn, P. H. Jr., 1993,
Soil Redox and pH Effects on Methane Production in a Flooded Rice Soil,
Soil Sci Soc Am J 57, 382-385.
35.Masscheleyn, P. H., DeLaune, R. D., Patrick, W. H. Jr., 1993, Methane
and nitrous oxide emissions from laboratory measurements of rice soil
suspension: Effect of soil oxidation-reduction status, Chemosphere 26,
251-260.
36.Wijler, J., and Delwiche, C. C., 1954, Investigations on the denitrifying
process in soil, Plant and soil 5, 155-169.
37.Bergman, I., Klarqvist, M., Nilsson, M., 2000, Seasonal variation in rates
of methane production from peat of various botanical origins: effects of
temperature and substrate quality, FEMS Microbiology Ecology 33 ,
181-189.
38.Tanner, C. C., Adams, D. D., Downes, M. T., 1997, Methane Emissionsfrom Constructed Wetlands Treating Agricultural Wastewaters, J Environ
Qual 26, 1056-1062.
39.Crozier, C. R., Devai, I., DeLaune, R. D., 1995, Methane and Reduced
Sulfur Gas Production by Fresh and Dried Wetland Soils, Soil Sci Soc
Am J 59, 277-284.
40.陳怡伶，2006，以複合式水平流人工濕地處理中高埋齡垃圾滲出水之
研究，國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系碩士論文。
41.Garrido, J. M., Campos, J. L., Méndez, R., Lema, J. M., 1997, Nitrous
oxide production by nitrifying biofilms in a biofilm airlift suspension
reactor, Water Science and Technology 36, 157-163.
42.Sommerfeld, R. A.,Mosier, A. R.,Musselman, R. C., 1993, CO2, CH4 and
N2O flux through a Wyoming snowpack and implications for global
budgets, Nature 361, 140-142.
43.MacKenzie, A. F., Fan, M. X., Cadrin, F., 1998, Nitrous Oxide Emission
in Three Years as Affected by Tillage, Corn-Soybean-Alfalfa Rotations,
and Nitrogen Fertilization, J Environ Qual 27, 698-703.
44.Updegraff, K., Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J., Weishampel, P., Harth, C.,
2001, Response of CO2 and CH4 Emissions from Peatlands to Warming
and Water Table Manipulation, Ecological Society of America 11,
311-326.
45.Schimel, J., 2000, Rice, microbes and methane, Nature 403, 375-377.
46.Johansson, A.E., Gustavsson, A.M., Oquist, M.G., Svensson, B.H., 2004,
Methane emissions from a constructed wetland treating
wastewater-seasonal and spatial distribution and dependence on edaphic
factors, Water Research 38, 3960-3970.
47.Tai, P.D., Li, P. J., Sun, T. H., He, Y. W., Zhou, Q. X., Gong, Z. Q.,Mizuochi, M., Inamori, Y., 2002, Greenhouse gas emissions from a
constructed wetland for municipal sewage treatment, J Environ Sci
(China) 14, 27-33.
48.Johansson, A.E., Klemedtsson, Å. K., Klemedtsson, L., Svensson, B.H.,
2003, Nitrous oxide exchanges with the atmosphere of a constructed
wetland treating wastewater, Tellus 55B, 737–750.
49.Mander, U.,Lõhmus, K., Teiter, S., Nurk, K., Mauring, T., Augustin, J.,
2005, Gaseous Fluxes from Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for
Wastewater Treatment, Journal of Environmental Science and Health 40,
1215–1226.
50.Stadmark, J., Leonardson, L., 2005, Emissions of greenhouse gases from
ponds constructed for nitrogen removal, Ecological Engineering 25,
542-551.
51.Zhu, N., An, P., Krishnakumar, B., Zhao, L., Sun, L., Mizuochi, M.,
Inamori, Y., 2007, Effect of plant harvest on methane emission from two
constructed wetlands designed for the treatment of wastewater, J Environ
Manage 85, 936-43.
52.Søvik, A. K., Kløve, B., 2007, Emission of N2O and CH4 from a
constructed wetland in southeastern Norway, Sci Total Environ. 380,
28-37.
53.楊盛行，2000，氣候變化綱要公約資訊速報第 2 5 期，P7-9。
54.大華國小主題網頁-鳥松濕地公園，
http://k.dhp.ks.edu.tw/subweb/ch/index.htm。
55.環保署環境保護人員訓練所，2008，毒化物運作場所防止排放洩漏設
施、應變器材及偵測警報設備之設置管理，P57-59。
56.馬維君，2000，台灣地區蛋雞產業溫室氣體排放之探討，中國文化大學生物科技研究所碩士論文。
57.吳淑岱，1995，空氣與廢氣監測分析方法，中國環境科學出版社。
58.Rolston, D. E. 1986. Gas flur. p. 1103-1119. In A. Klute et al. (ed.)
Method of soil analysis; Part 1.Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd
ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
59.Gabriel, M.L., Roxane, M., Jacques, B., Florent, C., 2009. Greenhouse
gas production and efficiency of planted and artificially aerated
constructed wetlands. Environ. Pollut. 157,748–754.
60.王毅勇、鄭循華、宋長春、趙志春，2006，三將瓶元典型沼澤濕地氧
化亞氮通量，應用生態學報17,493-497。
61.Ryuhei Inamori , Yanhua Wang , Tomoko Yamamoto , Jixiang
Zhang ,Hainan Kong , Kaiqin Xu, Yuhei Inamori . 2008. Seasonal effect
on N2O formation in nitrification in constructed wetlands. Elesvier
73.071–1077
62.Regina, K., Nykänen, H., Silvola, J., Martikainen, P.J., 1996, Fluxes of
nitrous oxide from boreal peatlands as affected by peatland type, water
table level and nitrification capacity, Biogeochemistry 35, 401–418.
63.Martikainen, P.J., Nykänen, H., Crill, P., Silvola, J., 1993, Effect of
lowered water table on nitrous oxide fluxes from northern peatlands,
Nature 366, 51–53.
64.Nykänen, H., Alm, J., Lång, K., Silvola, J., Martikainen, P.J., 1995.
Emissions of CH4, N2O and CO2 from a virgin fen and a fen drained for
grassland in Finland. J. Biogeogr. 22, 351–357.
65.Søvik, A.K., Kløve, B. Emission of N2O and CH4 from a constructed
wetland in southeastern Norway. Sci. Total Environ., in press.