參考文獻
一、中文文獻
王正華與陳秀娟(2011)，專利分析相關文獻關係與發展趨勢:採用引用文獻分析與社會網
絡分析，科技管理學刊，第16卷，第4期，頁68。
中華民國專利法(2014)，全國法規資料庫。取自
http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=J0070007。
洪永杰(2005)，專利申請的策略與專利佈局的模式。取自http://designer.mech.yzu.edu.tw/。
科技產業資訊室(2010)，關於專利家族 (patent family)。取自
http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=3448。
科技產業資訊室(2010)，蘋果控告宏達電侵犯其智慧型手機專利，目標在Google？。取
自http://cdnet.stpi.narl.org.tw/techroom/pclass/2010/pclass_10_A035.htm。
科技產業資訊室(2011)，智慧型行動手持裝置專利戰爭 Apple vs. HTC。取自
http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=6376。
科技產業資訊室(2012)，HTC與Apple全球專利訴訟大和解觀察。取自
http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=7549。
夏文龍(1998)，專利對產業界的價值。智慧財產權管理，頁20-21。陳達仁與黃慕萱(2009)，專利資訊檢索、分析與策略。臺北市：華泰文化。
張順評(2009)，以社會網絡分析法探討虛擬社群之反應結構。國立屏東商業技術學院資
訊管理系，頁12-21。
梅筱珍(2010)，技術主導、互補與相容。暨南國際大學國際企業學系博士論文。曾元顯(2004)，專利文字之知識探勘：技術與挑戰。現代資訊組織與檢索研討會。
葉柏宏(2007)，以專利訴訟進行專利價值影響因素之研究。中華大學科技管理研究所，
頁11。
經濟部智慧財產局(2012)，智慧局101年報專利統計，經歷部智慧財產局。取自http://www.tipo.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=6721&CtUnit=3231&BaseDSD=7&mp=1&nowPage=1&pagesize=10。
新聚能科技顧問Synergytek(2013)，引證專利資訊並非全部都具有相同的意義。取自
http://synergytek.com.tw/blog/2013/07/15/citations_are_not_the_same/。
賴奎魁、吳曉君與張善斌(2004)，建立產業專利分類系統-共同引證分析的觀點。管理學
報，22卷，2期，頁263。
賴奎魁、林美蘭、張淑敏與張善斌(2006)，專利分析相關文獻之分類研究：採用書目計
量方法。科技管理學刊，第十一卷，一期，頁162。
簡榮宗(2011)，專利訴訟之法律策略，律師事務所-臺灣法律網。取自http://lawtw.com/article.php?template=article_content&parent_path=,1,779,&article_category_id=823&job_id=179599&article_id=102701。
蘇芳霈(2009)，建構專利佈局之分析模式：專利家族觀點。國立雲林科技大學，博士論文。
二、英文文獻
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in
regional networks. Management science, 45(7), 905-917.
Trippe, A. (2002). Patinformatics: identifying haystacks from space.
SEARCHER-MEDFORD NJ-, 10(9), 28-41.
Branstetter, L. (2000). Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers?
Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States (No. w8015). National Bureau of
Economic Research.
De Bondt, R. (1997). Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial
Organization, 15(1), 1-28.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2002). Citations, family size, opposition and the
value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
European Patent Office, (2008). Patent families. Retrieved June 14, 2011, from
http://www.epo.org/patents/patent-information/about/families.html.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks,
1(3), 215-239.
Faust, K. (1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social networks, 19(2), 157-191.
Huang, M. H., Chiang, L. Y., & Chen, D. Z. (2003). Constructing a patent citation map using
bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies. Scientometrics, 58(3),
489-506.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND
Journal of economics, 16-38.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge
spillovers as evidenced by patent citations (No. w3993). National Bureau of Economic
Research.
Allison, J. R., Lemley, M. A., Moore, K. A., & Trunkey, R. D. (2004). Valuable patents. Geo. Lj, 92, 435.
Jang, S. L., Lo, S., & Chang, W. H. (2009). How do latecomers catch up with forerunners?
Analysis of patents and patent citations in the field of flat panel display technologies.
Scientometrics, 79(3), 563-591.
Kessler, M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Journal of American
documentation, 14, 10-25.
Kostoff, R. N. (1998). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation.
Scientometrics, 43(1), 27-43.
Kuo-hsun Yu ,Yuan-duen Lee and Yender Mclee(2008) ,”Human Resource Management :
Themes ,Concepts and Realationships” ,人力資源管理學報,Vol.8(1) , 075-085.
Tseng, L. Y. C. H. C. (2010). Exploring the intellectual structure of contemporary tourism
studies. Journal of Quality Vol, 17(2), 159.
Lai, K. K., & Wu, S. J. (2005). Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent
classification system. Information Processing & Management, 41(2), 313-330.
Marshakova, I. V. (1973). Document coupling system based on references taken from
ScienceCitation Index (in Russian). Nauchno-TeknicheskayaInformatsiya, 2(6.3).
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis.
Scientometrics, 36(3), 435-444.
Meyer, M. (2000). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and
patent citations. Scientometrics, 49(1), 93-123.
Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.
Price, N., & Schiminovich, S. (1968). A clustering experiment: First step towards a
computer-generated classification scheme. Information storage and retrieval, 4(3),
271-280.
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration,
and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306.
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship
between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4),
265-269.
Sharabchiev, J. T. (1989). Cluster analysis of bibliographic references as a scientometric
method. Scientometrics, 15(1), 127-137.