臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

國內不動產業向來素有經濟火車頭之稱，惟近年來國內不動產業不但面臨經濟不景氣之威脅，更因全球化之關係得與來自國際不動產業進行全球之競爭，故如何提昇國內不動產業之競爭力，如何研擬適當有效之管理策略確實有深入探討之必要。
不動產業的發展是國家經濟競爭力重要指標之一，也是最受到景氣循環影響的產業，不動產業與其他產業間有著密切的關聯，例如鋼鐵業、水泥業、金融業等，但與營建業最為息息相關。由於前幾年因金融風暴關係，無論個人、企業與法人，不再把金融商品當作唯一的投資工具。而不動產具有唯一性、稀少性及地區性等特性，導致近年來房價高漲，迫使政府祭出一連串打房政策，例如在民國100年6月實施奢侈稅以及101年8月的實價申報登錄，除受到政府政策的影響，同時面臨景氣低迷的雪上加霜。又因不動產公司的產品施工期長短不一，以及產品具有多種特殊性，使得在入帳方式、行銷方法或經營模式上，與一般企業有極大差異，因影響不動產產業的營運與績效的變數眾多，所以建構完整有效評估不動產公司績效衡量模式與指標具有其價值與必要性。
有鑑於過去文獻多半採較短期間或未考量多元變數。因此，本文建構2003年第一季到2012年第三季，共39季台灣上市(櫃)不動產產業之資料。首先，本研究運用產業經濟學之S-C-P (structure-conduct-performance) 理論探討不動產業結構、行為與績效。不動產廠商由於入帳時點不穩定，盈餘與銷貨收入經常呈現暴起暴落之特性，據以衡量績效容易產生扭曲，要透過傳統方式衡量經營績效，甚至找出管理上的盲點，有相當困難度存在。故應由投入資源與產出的相關性進行績效指標架設。本文將根據不動產產業之經營特性，建立不動產業之績效指標，利用Charnes, Cooper, and Rhode (1978,1981) 以及Banker, Charnes, and Cooper (1984) 之多投入與多產出的資料包絡分析法 (data envelopment analysis, DEA)，並且採用Fare et al.(1989) 提出跨期的麥氏生產力指數 (Malmqusit productivity index, MPI) 進行不動產業生產力以及相對效率之評估。
與過去文獻不同之處，在於本文採用績效多元變數進行研究，進一步將總公司設立區域予以劃分，並且針對金融風暴前後之差異進行比較。另外，亦將實價登錄與奢侈稅之衝擊納入本文實證中予以探討。實證結果可提供各家廠商，根據其目前的經營效率與生產力變動，擬定合適的經營策略與方針外，在面臨全球化的新局面下，爲提昇國內不動產產業之競爭力，以達永續經營之目標，本研究另依據實證分析結果，提出下述提昇國內營造業總體競爭力之經營與管理策略，俾作為政府擬定產業政策之參考，以及投資大眾決策擬定與後續研究者具價值之參考。

The domestic real estate industry is known as the locomotive of the economic. Unfortunately, these years the domestic real estate industry is facing economic depression. More than that, it’s facing international real estate global competition. It is necessary to research how to increase the competitive of domestic real estate, and how to formulate the efficacious management strategy.
The development of real estate industry is an important indicator of national economic competitive and it is most easily affected by business cycles. Real estate is closely allied to other industries. For example: steel industry, cement industry, financial sector, etc. But it is the most closely related with construction industry. Therefore, the domestic real estate industry is called, “locomotive of the economic”. Couple years ago due to financial crisis; no matter individual enterprise and legal, it no longer takes financial goods as the only investment instrument because of the real estate having uniqueness, scarcity, and regional etc. It resulted the price of house mark up in last several years. The government implemented a series of blast real estate speculation policies, like implementing Luxury Tax on June 2011 and Actual Selling Price Property Value Reporting on August 2012. It causes the real estate industry to face the effect of the government policy and makes the economic slump even worse. Also due to the different length of the building period and the product has many particularities, it makes the real estate industry that has each different accounted method, marketing method, and business model with general enterprise. Therefore, there are so many variations that would affect operation and performance. The structure’s completed and effective performance model and index can evaluate the real estate industry company which makes it valuable and essential.
To consider the past literatures, most of them adopt the shorter period or do not take into account the multi- variants. Therefore this paper constructs the data from 2003-2012 third quarters the total 39 quarters of Taiwanese public and over-the-counter companies in real estate industry. First, this paper uses the theory of S-C-P to discuss the structure and conduct. Due to the firms of real estate industry is not stable with timing of account and revenue reveals the character of up and down. Hence this paper will consider the characters of real estate to construct the index of performance by data envelopment analysis, and make malmqusit productivity index to evaluate the relative efficiency and productivity.
The difference with this paper and past literature is research methods. This paper uses multi- variants to study and compare. Further this paper separates the regions, then comparison of efficiency and productivity during pre- and post- financial crisis. Besides, the impacts of actual selling price property and luxury taxation will be detected in the empirical model. The empirical results could provide every company to formulate suitable management strategy by their business performance and the change of productivity, in order to promote competitive of domestic real estate industry to accomplish sustainable management. According to the other empirical results that we provide enhance the domestic construction industry overall competitiveness of business and management strategies, intended to serve as a government industrial policy reference, the investors to make decisions, and develop valuable reference for future researchers.

目 錄
中文摘要………………………………………………………….……………..I
Abstract...……………………………………………………………………….III
誌謝……………………………………………………………………………..V
表目錄………………………………………………………………………..VIII
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………….... IX
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………...01
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………..01
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………..03
第三節 研究架構………………………………………………………..04
第二章 文獻回顧與探討…………………………………………………….05
第一節 台灣不動產之產業發展沿革…………………………………..08
第二節 台灣不動產之產業特性…………………………………..……11
第三節 台灣不動產之產業面臨問題…………………………………..15
第四節 國內、外不動產績效評估相關文獻……………………………17
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………….26
第一節 研究方法說明……………………………………………………26
第二節 樣本選取與資料來源……………………………………………34
第三節 投入與產出項之選取定義………………………………………36
第四章 台灣不動產之產業結構…………………………………………….40
第五章 實證結果與分析…………………………………………………….44
第一節 基本資料分析……………………………………………………44
第二節 金融風暴前後之比較……………………………………………46
第三節 總公司設立區域績效走勢………………………………………51
第四節 奢侈稅、實價申報前後之比較………………………………....53
第六章 結論與建議………………………………………………………….59
第一節 結論………………………………………………………………60
第二節 建議………………………………………………………………62
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………….63
一、 中文文獻……………………………………………………………63
二、 英文文獻……………………………………………………………65

一、中文文獻
1.內政部建築研究所、國立政治大學台灣房地產研究中心，台灣房地產景氣動向季報，出版品之房地產景氣指標，2010年第三季。
2.江文豐 (2009)，台灣營造業營運績效評估之研究，佛光大學管理所碩士論文。
3.吳金松 (2006)，台灣地區上市上櫃營建公司成本效率之實證研究，朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
4.吳姿穎 (2006)，從效率觀點評估建設公司財務績效之研究，國立台灣科技大學營建工程所碩士論文。
5.吳濟華、何柏正、黃元璋 (2006)，台灣地區營造業營運績效與經營策略，建築學報，第64期，25-48頁。
6.林世陽 (2007)，以資料包絡分析法評估上市建設公司經營效率-AR與BCC模式比較，國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營所碩士論文。
7.洪維廷、尚瑞國 (2005)，台灣地區上市櫃建設公司純粹管理效率評估：四階段資料包絡分析法之應用，建築學會，第53卷，1-20頁。
8.俞聖筠 (2010)，產業集中度、公司獲利能力與股票報酬，大同大學事業經營學所碩士論文。
9.陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發 (2003)，產業經濟學，第一版、雙葉書廊有限公司出版，58-85頁。
10.陳信宏 (1999)，營造業經營效率評估與影響其效因子之探討，國立交通大學經營管理所碩士論文。
11.陳衍利 (2008)，台灣建設公司之經營績效評估-SBM Super DEA Model，東吳大學經濟學所碩士論文。
12.陳博亮、周劍虹、鄭一俊、林志蒼、戴玉珍 (2010)，台灣地區上市上櫃營建公司經營效率分析，建築學會,，第73卷， 25-50頁。
13.陳德昌 (2010)，銀行組織變更對經營績效影響－以Ｈ銀行為例，國立中央大學財務金融所碩士論文。
14.章定煊、張金鶚 (2001)，上市櫃建設公司績效評估與影響因素探討，住宅學報，第14卷，第1期，41-65頁。
15.黃金瑞 (2003)，我國建築業之概況與趨勢，產業經濟期刊，第258期，3-5頁。
16.魏衍、陳振川、林正平、許鎧麟 (2001)，提昇台灣營建產業國際競爭力之研究，財團法人台灣營建研究院。
17.嚴珮瑜 (2008) ，台灣本土銀行經營效率比較分析：DEA、Malmquist生產力指數及SFA方法之應用，國立中興大學應用經濟學所碩士論文。 
二、英文文獻
1.Bain, J.S. (1968), Industrial organization, 2nd New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
2.Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. (1984), Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp.1078-1092.
3.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No.6, pp.429-444.
4.Chau et al. (2005), Technological progress and the productive efficiency of construction firms in Hong Kong, 1981-2001, Journal of Construction Research, Vol.6, No.2, pp.195-207.
5.Farrell, M. J. (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Vol.120, No.3, pp.253-281.
6.Fare et al. (1989), Multilateral Productivity Comparisons when Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 71, pp. 90-98.
7.Golany,B., and Y. Roll(1989), An Application Procedure for DEA, OMEGA, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.237-250.
8.Mason, E. S. (1939), Price and Production Policies of Large-Scale Enterprises, American Economic Review, Vol. 29, pp.61-74.
9.Mohammad, S. El-Mashaleh, R. Edward Minchin, Jr., and William J. O’Brien (2007), Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.23, No.3, pp.10-17.
10.McCabe, B., Tran, V. and Ramani, J. (2005), Construction prequalification using data envelopment analysis. Europe Journal of Operational Research, Vol.62, pp.74-84.
11.Mohamed, A. W. and Bernard, V. (2011), Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan, Construction Management and Economics,Vol.29, pp.635-644.
12.Simons and Dvorin (1977), How Do Subordinates React To Your Managerial Style, Hayward, Herbert C., Dvorin, Robert’s, Management Dayton, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 23-29.
13.Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research：A comparison of Approach, Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, No.4, pp.801-814.
14.Xiaolong, X., Qiping, S., Yaowu, Wang. and Jinfeng, L. (2008), Measuring the Productivity of the Construction Industry in China by Using DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Indices, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.134, No.1, pp.64-71.
15.Yan, L. and Chunlu, L. (2010), Malmquist indices of total factor productivity changes in the Australian construction industry, Construction Management and Economics, Vol.28, pp.933-945.