臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資料庋用的目的為對研究資料的保存、呈現、加值、使用及再利用。研究資料透過資料庋用，可被更廣泛地利用、減少重複創造研究資料所付出的成本，增加現有研究資料的長期價值，降低長期研究的價值流失及資料過時的風險，資料庋用相關議題在國內的研究與討論相當稀少，國內也尚未發展出完整的資料庋用服務實例，因此國內學術圖書館及研究人員對於資料庋用的概念還相當薄弱。
本研究以基礎醫學領域為例，採用問卷調查法與訪談法進行，探討大學圖書館員及研究人員對資料庋用的認知與態度、兩者認知與態度之間的關聯性，以及設計資料庋用後設資料所需描述元素。
本研究從研究結果分析得到以下結論：1. 大學圖書館員對資料庋用的認知不足、對資料庋用持正向態度、能扮演資料庋用員或資料圖書館員的角色、未具備研究人員期待的相關能力；2. 研究人員通常將資料儲存於私人工作用電腦、對公開研究資料的考慮因素相當多元、降低研究人員公開其研究資料的疑慮能加強其分享資料的意願、研究人員對於「資料庋用」一詞沒有認知，卻有相關概念、不同研究人員對於資料庋用的態度不盡相同；3. 館員對資料庋用的認知單向影響研究人員的認知、館員及研究人員對資料庋用的態度會互相影響；4. 本研究設計之後設資料元素建議表能大致符合研究人員的需求、研究人員建議將研究進行次數、研究對象數目、和研究成果的連結、開放欄位、資料使用用途與使用規範等相關元素加入資料表。
本研究依據研究結果提出建議，包含：增加吸引研究人員參與資料庋用服務的誘因、由政府單位制訂資料庋用服務相關政策、增加館員對資料庋用的認知、加強館員提供資料庋用服務的相關能力、整體考量圖書館經費挹注及人力配置、研究人員可增加和館員互動的頻率、研究人員可和館員共同設計與管理資料庋用服務。

The purpose of data curation is preserving, presentation, adding value, using and reusing research data. Through data curation, research data can be used more widely, reducing the cost of duplication of research data creation, adding long-term value of existing research data, and reducing the risk of long-term research value mitigation and research data obsolescence. There are few discussion about data curation in Taiwan, and no exactly example of data curation services, therefore, academic libraries and researchers of Taiwan have weak concept of data curation.
This study taking basic medical sciences for example and using questionnaire and interview to explore the perception and attitudes of academic librarians and researchers about data curation, and the relationship of their perception and attitude. Furthermore, this study design the metadata of data curation.
This study explored that: 1. Academic librarians have weak concept of data curation, the attitudes of librarians in data curation are positive, librarians can play the role of data curator or data librarian, and librarians do not have skills that researchers expect for; 2. Researchers usually store their research data in private PCs, researchers have many considerations for making their research data public, reducing researchers’ doubts will let them share research data, researchers don’t know the word “data curation”, but have related concept, there are different attitudes between researchers; 3. Only librarians’ perception about data curation will influence researchers’ perception, the attitudes of librarians and researchers will influence each other; 4. The data curation metadata designed by this study can almost fit researchers’ need, and researchers suggested adding some elements, including “research repeat time”, “connection to research result”, “open element”, etc.
This study give suggestions based on the study results, including that adding incentives to make researcher joining in data curation services; Government should make related policies to develop data curation; enhance librarians’ perception of data curation and related skills; Library should overall consider funds and human resource; Researchers can increase the frequency of interaction with librarians; Researchers and librarians can design and handle data curation services together.

第一章　緒論 1
第一節　研究背景與動機 1
第二節　研究目的 3
第三節　研究問題 4
第四節　研究範圍與限制 5
第五節　名詞解釋 5
第二章　文獻探討 9
第一節　資料庋用之意涵與重要性 9
第二節　各國發展資料庋用之狀況 24
第三節　研究者對資料庋用的認知與態度 34
第四節　大學圖書館員與資料庋用 39
第五節　資料庋用之資訊組織 47
第三章　研究設計與實施 57
第一節　研究架構 57
第二節　研究對象 59
第三節　研究方法與工具 60
第四節　研究抽樣與施測方式 64
第五節　研究步驟與實施程序 65
第六節　資料處理與分析 67
第四章　研究設計與實施 69
第一節　大學圖書館員對資料庋用之認知與態度 69
第二節　研究者訪談結果分析 89
第三節　綜合討論 120
第五章　結論與建議 129
第一節　結論 129
第二節　建議 134
第三節　後續研究建議 136

參考文獻 139
附錄一　大學圖書館員提供資料庋用服務之認知與態度調查問卷 149
附錄二　訪談題綱 153
附錄三　基礎醫學領域資料庋用後設資料元素建議表 155
附錄四　基礎醫學領域資料庋用後設資料元素修正表 161
附錄五　資料庋用後設資料元素比較表 165

表次
表2-1　DCC資料庋用生命週期模型與OAIS參考模型對照表 17
表2-2　DataShare後設資料元素及標籤一覽表 28
表2-3　DataStaR系統發展初期支援之典藏庫及其整合後設資料表 32
表2-4　DataStaR最小後設資料元素一覽表 32
表2-5　美加地區圖書資訊學系所開設資料庋用課程主題及授課學校數 45
表2-6　資料庋用最常出現的後設資料元素一覽表 53
表3-1　各校基礎醫學領域系所一覽表 59
表3-2　問卷調查與訪談人數統計表 60
表3-3　研究目的、研究問題、研究方法及研究工具對應表 62
表3-4　學者專家專長領域一覽表 65
表4-1　問卷發送與回收統計表 69
表4-2　整體受測館員基本資料分析表 70
表4-3　館員和醫學領域研究人員在學術上的互動概況統計表 72
表4-4　館員聽說資料庋用管道一覽表 73
表4-5　館員工作年資與對資料庋用之認知統計表 74
表4-6　館員最高學歷與對資料庋用之認知統計表 74
表4-7　館員業務職掌與對資料庋用認知之相關分析表 75
表4-8　館員對資料庋用之認知是否影響其態度分析表 76
表4-9　館員對資料庋用之認知與態度統計表 76
表4-10 館員對資料庋用之認知與態度互相影響分析表 77
表4-11 館員認為本身專業能力能夠提供資料庋用服務分析表 77
表4-12 館員認為其具備專業能力項目能提供資料庋用服務之態度分析表 78
表4-13 館員認為需要具備專業能力以提供資料庋用服務分析表 78
表4-14 館員對圖書館提供資料庋用服務態度分析表 79
表4-15 館員認為其他適合提供資料庋用服務單位統計表 80
表4-16 館員認為圖書館提供資料庋用服務的困難項目統計表 80
表4-17 館員願意向研究者推廣資料庋用服務的原因統計表 81
表4-18 館員願意提供資料庋用服務的原因統計表 81
表4-19 館員不願意提供資料庋用服務的原因統計表 82
表4-20 館員個人提供資料庋用服務之意願是否影響其態度分析表 82
表4-21 不同工作年資館員對資料庋用服務態度之差異分析表 83
表4-22 不同學歷館員對資料庋用服務態度之差異分析表 83
表4-23 館員專業能力和個人提供資料庋用服務相關工作影響分析表 84
表4-24 館員業務職掌對圖書館適合提供資料庋用服務態度之影響分析表 85
表4-25 館員業務職掌對資料庋用服務和圖書館其他業務同等重要態度之影響分析表 85
表4-26 館員業務職掌對本身專業能力能提供資料庋用服務態度之影響分析表 86
表4-27 館員個人參與資料庋用服務相關工作意願與業務職掌相關分析表 87
表4-28 館員和研究者進行互動對館員提供資料庋用服務態度之影響分析表 88
表4-29 館員是否和研究者進行學術上的互動對館員提供資料庋用服務態度之影響分析表 88
表4-30 訪談對象詳細背景資料表 89
表4-31 訪談對象研究領域與年資表 90
表4-32 訪談對象研究資料主題、資料格式與保存方式統計表 91
表4-33 基礎醫學領域資料庋用後設資料元素需求統計表 114

圖次
圖2-1 資料庋用過程模式圖 12
圖2-2 資料庋用生命週期模型圖 15
圖2-3 OAIS參考模型功能模組示意圖 17
圖2-4 強化文獻範例示意圖 20
圖2-5 傳統出版模式示意圖 21
圖2-6 奈米出版模式示意圖 22
圖2-7 DISC-UK DataShare合作關係圖 26
圖2-8 Edinburgh DataShare資料提交介面示意圖 27
圖2-9 DataStaR系統架構圖 31
圖3-1 本研究之研究架構圖 58
圖3-2 研究流程圖 66

中文文獻
王梅玲(2003)。從學術出版的變遷探討學者、出版者與圖書館的角色。國家圖書館館刊，92(1)，67-92。
林玉(2012)。資料庋用詮釋資料之建置方法。(臺灣大學)。臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所學位論文，(2012年)，1-144。檢自華藝線上圖書館。
林玉、劉京玫(2012)。資料庋用詮釋資料之探悉。在陳雪華、陳光華(編)，e-Research:學術圖書館創新服務(頁123-152)。臺北市:臺大圖書館。
林珮萱(2012)。選校指南4〉學術力。遠見雜誌大學專刊，2012，108-114。
柯皓仁(2014)。圖書館資訊科技與應用。在國家圖書館輔導組(編)，中華民國一○二年圖書館年鑑(頁197-220)。臺北市:國家圖書館。
秦韻涵(2012)。從大學教師的觀點探討學術圖書館發展之資料庋用服務(碩士論文)。臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所學位論文，臺北市。
國立台灣大學醫學院醫學系(2013)。簡介。2014年12月15日檢自: http://www.med.ntu.edu.tw/main.php?Page=A4
曹錦丹、徐坤(2014)。e-Science環境下科研數據研究現狀與發展趨勢。情報科學，32(2)，58-62。
陳光華(2012)。結論與建議。在陳雪華、陳光華(編)，e-Research:學術圖書館創新服務(頁181-196)。臺北市:臺大圖書館。
陳光華(2013)。面對巨量資料，圖書館服務的再創新。2014年10月15日檢自http://lis.nsysu.edu.tw/files/15-1240-80976,c1225-1.php
陳和琴、張慧銖、江琇瑛、陳昭珍(2003)。資訊組織。台北﹕空大
陳定權、諸葛列煒(2014)。數據監護發展現狀及對國內高校圖書館的思考。圖書館論壇，2014(3)，97-102。
陳雪華、張素娟、吳瑟量(2010)。臺灣學術機構典藏推展之探討。大學圖書館，14(1)，3-15。doi:10.6146/univj.2010-14-1.01
陳雪華、陳光華(編)(2012)。e-Research:學術圖書館創新服務。臺北市:臺大圖書館。
曾品方(2012)。學術圖書館與資料庋用。在陳雪華、陳光華(編)，e-Research:學術圖書館創新服務(頁71-94)。臺北市:臺大圖書館。
湯其群(2014)。湯其群：基礎醫學，醫學家的搖籃。2014年12月15日檢自 http://medicine.fudan.edu.cn/show.aspx?info_lb=19&flag=13&info_id=1297
黃文琪、蔣禮芸及秦韻涵(2012)。從研究人員觀點探討資料庋用系統:以地理資訊應用領域為例。在陳雪華、陳光華(編)，e-Research:學術圖書館創新服務(頁95-122)。臺北市:臺大圖書館。
楊美華(2012)。大學圖書館在新學術傳播體系的角色。大學圖書館，16(2)，1-19。doi:10.6146/univj.2012-16-2.01
劉應琳(2012)。臺灣發展研究資料管理政策之芻議。在陳雪華、陳光華(編)，e-Research:學術圖書館創新服務(頁47-70)。臺北市:臺大圖書館。
謝婧、陳雅(2014)。國內外科學數據監管研究。大學圖書情報學刊，32(4)，114-119。
英文文獻
Akers, K. G., Doty, J. (2013). Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(2), 5-26. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.263
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2011). Digital curation interest group. Retrieved March 30, 2014, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/aboutacrl/directoryofleadership/interestgroups/acr-igdc
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2012). 2012 top ten trends in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 73(6), 311-320. Retrieved November 21, 2014, from http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/6/311.full.pdf+html
Australian Government. (2007). Australian code for the responsible conduct of research. Retrieved December 18, 2014, from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/r39.pdf
Australian National Data Service. (2011). Metadata-working level. Retrieved December 30, 2013, from http://www.ands.org.au/guides/metadata-working.pdf
Ball, A. (2009). Scientific data application profile scoping study report. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/sdapss/papers/ball2009sda-v11.pdf
Ball, A. (2011a). Overview of scientific metadata for data publishing, citation, and curation. In Eleventh International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications(DC-2011). University of Bath. Retrieved December 18, 2014, from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/26309/
Ball, A. (2011b). Exchanging scientific metadata with Dublin core. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://technicalfoundations.ukoln.ac.uk/print/27.html
Ball, A., Chen, S., Greenberg, J., Perez, C., Jeffery, K., & Koskela, R. (2014). Building a disciplinary metadata standards directory. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(1), 142-151. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.308
Ball, R. (2011). The scholarly communication of the future: From book information to problem solving. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27(1), 1-12. doi:10.1007/s12109-011-9202-y
Beagrie, N. (2006). Digital curation for science, digital libraries, and individuals. The The International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(1), 3-16. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v1i1.2
Belloni, F. L. (2013). Graduate school of basic medical sciences. Retrieved December 9, 2014, from http://www.nymc.edu/academics/SchoolOfBasicMedicalSciences/index.html
Borgman, C. L. (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age : Information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Bracke, M. S. (2011). Emerging data curation roles for librarians: A case study of agricultural data. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 12(1), 65-74. doi:10.1080/10496505.2011.539158
Burk, D. L. (2009). Intellectual property in the context of e-Science. In Jankowski, N. W. (Ed.). E-Research: Transformation in scholarly practice(pp. 273-288). New York : Routledge. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00340.x
Choudhury, G. S. (2008). Case study in data curation at Johns Hopkins University. Library Trends, 57(2), 211-220. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0028
Collins, E. (2011). Use and impact of UK research data centres. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1), 20-31. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.169
Corrado, E. M., & Moulaison, H. L. (2014). Digital preservation for libraries, archives, and museums. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
Council on Library and Information Resources. (2014). Johns Hopkins University, The Sheridan Libraries. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from http://www.clir.org/fellowships/postdoc/applicants/jhu_dcs2015
Cragin, M. H., Palmer, C. L., Carlson, J. R., & Witt, M. (2010). Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4023-4038. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0165
Data Conservancy. (n.d.). About. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from https://dataconservancy.org/about/
Data Information Specialists Committee - UK(2009). DataShare project. Retrieved December 29, 2013, from http://www.disc-uk.org/datashare.html
Denison, T., Kethers, S., & McPhee, N. (2007). Managing the soft issues in e-Research: A role for libraries?. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 38(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/00048623.2007.10721263
Dietrich, D. (2010a). A staging repository for supporting library-based data curation services. Retrieved December 29, 2013, from http://esciencelibrary.umassmed.edu/sites/all/themes/esci/pdfs/datastar.pdf
Dietrich, D. (2010b). Metadata management in a data staging repository. Journal of Library Metadata, 10(2/3), 79-98. doi:10.1080/19386389.2010.506376
Digital Curation Centre. (2008a). DCC Curation Lifecycle Model. Retrieved March 16, 2013, from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-lifecycle-model
Digital Curation Centre. (2008b). What is digital curation ? Retrieved March 16, 2013, from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/digital-curation/what-digital-curation
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2005). DCMI glossary. Retrieved December 29, 2013, from http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/glossary.shtml#M
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2012). Dublin core metadata element set, version 1.1. Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/
Edinburgh DataShare. (2011). Edinburgh DataShare. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk/
eResearch SA. (n.d.). What is eResearch? Retrieved April 19, 2014, from https://www.ersa.edu.au/whatis
Federer, L. (2013). The librarian as research informationist: A case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 101(4), 298. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011
Fulton, B., Botticelli, P., & Bradley, J. (2011). Digln: A hands-on approach to a digital curation curriculum for professional development. Journal Of Education For Library & Information Science, 52(2), 95-109. Retrieve December 22, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41308885
Gore, S. A. (2011). E-Science and data management resources on the web. Medical reference services quarterly, 30(2), 167-177. doi:10.1080/02763869.2011.562778.
Gradmann, S. (2014). From containers to content to context: The changing role of libraries in eScience and eScholarship. Journal of Documentation, 70(2), 241-260. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2013-0058
Groenewald, R., & Breytenbach, A. (2011). The use of metadata and preservation methods for continuous access to digital data. The Electronic Library, 29(2), 236-248. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640471111125195
GSLIS Center for Informatics Research in Science and Scholarship. (n.d.). Digital curation education program of University of Illinois Urbana/Champaign. Retrieve March 22, 2014, from http://cirss.lis.illinois.edu/CollMeta/dcep.html
Harris-Pierce, R. L., & Liu, Y. Q. (2012). Is data curation education at library and information science schools in North America adequate?. New Library World, 113(11 and 12), 598-613. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074801211282957
Harvard University. (2014). New metadata features for 4.0. Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://datascience.iq.harvard.edu/blog/metadata-features-40
Harvey, D. R. (2010). Digital curation: A how-to-do-it manual. New York: Neal- Schuman Publishers.
Higgins, S. (2007). Using metadata standards. Retrieved December 30, 2013, from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/standards-watch-papers/using-metadata-standards
Higgins, S. (2008). The DCC curation lifecycle model. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 134-140. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
Jankowski, N. (2009). The contours and challenges of e-Research. In Nicholas Jankowski(Ed.). e-Research: Transformation in scholarly practice,(pp.3-31). New York: Routledge.
Johns Hopkins University Data Management Services. (2015). History and the team. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from http://dmp.data.jhu.edu/about-us/history-and-the-team/
Khan, H., Caruso, B., Corson-Rikert, J., Dietrich, D., Lowe, B., & Steinhart, G. (2011). DataStaR: Using the semantic web approach for data curation. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 209-221. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.197
Lavoie, B. (2000). Meeting the challenges of digital preservation: The OAIS reference model. OCLC Newsletter, 243, 26-30. Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://library.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p267701coll28/id/527
Lord, P., Macdonald, A. (2004). e-Science data curation. Retrieved December 21, 2013, from http://sitecore.jisc.ac.uk/publications/generalpublications/2004/pub_escience.aspx
Lord, P., Macdonald, A., Lyon, L., & Giaretta, D. (2004). From data deluge to data curation. In Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands meeting 2004(pp. 371-375). Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/e.j.lyon/150.pdf
Macdonald, S., & Martinez-Uribe, L. (2010). Collaboration to data curation: Harnessing institutional expertise. New Review Of Academic Librarianship, 16, 4-16. doi:10.1080/13614533.2010.505823
Martinez-Uribe, L. (2007). Digital repository services for managing research data: What do Oxford researchers need?. IASSIST Quarterly, 31(3-4), 28-33. Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://www.iassistdata.org/downloads/iqvol313martinez.pdf
Martinez-Uribe, L., & Macdonald, S. (2008). A new role for the academic librarian: Data curation. Profesional De La Informacion, 17(3), 273-280. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/57672407?accountid=12716
Medeiros, N. (2013). A public trust: Libraries and data curation. OCLC Systems & Services, 29(4), 192-194. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-06-2013-0018
Mons, B., Haagen, H. V., Chichester, C., Hoen, P., Dunnen, J. T. D., Ommen, G. V., ... Mulligen, E. V. (2011). The value of data. Nature Genetics, 43(4), 281-283. doi:10.1038/ng0411-281
Nanopub.org. (2013). About. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://nanopub.org/wordpress/?page_id=65
National Information Standards Organization. (2004). Understanding metadata. Retrieved December 29, 2013, from http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf
National Library of Australia. (2007). Preservation metadata. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://www.nla.gov.au/padi/to pics/32.html
National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections enabling research and education in the 21st century. Retrieved December 21, 2013, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/nsb0540.pdf
O’Donoghue, J., & Van Hemert, J. I. (2009). Using the DCC lifecycle model to curate a gene expression database: A case study. International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(3), 57-70. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v4i3.120
Ogburn, J. L. (2010). The imperative for data curation. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 10(2), 241-246. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0100
Open Archives Initiative. (n.d.). Object reuse and exchange. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://www.openarchives.org/ore/
OSI e-Infrastructure Working Group. (2007). Developing the UK’s e-infrastructure for science and innovation. Retrieved November 21, 2014, from www.nesc.ac.uk/documents/OSI/report.pdf
PARSE.Insight consortium. (2010)PARSE.Insight. INSIGHT into issues of permanent access to the records of science in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.parse-insight.eu/downloads/PARSE-Insight_D2-2_Roadmap.pdf
Pritchard, SM., Anand, S. & Carver, L. (2005). Informatics and knowledge management for faculty research data. Retrieved November 22 , 2014 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0502.pdf.
Pryor, G. (2012). Intellectual property in the context of e-Science. In Pryor, G. (Ed.). Managing research data. (pp.2-16). London: Facet Publishing.
Pryor, G. (Ed.). (2012). Managing research data. London: Facet Publishing.
Research Information Network. (2008).To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs . Retrieved December. 26, 2013, from http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/data-management-and-curation/share-or-not-share-research-data-outputs
Rice, R. (2009). DISC-UK DataShare project final report. Retrieved December. 29, 2013, from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/336/1/DataSharefinalreport.pdf
Rice,R., Macdonald, S., & Hamilton, G. (2008). DSpace metadata schema for Edinburgh DataShare. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://www.disc-uk.org/docs/Edinburgh_DataShare_DC-schema1.pdf
Scaramozzino, J. M., Ramirez, M. L., & McGaughey, K. J. (2012). A study of faculty data curation behaviors and attitudes at a teaching-centered university. College & Research Libraries, 73(4), 349-365. doi:10.5860/crl-255
Steinhart, G. (2011). DataStaR: A data sharing and publication infrastructure to support research. Agricultural Information Worldwide, 4(1), 16-20. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://journals.sfu.ca/iaald/index.php/aginfo/article/view/199
Swan, A. & Brown, S. (2008). The skills, role and career structure of data scientists and curators: An assessment of current practice and future needs. Truro, UK: Key Perspectives Ltd. Retrieved November 15, 2014 from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/16675/
Taylor, A. G., & Joudrey, D. N. (2009). The organization of information(3rd ed.). Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.
Tenopir, C., Sandusky, R. J., Allard, S., & Birch, B. (2013). Academic librarians and research data services: Preparation and attitudes. IFLA journal, 39(1), 70-78. doi:10.1177/0340035212473089
Wallis, J. C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. L. (2013). If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PloS one, 8(7), e67332. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
Walters, T., & Skinner, K. (2011). New roles for new times: Digital curation for preservation. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved November 15, 2014 from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/nrnt_digital_curation17mar11.pdf
Witt, M. (2008). Institutional repositories and research data curation in a distributed environment. Library Trends, 57(2), 191-201. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0029
Yakel, E. (2007). Digital curation. OCLC Systems & Services, 23(4), 335-340. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650750710831466