臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著消費市場競爭日漸激烈，設計專利乃成為各產業逐漸重視的專利種類。近年來經濟部智慧財產局陸續進行專利法之修正，以期符合世界潮流。目前實施之新法針對設計專利相關的規範更趨嚴謹，有助於實質保障設計產業之創作產出。使我國商品能在市場上更具有競爭優勢。我國於2011年將專利法修正公布，並於2013年實施。其中，新法中將聯合新式樣專利制度廢除，並增設衍生設計專利制度，無疑是一重大的改革。
本研究係先以文獻分析法針對聯合新式樣專利與衍生設計專利探討兩者之間的差異性。為了將兩者於理論的差異性加以視覺化，以利探討兩者的專利範圍差異。本研究挑選一組已核准之設計專利案例，此案例為插座，並進行專業人員(專利專業人員、設計專業人員)的專利範圍建構實驗。實驗目的在於分別將聯合新式樣專利與衍生設計專利的專利範圍予以視覺化。本研究並將專利專業人員與設計專業人員建構之設計專利地圖結果進行比對。藉以分析聯合新式樣專利改變成衍生設計專利制度後，是否將擴大專利權範圍。
　　本研究之結果如下：(1)從舊法之聯合新式樣專利改變成新法之衍生設計專利後，其專利權範圍確實有擴權之情形存在。(2) 聯合新式樣專利改變為衍生設計專利後，專利權人將可以更靈活的運用設計專利進行設計改款時的策略布局。(3) 建置設計專利地圖能更清楚聯合新式樣專利改變成衍生設計專利的專利權利分布狀況，亦可使設計師避免落入他人之現有專利權範圍中。

Because of the increasing competition in the consumer market, design patents are becoming an increasingly noteworthy patent type by the industries. To keep pace with international trends, the Intellectual Property Office of the Ministry of Economic Affairs has, in recent years, made various revisions to the Patent Act. The newly implemented amendment contains stricter rules for design patents, which helps provide substantial protection to the works produced by the design industry and enhance the competitiveness of the Taiwanese products in the market. The amended Patent Act of the Republic of China was announced in 2011 and implemented in 2013. An important reformation brought about by the revised Act, no doubt, is the abolishment of the Associated Design Patent and the introduction of the Derivative Design Patent.
In this study, a comparison was first made to identify the differences between the Associated Design Patent and the Derivative Design Patent, using documentary analysis methods. To visualize the differences between the two in terms of the theoretical aspect and furthermore facilitate the study of the differences between each patent scope, the researcher selects an approved case of design patent, which is concerned with a Power Outlet Patent. An experiment was conducted to examine the patent scopes constructed by the relevant professionals (the patent professionals and the design professionals). The objective of this experiment is to provide respective visual aids to illustrate the patent scopes of the Associated Design Patents and the Derivative Design Patents. A comparison has also been made to check the design patent maps constructed by the patent professionals and the design professionals. The purpose is to probe whether the development from the Associated Design Patent System to the Derivative Design Patent System has led to an enlarged patent scope.
The results of the study are: (1) An enlargement of the patent scope has been noticed following the change from the Associated Design Patent system to the Derivative Design Patent system. (2) After the movement from the Associated Design Patent system to the Derivative Design Patent system, the patentees are given higher flexibility in utilizing the patents and making strategic decisions when making design revisions. (3) The design patent maps provide a clearer picture on the distribution of patent scopes after the change from the Associated Design Patent system to the Derivative Design Patent System. It also helps the designers to avoid infringements on an existing patent.

摘要 iv
英文摘要 v
致謝 vii
目次 viii
表目錄 x
圖目錄 xi
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究範圍與限制 3
1.4 研究架構與流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1設計專利的定義與本質 6
2.1.1 設計必須應用於物品 9
2.1.2 設計所呈現之外觀 11
2.1.3 透過視覺訴求之創作 11
2.1.4 設計專利法定排除之標的 12
2.1.5 各國專利法對設計專利之定義 13
2.2設計專利要件 15
2.2.1 產業利用性 15
2.2.2 新穎性 16
2.2.3 創作性 18
2.2.4 主張喪失新穎性或創作性之例外的情事 18
2.3 聯合新式樣專利 18
2.4 衍生設計專利 21
2.5 小結 23
第三章 研究方法 24
3.1 研究設計 24
3.2 實驗步驟 25
3.3 研究工具 31
3.4 問卷設計 31
3.5 統計方法 32
3.6 資料處理 32
3.7 研究樣本與限制 32
第四章 探討聯合新式樣專利及衍生設計專利 34
4.1 依舊、新法分析聯合新式樣專利及衍生設計專利 34
4.2 聯合新式樣專利與衍生設計專利權範圍界定 38
4.3 聯合新式樣專利與衍生設計專利權申請期間 42
4.4 小結 48
第五章 研究結果與分析 49
5.1 專利與設計專業人員實驗過程照片 49
5.2 專利與設計專業人員基本資料統計分析 50
5.3 解析受測資料 55
5.4 建置設計專利範圍分析圖 57
5.4.1 專利專業人員實驗結果與說明 57
5.4.2 設計專業人員實驗結果與說明 59
5.5 設計專利範圍分析圖呈現結果 61
5.6 設計專利範圍分析圖相互覆蓋呈現結果 64
5.6.1　專利與設計專業人員之設計專利範圍分析圖相互覆蓋結果 64
5.6.2　插座專利之設計專利範圍分析圖覆蓋結果 66
第六章 結論與建議 69
6.1 結論 69
6.2 建議 71
參考文獻 72
附錄一 77

中文文獻
1.吳宗成、黃丙喜、覃冠豪、陳櫻琴、張順教、欒斌、周子詮、方力維，山寨風暴，理財文化事業股份有限公司，2009年初版一刷。
2.曾陳明汝，兩岸暨歐美專利法，學林文化事業有限公司，2004年2月修訂再版。
3.林洲富，專利法–案例式，五南圖書出版，2011年三版。
4.陳達仁、黃慕萱，專利資訊與專利檢索，文華圖書管理資訊股份有限公司，2002年初版。
5.劉國讚，專利實務論，元照出版有限公司，2009年4月出版1刷。
6.顏吉承、陳重任，設計專利理論與實務，揚智文化事業股份有限公司，2007年7月初版一刷。
7.宿文堂(1997)，評我國專利法中新型專利的進步性要件，法令月刊第48卷第12期，頁18-25。
8.葉雪美，「淺談美國設計(新式樣)的定義」，智慧財產權月刊第73期，頁32-45，2005年1月。
9.葉哲維，「衍生與聯合新式樣專利之差異」，智慧財產權月刊第150期，頁36-37，2011年6月。
10.黃振榮(2004)，我國聯合新式樣專利制度之研究，世新大學法學院碩士論文。
11.賴建坤(2006)，創新技術申請專利之決策因素研究，朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
12.林品瑄(2007)，商品設計外觀之智慧財產權保護一新式樣專利與著作權法、商標法、公平交易法之交錯適用，臺灣大學法律學院碩士論文。
13.專利審查基準彙整，2013年版，http://www.tipo.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=6680&CtUnit=3208&BaseDSD=7&mp=1， (最後瀏覽日：2013/1/24)。
14.中華民國專利公報，http://twpat.tipo.gov.tw/tipotwoc/tipotwkm， (最後瀏覽日：2013/2/20)。
15.華鼎事務所，http://edn.udn.com/article/view.jsp?aid=558765，(最後瀏覽日：2013/2/3)。
16.葉雪美(2010)，解析極小物品外觀設計專利的視覺觀察與侵害判斷(下)，http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Design_Patent/publish-19.htm，(最後瀏覽日：2013/2/19)。
17.葉雪美(2009)，解析同一設計概念的外觀設計保護(下)－中國、台灣及美、日、歐盟相似外觀設計制度的比較，http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Design_Patent/publish-12.htm，(最後瀏覽日：2013/2/20)。
18.葉哲維(2010)，台灣新式樣專利法制面的介紹，http://tw.naipo.com/portals/1/web_tw/knowledge_center/Design_Patent/publish-22.htm，(最後閱覽日：2013/2/19)。
19.蔡佳妤(民101年7月31日)。衍生設計專利布局新武器。聯合電子報。取自http://paper.udn.com/index.php。
20.顏吉承，設計專利侵害鑑定，http://www.iip.ntut.edu.tw/ezfiles/109/1109/img/1142/601380009.pdf，(最後瀏覽日：2013/10/25)。
21.行政院經濟建設委員會，http://www.cepd.gov.tw/，(最後瀏覽日：2013/2/20)。
22.臺灣經濟部智慧財產局(TIPO)，http://www.tipo.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1，(最後瀏覽日：2013/10/25)。
英文文獻
1.Aalt, v. d. K. (2012), Successful European oppositions: Analysis for the patent information professional, World Patent Information, 34(4), 1-4.
2.Braunfeld, R. and Wells, T. O. (2001), Protecting Your Most Valuable Asset: Intellectual Property, IT Professional, 3(2), 11-17.
3.Buskop, W. K. B. (2005), Instrumentation technology- Is it patentable, Technical Papers of ISA, 459, 67-77.
4.Cao, Z. and Zhao, H. (2008), Research of knowledge acquisition and modeling method based on patent map, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling Workshop Proceedings, 1090-1094.
5.Cetintas, S. and Si, L. (2012), Effective query generation and postprocessing strategies for prior art patent search, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 512-527.
6.Chen, C.C., Chen, R, and Dai, T.T. (2011), Framework of design patent map systems based on dissimilarity from populace survey, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 264, 75-82.
7.Chen, C. C., Chen, R., Wang, D.C. ,and Dai, T.T.,(2011), GA-based dissimilarity visualization engine for design patent map systems, Proceedings of the 2011 11th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 595-600.
8.Chen, R., Chang, E., Lee, Y.J., Chen, C.Y., Lin, C.Y. , and Yau, B.B. (2010), A study on Design Patent Knowledge Base System, 3CA 2010 - 2010 International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation, 1, 283-286.
9.Chen, A. and Chen, R. (2007), Design patent map: An innovative measure for corporative design strategies, Engineering Management Journal, 19(3), 14-29.
10.Chen, X. , Ha, N. ,and Niu, X.(2011) , Impact of IPR System on Patent Based Innovation in China: Empirical Studies over Chinese Patent Reform in 2000, 2011 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2, 318-323.
11.Cooper, I. P. (1983), Preventing Inadvertent Forfeiture of Patent Rights, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, 5(3), 70-72.
12.David (1981), Question of law - Penetrate a patent's legalese to determine scope of protection, EDA, 26(20), 486-500.
13.Davis, G. (1993), War of the Words: Intellectual Property Laws and Standardization, IEEE Micro, 13(6), 19-27.
14.Emma, P. (2005), Patents: To file or not to file? , IEEE Micro, 25(5), 79-81.
15.Felger, T. R. (2001), Development, Management and Use of Intellectual Property, 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology (EMAT'01), 7.
16.Gaff, B. M., Murphy, B. P., and Cuomo, P. J. (2012), Defending Against Patent Infringement, IEEE Computer Society, 45(4), 9-12.
17.Gaff, B. M. and Cuomo, P. J.(2013),Design Patents, IEEE Computer Society, 46(3), 8-10.
18.Gilman, M. G. (1997), Guarding against loss of patent rights, Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 3, 2175-2180.
19.Gustavson, W. R. (1998), How to obtain an enforceable U.S. patent, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Petroleum Division (Publication) PD, 8.
20.Hassler, V. (2007), Commercial patent evaluation, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2007, 5.
21.Hsu, Y. L., Hsu, P. E. ,and Hung, Y. C. (2009), Development of a design methodology based on patent and axiomatic design, Journal of Quality, 16(3), 153-163.
22.Hu, P., Huang, M., Xu, P., Li, W., Usadi, A. K., and Zhu, X. (2012). Finding nuggets in IP portfolios: Core patent mining through textual temporal analysis, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1819-1823.
23.Kivenson, G. (1985), Patent and Its Alternatives, Machine Design, 57(25), 78-83.
24.Kinton, J. D. and Miller, T. (2006), Patent litigation in the United States - An overview, 2006 TMS Fall Extraction and Processing Division: Sohn International Symposium, 9, 147-157.
25.Lee, S., Kang, S., Oh, M., Kim, K., Park, E., Lee, S., and Park, Y. (2006), Using Patent information for new product development: Keyword-based technology roadmapping approach, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 3, 1496-1502.
26.Lei, X.P., Zheng, J., Gui, J., and Xiong, J.H. (2010), Research on the relative competitiveness of companies based on patent analysis, 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, 1-4.
27.Li Z. and Liang D. (2010), Empirical Study on Patent Development in China Based on DEA Method, 2010 3rd International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2, 339-342.
28.Liang, Y., Tan, R. ,and Ma, J.(2008), Patent analysis with text mining for TRIZ, Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT, 1147-1151.
29.Morris, J. L. (2012), Adding value to product designs: The convergence of designpatents and trade dress, Annual Technical Conference - ANTEC, Conference Proceedings, 3, 1741-1745.
30.Nichols, K. (1999), Age of software patents, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society, 32(4), 25-31.
31.Qiu, Q., Xue, C., Feng, P. ,and Deng, K. (2012), Novelty evaluation method of patent design knowledge and its application in creative design, Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 48(11), 39-45.
32.Qiu, Q. Y.,Zhang, Hui.,and Feng, P. E. (2011),Method to aid product innovation by patent knowledge, Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 45(2), 228-233+246.
33.Trappey, A.J.C., Trappey, C.V., Wu, C.Y. ,and Lin, C.W. (2012), A patent quality analysis for innovative technology and product development, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), 26-34.
34.Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Sun, J., and Tan, R.(2007), Technique of product technology evolutionary potential mapping based on patent analysis, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2033-2037.
35.Alessi, http://www.alessi-funclub.com.tw/, (accessed 6 March,2013).
36.China Patent Infonet, http://www.patent.com.cn/, (accessed 2 March 2013).
37.Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, http://www.dpma.de/, (accessed 1 March 2013).
38.European Patent Organisation (EPO), http://www.epo.org/, (accessed 1 March 2013).
39.European Patent Convention (EPC), http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/epc.html, (accessed 1 February, 2013).
40.Japan Patent office, http://www.jpo.go.jp/indexj.htm, (accessed 2 March 2013).
41.Patent Genius, http://www.patentgenius.com/, (accessed 2 March 2013).
42.United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), http://www.uspto.gov/, (accessed 1 March 2013).