臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘 要

對我國這樣的小型開放經濟體來說，對外貿易左右了國家的經濟發展好壞。每當經濟陷入衰退停滯，或是實質薪資出現倒退情形時，執政當局採取的應對方式往往是要拼貿易、拼出口。儘管日常生活中時常聽見關於我國社會貧富差距擴大的討論，但對近年來我國薪資分配的變化情形，以及貿易帶來的薪資分配效果，卻缺乏完整的了解。本文的目的即是提供近30年來我國薪資分配的變化的描述，並且釐清貿易在這其中扮演的角色。
透過長時間個體資料的分析，近年我國薪資分配的變化趨勢大致如下。1980年中產階級的崛起，使中下層薪資差距開始擴大。到了1987年解除進出口與外匯管制 (進口開放) 後，以製造業為主，我國薪資分配明顯改善。2000年後，薪資分配則持續惡化右偏。而貿易在1987年至2000年左右的薪資分配改善中，對薪資分配的影響最為明顯。
藉由市場整合效果，進口開放雖導致紡織成衣、皮革製品等低技術製造業的下游工廠外移，短時間內卻會有利於其上游工廠的出口增加，反而有讓薪資分配改善的效果。經過區分不同期間、不同製造業技術水準、不同性別的迴歸結果的驗證，進口的增加的確在1987年進口開放後，顯著使薪資分配改善，且此薪資分配改善的趨勢應與高學歷者的供給增加無關，貿易是造成這波薪資分配改善最主要的因素。

Abstract

As a small open economy, external trade has great influence on the economic prosperity of Taiwan. Whenever the recession or real wage stagnation occurs, the government often adopts strategies aiming at stimulating export. Although discussions about expanding wage inequality can be easily found on media recent years, we actually know little about the wage inequality trend of Taiwan as well as the distribution effect of trade which might trigger wage inequality. The purpose of this article is to provide a detail description about the wage inequality trend of Taiwan, and explore the role of trade on wage inequality.
Based on the microdata from 1978 to 2012, the wage inequality trend can be divided as follows: In 1980s, the wage gap between middle and lower class widened rapidly. After the removal of import and exchange regulation in 1987, wage gap began to shrink in manufacturing. Since 2000, wage distribution is continuously skewed to the right, and the wage gap between middle and lower class declines. During the entire period, trade (especially import) is clarified as the most important factor affecting wage inequality only to 1987-2002.
By market integration, even if import deregulation had adverse effect on the downstream plants of low-tech manufacturing such as textiles and leather products, it would be beneficial for the upstream plants of low-tech manufacturing. After the offshore migration of downstream plants, the upstream material purchase would gain, leading to export growth of upstream plants and narrowing wage gap. Through comparison of regressions using different subgroups sample, it can be verified that market integration is the most persuasive explanation to explain the wage gap reduction occurred in 1987-2002.

目 錄
口試委員審定書 …………………………………………………………………. i
中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………………… ii
英文摘要 ………………………………………………………………………... iii
第1章 前言…………………………………………………………………….. 1
第2章 資料說明……………………………………………………………….. 6
第3章 我國薪資分配與貿易趨勢變化……………………………………… 15
3.1 薪資分配變動趨勢…………………………………………………… 15
3.2 貿易趨勢……………………………………………………………… 22
第4章 實證分析……………………………………………………………… 29
4.1 迴歸模型設定………………………………………………………… 29
4.2 實證結果……………………………………………………………… 34
4.2.1 基本結果……………………………………………………….. 34
4.2.2 市場整合與供給因素………………………………………….. 37
4.3 其他相關議題與本文的侷限………………………………………… 46
4.3.1 技術進步對薪資的影響……………………………………… 46
4.3.2 本文的其他侷限……………………………………………….. 48
第5章 結語…………………………………………………………………… 49


參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………….. 50
附錄A 行業與進出口資料的重分類………………………………………… 53
附錄B 職業重分類…………………………………………………………… 56

參考文獻

曹添旺, 陳隆華, 陳建良(2006), “國際化對台灣製造業男性工資差異的影響”, 《人文及社會科學集刊》, 18, 343–383。

Autor, David H, Katz, Lawrence F, and Kearney, Melissa S (2008), “Trends in U.S. wage inequality: Revising the revisionists”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 300–323.
Berman, Eli, Bound, John, and Griliches, Zvi (1994), “Changes in the demand for skilled labor within U.S. manufacturing: Evidence from the annual survey of manufactures”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 367–397.
Chen, Been-Lon and Hsu, Mei (2001), “Time-series wage differential in Taiwan: The role of international trade”, Review of Development Economics, 5(2), 336–354.
Chen, Uniko (2013), “The impact of the expansion in postsecondary education on the university wgae premium in Taiwan: Supply-demand framework”, Unpublished draft, the 2013.4 edition.
Feenstra, Robert C and Hanson, Gordon H (1996), “Globalization, outsourcing, and wage inequality”, American Economic Review, 86(2), 240–45.
Feenstra, Robert C. and Hanson, Gordon H. (1999), “The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979–1990”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 907–940.
Frias, Judith A., Kaplan, David S., and Verhoogen, Eric (2012), “Exports and within-plant wage distributions: Evidence from Mexico”, American Economic Review, 102(3), 435–40.
Galiani, Sebastian and Sanguinetti, Pablo (2003), “The impact of trade liberalization on wage inequality: evidence from Argentina”, Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 497 – 513, 14th Inter-American Seminar on Economics.
Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou and Pavcnik, Nina (2007), “Distributional effects of globalization in developing countries”, Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 39–82.
Hatzichronoglou, Thomas (1997), “Revision of the hightechnology sector and product classification”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.
Juhn, Chinhui, Murphy, Kevin M., and Pierce, Brooks (1993), “Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill”, Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), pp. 410–442.
Katz, Lawrence F. and Murphy, Kevin M. (1992), “Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 35–78.
Krishna, Pravin, Poole, Jennifer P., and Senses, Mine Zeynep (2012), “Trade, labor market frictions, and residual wage inequality across worker groups”, The American Economic Review, 102(3), 417–423.
Krueger, Alan B. (1993), “How computers have changed the wage structure: Evidence from microdata, 1984–1989”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 33–60.
McNabb, Robert and Said, Rusmawati (2013), “Trade openness and wage inequality: Evidence forMalaysia”, Journal of Development Studies, 49(8), 1118–1132.
Mincer, Jacob A (1974), Schooling, experience, and earnings, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Tsou, Meng Wen (2002), “Wage differentials in Taiwanese manufacturing, 1982-1997”, Asian Economic Journal, 16(4), 317–335.
Wood, Adrian (1997), “Openness and wage inequality in developing countries: The latin american challenge to east asian conventional wisdom”, The World Bank Economic Review, 11(1), 33–57.