臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在經營環境日趨激烈的現今，企業組織都努力地在產業中尋求生存及發展的契機，Gulati and Kletter (2005)訪談了Fortune雜誌所公佈的1000大企業中的112位CEO，Gulati根據訪談指出企業經營的競爭優勢，由實體資產邁向智慧資產再邁向關係資產，大企業如此，而資源相較不足的中小企業，也開始意圖透過網絡關係來獲取競爭優勢。
為此本研究輔以社會鑲嵌的觀點來探討網絡學習對創新能力之影響，透過網絡關係、組織學習、創新能力等三項構念，發展出十五項假設來對此一議題進行探討、完善相關理論。
本研究共取得份120樣本資料，有效問卷回收率為60%，研究結果發現，網絡關係對於組織創新能力有直接顯著的正向相關，網絡關係亦會透過組織網絡學習能力的中介效果，來正向影響創新能力，其中組織網絡學習能力在其中辦演著部分中介的角色，而組織學習對於創新能力的影響比網絡關係更具效度，雖然網絡學習可以提升創新能力，但還是離不開組織學習的本質，因此建構配適的組織網絡學習能力才利於組織的發展。

Under the present drastic competition in business world, business organization has search for potential opportunities for survival and development in their own industries. Researcher Gulati and Kletter (2005) interviewed 112 CEOs of Fortune 1000 companies, which indicated business competitive advantage is from physical assets to intellectual assets and then towards relationships assets. Large enterprises to do so, SMEs also began to rely on network relationships to gain competitive advantage.
For the reason, this dissertation using social embeddedness perspective to investigate about the issue that the effects of network learning on innovation ability. This research explore three research constructs generated by the network relationship, organizational learning ability, innovation ability, and propose fifteen research hypothesis.
In this research finally obtained 120 samples excluding frustrate ones, effective recovery ratio of questionnaire was 60%. The findings certified that the network relationship has a positive direct effect with innovative abilities. In addition, organizational learning capabilities will also played a partially mediates effect between network relationship and innovative abilities and represented a positive direct effect. The results also indicate that the organizational learning for the impact of innovative abilities is more effective than the network relationship, Although the findings certified that the network relationship can enhance the innovative abilities, but network learning still cannot separate the nature of organizational learning, Therefore, the construction of appropriate organizational learning capabilities is conducive to the development of the organization.

目錄
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 IV
表目錄 IX
圖目錄 XII
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節問題陳述 2
第三節研究目的 4
第四節研究流程 5
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節社會鑲嵌觀點之網絡關係 7
一、網絡的定義 7
二、鑲嵌問題 9
三、關係鑲嵌 (Relational embeddedness) 11
四、結構鑲嵌 (Structural embeddedness ) 14
五、小結 16
第二節學習理論 18
一、組織學習的定義 18
二、以知識為基礎的組織學習 21
三、網絡學習 28
四、小結 29
第三節創新能力 31
一、創新的定義 31
二、創新的類型 32
第三章研究方法 37
第一節研究架構 37
第二節研究假設 38
第三節研究構念之操作性定義與衡量題項 39
ㄧ、自變數 - 網絡關係 39
二、中介變數–組織網絡學習能力 40
三、依變數–創新能力 42
四、衡量題項 45
第四節研究樣本及資料蒐集 53
ㄧ、研究對象 53
二、問卷發放 53
三、問卷回收 54
第五節實證分析方法之設計 55
ㄧ、敘述性統計分析 56
二、效度檢定 56
三、信度檢定 56
四、層級迴歸分析 57
第四章研究成果 58
第一節 樣本特性 58
ㄧ、研究樣本來源 58
二、樣本來源檢定 58
三、樣本來源結構 59
第二節 敘述性統計分析 61
ㄧ、網絡關係 61
二、組織網絡學習能力 62
三、創新能力 64
第三節 信度與效度分析 66
ㄧ、效度分析 66
二、信度分析 66
第四節 各構面模式檢測 68
ㄧ、相關性分析 68
二、網絡關係之迴歸分析結果 69
三、組織網絡學習能力之迴歸分析結果 71
四、組織網絡學習能力之中介效果檢測 73
第五節 研究假說檢定結果 79
第五章研究結論與建議 80
第一節 研究結論 80
ㄧ、網絡關係與組織創新能力之關聯性 80
二、學習能力與組織創新能力之關聯性 81
三、學習能力在網絡關係、組織創新能力中的影響 82
第二節 實務意涵及建議 84
第三節 研究限制與後續建議 86
一、研究限制 86
二、後續研究建議 86
參考文獻 88
附錄 研究問卷 97
表目錄
表 2-2-1 Growth in average yearly publications 19
表 2-2-2 組織學習的定義 19
表 2-3-1各學者對創新的定義 31
表 2-3-2 Schumann 創新矩陣與組織創新活動的分類 34
表 3-3-1 研究變數衡量表 43
表 3-3-2 專家學者效度名單 45
表 3-3-3 網絡關係衡量題項彙整表 46
表 3-3-4 組織網絡學習能力衡量題項彙整表 47
表 3-3-5 創新能力衡量題項彙整表 49
表 3-3-6 衡量題項預試發放概況 50
表 3-3-7 衡量題項預試信度檢測 51
表 3-4-1 Compute required sample size 53
表 3-4-2 問卷回收統計表 54
表 4-1-1 問卷回收統計表 58
表 4-1-2 樣本來源方式獨力樣本T檢定 59
表 4-1-3 研究樣本之結構 60
表 4-2-1 結構鑲嵌之平均數及標準差分析 61
表 4-2-2 關係鑲嵌之平均數及標準差分析 62
表 4-2-3 知識獲取之平均數及標準差分析 62
表 4-2-4 學習意圖之平均數及標準差分析 63
表 4-2-5 吸收能力之平均數及標準差分析 63
表 4-2-6 知識獲取之平均數及標準差分析 64
表 4-2-7 技術創新之平均數及標準差分析 64
表 4-2-8 管理創新之平均數及標準差分析 65
表 4-3-1 Cronbach's α係數評鑑標準表 66
表 4-3-2 問卷信度分析表 67
表 4-4-1 皮爾森積差相關分析表 68
表 4-4-2 相關分析表 68
表 4-4-3 網絡關係對創新能力之迴歸分析表 69
表 4-4-4 網絡關係對技術創新之迴歸分析表 70
表 4-4-5 網絡關係對管理創新之迴歸分析表 70
表 4-4-6 組織網絡學習能力對創新能力之迴歸分析表 71
表 4-4-7 組織網絡學習能力對技術創新之迴歸分析表 72
表 4-4-8 組織網絡學習能力對管理創新之迴歸分析表 73
表 4-4-9 網絡關係對創新能力之迴歸分析表 75
表 4-4-10 網絡關係對組織網絡學習能力之迴歸分析表 76
表 4-4-11 組織網絡學習能力對創新能力之迴歸分析表 76
表 4-4-12 網絡關係、組織網絡學習能力對創新能力之層級迴歸分析表 77
表 4-4-13組織網絡學習能力中介效果判斷 78
表 4-5-1研究假說檢定結果彙整表 79
表 5-1-1 網絡關係、組織網絡學習能力對創新能力之層級迴歸分析表 82

 
圖目錄
圖 1-4-1 研究流程架構圖 6
圖 2-2-1 OL publications by year 18
圖 3-1-1 研究之觀念性架構圖 37
圖 3-5-1 本研究實證資料分析方法 55

一、中文部分
1.方世杰 (2001)。以網路個體分析方法探討我國中小企業之國際化與績效─中衛體系電子資訊業廠商之實證研究，管理學報，51(2)，6，pp.77-98.
2.王俊閔 (2002)。產業網絡中社會鑲嵌與組織績效關係之探討。未出版碩士論文，國立中興大學企業管理學系碩士班論文，台中市。
3.吳思華 (2000)，策略九說-策略思考的本質（2 版），臺北：臉譜出版社。
4.邱建鐘（2010）。個人學習對於創業機會辨識能力之影響：以網絡關係與過去知識為干擾變項。未出版碩士論文，國立成功大學國際企業研究所，台南市。
5.翁瑞宏, et al. (2012)。醫院創新之外部知識來源使用與影響因素.臺灣公共衛生雜誌 31.5: 460-472.
6.經濟部中小企業處(2015)。中小企業白皮書‧2015。臺北：同作者。
7.戴志璁 (2007)。從網絡學習的觀點探討組織同形對創新能力之影響-以中小企業為例。未出版博士論文，國立中正大學企業管理研究所，嘉義縣。
 
二、英文部分
1.A. Subramanian and S. Nilakanta (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance, Omega, 1996, vol. 24, issue 6, pages 631-647.
2.Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A. (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 1, 42-58.
3.Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
4.Betz, F (1993). Strategic Technology Management, McGraw-Hill Inc, New-York.
5.Bierly III, P. E., Damanpour, F., and Santoro, M. D., (2009). The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 3, 481-509.
6.Bower GH, and Hilgard ER. (1981). Theories of Learning , Prentice- Hall : Englewood Cliffs, HJ.
7.Brown (1992). Managing the S Curves of Innovation, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(1), 61-72.
8.Burt, Ronald (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition,〞Cambridge,” MA: Harvard University Press.
9.Christensen, Clayton and Overdorf, Michael. (2000). Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change
10.Cohen and Levinthal (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation , Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 35, Issue 1 pg. 128-152.
11.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, 128-152.
13.Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3):555-590.
15.Davenport, S., J. Davies, and C. Grimes (1999). Collaborative Research Programmes: Building Trust form Difference , Technovation, 19, 1, pp.31-40.
16.Devi R. Gnyawali and Ravindranath Madhavan (2001). Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Jul., 2001), pp. 431-445.
17.Drucker Peter F. (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship-Practice and Principles.
18.Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 660-679.
19.Edison, H., Ali, N.B., and Torkar, R. (2013). Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. Journal of Systems and Software 86(5), 1390-1407.
20.Filley, A., House, R., and Kerr, S., (1976). Managerial Process and Organizational Behavior, 2ndend. Scott, Forseman: Glenview IL.
21.Fiol, C. M., and Lyles, M. A., (1985). Organizational learning, Academy of Management Review, 10: 803-813.
22.Frankel, E. G., (1990). Management of Technological Change, NY: Kluwer.
23.Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No79-81.
24.Gerrit Rooks, Werner Raub, Robert Selten, Frits Tazelaar. (2000). How inter-firm co-operation depends on social embeddedness: A vignette study, Acta Sociologica, vol. 43, issue 2, pp.123.
25.Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2000). The Organizational Learning of Safety in Communities of Practice, Journal of Management, 9(1), pp. 7-18.
26.Glaister, K., and Buckley, P. (1996). Strategic Motives for International Alliance Formation, Journal of Management Studies, 33(3): 301-332.
27.Granovetter, Mark. (1985). Economic action and social structure : The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91(3),pp.481-510.
28.Granovetter, Mark. (1992). Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology. in Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccless, Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, pp.25-56, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
29.Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the World Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.Gulati,R. and Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do Inter organizational Networks Come From: American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1439-1493.
31.Gulati, R. (1995). Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1,pp.85-112.
32.George, D., and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33.Gulati, R. and D. Kletter (2005). Shrinking Core, Expanding Periphery: The Relational Architecture of High-Performing Organization, California Management Review, Vol. 47, No.3, Spring, pp.77-103.
34.Gulati, R. and D. Kletter. (2005). Shrinking Core, Expanding Periphery: The Relational Architecture of High-Performing Organization, California Management Review, Vol. 47, No.3, Spring, pp.77-103
35.Gulati, R. (1999). Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation, Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420.
36.Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks, Strategic Management Journal (19), 1998, pp. 293-317
37.Hair, Joseph F., et al. (1993). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Print.
38.Haeckel, S. H. and Nolan, R. L. (1993) Managing by Wire, Harvard Business Review,71(5): 122-132.
39.Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 83-103.
40.Heide, J. B. and John, G. (1992). Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, No. 2, 32-44.
41.Inkpen, A. C. and Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures, Organization Science, Vo1.9, No. 4, pp. 454-468.
42.Inkpen, A. C. (1998). Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures, Organization Science, 9(4): 454-468.
43.Inzelt, A. (1996). Institutional Support for Technological Improvement - The Case of Hungary, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 51(1):65-93.
44.Jarillo, J.C. (1988). On Strategic Network. Strategic Management Journal, Vo.9, pp.31-41.
45.Johne, F. A. and Snelson, P. A. (1989). Product Development Approaches in Established Firms. Industrial Marketing Management.18:113-124.
46.Kelly, J. (1974). Organizational Behavior: An Existential-System Approach, Richard Irwin, Inc.
47.Kim, D. H. (1993). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Sloan Management Review, 35(1):37-50.
48.Knoke, David and KuKlinski, James H. (1982), Network Analysis: Basic Concepts. Beverly Hills: Sage Miles.
49.Raymond E. and Snow, Charles C. (1992). Causes of Fails in Network Organizations. California Management Review, summer, pp.57-72.
50.Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, 383-397.
51.Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, 383-397.
52.Kogut, B., and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of technology, Organizational Science, 3(3): 383-397.
53.Lane P. J. and M. Lubatkin. (1998). Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter ogranizational Learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp.461-477.
54.Levitt, B., and March, J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319-340.
55.Lorenzoni, G. and A. Lipparini. (1999). The leveraging of inter firm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp.317-338.
56.Madhok, A. (1995). Revisiting multinational firm’s tolerance for joint ventures: A trust based approach. Journal of International Business Studies, pp.117-137.
57.Makhija, M. V. and U. Ganesh. (1997). The Relationship Between Control and Partner Learning in Learning-Related Joint Ventures, Organization Science, 8(5), September - October, pp.508-527.
58.Makhija, M., and Ganesh, V. U. (1997). The Relationship between Control and Partner Learning in Learning-Related Joint Ventures, Organization Science, 8(5):508-528.49.
59.March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations, New York: Wiley. (Second edition, 1993. New York: John Wiley.)
60.Marquish, D. G. (1982). The Anatomy of Successful Innovation, Winthrop Publishers, Cambridge.
61.Martin, S. (1996). Public policies towards cooperation in research and development: the European Union, Japan and the United States, In: Comanor, W., Goto, A., Waverman, A. (Eds.), Competition in a Global Economy. Routledge, London.
62.Mary Crossan and Tracy Guatto. (1996). Organizational learning research profile , Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 9 Iss 1 pp. 107 - 112
63.Matson, E., Patiath, P., & Shavers, T. (2003). Stimulating knowledge sharing: Strengthening your organization’s internal knowledge market. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3):275-285.
64.Meyers, P. W. (1990). Non-Linear Learning in Technological Firms, Research Policy,19: 97-115.
65.Michael J. Marquardt. (1996). Building the Learning Organization: A Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement McGraw-Hill, 220 (242) pages.
66.Mitchell, J.C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In J.C. Mitchell (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in central African towns (pp. 1-50). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
67.Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between Provider and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.29 (August), pp.314-328.
68.Oates, K. (1997). Innovation is Everybody's Business, Management Services, 41(5):8-13.
69.Pennings, J. M. & Harianto, F. (1992). The Diffusion of Technological Innovation in the Commercial Banking industry, Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 29-46.
70.Polanyi, K. (2001/1944]) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, with a foreword by Joseph Stieglitz and introduction by Fred Block, Boston, MA, Beacon Press.
71.Popper, M., and Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational Learning: Mechanisms, Culture, and Feasibility, Management Learning, 31(2): 181-197.
72.Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
73.Powell, Walter. (1990). neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: pp.295-336.
74.Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review, March-April: 71-80.
75.Radcliffe-Browne, A.R. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society, essays and addresses. London: Cohen & West.
76.SA Vinhas, A., Heide, J. B., & Jap, S. D. (2012). Consistency judgments, embeddedness, and relationship outcomes in inter organizational networks. Management Science, 58(5), 996-1011.
77.Schumann, P. A., Prestwood, D. C., Tong, A. H. and Vanston, J. H. (1994). Innovate: Straight Path to Quality Customer Delight & Competitive Advantage, McGraw-Hill, New York.
78.Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
79.Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis. Sage.
80.Senge, P., M. (1994). Learning to Alter Mental Models, Executive Excellence, 11(3), pp. 16-28.
81.Singh, Jasjit. (2004). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management science 51.5 : 756-770.
82.Stanko, M. A., Bonner, J. M., and Calantone, R. J. (2007). Building Commitment in Buyer-Seller Relationships: a Tie Strength Perspective, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 36, No. 8, 1094-1103.
83.Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 27-43.
84.Thompson, J. (1995). The Renaissance of Learning in Business, In S. Chawla and J.Renesch (eds.), Learning Organizations: Developing Cultures for Tomorrow’s Workplace, Productivity Press: Portland, OR, pp: 85–99.
85.Thorelli. H. B. (1986). Network: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7. pp.37-51.
86.Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intra organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vo1. 44. No.5, pp. 996-1004.
87.Tucker, Anita L., Ingrid M. Nembhard, and Amy C. Edmondson. (2007). implementing new practices: an empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science 53.6: 894-907.
88.Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61:674-698.
89.Uzzi, Brian. (1997). toward a network perspective on organizational decline.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17: pp.111-155.
90.Webster, F. (2005). Network. In T. Bennett, L. Grossberg, M. Morris & R. Williams (Eds.), new keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society, 239-241. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
91.Yli-renlo, H., Autio, E. and Sapienza, H. (2001). Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms, Strategic management Journal, 22, pp. 587-613.
92.Zahra and George (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension, Academy of Management Review, Volume 27, Issue 2, pg. 185-203
93.Zahra, A. S., and George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review Reconceptualization and Extension, Academy of Management Review, 27(2):185-203.
94.Zukin, S. & DiMaggio, P. (1990). Structural of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,
95.Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P. (1990). Introduction. In Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P. (eds) Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–36.