臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討智力、創造力與學業成績三者間的關係，並透過多元迴歸的方式看出智力與創造力解釋了學業成績多少的變異量，再利用探索性因素分析得到智力測驗與創造力測驗一共可分成幾個因素。本研究一共收集到了232位樣本，為台南與高雄地區共四所國中一、二年級的學生，分別施測了智力測驗與創造力測驗，並以第一次段考之結果當作學業成績，其中智力測驗包含語文、數字和圖形三個大題；創造力測驗則可得到流暢力、開放性、變通力、獨創力、精密力、冒險性、好奇性、想像力、挑戰性九個成份之分數。
研究結果顯示智力與學業成績呈現顯著的中度正相關，但創造力與學業成績之間的相關並不明顯，智力與創造力兩者間則為顯著的低度正相關，而智力與創造力共可解釋學業成績約33%～58%的變異量，且本研究所使用的兩個測驗工具所測得的因素共可分成四個。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship among intelligence, creativity and academic achievement. Multiple regression analysis was used to show how much variance in academic achievement could be explained by intelligence and creativity. Exploratory factor analysis was also used to investigate the number of factors underlying the intelligence test and creativity test. Two hundred and thirty-two seventh and eighth graders sampled from four junior schools in Tainan City and Kaohsiung City were administered the intelligence and creativity tests. Their performances on the first midterm exam were collected to serve as academic achievement. The intelligence test includes verbal, quantitative and figural sections; the creativity test provides scores of nine components including fluency, patency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, adventure, curiosity, imagination and challenge.
The results show that intelligence and academic achievement correlate moderately positive, but the correlation between creativity and academic achievement is not significant. The correlation between intelligence and creativity is low but positive. They accounts for about 33% to 58% of the variance of the academic achievement.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌 謝 iii
目 錄 iv
表 目 錄 vi
圖 目 錄 viii

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 待答問題 2
第四節 名詞解釋 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 智力理論及測驗 4
第二節 創造力理論及測驗 11
第三節 智力與創造力的關係 18
第四節 智力、創造力與學業成績的關係 19
第三章 研究設計與方法 21
第一節 研究架構與流程 21
第二節 研究對象 23
第三節 研究工具 23
第四節 資料分析 27
第四章 結果與討論 28
第一節 三份測驗的描述統計 28
第二節 智力、創造力與學業成績之相關 29
第三節 智力與創造力之相關 33
第四節 智力、創造力與學業成績之迴歸分析 35
第五節 探索性因素分析 45
第五章 結論與建議 48
第一節 研究結論 48
第二節 研究建議 49
第三節 研究範圍與限制 50
參考文獻 51
一、中文部分 51
二、英文部分 53
附錄一：國內常見的智力測驗 57
附錄二：測驗研究用同意書 58

一、中文部份
王千倖（2000）。提升教師教學創造力。中等教育，51，60-71。
王文科（1989）。教育心理學。臺北：五南。
王振德、何榮桂、陳美芳、蔡崇建（1984）。國中資優學生學習行為初步研究。資優教育季刊，12，17-22。
王溢嘉（1991）。IQ 與創造力。台北：自立晚報。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台（2000）。創造力研究。台北：心理。
李素卿（譯）（1999）。Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E.著。當代教育心理學 。台北：五南。
郭生玉（2004）。教育測驗與評量。台北：精華。
郭有遹（1994）。發明心理學。台北：遠流。
郭俊賢、陳淑惠（譯）（1999）。Campbell, L., Campbell, B. & Dickinson, D.著。多元智慧的教與學。台北：遠流。
郭靜晃（2005）。兒童發展與保育。台北：威士曼文化。
涂金堂（1999）。簡介「國民中小學學生推理能力測驗」及其應用。學生輔導，63，24-33。
高健（1998）。即興創意。台北：時報。
高振耀（2012）。探索斯騰伯格智力三元能力測驗、一般智力測驗以及學業成就之間的關係。特殊教育與復健學報，26，71-102
高振耀（2012）。解開創造力的奧秘：創造力的四個P。特教論壇，12，1-12。
張春興（2007）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
程薇（2010）。心理學曁教育心理學。台北：志光。
詹秀美（1990）。創造的產品。創造思考教育，2，44-47。
楊世英（2005）。當創造與智慧相遇：臺灣華人文化中創造力與智慧的關係。教育資料集刊，30，47-74。
賈馥茗（1972）。數學創造能力與其相關能力發展之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，14，1-14。
趙志裕、康螢儀、鄭思雅、賀蓓（1998）。多元才能－IQ以外的能力。台北：心理。
劉世南、郭誌光（2001）。創造力與智慧的關係。資優教育季刊，80，16-21。
蔡明富（2014）。國小4～6年級團體智力測驗的編製。高雄師大學報，36，47-76。
蔡崇建（1991）。智力的評量與分析。台北：心理。
蔡崇建、高翠霞（2005）。智力與創造力：人類心智析論與強化。教育資料集刊，30，75-96。
簡茂發（1981）。我國國小及國中學生的智力發展。教育心理學報，14，125-148。

二、英文部分
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond Talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 333-336.
Aiken, L. R. (1997). Psychological Testing and Assessment. (9th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Arlin, P. K. (1990). Wisdom: the art of problem finding. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 230-243). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Basadur, M. (1994). Managing the Creative Process in Organization. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem, Finding, problem Solving, and Creativity (pp. 237-268). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
Cunningham, G. K. (1986). Educational and Psychological Measurement. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Davis, G. A. (1986). Creative is forever. Dubuque, IA: Kendal/Hunt Publishing Company.
Erikson, E. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York, NY: Wiley.
Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (2001). Creative work: The case of Charles Darwin. American Psychologist, 56, 346-349.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1971). Creative and its Cultivation. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Haensly, P. A., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Creativity and Intelligence. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 111-132). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Kaltsounis, B., & Honeywell, L. (1980). Additional instruments useful in studying creative behavior and creative talent: Part IV. Non-commercially available instruments. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 56-67.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Martindale, C. (2001). Oscillations and analogies: Thomas Young, MD, FRS, genius. American Psychologist, 56, 342-345.
McGrew, K., & Flanagan, D. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference: Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston, MA: Ally & Bacon.
Mooney, R. L. (1963). A conceptual model for integrating four approaches to the identification of creative talent. In C. W. Taylor, & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 331-340). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
Perkins, D. N. (1988). Creativity and the quest mechanism. In R. J. Sternberg and E. E. Smith, The Psychology of human thought (pp. 309-336). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Weise, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 159-170.
Rekdal, C. K. (1977). In search of the wild duck: Personality inventories as tests of creative potential and their use as measurements in programs for the gifted. Creative Behavior, 18, 11-22.
Rhode, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Rossiman, T., & Horn, J. (1971). Cognitive, motivational and temperamental indicants of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, 265-286.
Runco, M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 62-92). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
Runco, M, A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Silvia, P. J. (2008). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1012-1021.
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Creativity and wisdom in aging. In J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 320-329). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151-158.
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Staudinger, U. M., Lopez, D. F., & Baltes, P. B. (1997). The psychometric location of wisdom-related performance: Intelligence, personality, and more? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1200-1214.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. L. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivation creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: The free press.
Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251-272). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56, 360-362.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006a). The rainbow project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321-350.
Taylor, I. A. (1988). Creativity: Progress and Potential. New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 236-262.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43-75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wallas (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
Ward, T. B. (2001). Creative cognition, conceptual combination, and the creative writing of Stephen R. Donaldson. American Psychologist, 56, 350-354.
William, F. E. (1967). Intellectual creativity and the teacher. Journal of Creative Behavio,1, 173-180.
Williams, P. E., Ed. (1980). Creativity Assessment Packet(CAP): Manual. Buffalo, NY: D.O.K. Publishers.