經濟的快速起飛，改善人們對於生活上各種不同的需求，但另一方面也對環境帶來破壞和傷害於是人們對於環境保護和永續經營的議題越來越重視，環境的議題雖然造成企業的威脅，卻也可能帶來創新的機會。企業為了生存與競爭開始尋求創新的做法，這些方法包含了創造新產品、開發新市場，以新技術生產產品，或是與競爭者、供應商、顧客合作。大多數的中小企業，都有自己的供應商合作機制。本研究更加深入探討到與主要供應商之間的合作關係，藉由長期合作所產生的關係信任及學習是否會對企業的綠色創新行為產生影響。因此，本研究主要在這一方面提供了實證，鼓勵企業實施整合和關係，以提高他們的綠色創新，並加強在全球市場的競爭優勢。

因此，本研究提出一整合性架構，來探討與供應商整合、資源影響組織之間的信任、學習進而影響綠色創新的關聯性。期能提供臺灣中小企業在綠色創新策略之擬訂上有更詳盡的參考依據。

The rapid economic growth, improves people's daily life with a variety of different needs, but on the other hand has also created damage to the environment. People take more attention to issues of environmental protection and sustainable management. Although environmental issues pose threat to the enterprise, but may also bring opportunities for innovation. For survive and compete in the market. Companies began to seek innovative ways to create new products, developing new markets, produce products with new technology, or Cooperation with competitors, suppliers, customers. Most small and medium-sized enterprises, has its own suppliers mechanism. In this study, explore to the relationship between trust and learning generated by the long-term cooperation and cooperative relations between the major suppliers, and whether it would be that the green innovation behavior impact. Hence, this paper aims to bridge this gap by providing empirical evidence to encourage companies to implement integration and relationship in order to improve their green innovation, and to enhance their competitive advantage in the global market.
Therefore, this study proposes an integrated framework to explore how supplier integration and resources affect the trust and learning between the organization. Expect to provide a more detailed reference of Taiwan's SMEs in the green innovation strategy formulation.

第壹章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機
第二節 研究目的
第貳章 文獻探討
第一節 準垂直整合
第二節　資源整合
第三節　信任
第四節　學習
第五節　綠色創新
第參章　研究方法
第一節 研究架構
第二節 研究假說
第三節 操作性變數定義
第四節 資料來源與問卷設計
第五節 資料分析方法
第肆章 研究結果與分析
第一節 樣本回收概況
第二節 樣本基本資料分析
第三節 敘述統計分析
第四節 因素分析
第五節 信度分析
第六節 Pearson相關分析
第七節 多元迴歸分析
第八節 信任、學習之中介效果分析
第伍章 研究結論與建議
第一節 研究實證結果
第二節 研究結果與討論
第三節 實務上之意涵與建議
第四節 學術上之意涵與建議
第五節 研究限制
第六節 後續研究建議

一、中文
1.中小企業綠色環保資訊網。第12屆綠色供應鏈管理師班分組報告，取自中小企業綠色環保資訊網http://green.pidc.org.tw/index.php
2.方至民(2010)，策略管理 建立企業永續競爭力，台北：前程文化
3.白峻宇(2002)，「技術選擇與垂直整合之策略分析」，東海大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
4.何安邦(2000)，「供應商涉入角色與新產品開發專案績效關係之研究」，中正大學企業管理所碩士論文。
5.黃怡菁(2002)，「關係認知、關係屬性及關係涉入程度與合作績效之關聯」，逢甲大學企業研究所碩士論文
6.蕭惠文(2001)，「綠色技術研發與移轉及其影響因子之研究」，國立成功大學資源工程所碩士論文。
7.黃俊英(1994)，「綠色管理：企業因應環保壓力的對策」，中國行政，第55期，頁1-16
8.劉怡君(2006)，「中小企業製造商與供應商關係知識庫之探討-信任與組織學習能力之干擾效果」，雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
9.吳克(2011)，策略聯盟的兩難，初版，台北：聯經。
10.吳明隆(2005)，SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計，知城數位科技股份有限公司。
11.吳啟絹、廖述賢、胡大謙、楊旻儒(2010),吸收能力、知識移轉、組織學習與競爭優勢之關聯性研究。
12.榮泰生(2006)，SPSS與研究方法，初版，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
13.林盈旭 (2003)。資源連結、關係能力、學習能力、供應商競爭優勢與績效關係之研究，長榮大學經營管理學系未出版之碩士論文，台南縣。
14.劉道捷 編譯，「PS3可能降價100美元」，經濟日報／彭博資訊東京電，2007-03-21
15.溫肇東、陳泰明(1997)，「台灣的綠色創新組織初探」，台大管理論叢，第八卷第二期，頁99-124
16.郭展君(2010)，供應商整合對合作關係程度及供應商回應能力的影響-以供應商議價能力為調節變數。銘傳大學管理研究所碩士論文。
17.許銘勝(2005)，組織學習能力、創新雄心與創新之關係，逢甲大學企業管理所碩士論文。
18.曹為忠(2003)，「信任的決定因素及其對聯盟績效與未來合作意願之影響－中小企業策略聯盟之實證分析」，企業管理學報，第五十八期，頁102-132。
19.錢銘貴與施勵行(2007)。綠色供應鏈管理實務採行之驅力壓力與組織績效關係之實證研究–以台灣電機電子產業為例。人文社會科學研究，1（3）， 72-98。
20.微星科技股份有限公司(2011)。2011企業社會責任報告書。取自微星科技公司網址http://tw.msi.com/html/popup/csr_tw/cemm_ru.html
二、英文
1.Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42−58.
2.Argyris, Chris (1977), “Double Loop learning in organizations, “Harvard Business Review, September/October, pp.115-125
3.Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesleyy.
4.Argryris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.A.C. Inkpen, (1998) “Learning and knowledge Acquisition through International Strategic Alliances,” Academy of management Wxecutive, vol. 12,pp. 69-80.
6.Baron R.M.and KennyD. A. (1986). The Hoderator-Hediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51（6）, 1173-1182.
7.Bartlett, M. S. (1937).Properties of Sufficiency and Statistical Tests. Journal of Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 160, 268-282.
8.Chen, Y.-S., (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image – green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3), 531–543.
9.Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., Wen, C.-T., (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4), 331–339.
10.Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F. and Chung, S. H. (2011).The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E 47 , 822–836
11.Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management Journal, 34(3), 555-590
12.Damanpour, F., and Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance： The Problem of Organizational Lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409
13.Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer–seller relationships. Journal　of Marketing, 51(2), 11−27.
14.Durbin.J and Watson G.S. (1951). Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression（II）. Biometrika, 159–178.
15.Dyer, J. and Ouchi, W. (1993). ”Japanese Style Business Partnership：Giving Companies a Competitive Edge “,Sloan Management Review, Vol.35,pp51-63.
16.Garvin, David A. 1993. Buliding a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, July/August. 78-91
17.Hair (1998). "Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings." Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
18.Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., and Black W. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis（6th ed）, Upper Saddle River, N. J：Prentice Hall International.
19.Hart, S.L., 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (4), 986–1014.
20.Huber, G., 1991. Organizational Learning: the Contributing Processes and the Literature, Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
21.Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. (1994). Transformative Capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 1 (5), 365-385.
22.Klassen, R.D., Whybank, D.C., 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (6), 599–615.
23.Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Englewood cliffs,NJ：Prentice Hall
24.Madhok, A., “Revisting Multinational Firms’ Tolerance for Joint Ventures : A Trust-Based Approach, ”Journal of international Business Studies, 26(1), 1995, pp.117-137
25.Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20−38.
26.Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J.W. and Hill, R.C. (1996), “Measuring Performance in Entrepreneurship Research”, Journal of business Research, 15-23
27.Nonaka, I., “The Knowledge Creating Company,” Harvard Business Review.69 (6), 1991, 96-104.
28.Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-Creating Company. New York:Oxford University press
29.Popper, M., and Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organization learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34, 167-179
30.Porter. M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy, techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New York: Free press
31.Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., and Smith-Doer, L. (1996), “Inter-Organizational Collaboration and the Locus of innovation：Networks of learning in Biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41(1), pp.116-146
32.Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row
33.Robert B. Handfield and Christian Bechtel (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial marketing management, Vol. 31, pp367– 382
34.Selnes, Fred and James, Sallis (2003), “Promoting Relationship Learning, ”Journal of Marketing,67(July), 80-95
35.Shrivastava, P., 1995. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16 (S1), 183–200.
36.Stata, R. 1989. Organizational learning: The key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review, 30(3): 63-74.
37.Wittmann, C. M., Hunt, S. D., & Arnett, D. B. (2009). Explaining Alliance Success: Competences, Resources, Relational Factors, and Resource-Advantage Theory, Industrial Marketing Management, 38(7), 743-756.
38.Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., 2004. Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management 22 (3), 265–289.