跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.231.51) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/03/29 16:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:謝珍妮
研究生(外文):Jenny Hsieh
論文名稱:科技機構研究人員協同合作與資訊行為之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Collaboration and Information Behavior of Researchers in Science and Technology
指導教授:藍文欽藍文欽引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wen-Chin Lan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:圖書資訊學研究所
學門:傳播學門
學類:圖書資訊檔案學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:155
中文關鍵詞:資訊行為協同資訊行為協同合作科技機構研究人員
外文關鍵詞:information behaviorcollaborative information behaviorresearch collaborationscience and technology researchers
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:1463
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
資訊行為的研究,歷來是以「資訊個人」為焦點。近年來,協同資訊行為的議題也逐漸受到學者的重視。研究顯示,工作和日常生活的資訊採集和過濾的任務,通常是在幾個人之間分配,並且是有計劃和有目的地以集體協同合作的方式進行。因此,本研究以團體協同合作與其相關資訊行為為主題,探討科技機構研究人員在工作上個人與團隊成員協同合作的資訊活動,作為機構圖書館設計相關資訊系統與資訊服務之參考,並期望了解館員參與研究計畫之可能性。
本研究採半結構深度訪談方式,以核能研究所之研究人員為訪談對象。本研究採立意抽樣,共訪談21位受訪者,希望能含括多種研究計畫及團隊中各階層的人員。訪談內容,以受訪者之專業背景、工作內容及其在團隊中之自我角色認知,個人資訊行為之意圖及其過程,團體資訊行為的過程與特徵,以及影響協同合作與協同資訊行為的因素等四大面向為訪談重點。
訪談內容經謄錄及系統化編碼,其結果可歸納如下:
一、研究團隊展現的協同合作模式,可歸納為兩種類型。前者為階層式,是以團隊領導者(計畫主持人)為最高階,其次是分組長,最後是團隊成員,呈由上而下之階層模式。後者是分散模式,以團隊領導者(計畫主持人或分組長)為中心,呈放射狀。
二、協同合作計畫類型,依其性質可概分為三種:(一)前瞻(創新)型計畫,多以新主題或新領域的先期開發研究為主;(二)技術精進(改良)型計畫,是為了解決某個特別問題所發展出來的知識,具備較高風險、高報酬與中程規劃的特色;(三)技術服務型計畫,是以現有之技術、理論或知識為基礎,提供委託單位或是機構內部技術支援或服務。
三、個人資訊行為特徵:(一)研究人員在工作遭遇困難時,多數選擇上網查找專業相關學術期刊或資料庫,以及使用免費網路資源如google、yahoo,其次是人脈資源;(二)個人撰寫與發表研究報告或論文的資訊行為特徵為:蒐集、實驗、追踨、成形、討論、選擇、撰寫與發表;(三)撰寫研究報告與論文發表的目的非為學術研究,而是為了個人與團體工作績效的展現。
四、團體協同合作資訊尋求行為:(一)團隊共同發表之研究報告,題目多由計畫主持人訂定,內容則是依工作特性交相關人員分工撰寫;(二)期刊或會議論文多由一人主筆,負責整篇文章的邏輯架構,稱為主作者。其他共同作者可能是給予意見、審查論文、或是擁有計畫資源的主管等;(三)團隊協同合作資訊尋求行為是由管理者以工作分配的方式進行。
五、影響團體協同合作與其相關資訊行為的因素包括:人格特質、信任關係、團隊領導者的領導風格、資訊分享的氛圍、職務身份、人際關係、組織與環境因素。
依據研究結果與發現,研究者針對個案機構所屬之計畫團隊、圖書館以及圖書館館員提出建議:一、給個案機構所屬計畫之建議:(一)加強專業人力的備援;(二)應重視知識盤點與知識傳承;(三)儘速建立整合性知識管理平台。二、給個案機構圖書館之建議:(一)圖書館應成為機構內資訊資源的採購與保存中心;(二)提供跨領域與多元整合資訊;(三)協助機構內研究計畫團隊建立專屬知識庫。三、給個案機構圖書館館員之建議:(一)成為連接content creator和讀者的資訊專業人;(二)協助建立機構知識管理系統;(三)館員應積極跨領域知識學習與創新角色定位。

Traditionally, the focus of human information behavior research is the individual information users. Over recent years, there has been increasing interest among researchers in the notion of collaborative information behavior. It is gradually recognized that there are many situations, expecially when teamwork is required, that call for people to work together for information seeking. This study intends to explore the research collaboration and collaborative information behaviors of researchers in science and technology. More specifically, this study aims to investigate how researchers, who are involved in team projects, perform their everyday work practices associated with collaboration and information behavior.
This study employed in-depth interviewing as the main method to collect data. Twenty-one researchers from the same institute were chosen purposively. They are comprised of project directotrs, sub-group leaders, senior and junior researchers, engineers, and the like. A half-structured interview outline was used to guide the interviewing. The outline is composed of four facets: 1. the respondent’s daily work practices and work role identity, 2. the respondent’s individual information behavior, 3. the researcher collaboration and collaborative information behavior of the project team that the respondent belongs to, and 4. the factors that affect research collaboration and collaborative information behavior.
The results and findings of this study can be briefly summarized as below:
1. There are two types of collaboration model. One is hierarchical. The team director is on top, the sub-group leaders are in the middle, and the rest team members are on the bottom. The other model is radial. The team director is in the center and other team members are connected to the person directly.
2. The collaborative projects can be divided into three kinds: proactive and innovative type, technical improvement type, and technical service type.
3. The key features of individual information behavior are listed as following:
a. Most researchers would search online whenever they envounter a problem or question. The second most frequently used approach is to ask people around.
b. The characteristics of their information behaviors include data collection, experimentation, tracking, formation, discussion, selection, writing and publishing.
c. The goal of writing a research report or journal article is to fulfill the requirement of work performance, rather than to gain academic fame.
4. The key features of research collaboration and collaborative information behavior include the followings:
a. The team will write a research report collaboratively. The topic is decided by the team director and the writing responsibilities are disdributed to the team members.
b. It is a common practice that a person will be assigned to write a journal or conference paper to publish the findings of the project research. He or she will be the main author or this paper but the team director will add more people to be the co-authors based on their contributions to this paper.
c. Usually, the team director will decide what literature the team members should read or consult.
5. There are many factors that affect research collaboration and collaborative information behavior, such as personality, leadership, role identity, inter-personal relationship, organizational and environmental factors, competitive collaboration, and so on so forth.
Based on the results, the author suggested that the institute should establish a knowledge management system to help researchers effectively manage their research efforts. She also suggested that the librarians of the institute should be more active and creative. They should find a way to be part of the research teams and help them find and deliver the information they need as well as to organize and preserve the efforts they have made.


目 次
誌 謝 i
摘 要 ii
Abstract iv
表 次 viii
圖 次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 2
第三節 研究範圍與限制 4
第四節 名詞解釋 4
第二章 文獻分析 7
第一節 資訊行為研究 8
第二節 協同合作與資訊行為 27
第三章 研究設計與實施 39
第一節 研究場域與對象 39
第二節 研究方法與執行 41
第三節 資料分析 45
第四章 訪談結果分析 47
第一節 受訪者背景資料分析 47
第二節 多面向分析協同合作與資訊行為 49
第三節 影響協同合作與協同資訊行為之因素分析 92
第五章 分析與討論 103
第一節 研究結果分析 103
第二節 本研究結果與相關研究文獻之比較 110
第三節 發現與討論 119
第六章 結論與建議 121
第一節 結論 121
第二節 建議 126
參考文獻 129
附錄一 141
附錄二 143
附錄三 147
附錄四 149
附錄五 151



參考文獻
May, C. (2003)。質疑資訊社會。(The Information Society : A Sceptical View)(葉欣怡譯)。台北縣:韋伯文化。(原作2002出版)
Seidman, I. (2009)。訪談研究法。(Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences)(李政賢譯)。台北市:五南。(原作2006出版)
吳美美 (民90)。中文資訊檢索系統使用研究。台北市:學生書局。
林鉦棽 (民85)。組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點。管理科學學報,13(3),391- 415。
邱子恆 (民91)。圖書資訊專業人員與知識管理。臺北市立圖書館館訊,19(4),32-49。
李婷媛 (民95)。研發機構工程師資訊行為及其在資訊服務應用之探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
林彩鳯 (民96)。國防科技人員資訊尋求行為之研究-以中山科學研究院航空研究所為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所,台中市。
行政院原子能委員會核能研究所簡介。上網日期:99年7月30日,網址:http://www.iner.gov.tw/
徐莉芬 (民96)。積體電路(IC)設計公司人員之資訊行為研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
黃鴻珠、石秋霞 (民96)。線上目錄的新面貌。Web2.0與圖書館學術研討會。上網日期:99年7月22日,網址:http://www.lib.tku.edu.tw/libintro/pub/web20&lib_semina/onlinecat_ft.pdf
黃慕萱 (民90)。成人讀者之資訊尋求行為。台北市立圖書館館訊,19(2),1-16。
傅雅秀 (民85)。從科學傳播的觀點探討中央研究院生命科學專家的資訊尋求行為。未出版之博士論文,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系研究所,台北市。
張甲 (民99,5月)。21世紀的資訊服務。在台灣大學圖書館、世新大學圖書館、台灣大學圖書資訊學系、中華民國圖書館學會主辦,數位科技於圖書館資訊服務之應用研討會,台北市,1-8。
張德銳 (民84)。教育行政學。台北市:心理。
賴鼎銘、黃慕萱、吳美美、林珊如編著(民90)。圖書資訊學概論。臺北市:空中大學。
Anderson, C. J., Glassman, M., McAfee, R. B., & Pinelli, T. (2001). An investigation of factors affecting how engineers and scientists seek information. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(2), 131-155.
Ali, I, Pascoe, C., & Warne, L. (2003). Interactions of organizational culture and collaboration in working and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 5(2), 2002. Retrieved March 9, 2009, from http://www.ifets.info/journals/5_2/ali.pdf.
Allen, T. J. & Cohen, S. I. (1969). Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 12-19.
Baldwin, N.S., & Rice, R.E. (1997). Information-seeking behavior of securities analysts: Individual and institutional influences, information sources, and channels, and outcomes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 674–693.
Bates, M. J. (1996). Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Library Trends, 45(2), 155-64.
Bates, M. J. (2003). Task force recommendation 2.3 research and design review: Iimproving user access to library catalog and portal information. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/2.3BatesReport6-03.doc.pdf.
Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
Bender, D. R. (1998). What''s Special About Special Libraries? In INSPEL:International Journal of Special Libraries, 32(4), 197-204.
Black, C., Crest, S., & Volland, M. (2001). Building a successful information literacy infrastructure on the foundation of librarian–faculty collaboration. Research Strategies, 18(3), 215-225.
Blake, C., & Pratt, W. (2002). Collaborative information synthesis. In E.G. Toms (Ed.), In Proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://faculty.washington.edu/wpratt/Publications/BlakePratt-ASIST-2002.pdf
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the role of extrinsic motivators , social-psychological forces , and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Brophy, P. (2001). What is a library? Digital and hybrid libraries. In The library in the twenty-first century: New services for the information age (pp. 61-71). London: Library Association.
Brown, C. M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 929-943.
Bruce, H., Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A., Dumais, S., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. (2003). A comparison of the collaborative information retrieval (CIR) behaviours of two design teams. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 4(1), 139-153.
Bystrom, K., & Hansen, P. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1050-1061.
Bystrom, K., & Jarvelin, K. (1994). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31(2), 191-213.
Calhoun, K. (2007). Being a librarian: Metadata and metadata specialists in the twenty-first century. Library Hi Tech, 25(2), 174-187.
Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rosson, M. B., & McCrickard, D. S. (2002). Notification and awareness: Synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 58(5), 605-632.
Christiansen, L., Stombler, M., & Thaxton, L. (2004). A report on librarian-faculty relations from a sociological perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(2), 116-121.
Correia, Z., & Wilson, T. D. (2001). Factors influencing environmental scanning in the organizational context. Information Research, 7(1). Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://informationr.net/ir/7-1/paper121.html.
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges : Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450-467.
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In CSCW ''92, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 107-114). Toronto, Canada.
Endsley, M. R. (1999). Situation awareness in aviation systems. In D. J. Garland, J. A.Wise, & V. D. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of aviation human factors (chap. 11, pp. 257-276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486.
Ellis, D., & Haugen, M. (1997). Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 384-403.
Fidel, R., & Green, M. (2004). The many faces of accessibility: Engineers’ perception of information sources. Information Processing and Management, 40(3), 563-581.
Fidel, R., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2004). From information behaviour research to the design of information systems: The cognitive work analysis framework. Information Research, 10(1). Retrieved July 25, 2010, from http://informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper210.html.
Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Cleal, B., & Bruce, H. (2004). A multidimensional approach to the study of human information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 939-953.
Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of information behavior. New Jersey American Society for Information Science and Technology.
Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (1997). Workspace awareness. In Susan E. McDaniel, & Tom Brinck (Eds.), Position paper for the ACM CHI''97 Workshop on Awareness in Collaborative Systems, Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved July 25, 2010 from http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/grouplab/uploads/Publications/Publications/1997-WorkspaceAwareness.CHIWorkshop.pdf.
Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp.177-201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hansen, P., & Jarvelin, K. (2004). Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive domain. Information Processing and Management, 41(5), 1101-1119.
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S-L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965.
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2006). Toward a social framework for information seeking. In A. Spink & C. Cole (Eds.), New directions in human information behavior. Netherlands: Springer.
Henczel, S. (2000). The information audit as a first step towards effective knowledge management:An opportunity for the special librarian. INSPEL, 34(3/4), 210-226.
Hertzum, M., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2000). The information-seeking practices of engineers: Searching for documents as well as for people. Information Processing and Management, 36(5), 761-778.
Hirsh, S. G. (1999). Information seeking at different stages of the R&D research process. In F.Gey, M. Hearst, & R. Tong (Chair), Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp.285-286). Symposium held at the University of California, Berkeley, US.
Hyldegard, J. (2004). Collaborative information behaviour—exploring Kuhlthau’s Information Search Process model in a group-based educational setting. Information Processing and Management, 42(1), 276-298.
Hyldegard, J. (2009). Personality traits and group-abased information behaviour: An exploratory study. Information Research, 14(2). Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://informationr.net/ir/14-2/paper402.html.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.
Kanfer, A. G., Haythornthwaite, C., Bruce, B. C., Bowker, G. C., Burbules, N. C., Porac, J. F., et al. (2000). Modeling distributed knowledge processes in next generation multidisciplinary alliances. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(3/4), 317-331.
Karunakaran, A., Spence, P. R., & Reddy, M. C. (2010). Towards a model of collaborative information behavior. In 2nd International Workshop on Collaborative Information Seeking. Retrieved July 25, 2010 from
http://workshops.fxpal.com/cscw2010cis/submissions/tmp10.pdf
King, R. J. (2004). The future of the special library: One person’s perspective. Serials Review, 30(3), 171-175.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49, 339-355.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services (2nd ed.). Westport, CT.: Libraries Unlimited.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2005). Towards collaboration between information seeking and information retrieval. Information Research, 10(2). Retrieved July 25, 2010, from http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper225.html.
Kuhlthau, C. C., & Tama, S. L. (2001). Information search process of lawyers: A call for ‘just for me’ information services. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 25-43.
Kuruppu, P. U., & Gruber, A. M. (2006). Understanding the information needs of academic scholars in agricultural and biological sciences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(6), 609-623.
Lancaster, F. W. (1995). Needs, demands and motivations in the use of sources of information. 資訊傳播與圖書館學, 1(3), 3-19.
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2), 161-193.
Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration. St. Paul: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation. Retrieved July 25, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED390758.pdf
Marchionini, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1988). Finding facts vs. Browsing knowledge in Hypertext systems. IEEE Computer, 21(1), 70-80.
Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
McCain, H. D., & White, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
Simon, T., & Peterson, R. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intra-group trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 102-111.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (1995). Contested collaboration: A descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system. Information Processing & Management, 31(6), 859-877.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (1996). Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17, 277-301.
Sonnenwald, D. H., & Iivonen, M. (1999). An integrated human information behavior research framework for information studies. Library & Information Science Research, 21(4), 429-457.
Sonnenwald, D. H., & Lievrouw, L. A. (1997). A collaboration during the design process: Case study of communication, information behavior, and project performance. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context (pp. 179-204). London: Taylor Graham.
Sonnenwald, D. H., & Pierce, L. G. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing & Management, 36(3), 461-479.
Sonnenwald, D. H., Whitton, M. C., & Maglaughlin, K. L. (2003). Evaluating a scientific collaboratory: Results of a controlled experiment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(2), 150-176.
Sonnenwald, D. H., Whitton, M. C., & Maglaughlin, K. L. (2004). Designing to support situation awareness across distances: An example from a scientific collaboratory. Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 989-1011.
Spink, A., Wilson, T. D., Ford, N., Foster, A., & Ellis, D. (1999). Information-seeking and mediated searching. Part 1. Theoretical framework and research design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 695-703.
Spink, A., & Cole, C. (Eds.). (2006). New direction in human information behavior. Netherlands: Springer.
Talja, S., & Hansen, P. (2006). Information sharing. In A. Spink, & C. Cole, (Eds.), New directions in human information behavior (pp. 113-134). Netherlands: Springer.
Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. The New Review of Information Behavior Research, Retrieved July 25, 2010, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.96.163&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added process in information systems. Norwood, N. Y.: Ablex.
Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. Progress in Communication Sciences, 10, 217-255.
Twidale, M. B., Nichols, D. M., & Paice, C. D. (1999). Browsing is a collaborative process. Information Processing & Management, 33(6), 761-783.
Vakkari, P. (1999). Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 819-837.
Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalization of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44-60.
Vakkari, P. (2003). Task-based information searching. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 37(1), 413-464.
Vakkari, P. (2008). Trends and approaches in information behviour research. Information Research, 13(4). Retrieved July 25, 2010, from http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper361.html.
Vrabel, M. (2005). Searching for evidence: The value of a librarian-clinician collaboration. The Librarian’s Role Home Health Care Management & Practice, 17(4), 286-292.
Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1985). Do sociological theories grow? The American Journal of Sociology, 90(4), 697-728.
Wildmuth, B.M., & Hughes, A. (2006). Perspectives on the tasks in which information behaviors are embedded. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. F. F. McKechnie, (Eds.), Theories of Information Behavior (pp. 275-279). Meford, NJ: Information Today, Inc..
Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-269.
Wilson, T. D. (2006). 60 years of the best in information research: On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 62(6), 658-670.
Zucker, L.G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. 1840–1920. In L. L. Cumming and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 53–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.






QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top