參考文獻
中文部份
一、專書及專書論文
1汪渡村，公平交易法，五南圖書出版公司，2005年4月二版。
2林廷機，公平法有關不公平競爭行為，應如何適用「合理原則」或「當然違法」原則，第二屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集。
3陳文吟，我國專利制度之研究，五南圖書出版公司，2006年10月四版。
4黃茂榮，公平交易法理論與實際，自版，1993年10月初版。
5黃銘傑，「專利授權與公平交易法」，收錄於競爭法與智慧財產權法之交會－相生與相剋之間論文集，元照出版公司，2006年初版。
6廖義男，公平交易法之釋論與實務（第一冊）立法目的、事業、罰則，1996年8月。
7劉孔中，公平交易法，元照出版公司，2003年10月初版。
8賴源河編審，公平交易法新論，元照出版公司，2002年10月二版。
9謝銘洋，智慧財產權之基礎理論－智慧財產權法系列（一），翰蘆出版，1995年7月。
10謝銘洋、陳人傑，註釋公平交易法－第四十五條，公平交易法之註釋研究系列（三）第二十五條至第四十九條，公平交易委員會，2005年12月。
11蘇永欽，經濟法－已開發國家的任務與難題，收錄於氏著之民法經濟法論文集。
二、期刊論文
1宋皇志，瓶頸設施理論在智慧財產權之適用，月旦法學雜誌，第115期，2004年12月。
2李延禧，我國獨寡占商品市場結構及廠商行為規範之研究，公平交易委員會。
3李素華，專利權行使與公平交易法－以近用技術標準之關鍵專利為中心，公平交易季刊，第16卷第2期，2008年4月。
4洪志勳，專利集管授權之專利權濫用探討，科技法律透析，2006年9月。
5范建得、莊春發、錢逸霖，管制與競爭：論專利權之濫用，公平交易季刊，第15卷第2期。6張玉山、李淳，由競爭法之觀點論供油業者之關鍵設施共享，第七屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集。
7張長樹，樞紐設施原則之研究，政治大學法研所博士論文，2000年。
8張哲倫，從美國法之觀點論智慧財產權於競爭法之定位－兼論我國公平交易法第45條之適用，法學叢刊，第211期，2008年7月。
9梁雅琴，美國智慧財產權與反托拉斯法之互動，公平會研究報告，2003年。
10許忠信，智慧財產權之濫用與限制競爭防止法之適用—由美國法與日本法看我國公平交易法第四十五條，全國律師，第12卷第10期，2008年10月。
11曾陳明汝，兩岸暨歐美專利法，學林文化事業出版公司，2004年2月再版。
12黃銘傑，專利授權與公平交易法－以拒絕授權與強制授權為中心，萬國法律，第120期，2001年12月。
13楊宏暉，創新誘因的維護與競爭法規範－以專利拒絕授權為例，公平交易季刊，第12卷第2期。
14葉寧，競爭法對於專利授權適用性之研究，公平會研究報告，2003年。
15廖義男，公平交易法之立法目的與保護之法益－第一條之詮釋，公平交易季刊，第1卷創刊號，1992年10月。
16廖賢洲，從Verizon v. Trinko案看電信市場之管制與競爭，公平交易季刊，第13卷第3期，2005年7月。
17劉華美，公平交易法對於油品市場之規範，台大法學論叢，第36卷第1期。
18謝銘洋，由華康與文鼎案談專利權之濫用，月旦法學雜誌，第1期，1995年5 月。
英文部份
一、專書
1Areeda, Phillip E. & Hovenkamp, Herbert, Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and their Application (2d ed. 2000).
2Chisum, Donald S., Chisum on Patents (5th ed 1996).
3Dunfee, Thomas W. & Gibson, Frank F., Antitrust and Trade Regulation: cases and materials (2d ed 2001).
4Hovenkamp, Hebert, Federal Antitrust Policy: the Law of Competition and its Practice (1994).
5Hovenkamp, Herbert, IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law (2002).
6Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A., The economic structure of intellectual property law (2003).
7Motta, Massimo, Competition Policy (2004).
8Posner, Richard A., Antitrust Law (2d ed 2001).
9Rahnasto, Ilkka, Intellectual Property Rights, External Effects, and Anti-trust Law (2003).
10Schlicher, John W., Licensing Intellectual Property: Legal, Business, and Market Dynamics (1996).
二、期刊論文
1Apostolopoulos, Haris, Refusal-to-Deal Cases of IP Rights at the Aftermarket in the US and EU Law: Converging of Both Law Systems through Speaking the Same Language of Law and Economics, 7 Chi.-Kent J. Int’l Comp. L. 144 (2007).
2Baker, Jonathan B., Market Definition: An Analytical Overview, 74 Antitrust L.J. 129 (2007).
3Bauer, Joseph P., Refusals to Deal with Competitors by Owners of Patents and Copyrights: Reflections on the Image Technical and Xerox Decisions, 55 DePaul L. Rev. 1211 (2006).
4Briggs, Todd M., Submitted by Taylor, Edwin H., Patent Misuse and Antitrust, 531 PLI/Pat 331 (1998).
5Brown, D. Jeffrey & Collins, Paul & Rushton, Kevin,The Aspen Skiing Case from a Canadian Competition Law Perspective, 73 Antitrust L.J. 235 (2005).
6Calkins, Stephen, Patent Law: The Impact of the 1998 Patent Misuse Reform Act and Noerr- Pennington Doctrine on Misuse Defenses and Antitrust Counterclaim, 38 DRAKE L. REV. 175 (1989).
7Candeub, Adam, Trinko and Re-Grounding the Refusal to Deal Doctrine, 66 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 821 (2005).
8Carrier, Michael A., Refusals to License Intellectual Property after Trinko, 55 DePaul L. Rev. 1191 (2006).
9Economides, Nicholas, Hit and Miss: Leverage, Sacrifice, and Refusal to Deal in the Supreme Court Decision in Trinko, 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 121 (2007).
10Economides, Nicholas, Vertical Leverage and the Sacrifice Principle: Why the Supreme Court Got Trinko Wrong, 61 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 379 (2005).
11Feldman, Robin C., The Insufficiency of Antitrust Analysis for Patent Misuse, 55 Hastings L.J. 399 (2003).
12Genevaz, Simon, Against Immunity for Unilateral Refusals to Deal in Intellectual Property: Why Antitrust Law Should not Distinguish between IP and Other Property Rights, 19 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 746 (2004).
13Gilbert, Richard J. & Shapiro, Carl, An economic analysis of unilateral refusals to license intellectual property, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, Colloquium Paper (1996).
14Hovenkamp, Herbert, Exclusion and the Sherman Act, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 147 (2005).
15Hovenkamp, Herbert, Unilateral Refusals to License, 2 J. Competition L & Econ. 1 (2006).
16Keyte, James A., The Ripple Effects of Trinko: How It is Affecting Section 2 Analysis, 20-FALL Antitrust 44 (2005).
17Lao, Marina, Aspen Skiing and Trinko: Antitrust Intent and “Sacrifice”, 73 Antitrust L.J. 171 (2005).
18Lao, Marina, Unilateral Refusals to Sell or License Intellectual Property and the Antitrust Duty to Deal , 9 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 193 (Fall 1999).
19Leaffer, M., Engineering Competitive Policy and Copyright Misuse, 19 Dayton L. Rev. 1087 (Spring 1994).
20Lipsky, Abbott B. & Sidak, J. Gregory, Essential Facility, 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1187 (1999).
21Meese, Alan J., Property, Aspen, and Refusals to Deal, 73 Antitrust L.J. 81 (2005).
22Note: Is the Patent Misuse Doctrine Obsolete, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1922 (June, 1997)
23Popofsky, Mark S., Section 2, Safe Harbors, and the Rule of Reason, 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1265 (2008).
24Rabinowitz, Aaron B., When Does a Patent Right Become an Antitrust Wrong? Antitrust Liability for Refusals to Deal in Patented Goods, 11 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 7 (2005).
25Ritter, Cyril, Refusal to Deal and “Essential Facilities”: Does Intellectual Property Require Special Deference Compared to Tangible Property?, Antitrust Law and Economics Review, 28 World Competition 281 (2005).
26Robinson, Glen O., On Refusing to Deal with Rivals, 87 Cornell L. Rev. 1177 (2002).
27Schoen, Frank X., Exclusionary Conduct after Trinko, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1625 (2005).
28Thomas, Robert E., Vanquishing Copyright pirates and Patent Troll: The Divergent Evolution of Copyright and Patent Laws, 43 Am. Bus. L.J. 689 (2006).
三、網路資料
1MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K., Antitrust Immunity for Refusals to Deal in (Intellectual) Property is a Slippery Slope. The Antitrust Source (July 2002). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=976107
2U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition (2007). Available at :http://www.ftc.gov/reports/index.shtm
3U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Competition and Monopoly: Single-Firm Conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act (2008). Available at :http://www.usdoj.gov/art/public/reports/236681.htm
四、法院判決
1Advanced Health-Care Servs., Inc. v. Radford Cmty. Hosp., 910 F.2d 139 (4th Cir. 1990).
2Alaska Airlines Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1991).
3Am. Council of Certified Podiatric Physicians and Surgeons v. Am. Bd. of Podiatric Surgery, Inc., 185 F.3d 606 (6th Cir. 1999).
4American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 328 U.S. 781 (1946).
5Aspen Highlands Skiing Crop. v. Aspen Skiing Co., 738 F.2d 1509 (1984).
6Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Crop., 472 U.S. 585 (1985).
7Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of Am., Inc. 897 F.2d 1572 (1990).
8B. Braun Med. Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 124 F.3d 1419 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
9Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Technical Dev. Corp., 433 F.2d 55 (7th Cir. 1970).
10Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic, 65 F.3d 1406 (7th Cir. 1995).
11Broadway Delivery Corp. v. UPS, 651 F.2d 122 (2d Cir. 1981).
12Brooke Group Ltd. V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993).
13Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977).
14C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems Inc., 157 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
15Caribbean Broadcasting Sys., Ltd. V. Cable & Wireless PLC, 148 F.3d 1080 (D.C. Cir 1998).
16Colo. Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am.,885 F.2d 683 (10th Cir. 1989).
17Cont’l Paper Bag Co. v. E. Paper Bag Co., 210 U.S. 405 (1908).
18Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752, 775 (1984).
19CSU, L.L.C. v. Xerox Corp., 203 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000).
20Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp., 36 F.3d 1147 (1994).
21Digidynev. Date General Corp., 734 F.2d 1336 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied 473 U.S. 908 (1985).
22Eastern R. R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961).
23Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451(1992).
24Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co., 273 U.S. 359 (1927).
25Exxon Corp. v. Berwick Bay Real Estate Partners, 748 F.2d 937 (5th Cir. 1984).
26Fishman v. Estate of Wirtz, 807 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1986).
27Fuller Co. v. Krupp Polysius A.G., 889 F.2d 1100 (Fed. Cir. 1989).
28Gamco, Inc. v. Providence Fruit & Produce Bldg., Inc., 194 F.2d 484 (1st Cir. 1952).
29Grid Sys. Corp. v. Tex. Instruments Inc., 771 F. Supp. 1033 (N.D. Cal. 1991).
30Hayden Publ’g Co., Inc. v. Cox Broad Corp., 730 F.2d 64 (2d Cir. 1984).
31Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc., 570 F.2d 982 (D.C. Cir. 1977).
32Ill. Tool Works Inc. v. Indep. Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28, 31 (2006).
33Image Technical Services, Inc., v. Eastman Kodak Co., 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997).
34In re Independent Serv. Orgs. Antitrust Litig., 989 F.Supp. 1131 (D. Kansas 1997).
35Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp., 195 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
36International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947).
37Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. No.2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2, 16 (1984).
38Lorain Journal Co. v. United States, 342 U.S.143 (1951).
39Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medipart Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
40Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986).
41MCI Communications Corp. v. AT&T, 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1982).
42Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Inv. Co., 320 U.S. 661 (1944).
43Miller Instituform, Inc. v. Instituform of North America, Inc., 830 F.2d 606 (6th Cir. 1987).
44Morton Salt Co. v. Suppiger Co., 314 U.S. 488 (1942).
45Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 243 U.S. 502 (1917).
46N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 (1958).
47National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla., 468 U.S. 85 (1984).
48Olympia Equipment Leasing Company v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 797 F.2d 370 (1986).
49Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 366 (1973).
50Polysius Corp. v. Fuller Co., 709 F.Supp. 560 (E.D. Pa.)
51SCM Corp. v . Xerox Corp., 463 F.Supp. 983 (1978).
52SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 645 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1981).
53Senza-Gel Corp. v. Seiffhart, 803 F.2d 661 (Fed. Cir. 1986).
54Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327 (1945).
55Special Equip. Co. v. Coe, 324 U.S. 370 (1945).
56Tops Markets, Inc. v. Quality Markets, Inc., 142 F.3d 90 (2d Cir.1998).
57U.S. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc.,399 F.3d 181 (3d Cir. 2005).
58United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945)
59United States v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 642 F.2d 1285 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
60United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919).
61United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377 (1956).
62United States v. General Electric Co. 272 U.S. 476 (1926).
63United States v. Griffith, 334 U.S. 100 (1948).
64United States v. Grinnell Crop., 384 U.S. 563 (1966).
65United States v. Joint Traffic Association, 171 U.S. 505 (1898).
66United States v. Loew’s, Inc., 371 U.S. 38 (1962).
67United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.C.Cir2001).
68United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.h., 670 F.2d 1122 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
69United States v. Terminal Railroad Ass’n of St. Louis, 224 U. S. 383 (1912).
70United States v. United Shoe Mach. Corp., 110 F. Supp. 295 (D. Mass 1953).
71United States v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 648 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1981)
72USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505 (7th Cir 1982).
73Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curits V. Trinko, L.L.P., 540 U.S. 398 (2004).
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curits V. Trinko, L.L.P., 540 U.S. 398. Brief for the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner, 2003 WL 21269559.
74Viacom Int’l, Inc. v. Time Inc., 785 F. Supp. 371 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).
75Virginia Panel Corp. v. MAC Panel Co.,133 F.3d 860 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
76W. Parcel Express v. UPS, 190 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 1999).
77Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery &Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965).
78Windsurfing Intel, Inc. v. AMF, Inc., 782 F.2d 995 (Fed. Cir. 1986).
79Yoder Bros., Inc. v. Cal.-Fla. Plant Corp. 537 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir. 1976).
80Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100 (1969).