臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

圖書館主題編目工作是對資料內容的主題加以分析，以決定分類號與主題標目。分類號具有排架與聚集的功能，主題標目更是提供讀者進行主題檢索之基礎。主題編目成果良窳，是圖書館豐富資源能否被充分利用的重要關鍵，然而主題編目如何進行，在國內卻缺乏系統探討與瞭解。本研究主要目的，在探索國內學術圖書館編目館員進行中文圖書主題編目之歷程，包括主題編目之階段、使用之方法與資源，以及影響主題編目之因素。研究結果期能增進圖書館相關單位對主題編目之瞭解，進而作為改善主題編目工作之參考。

本研究採用質性研究取向，邀請十二位來自北部學術圖書館之資深編目館員為研究對象，結合大聲思考法與觀察法，請受訪者實地進行兩本中文圖書的主題編目，並於編目完成後透過半結構式深度訪談法，深入探究受訪者進行主題編目之實際歷程。

研究結果顯示：受訪者所進行的中文圖書主題編目歷程共包含五個階段，即：一、辨識作品主題；二、確認作者意圖；三、考量使用者需求；四、連結既有館藏；五、確認類號與標題。這些階段並非以線性方式依序呈現，而是具有彈性，視其需要交錯甚至反覆地出現在整個歷程中。此外，受訪者的主題編目歷程並不完全相同，每個階段中都可能綜合運用不同方法與資源來達成主題編目任務。書目特徵是受訪者分析圖書主題的主要依據，其中以題名、序言、目次及摘要最常被使用，其他如CIP、章節標題、插圖、作者簡介、出版者資訊、參考書目等，亦可作為主題判斷的輔助。書目特徵以外的方法與資源，包括查詢編目規範工具、館藏目錄、其他圖書館目錄、網路資源，以及請教同事或專家學者。影響受訪者進行主題編目的因素，主要包括讀者、作者、編目館員個人，以及編目社群等考量。兼顧編目質與量的壓力，亦影響主題編目歷程。

The task of subject cataloging includes two activities: analyzing the contents of materials and assigning classification number and subject headings. The classification number provides a means for shelving and collocating library materials, and the subject heading serves as the basis for subject searching. It is commonly known that the product of subject cataloging is a key affecting whether or not the library collection can be effectively utilized. However, the process of subject cataloging is still not fully examined and understood due to the scarcity of research in this topic. The main purpose of this study is to explore the process of subject cataloging of Chinese books performed by catalogers working in academic libraries in Taiwan. The facets observed in this study include the stages of subject cataloging, the uses of methods and resources, as well as the factors that influence the subject cataloging workflow. It is hoped that the results of this study can improve the understanding of the process of subject cataloging, and further enhance subject cataloging work.

This study employed a qualitative approach. The participants comprised of twelve senior catalogers coming from four academic libraries in the Taipei area. All participants were asked to actually catalog two Chinese books. They were required to think aloud when performing the task. The researcher also used unobtrusive observation to gather data. After the cataloging task was done, a follow-up interview was conducted with every participant.
The results show that the process of subject cataloging can be roughly divided into five stages: 1, the identification of the topic of the book; 2, the confirmation of the author’s intention; 3, the consideration of users’ needs; 4, the linkage with the existing collections; and 5, the determination and assignment of classification number and subject headings. These stages are not in a linear fashion; they are not employed in sequence. During the subject cataloging process, each cataloger would go back and forth depending on his/her needs. Besides, each participant may demonstrate his/her own working style and sequence. Even for the same cataloger, he/she may employ different approach to handle different books. During the process, they will use various methods and resources to accomplish the subject cataloging tasks.

The bibliographic features of a book are the basic clues used by catalogers for analyzing its contents and subjects matters. Among the bibliographic features, title, introductory preface (or foreword), table of contents and abstracts are the most commonly used ones. In some occasions, CIP, chapter titles, illustrations, authors, publisher information, section headings, and references may also be consulted. In addition to the bibliographic features found in the book, the following methods or resources are also employed by participants to help them determine the classification number and subject headings: checking with cataloging standards, searching the catalogs of local and other libraries, searching Internet resources, and consulting colleagues, experts and scholars. The factors that influence the subject determination include the catalog users, authors, the catalogers themselves, and their professional community. The requirement of quality and quantity of cataloging output also affects the subject cataloging process of the participants.

摘要 i
Abstract iii
目次 v
表次 vii
圖次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 問題陳述 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究範圍與限制 5
第四節 名詞解釋 5
第二章 文獻分析 9
第一節 主題編目的內涵 9
第二節 主題編目實證研究 23
第三章 研究設計與實施 31
第一節 研究方法 31
第二節 研究對象 33
第三節 研究設計 34
第四節 前置研究 37
第五節 資料處理 38
第六節 研究步驟 38
第四章 研究結果 41
第一節 研究對象分析 41
第二節 主題編目之歷程與階段 43
第三節 主題編目的方法 52
第四節 影響主題編目的因素 77
第五章 綜合討論 115
第一節 主題編目之歷程與階段 115
第二節 主題編目方法的探索 121
第三節 主題編目影響因素的探索 127
第六章 結論與建議 131
第一節 結論 131
第二節 建議 137
第三節 進一步研究之建議 139
第四節 研究方法的省思 141
參考文獻 143
附錄一 訪談大綱 149

中文主題詞表編訂小組編訂（2005）。中文主題詞表（2005年修訂版）。臺北市：國家圖書館。
中文圖書分類法2007年版修訂委員會（2007）。中文圖書分類法（2007年版）。臺北市：國家圖書館。
王省吾（1955）。圖書分類法導論。臺北市：中華文化。
王梅玲（1995）。主題分析。在圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（上冊，頁374）。臺北市：漢美。
王梅玲（2007，4月）。臺灣資訊組織與Metadata教育之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，33(1)，頁103-122。
何日章（1965）。中國圖書十進分類法（刊印本）。臺北市：何日章。
何世文（1999）。中文分類主題一體化之研究：以教育學類為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
何光國（1990）。圖書資訊組織原理。臺北市：三民。
吳明德（1996）。分類編目教材編纂計畫研究成果報告。臺北市：教育部顧問室。
吳王留璃（1995）。主題編目。在圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（上冊，頁375）。臺北市：漢美。
周繼良主編（1989）。圖書分類學。武昌市：武漢大學出版社。
俞君立、陳樹年主編（2001）。文獻分類學。武昌市：武漢大學出版社。
胡幼慧主編（2008）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（二版）。臺北市：巨流。
倪寶坤（1962）。圖書館編目學。臺北市：臺灣中華。
馬張華、侯漢清（1999）。文獻分類法主題法導論。北京：北京圖書館出版社。
馬張華、侯漢清、薛春香（2009）。文獻分類法主題法導論（修訂版）。北京：國家圖書館出版社。
國立中央圖書館編目組編訂（1995）。中文圖書標題表（修訂版）。臺北市：中央圖書館。
國家圖書館書目中心（2008）。2008全國圖書書目資訊網合作館館長會議。臺北市：該館。
國家圖書館國際標準書號中心編輯（1996）。中華民國國際標準書號與出版品預行編目使用手冊（第二版）。臺北市：國家圖書館。
張樹三（1977）。中文圖書分類之原理及實務。臺北市：臺灣中華書局。
張燕飛（2005）。信息組織的主題語言。武昌：武漢大學出版社。
教育部圖書館事業發展委員會「中國圖書分類標準化問題研究小組」編（2001）。現代圖書分類法。臺北市：編者。
莊芳榮（1973）。圖書分類與編目表解題解。中壢市：學聯文化。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市，五南圖書。
陳和琴（2007）。主題分析的現況與發展。在國家圖書館編目組編，中華民國圖書館學會96年資訊組織進階班。臺北市：中華民國圖書館學會。
陳和琴、吳王留璃、江糸秀瑛編著（1996）。圖書分類編目。臺北縣：國立空中大學。
陳和琴、張慧銖、江糸秀瑛、陳昭珍編著（2003）。資訊組織。臺北縣：國立空中大學。
陳書梅（2002，12月）。知識管理與圖書館組織文化。中國圖書館學會會報，第69期，頁66-81。
陳素美（2010）。採編館員專業知能表現於技術服務歷程之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺中市。
陳麥麟屏、林國強著（2001）。美國國會圖書館主題編目（增訂二版）。臺北市：三民。
黃淵泉（1986）。中國圖書分類編目學。臺北市：臺灣學生。
經濟部標準檢驗局（1993）。CNS 13149。西文資料審查文獻、訂定主題及選擇索引詞彙之方法。臺北市：經濟部標準檢驗局。
熊逸民（1967）。中文圖書分類編目實務。臺北市：編者。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北市：心理。
盧秀菊（1997，12月）。中文主題標目與標題表。中國圖書館學會會報，第59期，頁25-42。
賴永祥編訂（1989）。中國圖書分類法（新訂七版）。臺北市：三民。
賴永祥編訂、黃淵泉、林光美協編（2001）。中國圖書分類法（增訂八版）。臺北市：文華。
簡秀娟（2007，2月）。出版品預行編目（CIP）在資訊時代的角色詮釋。國家圖書館館訊，96(1)，頁25-29。
藍文欽（2004）。描述性後設資料之「無力論」。在王振鵠教授八秩榮慶籌備小組編，王振鵠教授八秩榮慶論文集。臺北市：臺灣學生。
Bates, M. J. (1986, November). Subject access in online catalogs: A design model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(6), 357-376.
Bellardo, T. (1991). Subject indexing: An introductiory guide. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
Beghtol, C. (1986). Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of Documentation, 42, 84-113.
Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Final report, March 17, prepared for the Library of Congress. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf
Chan, L. M. (1994). Cataloging and classification: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chan, L. M. (2007). Cataloging and classification: An introduction (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Chu, C. M. & O’Brien, A. (1993). Subject analysis: The critical first stage in indexing. Journal of Information Science, 19(6), 439-454.
Chung, E. & Hastings, S. K. (2006). A conception-based approach to automatic subject term assignment for scientific journal articles. In A. Grove(Ed.), Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST), 43, Austin, TX. Retrieved July 27, 2007, from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/116328275/PDFSTART
Cleveland, D. B. & Cleveland, A. D. (2001). Introduction to indexing and abstracting (3rd ed). Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
Curly, A. & Varlejs, J. (1984). Akers'' Simple library cataloging (7th ed.). Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.
David, C. & et al. (1995). Indexing as problem solving: A cognitive approach to consistency. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 32. Retrieved July 27, 2007, from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/1995/david_1995.pdf
Downing, M. H. & Downing, D. H. (1992). Introduction to cataloging and classification (6th ed.). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Foskett, A. C. (1996). The subject approach to information (5th ed.). London: The Library Association.
Gross, T. & Taylor, A. G. (2005, May). What have we got to lose? The effect of controlled vocabulary on keyword searching results. College & Research Libraries, (66)3, 212-230.
Hickey, D. J. (1976). Subject analysis: An interpretative survey. Library Trends, (25)1, 273-291.
Hjorland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: an activity-theoretical approach to in formation science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Hjorland, B. (2001, July). Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content…and relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(9), 774-778.
Hovi, I. (1989). The cognitive structure of classification work. In S. Kosskiala & R. Launo(Ed.), Information, knowledge, evolution: proceedings of the fourty-fourth FID congress (pp. 121-132). Amsterdam: North Holland.
International Organization for Standardization(1985). ISO 5963:1985. Methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting indexing terms. Geneva: ISO.
Jeng, L. H. (1996). Using verbal reports to understand cataloging expertise: Two cases. Libray Resources and Technical Services, 40(4), 343-358.
Joudrey, D. N. (2002). Textbooks used in bibliographic control education courses. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 34(1/2), 103-120.
Joudrey, D. N. (2005). Building puzzles and growing pearls: A qualitative exploration of determining aboutness [electronic version]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, PA. Available from http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-12132005-155713/unrestricted/JoudreyDanielN_DissertEdt2005.pdf
Lancaster, F. W. (1991). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2nd ed.). London: The Library Association.
Langridge, D. W. (1989). Subject analysis: Principles and procedures. London: Bowker-Saur.
Mai, J-E. (2001). Semiotics and indexing: An analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of Documentation, 57(5), 591-622.
Mai, J-E. (2005). Analysis in indexing: document and domain centered approaches. Information Processing and Management, 41, 599-611.
Marcum, D. B. (2005, Jan). The Future of cataloging. Address to the Ebsco Seminar. http://www.loc.gov/library/reports/CatalogingSpeech.pdf
Mann, T. (2005, August). Will Google’s keyword searching eliminate the need for LC cataloging and classification? Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.guild2910.org/searching.htm
Mann, T. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Final report, prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun: A critical review. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.guild2910.org/AFSCMECalhounReviewREV.pdf
National Information Standards Organization (2005). ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005 Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. Gaithersburg, MD: NISO Press.
Olson, Hope A. & Boll, John J. (2001). Subject analysis in online catalogs (2nd ed.). Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
Saye, J. D. (2000). Manheimer''s cataloging and classification (4th ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Šauperl, A. & Saye, J. D. (1998). Subject determination during cataloging. In E. K. Jacob(Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, American Society for Information Science, Silver Spring, MD, held at the 61st ASIS Annual Meeting, October 25-29, Pittsburgh, PA.
Šauperl, A. (1999). Subject determination during the cataloging process [electronic version]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Retrieved March 5, from PQDD database.
Šauperl, A. (2004). Catalogers’ common ground and shared knowledge. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, (55)1, 55-63.
Šauperl, A. (2005). Subject cataloging process of Slovenian and American catalogers. Journal of documentation, (61)6, 713-734.
Taylor, A. G. (2004). The organization of information (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Taylor, A. G. (2006). Introduction to cataloging and classification (10th ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
The University of California libraries (2005, December). Rethinking how we provide bibliographic services for the University of California. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf
Williams, J. W. (2004, September). Book review: Subject determination during the cataloging process. College and Research Libraries (65)5, 460-462.
Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. California library reprint series ed., 1978.
Yee, Martha M. (2008). Will the response of the library profession to the Internet be self-immolation? Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://slc.bc.ca/response.htm