|
參考文獻 一.中文部分 黃慕萱(民85)。檢索系統評估。在資訊檢索(第十章,頁269-275)。台北市:台灣學生。
二.西文部分 Baeza-Yates, R. (1999). Modern Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press. Bates, M. J. (1979). Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 30(4), 205-214. Belkin, N. J. (1993). Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. Information retrieval, 93, 55–66. Belkin, N. J., Chang, S., Downs, T., Saracevic, T., & Zhao, S. (1990). Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs. In Proceedings of the 53rd ASIS annual meeting (pp. 69–79). Medford, NJ: Learned Information. Belkin, N. J., KELLY, D., Kim, G., Kim, J. Y., Lee, H. J., Muresan, G., Tang, M. C., et al. (2003). Query length in interactive information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval (pp. 205-212). ACM New York, NY, USA. Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. N., & Brooks, H. M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Journal of documentation, 38(2), 61-71. Borlund, P., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 53(3), 225-250. Borlund, P., & Ingwersen, P. (2000). Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 56(1), 71-90. Cleverdon, C. W. (1967). The Cranfield tests on index language devices. In Aslib proceedings, 19 (Vol. 6, pp. 173–194). Doms, A., & Schroeder, M. (2005). GoPubMed: exploring PubMed with the gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(Web Server Issue), 783-786. Dumais, S. T., & Belkin, N. J. (2005). The TREC interactive tracks: putting the user into search. In E. M. Voorhees & D. Harman (Eds.), TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (pp. 123-153). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Efthimiadis, E. N. (1996). Query Expansion. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology (ARIST) (Vol. 31, pp. 121-187). Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/efthimis/pubs/Pubs/qe-arist/QE-arist.html Efthimiadis, E. N. (2000). Interactive query expansion: a user-based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(11), 989-1003. Fidel, R. (1984). Online searching styles: A case-study-based model of searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(4), 211-221. Goetz, T., & von der Lieth, C. W. (2005). PubFinder: a tool for improving retrieval rate of relevant PubMed abstracts. Nucleic acids research, 33(Web Server Issue), 774-778. Harman, D. (1988). Towards interactive query expansion. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 321-331). ACM New York, NY, USA. Harman, D. (1992). Relevance feedback revisited. In Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 1-10). ACM New York, NY, USA. Hearst, M., Elliott, A., English, J., Sinha, R., Swearingen, K., & Yee, K. P. (2002). Finding the flow in web site search. Communications of the ACM, 45(9), 42-49. Hersh, W., Pentecost, J., & Hickam, D. (1996). A task-oriented approach to information retrieval evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(1), 50-56. Hersh, W. R., & Hickam, D. H. (1998). How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. JAMA, 280(15), 1347-1352. Ingwersen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn: integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., Bateman, J., & Saracevic, T. (1998). Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the Web. In ACM SIGIR Forum (Vol. 32, pp. 5–17). Joho, H., & Jose, J. M. (2006). Slicing and dicing the information space using local contexts. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information interaction in context (pp. 66-74). Copenhagen, Denmark: ACM. doi:10.1145/1164820.1164836 Kristensen, J., & Järvelin, K. (1990). The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free text searching of a full-text database. International Classification, 17(2), 77–84. Kules, B., & Capra, R. (2008). Creating exploratory tasks for a faceted search interface. In Second Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction (HCIR 2008). Lin, X. (1999). Visual MeSH. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 317-318). ACM New York, NY, USA. Manning, C. D. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pennanen, M., & Vakkari, P. (2003). Students'' conceptual structure, search process, and outcome while preparing a research proposal: a longitudinal case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(8), 759–770. Perez-Iratxeta, C., BORK, P., & Andrade, M. A. (2001). XplorMed: a tool for exploring MEDLINE abstracts. Trends in biochemical sciences, 26(9), 573-575. Plikus, M. V., Zhang, Z., & Chuong, C. M. (2006). PubFocus: semantic MEDLINE/PubMed citations analytics through integration of controlled biomedical dictionaries and ranking algorithm. BMC bioinformatics, 7(1), 424. Pollitt, A. S. (1998). The key role of classification and indexing in view-based searching. International cataloguing and bibliographic control, 27(2), 37-40. Robertson, S. E., & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. M. (1992). On the evaluation of IR systems. Information Processing and Management, 28(4), 457-466. Ruthven, I. (2008). Interactive information retrieval. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science & Technology (Vol. 42, pp. 43-91). Medford, NJ: Information Today. Saracevic, T. (1997). The stratified model of information retrieval interaction: Extension and applications. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science (Vol. 34, pp. 313–327). Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. (1988a). A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(3), 177–196. Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. (1988b). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 39(3), 197–216. Saracevic, T., Kantor, P., Chamis, A. Y., & Trivison, D. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving: Background and methodology. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 39(3), 161-176. Shiri, A., & Revie, C. (2006). Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment: A user-centered evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(4). Shiri, A., Revie, C., & Chowdhury, G. (2001). Thesaurus-assisted search term selection and query expansion: a review of user-centred studies. Knowledge Organization, 29(1), 1–19. Spink, A. (1995). Term relevance feedback and mediated database searching: implications for information retrieval practice and systems design. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 161–171. Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (1997). Interaction in information retrieval: selection and effectiveness of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 741–761. Su, L. T. (1992). Evaluation measures for interactive information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 28(4), 503–516. Su, L. T. (1994). The relevance of recall and precision in user evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 207–217. Su, L. T. (2003). A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of web search engines: Ii. an evaluation by undergraduates. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1193–1223. Vakkari, P. (1999). Task complexity, problem structure and information actions integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 819-837. Vakkari, P. (2000). Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance: A longitudinal case study. In Proceedings of the RIAO 2000 Conference (pp. 894–907). Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44–60. Vakkari, P., & Hakala, N. (2000). Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. Journal of Documentation, 56(5), 540–562. Vakkari, P., Pennanen, M., & Serola, S. (2003). Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal A longitudinal case study. Information Processing and Management, 39(3), 445–463. White, R. W., Kules, B., & Drucker, S. M. (2006). Supporting Exploratory Search, Introduction, Special Issue, Communications of the ACM. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 36-39. White, R. W., Ruthven, I., & Jose, J. M. (2005). A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 35-42). ACM New York, NY, USA. Xie, I. (2008). Interactive Information Retrieval in Digital Environments. Hershey,PA: IGI Pub.
|