臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

現今科技的發達、生活步調快，為了減輕壓力，現代人重視休閒已成為一種趨勢，因此消費者的休閒體驗與自我觀念之間的關係，便是即具重要性的議題。為能深入探討消費者對休閒體驗的觀念與想法，其體驗過程必須具有體驗行為的動態需求，包含背景脈絡、體驗符號、自我體驗、自我反思的過程、修正自我行為以及針對消費者在互動時所產生的建議行為，根據此過程加以分析探討。
本研究視消費者的休閒體驗為社會互動，運用符號互動模式做為整體架構的核心，採用紮根理論法來探討消費者互動之間的意義並加以解釋，針對具有代表性的男性、女性共計19名消費者進行訪談，歸納出體驗行為，主要以觀賞與品嚐、參與與實作、觀察與探究、舒展心靈與體能、人際交流等五項體驗行為，並且分類出充電器、調節器、品味師、社交場合等四項符號指標，以及分析互動過程中自我體驗與自我反思中的身體我、心理我、社會我等三個層面分別做探討、考量到消費者對休閒單位之體驗，並加入了修正自我行為、建議休閒單位等指標，再根據影響消費者自我互動之背景脈絡與互動情境因素，建構出消費者休閒體驗之符號互動模式。
研究結果得知男性、女性消費者在休閒體驗的互動過程中，符號意義的產生與自我觀念的反思，影響到自我的修正行為，以及與互動過程對休閒單位之建議行為。研究發現，女性消費者主要是因為身體與心理層面的感覺，影響了自我的修正行為，而男性消費者則較多是因為社會我的工作價值觀，影響到自我的修正行為。本研究依照此動態歷程模式，討論休閒體驗與自我觀念的動態過程，對於消費者的行為做分析，藉此擬定方案以提供休閒單位具體之建議。

Facing the work stress and fast paced life in the present day, people put great importance on leisure to reduce stress. The relationship between consumer''s leisure experience and self-concept is a vital topic for discussion. In order to fully understand the consumer''s idea and opinion on leisure experience, we must view the behavior of consumer''s experience as a dynamic process: including context of background, experience symbol, self-experience, and self-reflection process, correction of self-behavior and aimed at the suggestion behavior resulting from consumer interaction. We can then analyze and investigate the above process.
In this research we see consumer''s leisure experience as a social interaction, and utilize symbolic interactionism as the analysis structure. During the data analysis, we adopt grounded theory to investigate the consumers’ meaning construction process about the leisure experience and associated factors. 19 leisure consumers are selected for in-depth interviewing. Based on the results of analysis, five social interactions for leisure experience are classified, namely admire and tasting, participating and performing, observing and investigating, heart-opening and body stretching, socializing. Also we classify the experience behaviors into four symbolic dimensions and analyze the self-experience and self-reflection from three: body-self, mental-self and social-self. The symbolic dimensions are related to both the correction of leisure and everyday’s life behavior and context of background situation to develop a symbolic interactionism model for leisure experience.
Research result shows that during leisure experience interaction, symbol meaning''s creation and self -concept''s reflection of male and female consumers, affects self-correction behavior. It also shows how interaction process affects suggestion behavior. In the research we found, female consumers are mainly because of the physical and psychology senses, affects self-correction behavior, while male consumers are more prone to social-self''s work values, affects self-correction behavior. In this research, we view the leisure experience as a dynamic process to discuss the changing nature of self-concept and consumer behavior. The managerial implications are discussed and effective suggestions for practice are also provided.

目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第壹章　緒論 1
第一節　研究背景 1
第二節　研究動機與目的 2
第三節　研究流程 4
第貳章　文獻回顧 5
第一節　休閒體驗的定義與重要性 5
第二節　休閒的符號互動模式 15
第參章　研究方法 23
第一節　研究設計 23
第二節　研究方法 24
第三節　研究進行步驟 29
第肆章　資料分析結果 37
第一節　編碼過程 37
第二節　符號 44
第三節　消費者的自我互動 47
第四節　自我修正與建議行為 54
第五節　影響消費者自我互動的因素 62
第六節　休閒體驗模式 64
第伍章　結論與建議 68
第一節　研究結論 68
第二節　研究建議 71
參考文獻 74

表目錄
表3-1 受訪者基本相關資料 30
表4-1 休閒體驗互動行為分析 38
表4-2 開放性編碼命名 39
表4-3 主軸編碼說明 40
表4-4 主軸編碼分類表 41
表4-4 主軸編碼分類表（續） 42
表4-5 開放性編碼之同意度比率 43
表4-6 主軸編碼之同意度比率 43
表4-7 休閒體驗的符號指標 46
表4-8 消費者的自我體驗 48
表4-9 消費者的自我反思 50
表4-10 消費者與休閒單位之間的互動 52
表4-11 身體我－體驗與價值觀 54
表4-12 心理我－體驗與價值觀 55
表4-13 社會我－體驗與價值觀 56
表4-14 自我修正行為 57
表4-15 價值觀與「修正生活習慣或健康行為」 58
表4-16 價值觀與「修正工作行為」 59
表4-17 價值觀與「修正人生目標」 60
表4-18 休閒單位建議與自我體驗、價值觀、休閒單位互動之關係 61
表4-19 影響消費者自我互動的因素 62

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖 4
圖2-1 休閒體驗之互動關係 22
圖3-1 研究架構圖 26
圖4-1 休閒體驗的動態過程 65

一、中文部份
1.Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin原著。質性研究概論（徐宗國譯，1997）。台北：巨流。
2.Cordes, Kathleen A.原著。休閒遊憩事業概論（運動與休閒管理研究小組編譯，2000）。台北：美國麥格羅•希爾。（原著出版年：1999）
3.Jonathan A. Smith.原著（1996）。質性心理學研究方法的實務指南（丁興祥、張慈宜、曾寶瑩譯，2006）。台北：遠流出版社。
4.Jonathan Culler原著。索緒爾（張景智譯，1992）。台北：桂冠。
5.Patton, M. Q.原著（1990）。質的評鑑與研究（Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods）（吳芝儀、李奉儒譯，1995）。台北：桂冠。
6.Pine II and Gilmore原著。體驗經濟時代（夏業良、魯煒編譯，2003）。台北市：台經濟新潮社發行，城邦文化出版。
7.Ransome, P.原著（2005）。工作、消費與文化（Work, Consumption and Culture）（黃彥翔譯，2008）。台北：韋伯。
8.王文科（1986）。教育研究法。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
9.王震宇（1996）。休閒體驗中之自由感對休閒活動參與情況之影響。國立台灣大學森林學研究所碩士論文，台北。
10.交通部觀光局（2009）。中華民國九十六年國人旅遊狀況調查報告。台北市：交通部觀光局。
11.江光榮（2001）。人性的迷失與復歸—羅傑斯的人本心理學。台北市：貓頭鷹出版社。
12.李明宗（1988）。戶外遊憩名詞解釋。戶外遊憩研究，1（1）。
13.林有得（1993）。景園體驗之研究。碩士論文，國立中興大學園藝研究所，台中。
14.周錦宏、程士航、張正霖（2007）。休閒社會學。台北：華立。
15.胡幼慧主編（1996）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流。
16.許義忠、莊麗君、葉智魁（2007）。以時間日記法評量大學生休閒與自由時間之運用。觀光研究學報，13，289-308頁。
17.陳水源（1997）。觀光事業專論選輯（29-35頁）。台北：交通部觀光局。
18.陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南出版社。
19.陳坤宏（2005）。消費文化理論。台北：揚智出版。
20.陳奎憙（1998）。教育社會學的發展與主要理論。載於陳奎憙主編，現代教育社會學，15-37頁。台北：師大書苑。
21.葉智魁（1995a）。社會學理論與觀光研究。戶外遊憩研究，1（8），1-13，台北：中華民國戶外遊憩學會。
22.黃光國（1998）。知識與行動。台北市：心理。
23.劉維公（2006）。風格社會。台北：天下。
24.劉維公（2007）。風格競爭力。臺北市：天下雜誌。
25.蔡宏進（2004）。休閒社會學。台北：三民書局。
26.鄭陸霖（2000）。產業研究的質性方法反思。中小企業需求調查座談會－質化研究在管理上之應用研討會論文集。
27.嚴祖弘（2001）。休閒生活的新思維。台灣月刊，217，4-7頁。

二、英文部份
1.Baudrillard, J. (2001). Selected Writing: edited and Introduced by Mark Poster (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
2.Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations, Trans. Foss, P., Patton, P., and Beitchman, P. NY: Semiotext.
3.Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method Englewood Ciffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.Boostrom, R. E. Jr. (2004). Symbolic Interactionism in Brand Equity Theory: The Ford Mustang as an Abstract Object, Master of Arts Degree. University of Missouri-Kansas City. UMI Number: 1419571.
5.Brightbill, C. K. (1960). The challenge of leisure. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
6.Colton. (1987). Leisure, recreation, and tourism: a symbolic interactionism view. Annals of Tourism Research, 14, pp.345-360.
7.Cordes, K. A. & Ibrahim, H. M. (1999). Application in recreation & leisure for today and the future (2nd ed.). Boston: WCB McGraw Hill.
8.Driver, B. L. & Brown, P. J. (1975). A socio-psychological definition of recreation demand, with implications for recreation resource planning. Assessing Demand for Outdoor Recreation, 12(8), pp.62-88.
9.Driver, B. L. & Toucher, R. C. (1970). Toward a behavioral interpretation of recreation of planning. Element of Outdoor Recreation Planning, pp.9-31.
10.Dumazedier, J. (1967). Toward a society of leisure. New York: The Free Press.
11.Echtner, C.M. (1999). The Semiotic Paradigm: Implications for Tourism Research. Tourism Management, 20, pp.47-57.
12.Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
13.Glasser, B. (1992). Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley. CA: Sociology Press.
14.Gopal, A. & Prasad, P. (2000). Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), pp.509-546.
15.Harper, W. (1986). Freedom in the experience of leisure. Leisure Sciences, 8, pp.115-130.
16.Havitz, M.E. & Dimanche, F. (1999). Leisure Involvement Revisited: Drive Properties and Paradoxes. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, pp.122-149.
17.Holbrook, M. & Hirschman, E. (1982). The Experiential Aspects of Consumpton: Consumer Fantasies, Feeling, and Fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, pp.132-140.
18.Hull, P. B. & Steward, W. P. (1992). Satisfaction of what? Post-hoc versus real-time construct vality. Leisure Science, 14(3), pp.195-209.
19.Iso-Ahola, S.E. (1980). The Social Psychology of Leisure and Recreation. Dubugue, IA：Wm. C. Brow Company.
20.Ittelson, W. H. (1978). Environmental perception and urban experience. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), pp.193-213.
21.Iwasaki, Y. & Havitz, M. E. (1998). A path analytic model of relationships between involvement psychological commitment, and loyalty. Journal of Leisure Research, 30, pp.256-280.
22.Jackson, E. L. (1988). Leisure constraints: A survey of past research. Journal of Leisure Research, 10(3), pp.202-215.
23.Kelly, J. R. (1972). Work and leisure: A simplified paradigm. Journal of Leisure Research, (4), pp.50-62.
24.Kelly, J. R. (1983). Leisure Identities and Interaction: Allen & Unwin.
25.Kelly, J. R. (1987). Freedom to be: Toward a new sociology of leisure. New York: MacMillan.
26.Kelly, J. R. (1990). Leisure. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.Kraus, R. G. (1990). Recreation and leisure in the modern society (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
28.Lee, D. H. (1990). Symbolic Interactionism: Some Implications for Consumer Self-concept and Product Symbolism Research. Journal of Advertising, 17, pp.386-393.
29.Lee, Y. (1999). How do individuals experience leisure? Parks & Recreation, 34(2), pp.40-46.
30.Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for Sales. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), pp.117-124.
31.Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. London, UK: Sage publications.
32.Maykut, P. & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research-A Philosophic and Practical Guide. PA: The Falmer Press.
33.Mckercher, B. (2002). Towards a Classification of Cultural Tourists. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4, pp.29-38.
34.Munt, I. (1994). The Other Postmodern Tourism: Culture, Travel and the New Middle Classes. Theory, Culture & Society, 11, pp.101-123.
35.Neulinger, J. (1974). The Psychology of Leisure. Springfield, (3rd ed.). Charles C. Thomas.
36.Otto J. E. & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1996). The service experience in tourism. Tourism Management, 17(3), pp.165-174.
37.Pace, S. (2004). A grounded theory of the flow experience of web users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, pp.327-363.
38.Petkus, E. Jr. (1992). Implications of the Symbolic Interactionist Perspective for the Study of Environmentally-responsible Consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, pp.861-869.
39.Pieper, J. (1963). Leisure: The basis of culture. New York: Random House.
40.Pohl, S., Borrie, W. & Patterson, M. (2000). Women, Wilderness, and Everyday Life: A Documentation of the Connectives Between Wilderness Recreation and Women Everyday Lifes. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), pp.415-434.
41.Prentice, R. C., Witt, S. F. & Hamer, C. (1998). Tourism as Experience: The Case of Heritage Parks. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(1), pp.1-24.
42.Rojek, C. (2005). Leisure Theory: Principles and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.Samdahl, D. M. (1988). A symbolic interactionist model of leisure: theory and empirical support. Leisure Sciences, 10(1), pp.27-39.
44.Samdahl, D. & Kleiber, D. A. (1989). Self-awareness and leisure experience. Leisure Sciences, 11(1), pp.1-10.
45.Schenk, T. C. & Holman R. H. (1980). A Sociological Approach to Brand Choice: The Concept of Situational Self Image. In Advances in Consumer Research, J. Olson ed., 7, pp.610-614.
46.Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential Marketing: A New Framework for Design and Communications. Designs Management Journal, 10, pp.10-16.
47.Shaw, S. M. (1985). The meaning of leisure in everyday life. Leisure Sciences, 7, pp.1-24.
48.Solomon, M. (1983). The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, pp.319-329.
49.Strauss A. & Corbin J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. CA: Sage Publications.
50.Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications.
51.Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
52.Trauer, B. (2006). Conceptualizing special interest tourism-frameworks for analysis. Tourism Management, 27(2), pp.183-200.
53.Uriely, N. (2005). The tourist experience Conceptual Developments. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), pp.199-216.
54.Virden, R. J. & Knopf, R. C. (1989). Activities, experiences and environmental settings: A case study of recreation opportunity spectrum relationships. Leisure Science, 11(2), pp.159-176.
55.Vitterso, J., Vorkinn, M., Vistad, O. I. & Vaagland, J. (2000). Tourist Experiences and Attractions. Annals of Tourism Research, 19, pp.432-450.