臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在電子化時代，網站是使用者與單位聯絡的橋樑，如何使用者快速又有效的從網站中取用所需之資訊，使網站的意念和訊息分享給無數的網際網路使用者，是網站在建置和規劃時必須考慮的問題。
本研究以台師大圖書館網站做為研究對象，目的在了解修正型德菲式卡片分類法的測試中，首位受試者的背景因素是否影響測試的成效。本研究控制首位受試者的職業及學科背景，實驗後產生5組網站架構，再徵集受試者進行尋獲度調查。分析結果顯示經過9個回合的修正型德菲式卡片分類法後，具學科背景及專業職業背景者為首的2個架構，其尋獲度的效益較高；另外研究發現修正型德菲式卡片分類法適合用來確認網站的資訊架構，是將來在進行網站改版或重新規劃設計網站時的實用工具。

Website is an important bridge between users and organizations. How to build a website providing users an easy and efficient way to explore and get the information to fit their needs becomes a main concern.
The purpose of this study targeted first participants in each group by the factor of their different background. And investigate the possibility of their performance affected by the factor of different backgrounds by adopting Modify-Delphi Card Sorting.
The occupation and subject major of first participants in each group were the controlling variables and five information structures are formed in this study. The collected data were analysed by task-oriented fundability test on various website’s information architectures, and showed that the first participants with professional background could lead better information architectures then the others. In addition, it also showed that the Modified-Delphi Card Sorting is a usable tool to gather users’ opinions while constructing the website.

中文摘要 ...................................................................................................................... I
Abstract ........................................................................................................................ II
表 次 ........................................................................................................................... ii
圖 次 ......................................................................................................................... iii
第一章 緒論 ............................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究動機與問題陳述............................................................................ 1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題............................................................................ 2
第三節 研究範圍與限制.................................................................................... 3
第四節 名詞解釋................................................................................................ 3
第二章 文獻分析 ....................................................................................................... 5
第一節 使用者特性與網站使用........................................................................ 5
第二節 卡片分類法............................................................................................ 6
第三節 修正型德菲式卡片分類法.................................................................. 10
第四節 卡片分類法使用性評估...................................................................... 15
第三章 研究設計與實施 ......................................................................................... 20
第一節 研究設計.............................................................................................. 20
第二節 研究個案與對象.................................................................................. 21
第三節 研究方法.............................................................................................. 22
第四節 研究步驟.............................................................................................. 26
第四章 研究結果與分析 ......................................................................................... 29
第一節 受試者分析.......................................................................................... 29
第二節 卡片分類歷程...................................................................................... 31
第三節 網站架構.............................................................................................. 31
第四節 網站尋獲度調查.................................................................................. 32
第五章 結論與建議 ................................................................................................. 33
第一節 結論...................................................................................................... 33
第二節 建議...................................................................................................... 34
第三節 未來研究建議...................................................................................... 36
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................... 37
附錄一 尋獲度問卷 ................................................................................................. 43

黃俊英（1994）。企業研究方法。台北市：東華。
宋文娟（2001）。一種質量並重的研究法--德菲法在醫務管理學研究領域之應用。醫務管理期刊，2（2），11-20。
林珊如（2002）。網路使用者特性與資訊行為研究趨勢之探討。圖書資訊學刊，17，35-47。
魏澤群（2005）。使用者最大：從優使性（usability）出發的網站設計原則。台北市：網奕資訊科技。
JunChen（2007）。利用卡片分類進行信息架構。上網日期：2010/4/7。檢自：http://ucdchina.com/blog/?p=90
丁依玲（2007）。以卡片分類法分析大學書館網站架構-- 以國立臺灣師範大學圖書館網站為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。
交通部統計處（2007）。民眾使用網際網路狀況調查報告。台北市：交通部統計處。
邱皓政（2000）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市：五南。
張苙雲、廖培珊（2009）。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第五期第四次調查執行報告。台北市：中央研究院社會學研究所。
劉至逢（2009）。大學圖書館網站使用性評估之探討。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。
吳怡青（2010）。以修正型德菲式卡片分類法探討大學圖書館網站尋獲度之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。
謝建成、劉至逢（2008）。大學圖書館使用性評估之探討，第十九屆國際資訊管理學術研討會。南投縣：國立暨南國際大學。
Ahlstrom, V., & Allendoerfer, K. (2004). Information Organization for a Portal Using a Card-Sorting Technique Retrieved 2010/5/22, from http://hf.tc.faa.gov/technotes/dot-faa-ct-tn04-31.pdf
Ahlstrom, V., & Allendoerfer, K. (2004). Information Organization for a Portal Using a Card-Sorting Technique Retrieved 2010/5/22, from http://hf.tc.faa.gov/technotes/dot-faa-ct-tn04-31.pdf
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189-194.
Brophy, P. & Craven, J. (2007). Web accessibility. Library Trends, 55(4), 950-973.
Campbell, N. (2001). Usability assessment of library-related web sites methods and case study. Chicago: LITA.
Capra, M. G. (2005). Factor analysis of card sort data: an alternative to hierarchical cluster analysis. Paper presented at the Human Factors And Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Dick, D. (2007). Innovations in Card Sorting Retrieved 2010/5/22, from http://www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0710-CardSorting.htm
Ebenezer, C. (2003). Usability evaluation of an NHS library website. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20(3), 134-142.
Faiks, A., & Hyland, N. (2000). Gaining User Insight: A Case Study Illustrating the Card Sort Technique. College & Research Libraries, 61(4), 349-357.
Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems, 22(3), 89-93.
Finstad, K. (2006). The System Usability Scale and Non-Native English Speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 185-188.
Fox, R. (2008). Weaving the digital library web. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(1), 8-17.
Fuccella, J. (1997). Using user centered design methods to create and design usable web sites. Paper presented at the 15th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, New York.
Fuccella, J., & Pizzolato, J. (1998). Creating Web Site Designs Based on User Expectations and Feedback. ITG NEWSLETTER Retrieved 2010/5/22, from http://internettg.org/newsletter/june98/web_design.html
Genuis, S. K. (2004). Web site usability testing: A critical tool for libraries. Feliciter,, 50, 161-164.
Hannah, S. (2005). Sorting out card sorting: Comparing methods for information architects, usability specialists, and other practitioners.
Hawley, M. (2008). Extending Card-Sorting Techniques to Inform the Design of Web Site Hierarchies Retrieved 2010/5/22, from http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2008/10/extending-card-sorting-techniques-to-inform-the-design-of-web-site-hierarchies.php
Hinkle, V. (2008). Card-Sorting: What You Need to Know about Analyzing and Interpreting Card Sorting Results. Usability News Retrieved 2010/5/22, from http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/102/cardsort.asp
Hudson, W. (2005). Playing your cards right: getting the most from card sorting for navigation design. interactions, 12(5), 56-58.
Kaufman, J. (2006). Card Sorting: An Inexpensive and Practical Usability Technique Retrieved 2010/05/22, from http://www.stc.org/intercom/PDFs/2006/200611_17-19.pdf

Martin, S., & Kidwell, D. K. (2001, August 16-August 17). A Case Study in Cluster Analysis for Intranet Organization. Paper presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology, Austin, Texas.
Morville, P. (2005). Ambient findability: Libraries at the crossroads of ubiquitous computing and the internet. Online, 29(6), 16-21.
Nielsen, J. (2000). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users Retrieved 2010/4/7, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
Nielsen, J. (2004). Card Sorting: How Many Users to Test. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox Retrieved 2010/4/7, 2010, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040719.html
Paul, C. L. (2007). A Modified Delphi Approach to a New Card Sorting Methodology. School of Information Arts and Technologies, University of Baltimore.
Robertson, J. (2001). Information design using card sorting Retrieved 2010/4/9, 2010, from http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cardsorting
Spencer, D., & Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: a definitive guide. Boxes and Arrows: The Design Behind the Design Retrieved 2010/3/17, 2010, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide
Tullis, T., & Wood, L. (2004). How Many Users Are Enough for a Card-Sorting Study? Retrieved 2010/4/7, from http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/UPA2004CardSorting.pdf
Turnbow, D., Kasianovitz, K., Snyder, L., Gilbert, D., & Yamamoto, D. (2005). Usability testing for web redesign a UCLA case study. OCLC System & Services, 21(3), 226-234.
Walker, A., & Selfe, J. (1996). The delphi method: A useful tool for the allied health researcher. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 3(12), 677-681.
Zimmerman, D. E., & Akerelrea, C. (2002). A Group Card Sorting Methodology for Developing Informational Web Sites Retrieved 2010/5/8, from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01049127&tag=1