|
1. Engström, D. and I. R. Kliger. 1997. Design for buildability of multi-storey timber buildings, In Structural Assessment, eds. K. S. Virdi, F. K. Garas, J. L. Clarke and G. S. T. Armer, 309-317. London: E & FN. 2. Council for Cultural Affair (CCA). 2000. Reconnaissance Report for Historic Buildings: 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake and 1022 Chiayi Earthquake. Taipei: CCA. (In Chinese) 3. Architecture and Building Research Institute (ABRI). 1999. The Preliminary Report of Structural Failures of 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake. Taipei: Ministry of Interior. (In Chinese) 4. Hsu, M. F., F. Y. C. Lin, and W. S. Chang. 2003. Investigation and Analysis for Characteristics of Structures and Joints of Chuan-Dou Timber Frames. Taipei: Ministry of Interior. (In Chinese) 5. Tsai, Y. L. 1997. Investigation on the Materials Used for Timber Construction of Historic Buildings. Master thesis submitted to Department of Forestry of National Chung Hsing University, Taichung. (In Chinese) 6. Kuhn, T. 1969. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 7. Popper, K. 1934. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson. Chehab, . 8. Gupta, Ajaya and G. P. Kuo. 1987. Modeling of a Wood-Framed House. Journal of Structural Engineering 113(2): 260-278. 9. Tuomi, R. L. and W. J. McCutcheon. 1974. Testing of A Full-Scale House Under Simulated Snow Loads and Wind Loads. Research Report, USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. 10. Kessel, M. H., M. Speich, and F. J. Hinkes. 1988. The Reconstruction of an Eight-Floor Timber Frame House at Hildesheim (FRG). In Proceedings, 1988 International Conference on Timber Engineering, Seattle, WA: 415-421. 11. Kasal, B., R. J. Leichti, and R. Y. Itani. 1994. Nonlinear finite-element model of complete eight-floored wood structures. Journal of Structural Engineering 120(1): 100-119. 12. Ceccotti, A., A. Vignoli, and C. Goirdana. 1994. Seismic tests on full-scale timber structures. In Proceedings of the Pacific Timber Engineering Conference Vol. 1, Gold Coast, Australia. July: 241–250. 13. Parisi, M. A. and M. Piazza. 2000. Mechanics of plain and retrofitted traditional timber connections. Journal of Structural Engineering 126(12): 1395-1403. 14. André, N., P. Galimard, and P. Morlier. 2003. Structural assessment of a wooden bell-tower, In Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture VIII, eds. C. A. Brebbia, 317-326. Ashurt, Southampton: WIT Press. 15. Hanazato, T., K. Fujita, I. Sakamoto, M. Inayama, and Y. Ohkura. 2004. Analysis of earthquake resistance of five-storied timber pagoda, In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, 1-6 August. Paper No. 1223. 16. Miyamoto, S., K. Miyazawa, Y. Irie, J. Wu, Y. Nomata, and O. Goto. 2004. A study on seismic performance and seismic diagnosis, seismic retrofit of Japanese temple, In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, 1-6 August. Paper No. 853. 17. Braham, M. and J.-P. Jaspart. 2004. Is it safe to design a building structure with simple joints, when they are known to exhibit a semi-rigid behaviour? Journal of Constructional Steel Research 60(3-5): 713-723. 18. Haller, P. 1998. Timber joints in joint research. In Control of the Semi-Rigid Behavior of Civil Engineering Structural Connections, eds. R. Maquoi, 245-254. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 19. Brungraber, R. L. 1985. Traditional Timber Joinery: A Modern Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation submitted to Department of Civil Engineering of Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 20 Kessel, M. H. and R. Augustin. 1996. Load bearing capacity of timber connections with wood pegs. Timber Framing, Journal of the Timber Framers Guild. 39: 8-11. 21. Kessel, M. H. and R. Augustin. 1995. Load behavior of connections with oak pegs. Timber Framing, Journal of the Timber Framers Guild 38: 6-9. 22. Bulleit, W. M., L. B. Sandberg, M. W. Drewek, and T. L. O’Bryant. 1999. Behavior and modeling of wood-pegged timber frames. Journal of structural engineering 125(1): 3-9. 23. Sandberg, L. B., W. M. Bulleit, and E. H. Reid. 2000. Strength and stiffness of oak pegs in traditional timber-frame joints. Journal of Structural Engineering 126(6): 717-723. 24. Burnett, D. T., P. Clouston, D. T. Damery and P. Fisette. 2003. Structural properties of pegged timber connections as affected by end distance. Forest Products Journal 53(2): 50-57. 25. Schmidt, R. J. and C. E. Daniels. 1999. Design considerations for mortise and tenon connections. Technical Report, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY. 26. Schmidt, R. J. and R. B. McKay. 1997. Timber frame tension joinery. Technical Report, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY. 27. Suzuki, Y., K. Katagihara, Y. Iwasa, K. Takata, Y. Masashi, M. Goto, and A. Kitahara. 2001. Dynamic characteristics and seismic performance of traditional wooden structure by shaking table tests. In Proceedings of US-Japan Workshop on Smart Structures for Improved Seismic Performance in Urban Regions. Seattle, WA, 14 August, 2001: 1-10. 28. Inayama, M. 1995. Design of compressive strain resistance connections (Nuki). Kenchiku-Gijutu 547: 106-111. (In Japanese) 29. Kitamori, A., K. Komatsu, Y. Kato, and Y. Kataoka. 2002. Effect of the degree of wedge fixation on the rotational behaviour of beam-column “Nuki” joint. In Proceedings of 7th World Conference on Timber Engineering. Shah Alam, 12-15 August, 2002: 173-182. 30. Yen, C. Y., W. S. King, and C. K. Cheng. 1993. Preliminary study on mechanical behavior of traditional timber frame – tenon behavior. Taipei: CCA. (In Chinese) 31. Shu, T. C. 2000. The Study of the Joint Systems in the Wooden Structure of Taiwan Listed Historic Buildings. Master thesis submitted to Department of Architecture of National Cheng Kung University, Tainan. (In Chinese) 32. Chao, C. C. 2004. Structural Behavior of Traditional Dei-do Wooden Frame -Illustrated by the San-Chuan-Dian of Listed Heritage Tian-Tan,Tainan. Master thesis submitted to Department of Architecture of National Cheng Kung University, Tainan. (In Chinese) 33. Huang, P. C. 2004. The Study on the Chuan-Dou System wooden frames of traditional houses in Tainan region. Master thesis submitted to Department of Architecture of National Cheng Kung University, Tainan. (In Chinese) 34. Chang, W. S. and M. F. Hsu. 2005. Mechanical characteristics of traditional Go-Dou and Stepped Dovetail timber connections in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Forestry Science (in press). 35. Nethercot, D. A. and R. Zandonini. 1989. Methods of prediction of joint behavior: beam-to-column connections. In Structural Connections, Stability and Strength, eds. R. Narayanan, 23-62, London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers. 36. Lionberger, S. R. and W. J. Weaver. 1969. Dynamic response of frames with non-rigid connections. Journal of engineering mechanics 95(1): 95-114. 37. Stelmack, T. W., M. J. Marlev, and K. H. Gerstle. 1986. Analysis and tests of flexibly connected steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 112(7): 1573-1588. 38. Gerstle, K. H. 1988. Effect of connection on frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 10: 241-267. 39. Frye, M. J. and G. A. Morris. 1975. Analysis of flexibly connected steel frames. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2(3): 280-291. 40. Jones, S. W., P. A. Kirby, and D. Nethercot. 1982. Columns with semi-rigid joints. Journal of Structural Engineering 108(2): 361-372. 41. Krishnamurthy, N., H. T. Huang, P. K. Jeffery, and L. K. Avery. 1979. Analytical Curves for End-Plate connections. Journal of the Structural Division, 105(1): 133-145. 42. Colson, A. and J. M. Louveau. 1983. Connection incidence on the behavior of steel structures. Euromechanical Colloquium Vol. 174. 43. Kishi, N. and W. F. Chen. 1987. Moment-rotation relation of top- and seat-angle connections. Structural Engineering Report No. CE-STR-87-4, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, Wet Lafayette, IN. 44. Lui, E. M. and W. F. Chen. 1986. Analysis and behavior of flexibly-jointed frames. Engineering Structures 8(4): 107-118. 45. Shi, Y. J., S. L. Chan and Y. L. Wong. 1996. Ultimate strength analysis of composite plane frames. In Proceedings of ICASS’96 International Conference of Advances in Steel Structures Vol. 1, Hong Kong: 221-226. 46. Lee, S. S. and T. S. Moon. 2002. Moment-rotation model of semi-rigid connections with angles. Engineering Structures 24(2): 227-237. 47. Sandoz, J. L. 1989. Grading of construction timber by ultrasound. Wood Science and Technology 23: 95-108. 48. Sandoz, J. L. 1991. Nondestructive evaluation of building timber by ultrasound. In Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. Madison, WI. 49. Sandoz, J. L. 1993. Valorization of forest products as building materials using nondestructive testing. In Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. Madison, WI. 50. Machado, J. S., R. Sardinha and H. Cruz. 1998. Evaluation of lengthwise variation of mechanical properties by ultrasounds. In Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Timber Engineering. Montreux: 304-311. 51. Pellerin, R. F., R. C. DeGroot and G. R. Esenther. 1985. Nondestructive stress wave measurements of decay and termite attack in experimental wood units. In Proceedings of 5th Nondestructive Testing of Wood Symposium. Pullman, WA: 319-353. 52. Ross, R. J., R. D. DeGroot, W. J. Nelson and P. K. Lebow. 1997. The relationship between stress wave transmission characteristics and the compressive strength of biological degraded wood. Forest Products Journal 47(5): 89-93. 53. Haines, D. W. and J. M. Leban. 1997. Evaluation of the MOE of Norway spruce by the resonance flexural method. Forest Products Journal 47(10): 91-93. 54. Haines, D. W., J. M. Leban and C. Herbe. 1996. Determination of Young’s modulus for spruce, fir and isotropic materials by the resonance flexural method with comparisons to static flexural and other dynamic methods. Wood Science and Technology (30): 253-263. 55. Ross, R. J., X. Wang, J. A. Mattson, J. R. Erickson and J. W. Forsman. 2000. Comparison of several nondestructive evaluation techniques for assessing stiffness and MOE of small-diameter logs. In Proceedings of 12th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. University of West Hungary, Sopron: 155-163. 56. Ross, R. J., X. Wang, M. O. Hunt and L. A. Soltis. 2002. Transverse vibration technique to identify deteriorated wood floor systems. Experimental Techniques 26(4): 28-30. 57. Halabe, U. B., H. V. S. GangaRao, S. H. Petro and V. R. Hota. 1996. Assessment of defects and mechanical properties of wood members using ultrasonic frequency analysis. Materials Evaluation 54(2): 314-322. 58. Ronca, P. and A. Gubana. 1998. Mechanical characterisation of wooden structures by means of an in situ penetration test. Construction and Building Materials 12(4): 233-243. 59. Emerson, R., D. Pollock, D. McLean, K. Fridley, R. Pellerin and R. Ross. 2002. Ultrasonic inspection of large bridge timbers. Forest Products Journal 52(9): 88-95. 60. Rinn, F. 1994. Resistographic inspection of construction timber, poles and trees. In Proceedings of the Pacific Timber Engineering Conference, Gold Coast, Australia. July. 61. Rinn, F. 1998. Inspection and documentation of historic timber constructions. In Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Timber Engineering. Montreux: 368-374. 62. Bethge, K., C. Mattheck and E. Hunger. 1996. Equipment for detection and evaluation of incipient decay in trees. Arboricultural Journal (20): 13-37. 63. Kappel, R. and C. Mattheck. 2003. Inspection of timber construction by measuring drilling resistance using Resistograph F300-S. In Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture VIII, eds. C. A. Brebbia, 825-834. Ashurt, Southampton: WIT Press. 64. Ceraldi, C., V. Mormone and E. R. Ermolli. 2001. Resistographic inspection of ancient timber structures for the evaluation of mechanical characteristics. Materials and Structures 34(1): 59-64. 65. Karsulovic, J. T., M. I. Dinator and R. Morales. 2002. Nondestructive gamma radiation methods for detection of central rot in logs of Lenga (Nothogagus Pumilio). Forest Products Journal 52(11/12): 87-93. 66. Bucur, V. 2005. Ultrasonic techniques for nondestructive testing of standing trees. Ultrasonics 43(4): 237-239. 67. Socco, L. V., L. Sambuelli, R. Martinis, E. Comino and G. Nicolotti. 2004. Feasibility of ultrasonic tomography for nondestructive testing of decay on living trees. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 15(1): 31-54. 68. Divos, F. and L. Szalai. 2002. Tree Evaluation by Acoustic Tomography. In Proceedings of 13th International Symposium on NDT of Wood. Berkeley, CO. 69. Bishop, T. A. and E. J. Dudewicz. 1978. Exact analysis of variance with unequal variance: Test procedures and tables. Technometrics (20): 419-424. 70. Brown, M. B. and A. B. Forsythe. 1974. The ANOVA and multiple comparisons for data with hterogenuous variances. Biometrics (30): 290-302. 71. James, G. S. 1951. The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of population variances are unknown. Biometrika (38): 324-329. 72. Krutchkoff, R. G. 1988. One-way fixed effects analysis of variance when the error variance may be unequal. Journal of statistics, computational simulation (30): 259-271. 73. Chen, S. Y. and H. J. Chen. 1998. Single-stage analysis of variance under heteroscedasticity. Communications in statistics Part B: simulation and computation 27(3): 641-666. 74. Bishop, T. A. and E. J. Dudewicz. 1981. Heteroscedastic ANOVA. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics Series B (43): 40-57. 75. Kleinbaum, D. G., L. L. Kupper, K. E. Muller and A. Nizam. 1998. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 3rd ed. Pacific Grove: Dexbury Press. 76. Hocking, R. R. 1976. The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics 32(1): 1-49. 77. Montgomery, D. C. and E. A. Peck. 1992. Introduction to linear regression, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 78. Allen, D. M. 1974. The relationship between variable selection and data argumentation and method for prediction. Technometrics, 16: 125-127. 79. Allen, D. M. 1971. The prediction sum of squares as a criterion for selecting prediction variables. Technical Report No. 23, University of Kentucky, Lexington, K.Y.
|