|
參考文獻
1.王保進(2004)。多變量分析套裝程式與資料分析。台北市：高等教育文化，初版。
2.周子敬(2006)。結構方程模式(SEM)-精通LISREL。台北市：全華，初版。
3.Ahituv, N. (1980). A systematic approach toward assessing the value of an information system. MIS Quarterly, 4(4), 61-75.
4.Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A study of student’s perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183–193.
5.Ali, G., Bilotta, E., Gabriele, L., & Pantano, P. (2006). An e-learning platform for academy and industry networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (pp. 231-234). Pisa, Italy: IEEE Conference Publishing Services.
6.Allen, M. (2003) Michael Allen''s guide to e-learning: Building interactive, fun and effective-learning programs for any company. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
7.Anaraki, F. (2004). Developing an effective and efficient e-learning platform. International Journal of Computerized, 12(2), 57−63.
8.Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. Routledge, England: Taylor and Francis.
9.Anita, L.-P. (2009). E-learning success model: An information systems perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(1), 61-70.
10.Bagozzi, R. P., &Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation for Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
11.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
12.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
14.Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, E-learning and distance education (2nd ed.). Routledge, England: Taylor and Francis.
15.Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
16.Bean, J. P., & Bradley, R. K. (1986). Untangling the satisfaction-performance relationship for college students. Journal of Higher Education, 57, 393-412.
17.Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
18.Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariance and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
19.Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
20.Berry, K. (2002). An exploration of how technology is integrated into the literacy curriculum in stage 1 classrooms. Proquest Digital Dissertations, (UMI No. NQ61317480).
21.Berry, L., & Brodeur, T. (1995). Relationship marketing of services - growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-45.
22.Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
23.Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229- 254.
24.Bhattacherjee, A., Perols, J., & Sanford, C. (2008). Information technology continuance: a theoretic extension and empirical test. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(1), 17–26.
25.Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
26.Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
27.Burke, T. P. (2009). Training evolution: how e-Learning is saving time and money. South Carolina Business, 30(5), 16–23.
28.Cavus, N., Uzunboylu, H., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). Student Opinion Towards Using an Open Source Learning Management System Together With a Collaborative Tool. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2). Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://www.world-educationcenter. org/index.php/cjes/article/view/34
29.Chang, H. H. (2010). Task-technology fit and user acceptance of online auction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 69–89.
30.Chang, L.-M., Chang, S.-I., Ho, C.-T., Yen, D. C., & Chiang, M.-C. (2011). Effects of IS characteristics on e-business success factors of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2129-2140.
31.Chao, C.-M, & Cheng, B.-W. (2012). How Future Relationships Influence Factors in Medical Device Suppliers’ Relationships - Social Exchange Theory and Relationship Quality Perspectives. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 40(7) (In Press).
32.Chen, H.-J. (2010). Linking employees’ e-learning system use to their overall job outcomes: An empirical study based on the IS success model. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1628–1639.
33.Chen, J.- L. (2011). The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1501–1511.
34.Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246.
35.Chiu, C.-M., Sun, S.-Y., et al. (2007). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of web-based learning continuance. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1224–1245.
36.Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
37.Cronin, Jr. J. J. & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
38.Cuthrell, K., & Lyon, A. (2007). Instructional strategies: What do online students prefer? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 357-362.
39.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
40.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9- 30.
41.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31-47.
42.Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 399-406.
43.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable and Measurement Errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
44.Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 163–176.
45.Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2003). Enterprise systems success: a measurement model. International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, WA.
46.Gable, G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Reconceptualizing information system success: The IS-impact measurement model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 377–408.
47.Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213−233.
48.Graham, C. R. (2006). Chapter 1: Blended learning system: Definition, current trends, future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
49.Guimaraes, T., & Igbaria, M. (1997). Client/server system success: Exploring the human side. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 851−875.
50.Hair, F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). New York, NY: MacMillan.
51.Horton, W. (2006). E-learning by design. New York: Pfeiffer.
52.Horton, W., & Horton, K. (2003). E-learning tools and technologies. New York: John Wiley.
53.Ifinedo, P., Rapp, B., Ifinedo, A., & Sundberg, K. (2010). Relationships among ERP post-implementation success constructs: An analysis at the organizational level. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1136-1148.
54.Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114.
55.Irvin, L. (2004). An investigation of Mississippi manufacturing workers'' attitudes toward computer use and their satisfactory completion of job training, Mississippi State University. Proquest Digital Dissertations, 64 (09), 3259. (UMI No. AAT 3106929)
56.James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Casual analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57.Jennex, M. E. (2005). The issue of system use in knowledge management systems. In Proceeding of the 38th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences.
58.Jerman-Blazic, B., Klobucar, T., Arh, T., Kieslinger, B., Wild, F., & Lai-Chong, E. (2006). An approach in provision of interoperability of e-learning systems in enlarged EU—The case of iCamp project. In Proceedings of the Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications and International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (pp.6-12). Guadeloupe, French Caribbean: IEEE Conference Publication Services.
59.Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(2).
60.Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K.A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
61.Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLISTM Command Language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
62.Jurison, J. (1996). The temporal nature of IS benefit: A longitudinal study. Information and Management, 30(2), 75−79.
63.Kerres, M., & De Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2/3), 101–113.
64.Ko, D., Kirsch, J. L., & King, W. R. (2005). Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 59–85.
65.Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
66.Lauer, M., & Matthes, M. (2003). MobiCom poster: ELAN—An e-learning infrastructure for ad hoc networks. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 7(1), 53-55.
67.Lee, B.-C., Yoon, J.-O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320–1329.
68.Levine, T., & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1997). Commitment to learning: Effects of computer experience, confidence and attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 83-105.
69.Liao, H. L., & Lu, H. P. (2008). The role of experience and innovation characteristics in the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1405-1416.
70.Liaw, S. S., Chen, G. D., & Huang, H. M. (2008). Users’ attitudes towardWeb-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers & Education, 50, 950–961.
71.Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2008). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational technology & Society, 12(4), 282–293.
72.Limayem, M., & Cheung, C.M.K. (2008). Understanding information systems continuance: The case of Internet-based learning technologies. Information & Management, 45(4), 227-232.
73.Lin, W.-S. & Wang, C.-H. (2011). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88–99.
74.Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9, 126–162.
75.Matsatsinis, N., Grigoroudis, E., & Delias, P. (2003). User satisfaction and e-learning systems: Towards a multi-criteria evaluation methodology. Operational Research, 3, 249-259.
76.McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean''s model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24−45.
77.Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2004). Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth.
78.Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption on WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48, 250–267.
79.Njagi, K. (2003). Students'' attitudes toward web-based learning resources. Clemson University. Proquest Digital Dissertations, (UMI No. AAT 3098287)
80.Njenga, J. K., & Fourie, C. H. (2008). The myths about e-learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 199–212.
81.Oliver, R. L. (1980). Resources Management Journal, 10(1), 6–25A cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction. Journal of MarketingResearch, 17, 460–469.
82.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multipleitem scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
83.Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: an examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159–166.
84.Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47, 222–244.
85.Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50−69.
86.Ravert, R. D., & Evans, M. A. (2007). College student preferences for absolute knowledge and perspective in instruction: Implications for traditional and online learning environments. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 321- 328.
87.Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., et al. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Human–Computer Studies, 64(6), 683–696.
88.Rovai, A.P., Ponton, M. K., Wighting, M. J., & Baker, J. D. (2007). A comparative analysis of student motivation in traditional classroom and e-learning courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 413-432.
89.Ruttenbur, B. W., Spickler, G., & Lurie, S. (2000). E-learning: the engine of the knowledge economy. New York: Morgan Keegan. Retrieved June 14, 2008, from: http://www.masie.com.
90.Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006). Information system success: individual and organizational determinants. Management Science, 52(12), 1849-1864.
91.Santhanam, R., Sasidharan, S., & Webster, J. (2008). Using self-regulatory learning to enhance e-learning-based information technology training. Information Systems Research, 19, 26–47.
92.Schumacker R., & Lomax (2004). A beginner’s guide for structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
93.Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
94.Seddon, P. B. & Kiew, M.-Y. (1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. In J. I. DeGross, S. L. Huff, & M. C. Munro (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on information systems (pp. 99−110). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.
95.Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240−253.
96.Sedera, D. & Gable, G. G. (2004). A factor and structural equation analysis of the enterprise systems success measurement model. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems, Washington DC, USA, 2004.
97.Shih, T., & Hung, J. (Eds.). (2006). Future directions in distance learning and communication technologies: Advances in distance education technologies. Hershey: IGI Global.
98.Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5–27.
99.So, H. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2010). Examining the roles of blended learning approaches in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments: a Delphi study. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 189–200.
100.Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
101.Stephenson, J., Brown, C., & Griffin, D. (2008). Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles. Computational & Educational, 50(3), 640−651.
102.Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M., Nölting, K., & Röser, M. (2004). Is e-learning the Solution for Individual Learning? Journal of e-learning, 2(2), 273–280.
103.Teas, R. K. (1993). Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumers'' perceptions of quality. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 18-34.
104.Ting, C. Y., & Yu, T. K., (2010). Modeling patient perceptions of service recovery: the effects of perceived fairness on health center repatronage. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(2), 395-404.
105.Torkzadeh, G. & Koufteros, X. (1994). Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 813-821.
106.Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1272-1283.
107.Vatanasombut, B., Lgbaria, M., Stylianou, A. C., & Rodgers, W. (2008). Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: the case of online banking. Information & Management, 45(7), 419–428.
108.Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
109.Williams, R. (2003). Integrating distributed learning with just-in-context knowledge management. Electronic Journal on E-Learning, 1(1), 45-50.
110.Wixom, B. H. & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.
111.Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: a respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information & Management, 43, 728–739.
112.Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., Hsia, T. L., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Analysis of e-learning innovation and core capability using a hypercube model. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1851–1866.
113.Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164.
114.Yang, Z., & Liu, Q. (2007). Research and development of web-based virtual on-line classroom. Computers & Education, 48, 171-184.
115.Yengin, I., Karahoca, A., & Karahoca, D. (2011). E-learning success model for instructors’ satisfactions in perspective of interaction and usability outcomes. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1396-1403.
116.Yu, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, X. (2006). New generation of e-learning technologies. Proceedings of the First International Multi-Symposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences, 2, (pp. 455-459). Hangzhou, China: IEEE Conference Publication Services.
117.Yu,T. K., Lu, L. C., & Liu, T. F. (2010). Exploring factors that influencing Knowledge Sharing Behaviour via weblogs. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 32-41.
118.Zhang, X., & Prybutok, V. R. (2005). A consumer perspective of e-service quality. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 461–477.
|