臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

案例式土地開發規劃支援系統，乃運用先前的土地開發規劃經驗來作為目前規劃之輔助。其有別於傳統以規則為基礎的系統，對於非結構性問題之知識擷取、展現與應用範疇支援的限制，其對於所謂「規劃經驗」的支援，能有較佳的處理與突破，在有關規劃事務之電腦輔助支援系統之發展，具有一定之潛力。
而一般案例式推理系統之運作過程中，如何能從案例庫中找出合適的參考案例，此即所謂「案例尋回」之機制，其直接影響系統支援規劃之能力，為系統建構的重要關鍵要素之一。然而一個完整的案例尋回之過程，其涉及尋回案例的索引建立、選擇參考案例的索引使用行為，以及不同案例間所謂相似的判斷方式等關鍵課題。上述案例尋回之關鍵課題，為本研究主要之探討焦點。
本研究嘗試以工商綜合區開發規劃為探討對象，在索引系統建立部分，乃從認知理論出發，運用個人建構理論為基礎的角色建構測驗法加以修正，並結合編碼技術之內容分析法，與口語正規化等程序，透過實際調查與訪談，建構包含12個索引項目與39個索引內容之索引系統。在規劃者選擇案例的索引使用行為方面，除調查與回顧規劃者實際使用案例之行為特性外，並運用非計量多元尺度法來加以輔助判斷規劃者選擇案例之主建構與次建構之索引內容，以及各索引具有之補償性與非補償性等特性，與進一步嘗試釐清各索引對於挑選案例行為之權重關係。而在規劃案例相似性判定方面，則針對規劃案例不易透過距離關係直接衡量之特性，以案例集合相似性判定之演算方法進行討論，並針對不同資料尺度之索引，提出一套集合相似判定之演算方法。最後並結合前述三個研究成果，以強調認知為基礎之系統設計理念，考量階段性、多重選擇彈性並結合資訊尋求行為特性之觀點，提出符合使用者需求之一套整合性的多重案例尋回機制。
研究最後則運用Delphi語言並整合地理資訊系統軟體（Arc-View 3.2）開發雛形系統，並透過「回收率」與「精確率」2個評估準則，對於實驗性系統之運作進行初步檢核，用以檢證系統之發展理論與發展方法。

Case-based land development planning support system utilizes previous experiences of land development planning as current planning assistances. The case-based system is different from the traditional rule-based system in collecting the knowledge and limitation of exhibition and application in dealing with non-structural problems. It not only deals better, but also is easy to create breakthroughs in so-called “planning experiences”. It is a higher potential in the development of related planning computer aided supporting system.
How to find the suitable referenced case from the case database is one of the key factors of system build-up in the process of ordinary case reasoning system which is the mechanism of case recall. It directly affects the abilities of the system supporting planning. The key topics include establishing the index of case recall, selecting usage of referenced case, and judging among similar case in the process of whole case recall. The main focus of this research is the key topics of case recall.
This research, first of all, tries to focus on the industrial-commercial park planning. It constitutes an index system of 12 index items and 39 index contents from the recognition theorem, revision by the role construct repertory which is based on personal construct theory, combination with contents analysis of coding technology, verbal normalization, to actual investigation and interview. In selecting the case index, this research investigates and reviews the behavior characteristics of actual case usage from planner, judges the index contents of selected case between super-ordinate construct and sub-ordinate construct with non-metric multidimensional scaling aid, and clarifies the weight relationship between compensatory characteristics and non-compensatory characteristics. In addition, this research also discusses the development of case set similarities and the characteristics of difficult direct distance measurement in the judgment of similarities of planning case and proposes a set of development of judgment of similarities from the different data scale indices. Eventually, this research will combine three of the previous research achievements to propose an integrated multiple case recall mechanism to emphasize system design concept of recognition, to consider gradation and multiple selection possibility, and to combine information search behavior characteristics.
Finally, this research will conduct a preliminary evaluation to testify the theorem and development method by a system which integrates AreView 3.2 (Geographic Information System package) and a CBR shell (has been developed by us with Delphi language) according to “recall ratio” and “precision ratio” two criteria.

封面
目錄
第一章緒論
第一節 研究動機
第二節 問題界定
第三節 研究目的
第四節 研究內容與方法
第五節 名詞解釋
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 土地開發規劃支援系統
一、規劃支援系統之意義
二、系統發展與課題
三、系統發展方向
第二節 案例式系統與規劃行為
一、案例式系統之特性
二、案例式推理系統組成與運作流程
三、規劃行為與案例使用
第三節 案例選擇之認知行為
一、案例選擇行為認知
二、資訊尋求行為
三、認知研究方法
第三章 案例尋回機制與索引分析
第一節 案例尋回機制回顧
一、案例式系統應用回顧
二、索引建構回顧與分析
第二節 索引系統之建立
一、資訊擷取過程
二、索引之形成
三、索引之建立
第三節 索引系統之設計
一、索引內容擷取方法
二、角色建構測驗(Rep)之課題與建議
三、索引擷取設計
第四節 工商綜合區案例索引調查
一、問卷訪談
二、語意正規化程序
三、群體建構建立
第四章 案例選擇行為與主次建構分析
第一節 規劃案例選擇行為
一、選擇行為模式
二、案例選擇行為特性
三、規劃者案例選擇行為
第二節 區分主次建構研究方法設計
一、多元尺度法之調查分析
二、統計分析
三、索引之權重分析
第三節 索引之主要建構及次建構建立
一、MDS結果分析
二、以索引內容比較之次數區分
第四節 各索引之權重分析
一、各案例共同屬性之判定
二、索引權重複迴歸分析
第五章 案例相似性比對探討
第一節 相似案例判定方法
一、相似性判定回顧
二、多準則相似計算
第二節 集合相似演算分析與設計
一、集合相似之觀念
二、集合相似演算方式
第三節 工商綜合區案例相似判定
一、主建構索引內容之屬性探討
二、次建構索引內容之屬性探討
第六章 案例尋回機制與維形系統運作
第一節 案例尋回機制設計
一、尋回機制特性
二、尋回機制構想
第二節 系統運作流程說明
一、主建構索引操作說明
二、次建構索引方式
第三節 系統操作模擬
一、案例索引內容
二、主建構索引內容選擇操作流程
三、次建構索引內容選擇操作流程
四、案例尋回結果輸出
第四節 系統評估
一、評估指標說明
二、評估實驗
第七章 結論與建議
第一節 結論
第二節 建議
參考文獻
附錄一
附錄二
附錄三

中文部分：
1. 王聖哲，1994，建築案例：一種設計資訊描述系統，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文
2. 江伯尹，1999，高速鐵路服務品質對旅客選擇行為影響之研究, 國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文
3. 吳芝儀，1997，以建構研究法探討個人建構系統與生涯決定的相關論題，輔導季刊, 第33卷, 第3期, pp.42-51.
4. 何楝國，1997，案例式農村規劃支援系統之研究，國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文
5. 何孝元，1995，設計知識的研究-人類設計行為與電腦輔助設計系統之間的差距，國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文
6. 吳武明，1994，資訊管理，松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司
7. 宋立垚，1993，都市規劃者對規劃資訊需求與使用變遷之研究─以現代化理論為觀點的探討，台灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文
8. 邱茂林，1998，建築設計中案例式設計與推理(二): 案例式推理系統之建構研究，建築學報，第26期，pp.1-17.
9. 林勝忠，1997，案例式立面設計中案例選擇與調適之研究，東海大學建築研究所碩士論文
10. 林峰田、李佳昀，1999，地震防救災文獻案例式系統研究，1999年都市計劃學會學術研討會
11. 洪光遠、鄭慧玲譯，1995，人格心理學，桂冠圖書有限公司
12. 段良雄、張淳智，1991，結合可補償與不可補償決策規則的個體運具選擇模式，運輸計劃季刊，20卷4期，pp.341-372
13. 孫書煌，1996，以案例為基礎推理模式之電腦輔助夾具定位設計方法，國立成功大學機械工程研究所博士論文
14. 陳甚勻，1999，現代決策應用與方法分析，五南圖書出版公司
15. 許朝榮，1994，基於模糊迴歸分析之案例式推論系統-實現於成型模具電腦輔助設計系統，國立成功大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文
16. 梁定澎，1982，多屬性效用模式用在消費者選擇行為之應用，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
17. 彭真悌，1999，國內航空公司競爭力之研究-多準則評估方法之比較分析，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文
18. 曾蘭婷，1998，台北市西松國小「快樂齊步走」計畫的設計推理，國立台灣大學城市及鄉村規劃研究所碩士論文
19. 傅雅秀，1996，從科學傳播的觀點探討中央研究院生命科學專家的資訊尋求行為，圖書館學與資訊科學論文叢刊，第七輯，pp.1-73
20. 黃慕萱，1996，資訊檢索，台灣學生書局圖書館學小叢書
21. 曾淑慧，1992，認知限制在決策支援系統設計過程中之理論與應用，東吳大學商學院管理學研究所碩士論文
22. 葉怡成、郭耀煌，1992，專家系統方法應用與實作，全欣資訊圖有限公司
23. 彭超明，1986，因素分析及理想點差距分析於人事評核作業中之應用，東海學報27期，pp.445-459
24. 鄒克萬，1998，案例式都市規劃支援系統發展架構之研究，國科會研究報告
25. 鄒克萬，1999，案例式都市規劃支援系統案例展現與擷取機制之研究，國科會研究報告
26. 鄒克萬、張學聖，1999a，都市計劃案例擷取指標選擇之研究，1999年都市計劃學會學術研討會
27. 鄒克萬、張學聖，1999b，案例式規劃系統案例選擇行為與相似性量測方法之探討，1999年中華地理資訊學會學術研討會（光碟版）
28. 溫國忠，1996，類神經網路的建築設計案例學習，國立台灣大學土木工程研究所博士論文
29. 黎漢林、徐開平，1997，空間配置規則的推導-人工智慧中案例學習法之運用，建築學報，第23期，pp.1-22
30. 鄭尚文，1996，混和決策規則之運具選擇模式-以旅行者之屬性分群，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文
31. 鄭燕翔，1995，旅行者運具選擇決策規則模式之研究，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文
32. 鄭昭明，1993，認知心理學─理論與實踐，桂冠圖書有限公司
33. 賴弘綱，1995，設計心智行為之資料記錄系統試探，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文
34. 鍾聖校，1990，認知心理學，心理出版社
35. 蕭一山，1996，案例式設計現象與方法之初探，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文
36. 蘇峰毅，1994，應用案例推論法於策略資訊系統，國立台灣工業技術學院
英文部份
1. Aamodt, A. & Plaza, E. (1994), “Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues Methodological Variations And System Approaches”, AI Communications, Vol.7, No 1, pp.39-52.
2. Aha, D. W. (1998), “The Omnipresence of Case-Based Reasoning In Science And Application”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 11, pp.261-273.
3. Allen, B. P. (1994), “Case-Based Reasoning: Business Applications”, Knowledge engineering systems, Vol.37, No.3, pp.40-42.
4. Bain, W. , (1986), “ Case-based Reasoning: A Computer Model of Subjective ASSESSMENT”, PHD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Yale University.
5. Bareiss, E. R. , Poter, B. W. , & C. C. Weir, (1988), “Protos: An Exemplar-Based Learning Apprentice”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol.29, pp.549-561.
6. Bergmann, R. (1998), “On the Use of Taxonomies for Representing Case Features and Local Similarity Measures”, In L. Gierl & M. Lenz (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 6th German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (GWCBR’98). IMIB Series, Vol. 7, University Rostock, pp.23-32.
7. Bergmann, R. & Stahl, A. (1998) , “Similarity Measures for Object-Oriented Case Representations”, In B. Smyth & P. Cunning ham (Hrsg.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR’98), Springer, pp.25-36.
8. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1972), “Socila Statistics”, McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Bruns, T. & Egenhofer , M. (1996) , “Similarity of Spatial Scenes. in: M-J. Kraak and M. Molenaar(Ed.)”, Seventh International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 4A. ,31-42.
10. Cao, O. (1996), “A Knowledge-Based Analysis System of Design”, Environment and Planning and Design, Vol. 23, pp.353-367.
11. Carver, S.J., (1991), “ Integrating Multi-Criteria Evaluation with Geographic Information”, International Journal of Geographical Information System, Vol.5, pp.321-339
12. Cauchard, F. V., Porquet, C. & M. Revenu, (1999) , “CBR for the Management And Reuse of Image-Processing Expertise: A Conversational System”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence”, 12, pp.733-747.
13. Chang, K. H., Raman, P., Carlisle, W. H. & J. H., Cross, (1996), “A Self-Improving Helpdesk Service System Using Case-Based Reasoning Techniques”, Computers in Industry, 30, pp.113-125.
14. Chen, F. & Delaney, J. (1998), “Expert Knowledge Acquistion: A methodology for GIS assisted industrial land suitability assessment”, Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp.301-315.
15. Chen, S. M. (1995), “Measures of Similarity Between Vague Sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.74, pp.217-223.
16. Chi, R. T., Chen, M. & M. Kiang, (1993), “Generalized Case-Based Reasoning System for Portfolio Management”, Expert Systems With Applications, Vol. 6, pp.67-76.
17. Christopher, K. R. & Roger , C. S. (1989), “ Inside Case-Based Reasoning”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
18. Chuang, M. C. & Shiau , K. A. (1998), “A Study of Style Recognition and The Operation of products in which Ming-style chairs are used as examples”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 25, pp.837-848.
19. Colman, A. M., & Stirk , J. A., (1999), “ Singleton Bias And Lexicographic Preferences Among Equally Valued Alternatives”, Journal of Economic behavior & Organization, Vol.40, pp.337-351.
20. Corner, J. L. & Corner , P. D. (1995), “Characteristics of Decisions in Decision Analysis Practice”, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol.46, pp.304-314.
21. David B. L., (1997), “ Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, & Future Directions”, The AAAI / The MIT Press.
22. Dries,P.,(1999), “A Natural Classification of Alcoholics by Means of Statistical Grouping Methods”, Addiction, Dec97, Vol.92 Issue 12, pp.1649-1661.
23. Dong, Y. &. Kitaoka , M (1994), “Implementation of a Case-Based Production Scheduling System in C Language”, Computers ind. Engng Vol. 27, Nos. 1-4, pp.265-268.
24. Ericsson K. A. & Simon , H. A. (1993), “Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports As Data”, The MIT Press.
25. Fan, J. & Xie ,W. (1999),” Some notes on similarity measure and proximty measure”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol.101, pp.403-412.
26. Flewelling, D. M. & Egenhofer , M. J. (1999), “Using Digital Spatial Archives Effectively”, International Journal of Geographic Information Science,Vol. 13, No 1, pp.1-8.
27. Flewelling, D. M., (1999), “Measuring Similarities of Spatial Datasets”, URISA Journal, Vol.11, No. 1 .
28. Gan, R. & D. Yang, (1994), “Case-based Decision Support System with Artificial Neural Network”, Computers ind, Vol. 27, pp.437-440.
29. Garcia-Molina, H. & Widom, J. & Wiener, J. & Labio, W. & Lent, B. & Y. Zhuge, (1995), “A Warehousing Approach to Data and Knowledge Intergration”, Stanford University, Technical Report.
30. Garrara, G. & Kalay, Y. E., (1994), Knowledge-Based Computer-Aided Architectural Design, Elsevier Science B. V.
31. Gilboa, I. & D. Schmeidler, (1992), “Case-based decision theory”, Working Paper, Northwestem University, Last Revision.
32. Goodman, M. (1989), “CBR in battle planning”, Proceedings: Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (DARPA), Pensacola Beach, Florida. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
33. Gudivada & Raghavan, V., (1995), “Design and Evaluation of Algorithm for Image Retrieval by Spatial Similarity.”, ACM Transactions on Information. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
34. Guiu, J. M.G. I., Ribe, E. G. I., Mansilla, E. B. I. & X. L. I. Farega, (1999), “Automatic Diagnosis With Genetic Algorithms And Case-Based Reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, Vol.13, pp.367-372.
35. Gupta, K. M. & Montazemi, A. R., (1997), “A Connectionist Approach For Similarity Assessment In Case-Based Reasoning Systems”, Decision Support Systems , Vol.19, pp.237-253.
36. Hansen, J., Meservy, R. & L., Wood, (1994), “ Indexing Tree and Pruning Concepts to Support Case-Based Reasoning, Omega”, Int. J. Mgmt. Sci. Vol.22, No. 4, pp.361-369.
37. Hammond, K. J. , (1989), “ Case-Based Planning: View Planning As A Memory Task.”, Boston: Academic Press.
38. Hammond, K. J. (1990), “Case-Based Planning: A Framework for Planning from Experience”, Cognitive Science, Vol.14, pp.385-443.
39. Harris, B. , (1994), “ Some Thoughts on New Styles of Planning.”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,Vol. 21, pp.393-398.
40. Hickey, R. & Jankowski, P., (1997), “GIS And Environmental Decisionmaking To Aid Smelter Reclamation Planning”, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 29, pp.5-19.
41. Hinrichs, T.R. , (1992), “Problem Solving in Open World: A Case Study in Design”, Northvale, Erlbaum, NJ.
42. Holt, A., & Benwell, G. L., (1996), “ Case-Based Reasoning And Spatial Analysis”, URISA Journal.
43. Holt, A. & Benwell, G. L., (1999), “Applying Case-Based Reasoning Echniques In GIS”, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.9-25.
44. Hopkins, L.D., (1997), “Research on Plan-Making”, Environment and Planning B, Vol.24 ,pp.317-318.
45. Hopkins, L.D. , (1999), “Structure of a Planning Support System for Urban Development” , Environment and Planning B : Planning and Design , Vol. 26, pp.333-343.
46. Hunt, J. & Miles, R. , (1995), “Toward An Intelligent Architectural Design Aid”, Expert Systems, Vol. 12(3), pp.209-217.
47. Hunt, J. (1997), “Case Based Diagnosis And Repair of Software Faults”, Expert Sysems, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.15-21.
48. Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. P.,(1995), “ Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction.”, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in Social Science.
49. Hwang, C. L., & Yook,K. (1981). “ Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications: A State of The Art Survey.”, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
50. Jankowski, P., (1995), “ Integrating Geographical Information System and Multiple Criteria Decision-making Methods”, INT. J. Geographical Information Systems, Vol.9, No.3, pp.251-273.
51. Jansson, D. G., Condoor, S. S., & H. R. Brock, (1992), “ Cognition In Design; Viewing The Hidden Side of The Design Process”, Environment and Planning B; Planning And Design, Vol. 19, pp.257-271.
52. Jeng, B. C. & Liang ,T. P. (1995), “Fuzzy Indexing and Retrieval in Case-Based Systems”, Expert Systems With Applications, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.135-142.
53. Krikelas, J. , (1983),“Information Seeking Behavior: Patterns and Concepts.” Drexel Library Quarterly 19: 17.
54. Kim, M. C. & Choi, K. S. (1999), “A Comparison of Collocation-Based Similarity Measures In Query Expansion”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 35, pp.19-30.
55. Kolodner, J.,(1993), “Case-Based Reasoning”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
56. Kolodner, J.L., (1991), Improving Human Decision Making through Case-based Decision Aiding, AI Magazine, pp.53-68.
57. Kolodner, J. L. and R. L. Simpson, (1989), “ The MEDIATOR: Analysis of an early case-based problem solver”, Cognitive Science, Vol.13, No.4, pp.507-549.
58. Koton, P. , (1989), “ Using Experience in Learning and Problem Solving”, PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, MIT.
59. Lancaster, F. W., (1995), “From Custodian to Knowledge Engineer: The Evolution of Librarianship as a Profession”, Journal of Information, Communication and Library Science 1:4.
60. Leake, D.B. & Plaza, E. (1997), “Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development”, Second International Conference on Case-Beasd Reasoning, ICCBR-97 Providence, RI, USA.
61. Leake, D. B. (1996), “Case-Based Reasoning Experiences lessons & Future Directions”, AAAI Press/ The MIT Press.
62. Lenz, M., Bartsch-Sporl, B., Burkhard, H. D. & S. Wess, (1998), “Case-Based Reasoning Technology”, Foundations to Applications, Springer.
63. Li, H., (1996), “Case-based reasoning for intelligent support of construction negotiation”, Information & Management, Vol. 30, pp.231-238.
64. Maber, M. L., Balachandran, M.B., & D.M., Zhang, （1995）, “ Case-Based Reasoning in Design ” , New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum.
65. Makoto A. (1999), “ A Generalized Additive Model for Discrete-Choice Data.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 17 Issue 3, pp.271-284.
66. Manrai, A.K. & Andrews, (1998), “ Two-stage Discrete Choice Models for Scanner Panel Data: An Assessment of Process and Assumptions”, European Journal of Operational Research, pp.193-215.
67. Mansfeld Y. & Ginosar , O. (1994), “Evaluation of the Repertory Grid Method in Studies of Locals” Attitude Towards Tourism Development Processes, Environment and planning A, Vol. 26, pp.957-972.
68. Maurer, F. (1996), “Current status of case-retrieval in engineering domains: an analysis from the knowledge engineering perspective”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 9, pp.83-91.
69. Mayer, M. L. , (1995), “ Case-Based Reasoning in Design”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
70. Mcgovern, J. , Samson, D. & A. Wirth ,(1994) , “Using Case Based Reasoning For Basis Development In Intelligent Decision Systems”,European Journal of Operaional Research , Vol.74 , pp.40-59.
71. Mechitov, A. I. , Moshkovich, H. M. , Bradley, J. H. & R. E. Schellenberger, (1996), “An Ordinal Model for Case-Based Reasoning in a Classification Task”, International Journal of Expert Systems, Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp.225-242.
72. Miyashita, K., Sycara, R., & R. Mizoguchi, (1996). “ Modeling Ill-Structured Optimization Tasks Through Cases”, Decision Support Systems, Vol.17,pp.345-364.
73. Mehorotra & Gray (1995), “Similar-Shape Retrieval ”, in Shape Data Management. IEEE Computer , Vol. 28, No. 9 , pp.57-62.
74. Molokova, O.S., (1993), “Methodology for the Acquisition of Knowledge for Expert Systems: Part 1 Basic Concepts and Definitions”, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, Vol.31, pp.1-5.
75. Morton, S., (1971), Management Decision Systems: Computer Based Support for Decision Making, Division of Research, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass
76. Mott, S. (1993), “Case-Based Reasoning: Market, Applications, and Fit With Other Technologies”,Exper Systems With Applications, Vol. 6 , pp.97-104.
77. Oehlmann, R. (1998), “Evaluating a case-based discovery system: a case-study in content-oriented evaluation”, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Vol.12, pp.61-76.
78. Oleary, D. E. (1993), “Verification and Validation of Case-Based Systems”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 6, pp.57-66.
79. Ossadnik, W. & Lange, O. (1999), “AHP-Based Evaluation of AHP-Software”, European Journal of Operational Research , Vol.118, pp.578-588.
80. Owrang, M. M. (1998), “Case Discovery in Case-Based Reasoning Systems”, Technology Outlook, pp.74-79.
81. Oxman, R. E. , (1996), “ Case-Based Design Support: Supporting Architectural Composition Through Precedent Libraries.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research,Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.242-255.
82. Ozernoy, V.M., (1992), Choosing the ‘best’ multiple criteria decision-making method, Information Systems and Operational Research, Vol. 30, pp.159-171
83. Paek, Y. K., Seo, J. & G. C. Kim, (1996), “An Expert System With Case-Based Reasoning for Database Schema Design”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 18, pp.83-95.
84. Pal, K. (1999), “An Approach To Legal Reasoning Based On A Hybrid Decision-Support System”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 17, pp.1-12.
85. Pomerol, J.C.(1997), “Artificial Intelligence And Human Decision Making”,European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 99, pp.3-25.
86. Rao, M. & Xia, Q. (1999), “Knowledge architecture and system design for intelligent operation”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 17, pp.115-127.
87. Ribeiro, R. A., Powell, P. L. & J. F. Baldwin, (1995) , “Uncertainty in decision-making: An abductive perspective”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 13, pp.183-193.
88. Riesbeck, C.K. & Schank, R. C. (1989), “Inside Case-Based Reasoning”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, NJ.
89. Roseman, M. , Gero, J. & R. Oxman, (1991) , “What’s in a Case”? , In G Schmitt (ED.),Proceedings of CAAD Futures’91 Zurich.
90. Seitz, A., Uhrmacher, A. M. & D. Damm ,(1999), “Case-Based Prediction In Experimental Medical Studies”, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Vol. 15, pp.225-273.
91. Salomons,O.W., Van H., F.J.A.M., & H.J.J. Kals, (1993), “Review of research in feature-based design”, Journal of Manufacturing System, Vol. 12, No.2, pp.113-132.
92. Schank, R. & Abelson , R., (1977), “ Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Northvale, Erlbaum, NJ.
93. Schank, R. (1982) , “ Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and people.”,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
94. Schank, R. & Leake, D. (1989), “Creativity and learning in a case-based explainer”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol.40, pp.353-385.
95. Schank, R., (1990), “ A Content Theory of Memory Indexing, Technical Report 2, The institute for the Learning Sciences” , Northwestern University Press.
96. Schmalhofer. F, Strube, G. & T. Wetter, (1991), “Contemporary Knowledge Engineering and Cognition”, First Joint Workshop Kaiserslautern, Germany.
97. Shi, X. & Yeh A. G. O. (1999) , “The Integration of Case-Based Systems And GIS in Development Control”, Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, Vol. 26, pp.345-364.
98. Slade, S., (1991), “Case-Based Reasoning: A Research Paradigm, AI Magazine”, Spring, pp.42-55.
99. Smith, T. R.(1996) , “ A Digital Library for Geographically Reference”, Materials. Computer, Vol. 29, No 5, pp.54-60.
100. Smyth, B. & Counningham, P. (1998), “Advances in Case-Based Reasoning”, 4th European Workshop, EWCBR-98 Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
101. Surma, J. & Braunschweig, B., (1996) , “Case-Base Retrieval in Process Engineering: Supporting Design by Reusing Flowsheets”, Engng Applic. Artif. Intell, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.385-391.
102. Sycara K., & Miyashita , K., (1994), “ Case-Based Acquisition of User Preferences for Solution Improvement in Ill-Structured Domains”, Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
103. Tang, A. Y., Adams, T. M., and E. L. Usery, (1996). “ A Spatial Data Model Design for Feature-Based Geographical Information Systems”. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol.10, No.5, pp.643-659.
104. Timmermans, H., (1994), “ Decision Support Systems in Urban Planning and Urban Design”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 21, pp.1-4.
105. Tsou, K.W. & Chang, H.S. (1998), “A Development Methodology For Case-Based Planning Support System”, International Conference on Modeling Geographical and Environmental System with Geographical Information System, Hongkong.
106. Tversky, A., and S. Sattath, (1979), “ Preference Trees”, Psychological Review, Vol. 86, pp.542-573.
107. Tversky , (1977), “ Features of Similarity ”, Psychological Review Vol. 84, No 4, pp.327-352.
108. Unwin, A.,(1981), “ Introductory Spatial Analysis.”, Methuen & Co., New York.
109. Voss, A., (1996), “How to Solve Complex Problems with Cases”, Engng Applic. Intell.Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.377-384.
110. Wanberg, K. W. & Horn, J. L. (1983) “ Assessment of Alcohol Use With Multidimensional Concepts And Measures”, American Psychologist, Vol. 38, pp.1055-1069.
111. Wang, W. J., (1997), “New similarity measures on fuzzy sets and on elements”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 83, pp.303-309.
112. Wang, Y. & Ishii, N., (1997), “A Method of Similarity Metrics for Structured Representations”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.89-100.
113. Wang, X. , Baets, B. D. & E. Kerre, (1995), “A comparative study of similarity measures”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol. 78, pp.259-268.
114. Wang, C. L. & Hwang , S. L., (1989), “ The Dynamic Hierarchical Model of Human Problem Solving”, IEEE Trans. Syst., Cybern., Vol. 19, No. 5, pp.946-954,
115. Williams, S., & Luthans, F. (1992). “ The Impact Of Choice of Rewards And Feedback On Task Performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior; Vol. 13, pp.653-666.
116. Williams, H. C. W. L. & Ortuzar, J. D.,(1982), “ Behavioral Theories of Dispersion and the Mis-Specification of Travel Demand Models ”, Transportation Research 16B, pp.167-219.
117. Wright, P.,(1975) , “ Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing”, J. of Marketing Research,Vol. 12, p60-67.
118. Xia , Q.& Rao ,M. ,(1999) , “Dynamic Case-Based Reasoning For Process Peration Support Systems” , Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 12 ,pp.343-361.
119. Yang, Jian-bo; Sen, Pratyush,(1997) , “ Multiple Attribute Design Evaluation of Complex Engineering Products Using the Evidential Reasoning Approach”, Journal of Engineering Design, Sep97, Vol. 8 Issue 3, pp.211-231.
120. Yeh, A. G. O. & Shi, X., (1999), “Applying Case-Based Reasoning To Urban Planning: A New Planning-Support System Tool”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 26, pp.101-105.
121. Yeh, A.G.O., & Shi, X., (1999) , “The Integration of Case-Based Systems And GIS In Development Control”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and design Vol.26, pp.345-364.
122. Yeh, A. G. & Shi, X. (1997) , “An Experimental System In Integrating Case-Based Reasoning and GIS for Processing Planning Applications in Hong Kong”, The Proceeding of GIS AM/FM ASIA ’97 & Geoinformatics ’97 Mapping the Future of Asia-Pacific Taipei, Taiwan, Vol. 26-29, pp.711-722.
123. Yoon, Y. & Acree,A. D. (1993), “ Development of A Case-Based Expert System: Application to A Service Coordination Problem, Expert System with Applications Vol. 6, pp.77-85
124. Zhu, A.X., (1999) , “A Personal Construct-Based Knowledge Acquisition Process for Natural Resource Mapping”,Geographical Information Science, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.119-141.