王梅玲、林志鳳、林孟玲和賴美玲(民92)。圖書資訊選擇與採訪。台北縣盧洲市:國立空中大學。
王麗蕉和鄭雅靜(民95)。大學圖書館評鑑之探討。國家圖書館館刊,95(1),35-58。
李美燕(民85)。電子期刊:圖書館新資源。圖書與資訊學刊,15,54-76。吳明德(民76)。我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之探討(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 76-0301-H002-13)。台北市:臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。
吳明德和薛理桂(民84)。圖書選擇與採訪。臺北縣蘆洲鄉:國立空中大學。
吳明德(民95)。館藏發展的再省思:從一些數據談起。在國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所編,數位時代圖書館館藏發展研究討會論文集。台中市:編者。
范豪英(民85)。館藏評鑑:試以書目核對法評比中國大學圖書館土壤學核心書刊之蒐藏。國家圖書館館刊,1,61-75。陳旭耀(民85)。臺灣地區圖書資訊學碩士論文及其引用文獻之研究。未出版之碩士論文,輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北縣。蔡天怡(民97)。資訊可獲性對圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻影響之研究。非正式出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。蘇蓉波(民92)。從博士學位文引用文獻探討成功大學圖書館館藏支援程度。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,12,53-69。莊道明(民84),館藏可得性研究。圖書館學與圖書資訊科學大辭典。(頁2284),臺北市:漢美。
Ajlan, A. (1985).The effectiveness of to academic libraries in Saudi Arabia: An enquiry into the main factions affecting their services. Case Western Reserve University.
Baker, S. L. & Lancaster, F. W. (1991).The Measurement and evaluation of library services. Arlington, Va. : Information Resources Press.
Barschall, H. H. (1988).Electronic version of printed journals. Serials Review, 17, 49.
Brandt, S. (1992).Accessing electronic journals. Academic and Library Computer, 9(10), 17.
Buckland, M. K. (1975).Book availability and the library user. New York: Pergamum.
Buzzard, M. L. & New, D. E.(1983).An investigation of collection support for doctoral research. College and Research Libraries, 44(6), 469-475.
Ciliberti, A. C., Radford, M. L., Radfrod, G. P., & Ballard, T. (1998).Empty handed?: A material availability study and transaction log analysis verification The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24(4), 282-289.
Covey, D. T.(2003).The need to improve remote assess to online library resources: Filling the gap between commercial vendor and academic user practice. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(4), 309-014.
Dunlap, C. R.(1976).Reaching the graduate students: Techniques and administration. In Radar, H. B.(Ed.).Faculty Involement in Library Instruction.
Egan, N. (2005). The impact of electronic full-test resources on interlibrary loan: A ten-year study at John Jay college of criminal justice. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserves, 15(3), 23-41.
Gaskill, H. V., Dunbar, R. M. & Brown, C. H. (1934). An analytical study of the use of a college library. Library Quarterly, 4, 564-589.
Gnoza, E.(1951).A survey of the circulation department: Charles deering library. Northwestern University Janayary-February, Photocopy.
Grarson, L. R., & Howard, J. G. (1984). Electronic publishing: Potential benefits and problems for authors, publishers and libraries. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 24, 123.
Hall, B. H. (1985). Collection assessment manual for college and university libraries. Phoenix, Airs: Oryx.
Jacobs, N. A. (1995). The evaluation and improvement of book availability in an academic library. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1, 41-55.
Jenkins, C., & Morley, M. (1999). Introduction. Gower: Alders hot.
Kantor, P. B. (1976). Availability analysis. American Society for Information Science, 27(6), 311-319.
Kantor, P. B. (1984). Objective performance measures for academic library. Washington, D.C.: Association of research libraries.
Kilgour, F. G. (1989). Towards 100 percent availability. Library Journal, 114, 50-53.
Kilgour, F. G. (2001). Known-item online searches employed by scholars using surname plus first, or last, or first and last title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(14), 1203-1209.
Kolner, S. J. & Welch, E. C. (1985). The book availability study as an objective measure of performance in a health science library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 73(2), 121-131.
Kushkowshi, J., Parsons, K., & Wiese, W. (2003). Master''s and Doctoral Thesis Citations : Analysis and Trends of a Longitudinal Study. Library & the Academy, 3(3), 459-479.
Lacaster, F. W.(1993).If you want to evaluate your library, London : Library Association.
Langschied, L. (1992). Electronic journal forum: Column I. Serials Review, 18, 131.
Lee, J. H., Renear, A.& Smith, L. C. (2006) Known-item search: variations on a concept. In grove, Andrew, eds. Proceedings 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) 43, Austin (US).
Line, M. B. (1973). The ability of university library to provide books wanted by researchers. Journal of Librarianship, 5, 37-41.
Liu, Z., & Yang, Z. (2004). Factors influencing distance-education gradate student''s use of information sources: A user study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 24-35.
Mansbridge, J. (1984). Evaluation Resource Sharing library networks. In Unpublished dissertation. OH.: Vase Western reserve University, Cleveland.
Mansbridge, J. (1986). Availability studies in libraries. Library and Information Science Research, 8(4), 299-314.
McMillan, G. (1991). Embracing the electronic journal: One library plan. The Serials Librarian, 21(97).
Meier, R. L.(1963).Information input overload: Features of growth in communications-org-ented institutions. Libri, 15, 1-44.
Mitchell, E. S., Radford, M. L., & Hegg, J. L. (1994). Book availability: academic library assessment. College and Research Libraries, 55(1), 47-55.
Nisonger, T. E. (2007). A review and analysis of library availability studies. Library Resources & Technical Services, 51(1), 30-49.
OKerson, A. (1991). The electronic journal: What, whence, and when? The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2, 5.
Rashid, H. F. (1990). Book availability as a performance measure of a library: an analysis of the effectiveness of a health science library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(7), 501-507.
Rehman, S. U., Arif, K., & Chaudhry, A. S. (1994). Availability analysis: Conduct comparison and applications. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 25, 19-26.
Rehman, S. U., & Bashir, S. (1993). Comparative measurement of book availability in academic libraries. International Information and Library Review, 25, 183-193.
Revill, D. H. (1987). Availability as a performance measure for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship, 19, 14-30.
Saracevic, T., Shaw, W. M., & Kantor, P. B. (1977). Causes and dynamic of user frustrating in an academic library. College and Research Libraries, 37, 7-18.
Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the Academic Society for Information Science, 45(2), 77-100.
Schofield, J. L., Cooper, A. & Waters, D. H. (1975).Evaluation of an academic library’s stack effectiveness. Journal of Librarianship, 7(3), 207-227.
Shaw, W. M.(1980). Longitudinal studies of book availability. In Library Effectiveness a State of the Art. N.Y. Kaske and Jones, W.G. eds337-349, Library Administration and Management Association / American Library Association, N.Y.
Shaw-Kokot, J., & Varre, C. d. l. (2001). Using a journal availability study to improve access. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89(1), 21-28.
Smith, R. H. & Warner, G.(1978).User and library failures in an undergraduate library. Collage and Research Library, 39(6), 467-473.
Thomas, J. (1993). Graduate student use of journals: A bolometric study of psychology theses. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 12(1), 1-7.
Walcott, R. (1994). Local citation studies: a shortcut to local knowledge. Science & Technology Librarians, 14, 1-14.
Washington-Hoagland, C., & Clougherty, L. (2002). Identifying the resource and service needs of graduate and professional students: The university of Iowa user needs of graduate professional series. Portal : Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 125-143.
Woodward, H. (1994). The impact of electronic information on serials collection management. ILFA Journal, 20, 29-36.
Whitlach, J. B., & Kieffer, K. (1978). Service at San Jose State university: Survey of document availability. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 4, 197-199.
Wuff, Y.(1978). Book availability in the university of Minnesota Bo-Medical library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 66, 349-350.
Zipp, L. S.(1996). Thesis and dissertation citations as indicators of faculty research use of university library journal collections. Library Resources and Technical Services, 40, 335-342.