臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

研究背景與目的：人類的不當行為造成當前的環境惡化與生態破壞。從1970年代起就有學者提出「環境行為」的概念，以探討造成環境問題的行為決定因素，更進一步強調環境行為的執行應由人類生活的各種層面做起。本研究目的是想瞭解台灣民眾環境關切與環境行為之間的關係，並探討自我效能在環境關切與環境行為中扮演的角色。
方法：本研究使用2010年「台灣社會變遷調查」資料。以雙變項分析來檢視社會人口學變項、環境關切分別與環境行為、自我效能等變項兩兩間的關係。接著使用波以松線性迴歸及羅吉斯迴歸，分別探討資源節用行為和資源回收行為兩面向的環境行為。最後，分析自我效能在環境關切與環境行為間的中介角色。
結果：主要結果如下：(1)女性、45~64歲、居住於北部地區、大學及以上、台灣客家人有較高頻率的環境行為。(2)環境關切中的「自然環境的重要性」及「個人願意為環境付出的代價」兩因素皆與資源節用行為及資源回收行為達統計上顯著相關。(3)自我效能並非環境關切與環境行為間的中介變項。
結論：環境關切的確會預測環境行為的產生，但不需透過自我效能。可能是本研究所探討的環境行為對一般民眾來說較容易執行；也可能因為本研究只用一個題項來測量自我效能，內容效度較低；或者自我效能的測量題項與其他在本研究未測量的變項有關。「自然環境的重要性」、「個人願意為環境付出的代價」這兩個重要的因子，皆說明了應積極培養一般民眾對環境的正向態度，以做為環境保護政策的基礎。

Purpose: Current environmental deterioration and ecological devastation are widely attributed to the misconduct of human beings. Researchers have proposed the concept of “environmental behavior” since 1970s to study behavioral determinants of environmental problems and have further emphasized the implementation of environmental practices in various aspects of daily life. This study aims to examine the relationship between environmental concerns and environmental behaviors, and the role self-efficacy may play to affect their relationship.
Methods: The Data on which this study was based came from “2010 Taiwan Social Change Survey.” Bivariate analyses were carried out to examine the associations among sociodemographic characteristics, environmental concerns, self-efficacy and environmental behaviors. Multiple Poisson linear regression and logistic regression were then used to analyze two domains of environmental behavior: resource-saving and resource-recycling, respectively. Finally, the analysis was proceeded to confirm the mediator role of self-efficacy, between environmental concerns and environmental behaviors.
Results: The main findings were:(1) Participants with the following characteristics were more likely to engage in environmental behaviors: female, 45~64 year-old, living in the northern part of Taiwan, achieving the highest educational level (university and above) and belonging to Hakka ethnic group, (2) The two dimensions of environmental concerns: “valuing natural environment” and “willingness to pay for environmental conservation” were both significant predictors of “resource-saving” as well as “resource-recycling” behaviors, and (3) Self-efficacy was not the mediator between environmental concerns and environmental behaviors.
Conclusions: Environmental concern could predict environmental behaviors but without being mediated by self-efficacy. It is possible that the environmental behaviors examined in this study are relatively easy for people to carry out that self-efficacy is no long an issue. It may be also due to the insufficient content validity resulted from the single-item measurement or the item included was related to other variables which were not measured in this study. The significant predictive power of “environmental values” and “willingness to pay” suggest the vital importance in cultivating pro-environmental values among the general public as the fundamental strategy in environmental protection policy.

口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究重要性 3
第三節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 環境關切定義 5
第二節 環境行為定義 9
第三節 環境行為模式及相關研究 12
第四節 自我效能與環境行為之關係 15
第五節 社會人口學變項與環境行為之相關 16
第六節 研究架構 18
第三章 研究方法與材料 19
第一節 資料來源 19
第二節 抽樣方法 19
第三節 研究變項的測量 21
第四節 資料分析與方法 26
第四章 研究結果 28
第一節 社會人口學變項、環境關切與自我效能、環境行為之雙變項分析 28
第二節 環境關切與自我效能之多變項分析 30
第三節 自我效能與資源的節用、回收行為之多變項分析 31
第四節 環境關切與資源的節用及回收行為之多變項分析 31
第五章 討論 34
第一節 主要研究結果 34
第二節 社會人口學變項與環境行為之關係 35
第三節 環境關切與環境行為之關係 36
第四節 自我效能在環境關切與環境行為間扮演的角色 37
第五節 研究優勢與研究限制 39
第六章 結論與建議 40
第一節 未來研究方向 40
第二節 政策建議 41
表1、研究對象之社會人口學特質 42
表2、環境關切中個人層面各子題原始分布 43
表3、環境關切中人群層面各子題原始分布 44
表4、環境關切中自然層面各子題原始分布 44
表5、自我效能題項原始分布 45
表6、環境行為中身體力行各子題原始分布 46
表7、三層面的環境關切之因素分析 47
表8、社會人口學變項、環境關切與自我效能之雙變項分析 48
表9、社會人口學變項及各單項環境行為之雙變項分析 49
表10、環境關切與自我效能之關係 50
表11、自我效能與資源的節用、回收行為之關係 51
表12、環境關切與資源的節用行為之關係 52
表13、環境關切與資源的回收行為之關係 53
參考文獻 54

王秋森、王根樹 (2009) 。全球環境變遷的公共衛生衝擊。總編輯：王榮德，公共衛生學下冊(修訂第四版)：財團法人陳拱北預防醫學基金會
王惠宏、林育燕、吳崇旗、王偉琴(2011) 。登山健行者環境態度與環境行為之相關研究。[A Study of the Relationships between Hikers'' Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors] 人文社會科學研究，5(3)，107-131。
王懋雯、彭蘭晴 (2007)。電子產業從業人員對環境議題的認知、態度與行為之研究。環境教育學刊 7，27-40。
行政院環保署資源回收基金管理委員會 (2013)。垃圾強制分類。西元2013年7月3日，取自http://recycle.epa.gov.tw/recycle/epa/ShowPage2.aspx?sno=1009&subsno=30
行政院環境保護署 (2012a)。政策。西元2012年12月23日，取自 http://www.epa.gov.tw/ch/aioshow.aspx?busin=323&path=7595&guid=441ec9c8-d10e-45a2-b89a-df6f08c14a6b&lang=zh-tw
行政院環境保護署 (2012b)。施政願景、策略、成果及展望。西元2012年12月21日，取自http://www.epa.gov.tw/ch/artshow.aspx?busin=2157&art=2008110513502803&path=12050
行政院環境保護署 (2012c)。移動汙染源管制網。西元2012年12月23日，取自http://mobile.epa.gov.tw/Restrain.aspx
行政院環境保護署 (2012d)。資源回收再利用資訊網。西元2012年12月21日，取自 http://waste1.epa.gov.tw/ier_web/
行政院環境保護署 (2012e)。綠色生活資訊網。西元2012年12月23日，取自 http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/GreenLife/info/mark/mark-2.aspx
李尹暘、林曉佩、林君怡 (2007)。自我效能理論之分析與應用。澄清醫護管理雜誌, 3(2)，46-52。
李蘭、晏涵文、陳富莉、陸玓玲、吳文琪、江宜珍 (2010)。健康行為與健康教育 。巨流圖書公司。
周少凱、許舒婷 (2010) 。大學生環境認知、環境態度與環境行為之研究。嶺東學報， 27，85-113。
柴松林 (2007)。從環境主義到綠色消費主義。消費者保護研究，第2輯。
許晃雄、陳正達、盧孟明、陳永明、周佳、吳宜昭 (2011) 。台灣氣候變遷科學報告2011：行政院國家科學委員會。
陳素琴、李明聰 (2007)。以計畫行為理論探討生態旅遊遊客之環境行為模式—以高雄洲仔濕地公園為例。論文發表於2007年21世紀第五屆產業經營管理國際學術研討會，高雄：國立高雄應用科技大學。
黃毅志、張維安(2000)。台灣客家閩南與客家的社會階層之比較分析。台灣客家族群史產經篇，頁305-338。台灣省文獻會。
楊冠政 (1992)。環境行為相關變項之類別與組織。環境教育季刊。
經濟部水利署 (2012)。節約用水資訊網。西元2012年12月23日，取自http://www.wcis.itri.org.tw/
經濟部能源局 (2012)。2012年能源產業技術白皮書。西元2012年12月23日，取自http://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/SubMenu.aspx?menu_id=62
詹長權 (2009)。環境資源與永續發展。總編輯：王榮德，公共衛生學下冊(修訂第四版)：財團法人陳拱北預防醫學基金會。
瞿海源 (2002)。民眾對社會問題嚴重性評估的變遷。台灣社會問題研究學術研討會。
魏鈺玲、曾治乾、黃禎貞、莊博閔、葉國樑 (2011)。台北縣某綠色學校國小高年級學童環境行為之調查研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，31，40-54。
Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21-32.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139-161.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6).
Barr, S., & Gilg, A. W. (2005). Conceptualising and analysing household attitudes and actions to a growing environmental problem: Development and application of a framework to guide local waste policy. Applied Geography, 25(3), 226-247. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.03.007
Berger, I. E. (1997). The Demographics of Recycling and the Structure of Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 515-531.
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257-278.
Chan, R. Y. K. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers'' green purchase behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 18(4), 389-413.
Cottrell, S. P. (2003). Influence of Sociodemographics and Environmental Attitudes on General Responsible Environmental Behavior among Recreational Boaters. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 347-375.
De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conservation Letters, 2(2), 61-66.
Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465-480.
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handboo of environmental sociology.
Dunlap, R. E., Liere, K. D. V., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
Emmons, K. M. (1997). Perspectives on Environmental Action: Reflection and Revision Through Practical Experience. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 34-44.
Flahive, M.-h. W., Chuang, Y.-C., & Li, C.-M. (2011). Reliability and Validity Evidence of the Chinese Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale Scores Among Taiwanese Children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(3), 273-285.
Fransson, N., & GÄRling, T. (1999). ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS, MEASUREMENT METHODS, AND RESEARCH FINDINGS. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369-382.
Grob, A. (1995). A structural model of environmental attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 209-220.
Groot, J. I. M. d., & Thøgersen, J. (2012). Values and pro-environmental behaviour. In L. Steg, A. E. v. d. Berg & J. I. M. d. Groot (Eds.), Environmental Psychology:An Introduction (pp. 141-152).
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986-87). Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
Honnold, J. A. (1984). Age and Environmental Concern: Some Specification of Effects. Journal of Environmental Education, 16(1), 4-9.
Hungerford, H. R., & Peyton, R. B. (1976). Teaching environmental education: Portland, Me. : J. Weston Walch.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing Learner Behavior through Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
Jaeger, C., Dürrenberger, G., Kastenholz, H., & Truffer, B. (1993). Determinants of environmental action with regard to climatic change. Climatic Change, 23(3), 193-211.
Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Jennifer Bennett, Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133-155.
Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1-19.
. Key World Energy Statistics 2011. (2011): International energy agency.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
Liere, K. D. V., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181-197.
Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
Maloney, M. P. W., Michael P. . (1973). Ecology: Let''s hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. . American Psychologist, 28(7).
Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2004). The structure of environmental attitudes: A first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 289-303.
Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of Environmental Behaviors: Bringing Back Social Context. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 181-208.
Ostman, R. E., & Parker, J. L. (1987). Impact of Education, Age, Newspapers, and Television on Environmental Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors Journal of Environmental Education, 19(1), 3-9.
P.Wesley Schultz, & Zelezny, L. (2003). Reframing Environmental Messages to be Congruent with American Values. Research in Human Ecology, 10(2).
Schaffrin, A. (2011). No Measure without Concept. A Critical Review on the Conceptualization and Measurement of Environmental Concern. International Review of Social Research.
Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 31-42.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
Smith-Sebasto, N. J., & D''Costa, A. (1995). Designing a Likert-Type Scale to Predict Environmentally Responsible Behavior in Undergraduate Students: A Multistep Process. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 14-20.
Snelgar, R. S. (2006). Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(2), 87-99.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322-348.
Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Snelgar, R., & Furnham, A. (2010). Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: A path analytic investigation of their determinants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 139-145.
Tabernero, C., & Hernández, B. (2011). Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation Guiding Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658-675.
Tremblay, K. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Rural-Urban Residence and Concern with Environmental Quality: A Replication and Extension Rural Sociology, 43(3), 474-491.
Wesley Schultz, P. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339.
Wu, H., & Mweemba, L. (2010). Environmental self-efficacy, attitude and behavior among small scale farmers in Zambia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12(5), 727-744.
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P.-P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. . Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443-457.