臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

性別主流化的概念，從1995年在北京被提出，經過了15年，性別議題逐漸在國際組織中獲得重視，各國對於性別主流化的推動與實施不遺餘力。台灣從2003年推動性別主流化至今，約七年的時間，對照起聯合國在2010年三月在紐約所召開的北京+15會議，台灣僅僅用了一半時間，發展出屬於台灣本土性別主流化經驗。
由於行政院婦權會具有「參與式民主」「公私合作」的特質，尤其來自民間的婦權委員，試圖在我國推動性別主流化的發展過程中，建立各種不同的參與機制與平台，將不同的個人與團體串連起來。換言之是一種參與式政府的體現，性別主流化過程中強調授與員工權力（性別聯絡人設置）與能力（性別培訓制度），試將政府組織內的個人納入決策過程，亦即是以體制內的「公務人員」作為參與式民主的主體，運用性別聯絡人制度、性別平等工作小組，以及性別培訓制度等擴大參與的制度，試圖將個別公務人員納入性別主流化推動過程中。此種體制內擴大參與的模式，改變了以社會中公民為主體的參與民主模式，進行體制內參與式民主發展的可能。
同時，婦權基金會所建立的婦女團體溝通平台亦是參與式民主機制的建立，婦女溝通平台不僅有助於政府部門與民間團體的溝通與對話，能夠使民間團體瞭解政府部門的各項施政與發展，也助於行政部門傾聽婦女團體對於個別議題的想法，以及婦女團體間對於議題的溝通與交流。在國際參與機制，婦權基金會透過每年補助民間團體與專家學者的機制，讓許多團體與個人，透過參加聯合國與各國際組織會議，將國際社會中關注的性別議題帶回台灣社會。

Gender mainstreaming had been formally raised in the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995. It has become one of the main strategies for fulfilling gender equality in international community. Gender mainstream is not only regarding female separately. Furthermore, it isn't only making some policies or allocating budgets for female affairs, but also putting gender views in all of the legislations, policies, schemes and budgets so that governments can evaluate and make concrete schemes and priority.
Currently, some problems have been generated when countries are putting efforts on gender mainstreaming. For instance, public servants have vague cognitive concepts and poor knowledge in this field. This situation also makes the gender concerns can’t deeply influence policies, schemes and legislations. It only appears occasionally in some processes of policies, but it can’t have comprehensive outlooks. However, it might have a window of opportunity for developing gender mainstreaming if we facilitate participatory democracy in domestic societ. In terms of domestic development, governments, experts and general public can get the opportunities of participation and dialogue via participatory democracy. It will also make the gender concerns get involved with the discussion and planning of policies.

第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………………………9
第一節 研究動機與目的 ………………………………………………9
第二節 研究方法 …………………………………………………… 16
第三節 章節安排 ……………………………………………………20
第二章 相關理論與文獻回顧 ………………………………………………23
第一節 性別與性別主流化理論 ……………………………………23
第二節 性別主流化與參與式民主理論 ……………………………30
第三章 性別主流化與國家性別機構 ………………………………42
第四章 性別主流化的發展 …………………………………………46
第三章 性別主流化與參與式民主的對話：行政院婦權會角色與功能 ……53
第一節 行政院婦權會的地位 ……………………………………54
第二節 行政院婦權會的組織 ………………………………………59
第三節 行政院婦權會的運作 ………………………………………64
第四節 啟動性別主流化 ……………………………………………68
第六節 行政院婦權會民間委員 ……………………………………77
第七節 小結 ……………………………………………………………87
第四章 性別主流化下的行政院 ………………………………………………89
第一節 從改變機構開始：組織結構改變與建立 …………………89
第二節 性別主流化下多層次參與：新結構的建立 …………………91
第三節 官僚體系體系的回應 ………………………………………101
第四節 小結 ……………………………………………………………106
第五章 性別主流化的在地深耕：婦權基金會、婦女團體 ………………108
第一節 政府與民間的橋樑：婦權基金會 ……………………… 108
第二節 在地深耕：婦女團體 ………………………………………118
第三節 小結 ………………………………………………123
第六章 性別主流化的本土實踐個案：性別平等教育法與性別預算的實施 125
第一節 性別主流化的本土實踐個案：性別平等教育法立法過程 126
第二節 性別主流化的本土實踐個案：性別預算工具 ……………132
第三節 小結 ………………………………………140
第七章 結論 …………………………………………………………………141
第一節 研究發現 ………………………………………………………141
第二節 檢討與反 ……………………………………………………147
第三節 後續研究建議………………………………………………… 151
參考書目 ……………………………………………………………………152
附錄 ………………………………………………………………………………166

表目錄
表1-1 本研究受訪人員 …………………………………………………………16
表1-2 次級資料受訪者基本資料 ………………………………………………19
表3-1 歷屆行政院婦權會的組 ……………………………………………63
表3-2 分工小組負責之議題一覽表 …………………………………………65
表3-3 2004年至2010年行政院婦權會通過之重要政策 ……………………68
表4-1 我國行政機關公務人員概況按職等分 …………………………………91
表4-2 行政院各部會所屬委員會委員性別比例改善情形 ……………………97
表4-3 我國性別統計發展 ……………………………………………………98
表5-1 2005-2009年婦女團體溝通平台受補助團體與辦理場次 …………112
表5-2 歷年各區補助場次 ………………………………………………114
表5-3 各區域參與婦女溝通平台之團 …………………………………115
表6-1 2005年至2009年我國中央政府婦女相關預算編列情況 …………136


圖目錄
圖1-1 我國推動性別主流化的政策網絡………………………………………13
圖1-2 台灣推動性別主流化主要部門…………………………………………15
圖3-1 婦權會委員組織圖………………………………………………………62
圖3-2 婦權會三層級議事運作方式圖…………………………………………67
圖4-1 各級教育學生性別比例 ……………… ………………………………99
圖4-2 2008年女性專任教師及女性校長比率 ………………………………99
圖5-1 2005-2009年婦女溝通平台受補團體 ……………………………113
圖5-2 : 2005-2009年婦女溝通平台受辦理場次 ……………………………113
圖5-3 歷年各區補助分佈圖 ………………………………………………114
圖5-4 98年度婦女團體溝通平台會議議題類型—依婦權會分工小組區分.117

一、中文參考書目
王如玄、李晏榕，2007，〈性別主流化--邁向性別平等之路〉，《研習論壇》，76期，頁18-26.。
朱偉誠，2009，〈性別主流化之後的臺灣性／別與同志運動〉，《臺灣社會研究》，74期，頁419-424。
江宜樺，2001，《自由民主的理路》，台北：聯經出版社。
行政院主計處網站，http://wrp.womenweb.org.tw/
行政院研考會網站，http://www.rdec.gov.tw/mp100.htm
行政院婦女權益促進委員會網站，http://cwrp.moi.gov.tw/
何碧珍、2008、〈推動我國加入CEDAW的策略與努力〉，《研考雙月刊》，32卷4期，頁43-53.。
余致力，2000，〈論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色：黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示〉，《公共行政學報》，4期，1-29頁。
余致力，2007，〈性別差異對公共管理者任用之影響：代表性文官體系的理論省思與實證探索〉，《國家菁英》，3卷4期，頁61-84.。
李兆環，2007，〈性別主流化--談性別意識培力〉，《臺灣勞工季刊》，6期，頁91-99.。
杜文苓、彭渰雯（2008），〈社運團體的體制內參與及影響：以環評會與婦權會為例〉，《台灣民主季刊》，5 卷1 期，頁119-148。
周威廷，2009，〈瑞典與芬蘭政府推動性別主流化之經驗淺析--人事管理觀點.〉，《人事月刊》，48卷1期，，頁33-44.。
周海娟，2008，〈北京宣言十三年：臺灣性別主流化的回顧與展望〉，《社區發展季刊》，123期，頁48-58.。
周瑞貞，2006，〈性別主流化趨勢之淺析〉，《人事月刊》，42卷3期，頁5-17.。
林芳玫，2007，〈性別主流化在臺灣：從國際發展到在地化實踐〉，《婦研縱橫》84期，頁64-72.。
林芳玫，2008，〈政府與婦女團體的關係及其轉變：以臺灣為例探討婦女運動與性別主流化〉，《國家與社會》，5期，頁159-203.。
林芳玫、蔡佩珍，2001，〈性別主流化--促進婦女權益的新思維〉，《社會發展季刊》，101期，頁29-41。
林書賢，2009，〈公部門推動性別主流化策略之研究--以各部會性別平等專案小組為例〉，《人事月刊》，第48期，頁119-148。
徐佳青，2001，〈婦權會為何功能不彰〉，《網氏/罔市女性電子報》：http：//forum.yam.org.tw/bongchhi。
財團法人婦女權基促進發展金會網站，http://wrp.womenweb.org.tw/
婦女新知基金會，http://www.awakening.org.tw/chhtml/index.asp
黃世鑫、徐仁輝、張哲琛，1996，《政府預算》，台北：空中大學。
張玨，2008，〈性別平等與社會發展：談婦女健康〉，《研考雙月刊》，32卷4期，頁67-78.。
張晉芬、陳美華，2009.3.28，〈再會吧，婦權會!〉，《中國時報》，A16時論廣場。
張懿云、盧孳豔，2002.3.15。〈慶祝三八婦女節，新內閣宜立即整頓婦權基金會〉，《中國時報》，A15 版。。
許孟智，2009，〈行政院人事行政局97年度推動性別主流化成果報告〉，《人事月刊》，48卷1期，頁45-50.。
郭玲惠，1998，〈行政院婦女權益委員會介紹〉，第三屆婦女國是會議「女人與公共參與研討會」會議資料。
郭秋永，2001，《當代三大民主理論》，台北：聯經出版社。
陳向明，2002，《社會科學質的研究》，台北：五南圖書公司。
陳秀峯，2006，〈向性別平等社會邁進--日本「男女共同參與社會基本法」之啟示〉，《政大法學評論》，90期，頁1-68.。
陳芬苓，〈由歐洲聯盟兩性平等工作政策談政策促進的新典範〉。生活/社會新視界：理論與實踐的對話學術研討會。台北：2001年11月，頁1-18。。
陳金燕，2008，〈性別與教育：從《性別平等教育法》談起〉，《.研考雙月刊》，32卷4期，頁79-92.。
陳惠馨，2005a，〈女性主義法學與性別主流化〉，《律師雜誌》，313期，頁15-37。
〈性別平等教育法通過的時代意義--以法律的有限創造教育的無限〉，《全國律師》，9卷2期，頁74-87.。
陳惠馨，2005b，〈性別主流化與國家發展〉，《總統府公報》，6660期。.
陳惠馨，2005c，〈性別平等教育法--臺灣性別教育之繼往與開來〉，《性別平等教育季刊》，30期，頁115-129.。
陳惠馨，2005d，〈認真對待性別平等教育法--性別平等教育法之立法與展望〉，《.國家政策季刊》，4卷1期，頁21-32.。
彭渰雯，2008，〈當官僚遇上婦運：台灣推動性別主流化的經驗初探〉，《東吳政治學報》，26卷4卷：頁1-58。
彭渰雯、李秉叡，2007，〈比利時的性別主流化〉，《臺灣國際研究季刊》，3卷4期，頁111-134.。
曾中明，2008，〈我國性別主流化推動計畫與機制〉，《研考雙月刊》，32卷4期，頁13-21.。
游美惠，2006，〈性別主流化〉，《.性別平等教育季刊》，34期，頁108-111。
游美惠，2007，〈化理念為行動--「性別主流化」實踐策略初探〉，《研習論壇》76期，頁6-10.。
黃世鑫、徐仁輝、張哲琛，1996，《政府預算》台北：空中大學。
黃長玲，2009.4.4，〈如果不跟婦權會說再見〉。《中國時報》，A14時論廣場
黃長玲，2007，〈彼此鑲嵌，互相形構：轉變中的國家與社會關係〉，殷海光基金會編《自由主義與新世紀台灣》：頁289-323。台北：允晨文化。
黃淑玲，2008，〈性別主流化－國際與在地經驗的對話〉，《研考雙月刊》，第266期：頁3-12。。
黃煥榮，2003，〈女性在公共行政之地位與困境－組織建築觀點之分析〉，《政治學的發展－新議題與新挑戰》頁123~150，台北：韋伯文化。
楊婉瑩，2004，〈婦權會到性別平等委員會的轉變：一個國家女性主義的比較觀點分析〉，《政治科學論叢》，第21期，頁117-148。。
楊婉瑩，2006，〈台灣性別法案推法歷程的比較分析〉，《政治科學論叢》，第.29,期，頁49-82
葉德蘭，2008，〈活力的女性公民社會參與〉，《婦研縱橫》，第86期，頁80-85.。
廖麗娟，吳秀貞，2008，〈性別影響評估實施現況與推動策略〉，《研考雙月刊》，32卷4期，頁32-42.。
蔡翔傑、黃東益、陳麗光、陳敦源，2009，〈委員會治理過程之評估－「全民健保醫療給付協議會議」的個案研究〉，2009年台灣政治學年會，玄奘大學主辦
鄭瑞成，2009，〈淺談性別主流化與性別統計及性別預算〉，《主計月刊》，642期，頁73-79.。
鄭麗燕，2007，〈談性別主流化〉，《.研習論壇》，76期，頁1-5.。
鄧修倫，2001，《聯合國體系下「女性議題」發展之探討》，台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
謝若蘭，2008，〈聯合國婦女會議與人權〉，《臺灣國際研究季刊》，4卷2期，頁53-79.。
魏美娟，2008，〈性別預算概念及我國實施情形之初探〉，《國會月刊》，36卷11期，頁40-56.。
蘇芊玲，2005，〈打造性別平等校園於法有據〉，《師友月刊》，452期，頁34-37.。
蘇芊玲，2006，〈性別平等，立基法律--通識課程「性別法律．議題探討」之教學分享〉，《南華通識教育研究》，3卷1期，頁17-40.。
蘇紅軍，1995，〈第三世界婦女與女性主義政治〉，載於鮑曉蘭主編《西方女性主義研究評介》，北京：生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。
顧燕翎，2009，《性別平等專責機制之研析》，台北：行政院研考會。

二、英文參考書目
Ashworth, G. , 1996, Gendered Governance: an Agenda for Change, available at: http://nird.ap.nic.in/clic/rrdl100.html

Balla, Steven J. and John R. Wright, 2000, "Can Advisory Committees Facilitate Congressional Oversight of the Bureaucracy?" In Congress on Display, Congress at Work, ed. William T. Bianco. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.pp. 167-187.
Barber, Benjamin,1984, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age， CA: University of California Press.
Basu, A. , 2000, “Gender and Governance: Concepts and Contexts”, Essays on Gender and Governance, New York: UNDP
Beall, Jo,1998, “Trickle Down or Rising Tide? Lessons on Mainstreaming Gender Policy from Columbia and South Africa”, Social Policy and Administration 32(5): 513-34.
Beall, Jo ,2005, Decentralizing government and centralizing gender in Southern Africa: lessons from the South African experience. Occasional paper 8. UNRISD, Geneva, Switzerland.
Behning, Ute and Amparo Serrano Pascual ,2001, Rethinking the Gender Contract?: Gender Mainstreaming in the European Employment Strategy. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. Available at: http://etui.etuc.org/Publications/Yearbook/Yearbook2000/Yb00Amp.pdf. Accessed on March 20, 2005.
Beijing Platform for Action website: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/e5dplw.htm
Beveridge, Fiona, Sue Nott and Kylie Stephen , 2000, “Mainstreaming and the Engendering of Policy Making: a Means to an End?”, Journal of European Public Policy 7, 3,: 385-405.
Bhatta, Gambhir ,2001, “Of Geese and Ganders: Mainstreaming Gender in the Context of Sustainable Human Development”, Journal of Gender Studies 10(1): 17-33
Bustelo, Maria ,2003, “Evaluation of Gender Mainstreaming; Ideas from a Meta-Evaluation Study”, Evaluation Journal 9(4): 383-403.
Byrne, Laier et al. , 1996, National Machineries for Women in Development: Experiences, Lessons and Strategies for Institutionalising Gender in Development Policy and Planning, BRIDGE report, prepared for the European Commission, Directorate-General for Development, Brighton: IDS
CIDA governance website: http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/CIDAWEB/acdicida.nsf/En/JUD-121135230-Q5V
Corner, L. , 1998, “Women in Politics and Good Governance: Transformative Politics in Asia Pacific”, Journal of International Development, 10:927–8
Corner, L. , 2005, Gender Sensitive and Pro-poor Indicators of Good Governance, Paper Prepared for the UNDP Governance Indicators Project, Oslo Governance Centre
Cunningham Frank ,2002, Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. London and New York : Routledge.
Dahl, Robert A., 1989, Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Daly, Mary , 2005, “Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice”, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12, 3,: 433-450.
Donaghy, Tahnya Barnett ,2004b, “Mainstreaming; Northern Ireland”s Participative-Democratic Approach”, Occasional Paper no. 2. Centre for Advancement of Women in Politics, School of Politics, Queens University Belfast. Available at: http://www.qub.ac.uk/cawp/research/mainstreaming.PDF. Accessed on March 20, 2005.
Dovi, S. , 2007, “Theorizing Women's Representation in the United States”, in Politics and Gender , Volume 3, Issue 03, UK: Cambridge Journals online
Elson D., 2002, “What”s Behind the Budget? Politics, rights and accountability” in A. Norton and D. Norton , eds., The Budget Process. London：Overseas Development Institute.
Elson, D., 1999, “Gender-neutral, Gender-blind, or Gender-sensitive Budgets? Changing the Conceptual Framework to Include Women's Empowerment and the Economy of Care,” Commonwealth Secretariat, London
Elson D.,2002, Gender Responsive Budget Initiatives: Key Dimensions and Practical Examples in UNIFEM, Gender Budget Initiatives. New York: UNIFEM.
Eveline, Joan and Carol Bacchi ,2005, “What are We Mainstreaming when We Mainstream Gender?”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (4): 496-512.
Eveline, J., Bacchi, C., and Binns, J. , 2009,“Gender Mainstreaming versus Diversity Mainstreaming: Methodology as Emancipatory Politics.” Gender, Work and Organization, Volume 16,Number 2, March 2009 , pp. 198-216(19)
Fitzgerald, Rona ,2002, “Making Mainstreaming Work”, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/equ_opp/pgm_external_en.pdf. Accessed on March 20, 2005.
Goetz, A.M. , 1997, Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development. UK: Zed Books
Goetz, Anne Marie ,1998, “Mainstreaming gender equity to National Development Planning” in Carol Miller Shahra Razavi (eds) Missions and Mandarins: Feminist engagements with development institutions, London: Intermediate Technology Publications in association with the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development
Goetz, Anne Marie ,1998, “Women in politics and gender equity in policy : South Africa and Uganda”,Review of African Political Economy Vol. 76
Goetz, A.M. , 2007, “Political Cleaners: Women as the New Anti-Corruption Force?”, Development and Change, 38, 1,: 87–105
Goetz, A.M. and Gaventa, J. , 2001, Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery, IDS Working Paper 138, Brighton: IDS
Goetz, Anne Marie and Gaventa, J. ,2001, “Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery”, IDS Working Paper 138, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies
Greed, Clara ,2005, “Overcoming the Factors Inhibiting the Mainstreaming of Gender into Spatial Planning Policy in the United Kingdom”, Urban Studies 42(4): 719-749.
Grosser, Kate and Jeremy Moon ,2005, “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Gender Mainstreaming”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 7(4): 532-554.
Guijt Irene and Shah, Meera Kaul (eds),1998, The Myth of Community: Gender issues in participatory development, London: Intermediate Technology publications
Guijt, Irene and Braden, Su ,1999, “Ensuring Reflection in Participatory Processes”, Participatory Learning and Action notes 34, London: IIED
Guijt, Irene and Cornwall, Andrea ,1995, “Critical Reflections on the Practice of PRAs”, Participatory Learning and Action notes 24, London: IIED
Guijt, Irene, Kisadha, T. and Mukasa, G.,1998, “Agreeing to disagree: dealing with age and gender in Redd Barna Uganda”, in Irene Guijt and Meera Kaul Shah (eds)
Hamadeh-Banerjee, L. , 2000, “Women”s Agency in Governance”, Women”s Political Participation and Good Governance: 21st Century Challenges. New York: UNDP
Harris, Simon ,2004, “Gender, Participation, and Post-Conflict Planning in Northern Sri Lanka”, Gender and Development 12(3): 60-69.
Harris, Simon , 2004, “Gender, Participation, and Post-Conflict Planning in Northern Sri Lanka”, Gender and Development 12, 3,: 60-69.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance , IDEA, , 2005, Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers – A Revised Edition, Stockholm: IDEA http://www. idea. int/publications/wip2/upload/WiP_inlay. pdf
Inter-Parliamentary Union , IPU, , 1997, Universal Declaration on Democracy, Geneva: IPU, http://www.ipu.org/cnl-e/161-dem.htm
IPU website: http://www.ipu.org/english/home.htm
Kelly, Liz ,2005, “Inside Outsiders: Mainstreaming Violence Against Women into Human Rights Discourse and Practice”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 7(4): 471-495.
Kim Eun-shil, 2008, “ Gender Mainstreaming Strategy in Korea's Women's Policy and Feminism” At The Conference “A New Global Tread on Gender Mainstreaming Its Implications for Women”s Policies in Korea”.
Kusakabe, K. , 2005,. “Gender mainstreaming in government offices in Thailand, Gender Mainstreaming in Government Offices in Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos: Perspectives from Below”,Gender and Development. 13(2); July 2005. p. 46-56
Lombardo, E. , 2003, “Integrating or Setting the Agenda? Gender Mainstreaming in the Two European Conventions on the Future of the EU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights”. Paper presented in ECPR Conference, Marburg, 18-21.
Lombardo, E. , 2003, “Integrating or Setting the Agenda? Gender Mainstreaming in the Two European Conventions on the Future of the EU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights”. Paper presented in ECPR Conference, Marburg, 18-21.
Lombardo, E. & Meier, P. , 2006, “Gender mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a feminist reading?” European Journal of Women's Studies,13: 151-166.
Lombardo, E. & Meier, P. , 2008, “Framing gender equality in the european union political discourse”,Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15, 1,:101-129.
Longwe, Sara Hlupekile ,1997, “The Evaporation of Gender Policies in the Patriarchal Cooking Pot”, Development in Practice 7(2): 148-156.
Mackay, Fiona and Kate Bilton ,2000, Learning from Experience: Lessons in Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities, governance of Scotland Forum. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Available at: ttp://www.scotland.gov.uk/cru/resfinds/sjf4 asp. Accessed on March 20, 2005.Main findings (from Executive Summary)
Mackay, Fiona and Kate Bilton , 2000, Learning from Experience: Lessons in Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities, governance of Scotland Forum. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Mitchell, J. , 2007, Procreative mothers , sexual difference, and child-free sisters , gender, In J. Browne , Eds., The Future of Gender. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Moser, A. , 2007, BRIDGE Cutting Edge Pack on Gender and Indicators. Brighton: IDS.
Moser, A. and Moser, C. , 2005, “Gender Mainstreaming Since Beijing: a Review of Successes and Limitations in International Institutions”, in Porter, F. and Sweetman, C. , eds, Mainstreaming Gender in Development: A Critical Review, Oxford: Oxfam
Moser, Caroline ,2005, “Has Gender Mainstreaming Failed? A Comment on International Development Agency Experiences in the South”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 7(4): 576-590.
Mosse David et al. , 2001, Development as process: Concepts and Methods for working with complexity South Asia Edition.New Delhi: India Research Press
Mukhopadhyay, Maitryee ,2004, “Mainstreaming Gender or ”Streaming” Gender Away: Feminists Marooned in the Development Business”, IDS Bulletin 35(4): 95-103.
NDP and United Nations Population Fund , 2007, UNDP budget estimates for the biennium 2008–9, New York: UN, http://www.undp.org/execbrd/word/dp08-3.doc
Palmieri, S. and Jabre, K. , 2005, “Case Study on Inter-Parliamentary Union”, in Ballington, J. and Karam, A., eds, Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers. Stockholm: IDEA
Pateman, Carole, 1978, Participation and Democratic Theory, reprinted, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Pedwell, C. and Perrons, D., 2007, The Politics of Democratic Governance: Organising for Social Inclusion and Gender Equity. UK: One World Action.
Rai, Shirin , 2004, “Gender mainstreaming: Conceptual and comparative issues”. Paper presented to ESRC Gender Mainstreaming Seminar, Leeds..
Rai, Shirin M.,ed.,2003, Mainstreaming Gender, Democratising the State? Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women.Manchester: Manchester University Press,.
Rao, A. ,2006, Gender Equality Architecture and Gender Equality Reforms, paper for submission to the UN Secretary-General”s High Level Panel on System-wide Coherence by the Center for Women”s Global Leadership (CWGL) and the Women”s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO)
Rao, Aruna and David Kelleher ,2002, “Unraveling Institutionalized Gender Inequality”, Occasional Paper no. 8. AWID. Available at: http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal. html. Accessed on March 20, 2005.
Razavi, S. and Miller, C. ,1995, Gender Mainstreaming: a Study of Efforts by UNDP, the World Bank and the ILO to Institutionalise Gender Issues, Geneva: UNRISD
Razavi, Shahra and Carol Miller ,1995, Gender Mainstreaming: A Study of Efforts by the UNDP, the World Bank and the ILO to Institutionalize Gender Issues. Occasional Paper no. 4. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, United Nations Development Program. Available at: http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/document.nsf/d2a23ad2d50cb2a280256eb300385 855/fc107b64c7577f9280256b67005b6b16/$FILE/opb4.pdf. Accessed on March 20, 2005.
Reanda, Laura ,1999, “Engendering the United Nations: The Changing International Agenda”, European Journal of Women”s Studies 6: 49-68.
Rees, Teresa , 2005, “Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 7, 4,:555-574.
Riddell-Dixon, Elizabeth,1999, “Mainstreaming Women”s Rights: Problems and Prospects Within the Center for Human Rights”, Global Governance 5: 149-171.
Rubery, Jill ,2002, “Gender mainstreaming and gender equality in the EU: the impact of the EU employment strategy”, Industrial Relations Journal 33(5): 500-523.
Sharp, R. , 2002, “Moving Forward: Multiple Strategies and Guiding Goals”, in UNIFEM Gender Budget Initiatives: Strategies, Concepts and Experiences, pp. 86–98.
Sharp, R., 2003, Budgeting for equity ─ Gender budget initiatives within a framework of performance oriented budgeting, UNIFEM.
Sharp, R. & Elson, D. , 2006,, Gender Budget Initiatives: Briefing Note for AusAid. University of South Australia, Adelaide AU.
Shaw, Jo ,2002, “The European Union and Gender Mainstreaming: Constitutionally Embedded or Comprehensively Marginalised?”, Feminist Legal Studies 10: 213-26.
Standing, Hilary ,2004, “Gender, Myth and Fable: The Perils of Mainstreaming in Sector Bureaucracies”, IDS Bulletin 35(4): 82-88.
Stragiki, Maria ,2005,“Gender Mainstreaming vs. Positive Action: An Ongoing Conflict in EU Gender Equality Policy”, European Journal of Women”s Studies 12(2): 165-86.
Subrahmanian, Ramya ,2004, “Making Sense of Gender in Shifting Institutional Contexts: Some Reflections on Gender Mainstreaming”, in ”Repositioning Feminisms in Development”, IDS Bulletin 35(4): 89-94.
Thege, Britta and Ingelore Welpe , 2002, Gender mainstreaming practices 1: Examples from the EU and South Africa. Pretoria: Occasional Publications Series of the Institute for Women”s and Gender Studies.
True, Jacqui ,2003, “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 5(3): 368-396.
True, Jacqui and Michael Mintrom ,2001, “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming”, International Studies Quarterly 45: 27-57.
UN Global Compact website: http://www.unglobalcompact.org
UNDP, 2000, Women”s Political Participation and Good Governance:21th Century Challenges.New York
UNDP , 2002, Deepening democracy in a fragmented world, Human Development Report.New York: UNDP
UNDP , 2006, Measuring Democratic Governance: a Framework for Selecting Pro-Poor and Gender-Sensitive Indicators. New York: UNDP,
UNDP , 2008, User”s Guide to Gender-sensitive Basic Services Delivery: Indicators and Methods of Measurement. Oslo: UNDP Oslo Governance Centre
UNIFEM , 2000, Progress of the World”s Women, United Nations Development Fund for Women, New York.
UNIFEM , 2008, Who answers to women? Gender and accountability. New York: UNIFEM
UNIFEM, Commonwealth Secretariat & IDRC,2001,Gender Responsive Budget Initiatives Brochure,UNIFEM.
Verloo, M. ,2001, “Another Velvet Revolution? Gender Mainstreaming and the Politics of Implementation”, Working paper no. 5, IWM.
Walby, Sylvia , 2004, “The European Union and Gender Equality: Emergent Varieties of Gender Regime”, Social Politics 11, 1,: 4-29.
Walby, Sylvia ,2005, “Introduction: Comparative Gender Mainstreaming in a Global Era”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (4): 453-470.
Walby, Sylvia. , 2005, “Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice” ,Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State &Society, 12 , 3,321-343
Whitbread, Jasmine ,2004, “Mainstreaming Gender in Conflict Reduction: From Challenge to Opportunity”, Gender and Development 12(3): 41-49.
Woodward, Alison , 2001, “Gender Mainstreaming in European Policy: Innovation or Deception?”, Discussion Paper no. FS101-103. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung.
Woodward, Alison ,2003, “European Gender Mainstreaming: Promises and Pitfalls of Transformative Policy”, The Review of Policy Research 20(1): 65-88.