跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.202.209.105) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/03/29 13:34
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:盧韋伶
研究生(外文):Lu, Wei-Ling
論文名稱:業餘攝影愛好者之網路圖像分享網站使用與標記行為研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of Amateur Photographer's Image Tagging behavior in Photo Sharing Website
指導教授:卜小蝶卜小蝶引用關係
指導教授(外文):Pu, Hsiao-Tieh
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:圖書資訊學研究所
學門:傳播學門
學類:圖書資訊檔案學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:139
中文關鍵詞:業餘攝影愛好者圖像標記行為標記行為標記動機社會性標記
外文關鍵詞:Amateur photographersImage taggingTagging behaviorTagging motivationSocial tagging
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:1668
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:255
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:9
隨著強調參與及共享精神的Web 2.0服務之普及,與數位相機及影像應用之成長,越來越多使用者利用網路圖像分享網站如Flickr搜尋、分享及保存圖像。面對大量使用者個人所產生的圖像,使用者如何有效搜尋及組織圖像,又如何與他人進行分享,是值得探討的議題。目前這類網路圖像分享網站多提供使用者標記功能,讓使用者為個人所保存之相片自由訂定標籤。透過這些標籤,使用者得以進行關鍵字搜尋;也能間接串連圖像相關線索,進而增加社會性互動。因此本研究以Flickr網路圖像分享網站中付費並具有特殊興趣之攝影愛好者為對象,嘗試分析網路圖像分享網站使用者之圖像標記動機及行為特性,及圖像標籤之分享及社會性功能。
本研究主要採用標籤內容分析及訪談法,並以目前全球最重要的網路圖像分享網站Flickr為範疇,以8位業餘攝影愛好者為對象進行分析。其中包括4位男性、4位女性,其年齡介於20-40歲之間,以教育程度且收入較高的上班族為主。標籤內容分析為針對研究對象之標籤內容主題及類型進行分析,共收集112,463張圖像及11,284筆標籤;訪談法則用以瞭解研究對象之圖像標記動機與使用行為特性。此外,訪談時研究對象也會進行實際的操作與說明,以便研究者即時觀察及討論。
主要研究結果包括:研究對象之圖像標記動機以滿足個人相片管理之利己需求為主,並間接產生與他人分享之社會性動機;就標籤使用特性,標記原則以提示圖像內容主題為主,包括主題事件、地點與時間等,且嘗試保持詳盡性與一致性;基於隱私考量,描述特定人物與任務之標籤較為少見;因研究對象之特殊興趣背景,攝影相關標籤使用率頗高;標籤使用語文以中文為主,多使用單一概念且無修飾之主題類型詞彙(81.40%);就標籤重複率來看,整體之標籤重複率為33.28%,而個人之標籤重複率為96.63%,顯示標籤的使用具有個人特色,而整體所重複的標籤多為具分類特性之熱門標籤;會進行標籤之組織,且多以階層式分類方式進行;對於標記功能的使用,研究對象僅集中於Flickr進行,其它平台多僅上傳或連結圖像;就圖像的檢索與瀏覽,瀏覽為主要檢索模式,關鍵字檢索則較為少見;就圖像的分享與互動,因考量專業、隱私、利益等因素,研究對象多屬被動性的互動,且對於互動對象,具有相當選擇性,也鮮少主動聯繫或進行社群相關功能。根據上述,本研究也提出一些網路圖像分享網站之個人標籤管理與社會性功能之建議。
With the high popularity of Web 2.0 services, and the use of digital cameras becomes increasingly pervasive, many users prefer searching, shareing, and preserving their photos by photo sharing website. To be faced with the large number of photos, this is a worthy issue to be study how people search, organize, and share photos with others. Nowadays, many photo sharing websites are offering users to tag their photos. Through this way, users not only can search photos by keywords, but also increase social interaction indirectly by the connections of photos. In this thesis, we focused on pro users whom were amateur photographers in Flickr, and tried to analyze users’ tagging motivation, tagging behavior, and the social functions of tags.
This thesis mainly used two research methods: content analysis and semi-structured interview. Based on the data set crawled from Flickr, we conducted a set of interviews with 8 people. Four of our participants were male, four female, with an age range of 20 to 40. Seven of them were office workers with high education and income, and one was student. This thesis collected 112,463 photos and 11,284 tags to assess participants’ typically types of tags. The interviews were helped us to understand participants’ image tagging motivation and usage. In addition, the participants would be conducted to actual operation and instructions for immediately observed.
Summary of findings: (1) the image tagging motivation were to fulfill selfish’ personal photo management, and indirectly bring the social motivation of sharing with others. (2) For the use of tags, the principle of image tagging is pointing out the content of imges, which is including subjects, events, locations and time, also trying to keep tags vocabulary exhaustivity and consistency. (3) The tags of describing specific figures and tasks are rare, because of the privacy concern. (4) Due to the specific background of participants, they tend to use more photographic-related tags. (5) Chinese is the most used language of tags, for the most part, the participants use unique terms (81.40%). (6) Overall repetition rate of tags is 33.28%, and individual is 96.63%, it indicate the usage of tags show personal characteristics. The duplicate tags are showing the classified feature of popular tags. (7) Hierarchical classification is a way of organize images. (8) Focusing tagging behavior on Flickr, for the others photo sharing websites are just uploading and linked. (9) Browsing is the main search mode, and keyword searching is rare. (10) Because of professional considerations, privacy, benefits and other factors, the participants social interaction are passive and selective. They’re rarely keeping track of contacts actively and using community-related functions. Based on the above results, this study posed the suggestions of improving personal tags management and social functions.
表次...................................................................................................................... IX
圖次................................................................................................................... XIII
第一章 緒論.................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機................................................................................ 1
第二節 研究目的與問題................................................................................ 3
第三節 研究範圍與限制................................................................................ 4
第四節 名詞解釋............................................................................................ 4
第二章 文獻探討 ........................................................................................... 7
第一節 社會性標記........................................................................................ 7
第二節 標記動機與行為.............................................................................. 20
第三節 標記系統.......................................................................................... 29
第四節 圖像資源的特性.............................................................................. 43
第五節 標籤類型綜合討論.......................................................................... 51
第三章 研究方法與實施 ............................................................................. 55
第一節 研究流程與架構.............................................................................. 55
第二節 研究對象.......................................................................................... 59
第三節 研究方法與設計.............................................................................. 59
viii
第四節 研究工具與資料分析...................................................................... 61
第五節 前置研究.......................................................................................... 63
第四章 研究結果與分析 ............................................................................. 67
第一節 研究對象.......................................................................................... 67
第二節 使用行為分析.................................................................................. 71
第三節 標記行為分析.................................................................................. 96
第四節 標籤類型........................................................................................ 105
第五章 結論與建議 ................................................................................... 115
第一節 研究結論........................................................................................ 115
第二節 研究建議........................................................................................ 121
第三節 後續研究建議................................................................................ 122
參考文獻............................................................................................................ 125
附錄一:基本資料問卷.................................................................................... 135
附錄二:訪談大綱............................................................................................ 139
中文文獻
W. Lawrence Neuman(2002)。當代社會研究法:質化與量化途徑(王佳煌、潘中道、郭俊賢、黃瑋瑩譯)。台北市:學富文化。(原著出版年:2000年)
卜小蝶(2006)。淺談社會性標記之意涵與應用。Web2.0 與圖書館學術研討會論文集。2008年12月23日,取自:http://www.lib.tku.edu.tw/libintro/pub/web20&lib_semina/social_tag_ft.pdf
卜小蝶(2007)。使用者導向之網路資源組織與檢索(初版)。台北市: 文華圖書館管理。
孟建、Stefan Friedrich(主編)(2005)。圖像時代:視覺文化傳播的理論詮釋。上海市:復旦大學出版社。
彼得‧伯克(2008)。圖像証史。(楊豫譯)。北京市:北京大學出版社。(原著出版年:2001年)
林珊如(1997)。從文獻分析探討“瀏覽”之概念。圖書館學刊,12,63-91。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2009)。九十八年度台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告。上網日期:2009年3月1日。網址:http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/0901all.pdf
張淇龍(2008)。社會性書籤網站使用者之標記動機及標籤選擇因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
創市際市場研究顧問公司(2006)。照相行為調查。2009年1月21日,取自: http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/self_digitalcamera20060811.html。
創市際市場研究顧問公司(2009)。網路使用概況。2009年12月1日,取自: http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/crossmedia_200906.html。
黃皓傑(2002)。線上社區資訊共享與交換行為之研究:以MP3論壇網站為例。上網日期:2009年12月31日。網址:http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/UPLOAD_FILES/HISTORY_PAPER_FILES/346_1.pdf
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(主編)(2001)。社會及行為科學研究法(下冊)。台北市:東華書局。
潘諾夫斯基(1997)。造型藝術的意義。(李元春譯)。台北市:遠流。(原著出版年:1983年)
韓叢耀(2005)。圖像與圖像研究。台北市:威仕曼文化事業股份有限公司。

英文文獻
Ames, M., & Naaman, M. (2007). Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Anagnostopoulos, A., Kumar, R., & Mahdian, M. (2008). Influence and correlation in social networks. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining.
Armitage, L. H., & Enser, P. G. B. (1997, August 1, 1997). Analysis of user need in image archives. Journal of Information Science, 23(4), 287-299.
ASIS&T. (2006). 2006 annual meeting, seminars & workshops. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.asis.org/Conferences/AM06/sigcr.html
Association, V. R. (2005). Vra core 4.0 beta. Retrieved May 10, 2009, from http://www.vraweb.org/projects/vracore4/pdfs/VRA_Core4_Intro_beta.pdf
Beaudoin, J. (2007). Flickr image tagging: Patterns made visible Retrieved 2009, April 20, from http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Oct-07/beaudoin.html
Benenson, F. (2009). Celebrate 100 million cc photos on flickr with joi ito's free souls. Creative Commons, 2009, from http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/12540
Bentley, F., Metcalf, C., & Harboe, G. (2006). Personal vs. Commercial content: The similarities between consumer use of photos and music. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems.
Chi, E. H., & Mytkowicz, T. (2008). Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia.
Cole, M. J., & Gwizdka, J. (2008). Tagging semantics: Investigations with wordnet. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries.
Cox, A. M., Clough, P. D., & Marlow, J. (2008). Flickr: A first look at user behaviour in the context of photography as serious leisure. Information Research, 13(1), 5.
Davies, J. (2006). Affinities and beyond! Developing ways of seeing in online spaces. E-Learning, 3(2), 217-234.
Ding, Y., Toma, I., Kang, S.-J., Zhang, Z., & Fried, M. (2008). Mediating and analyzing social data. In On the move to meaningful internet systems: Otm 2008 (pp. 1355-1366).
Farooq, U., Kannampallil, T. G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C. H., Carroll, J. M., & Giles, L. (2007). Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: Metrics and design heuristics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work.
Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., & Dumais, S. T. (1987). The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun. ACM, 30(11), 964-971.
Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2005). The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Arxiv preprint cs.DL/0508082.
Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci., 32(2), 198-208.
Gordon-Murnane, L. (2006). Social bookmarking, folksonomies, and web 2.0 tools. Searcher, 14(6), 26-38.
Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., & Scott, J. (2005). Social bookmarking tools (i). D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), 1082-9873.
Hayman, S. (2007). Folksonomies and tagging: New developments in social bookmarking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ark Group Conference: Developing and Improving Classification Schemes. from www.educationau.edu.au/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/papers/arkhayman.pdf
Heckner, M., Mühlbacher, S., & Wolff, C. (2008). Tagging tagging. Analysing user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems. Journal of Digital Information, 9(2).
Heckner, M., Neubauer, T., & Wolff, C. (2008). Tree, funny, to_read, google: What are tags supposed to achieve? A comparative analysis of user keywords for different digital resource types. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 2008 ACM workshop on Search in social media.
House, N. V., Davis, M., Ames, M., Finn, M., & Viswanathan, V. (2005). The uses of personal networked digital imaging: An empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing. Paper presented at the CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems.
Jörgensen, C. (1996). Indexing images: Testing an image description template. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. from http://www.asis.org/annual-96/ElectronicProceedings/jorgensen.html
Jörgensen, C. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Inf. Process. Manage., 34(2-3), 161-174.
Jaimes, A., & Chang, S.-F. (2000). A conceptual framework for indexing visual information at multiple levels. Paper presented at the IS&T/SPIE Internet Imaging. from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.37.29
Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 4(1), 8-18.
Kipp, M. E. I. (2006). @toread and cool: Tagging for time, task and emotion. Paper presented at the 17th Annual SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop part of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST).
Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Rother, C., & Wood, K. (2006). Understanding photowork. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems.
Koch, T. (2006). Social tagging. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://homes.ukoln.ac.uk/~tk213/pres/tagging0602.html
Komito, L. (1998). The net as a foraging society: Flexible communities. The Information Society: An International Journal, 14(2), 97 - 106.
Kroski, E. (2005). The hive mind: Folksonomies and user-based tagging. Retrieved December 24, 2007, from http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2005/12/07/the-hive-mind-folksonomies-and-user-based-tagging/
Lamantia, J. (2006). Tag clouds: Navigation for landscapes of meaning. Retrieved Novemeber 18, 2008, from http://www.joelamantia.com/blog/archives/ideas/tag_clouds_navigation_for_landscapes_of_meaning.html
Lee, C. P., & Copeland, J. A. (2006). Flowtag: A collaborative attack-analysis, reporting, and sharing tool for security researchers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Visualization for computer security.
Markkula, M., & Sormunen, E. (2000). End-user searching challenges indexing practices inthe digital newspaper photo archive. Inf. Retr., 1(4), 259-285.
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., & Davis, M. (2006). Ht06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia.
Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies - cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. Retrieved September 13, 2008, from http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Mika, P. (2007). Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(1), 5-15.
Millen, D. R., & Feinberg, J. (2006). Using social tagging to improve social navigation. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Social Navigation and Community-Based Adaptation Technologies, Dublin, Ireland.
Millen, D. R., Yang, M., Whittake, S., & Feinberg, J. (2007). Social bookmarking and exploratory search. In Ecscw 2007 (pp. 21-40).
Miller, A. D., & Edwards, W. K. (2007). Give and take: A study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Negoescu, R. A., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2008). Analyzing flickr groups. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Content-based image and video retrieval.
Noll, M. G., & Meinel, C. (2008). Exploring social annotations for web document classification. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing.
Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2008). What drives content tagging: The case of photos on flickr. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Rainie, L. (2007). Pew internet and american life project : 28% of online americans have used the internet to tag content: Pew Internet and American Life Projecto. Document Number)
Rivadeneira, A. W., Gruen, D. M., Muller, M. J., & Millen, D. R. (2007). Getting our head in the clouds: Toward evaluation studies of tagclouds. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Rodden, K., & Wood, K. R. (2003). How do people manage their digital photographs? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., et al. (2006). Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work.
Shatford, S. L. (1986). Analyzing the subject of a picture: A theoretical approach. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 6(3), 39 - 62.
Shatford, S. L. (1994). Some issues in the indexing of images. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 45(8), 583-588.
Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology is overrated: Categories, links, and tags Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html
Sigurbjörnsson, B., & Zwol, R. v. (2008). Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web.
Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008, February 1, 2008). The folksonomy tag cloud: When is it useful? Journal of Information Science, 34(1), 15-29.
Sinha, R. (2005). A cognitive analysis of tagging. Retrieved December 26, 2007, from http://www.rashmisinha.com/archives/05_09/tagging-cognitive.html
Sinha, R. (2006). A social analysis of tagging. Retrieved December 26, 2007, from http://rashmisinha.com/2006/01/18/a-social-analysis-of-tagging/
Smith, G. (2008). Tagging : People-powered metadata for the social web (1 ed.): New Riders Press.
Stebbins, R. A. (2005). Project-based leisure: Theoretical neglect of a common use of free time. Leisure Studies, 24, 1-11.
Suchanek, F. M., Vojnovic, M., & Gunawardena, D. (2008). Social tags: Meaning and suggestions. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge mining.
Szekely, B., & Torres, E. (2005). Ranking bookmarks and bistros: Intelligent community and folksonomy development.
Szomszor, M. N., Cantador, I., & Alani, H. (2008). Correlating user profiles from multiple folksonomies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia.
Tennis, J. T. (2006). Social tagging and the next steps for indexing Paper presented at the 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/2091/
Thom-Santelli, J., Muller, M. J., & Millen, D. R. (2008). Social tagging roles: Publishers, evangelists, leaders. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Trant, J. (2009). Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework. Journal of Digital Information, 10(1).
Vander Wal, T. (2005). Explaining and showing broad and narrow folksonomies. Retrieved November 13, 2008, from http://personalinfocloud.com/2005/02/explaining_and_.html
Vander Wal, T. (2006). Understanding folksonomy (tagging that works). Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://s3.amazonaws.com/2006presentations/dconstruct/Tagging_in_RW.pdf
Visual Resource Association [VRA] (2009). VRA Core 4.0. Retrieved May 9, 2009, from http://www.vraweb.org/projects/vracore4/index.html
Voss, J. (2006). Collaborative thesaurus tagging the wikipedia way. CoRR, abs/cs/0604036.
Voss, J. (2007). Tagging, folksonomy & co - renaissance of manual indexing? arxiv preprint, cs/0701072v2.
Yee, R. (2008). Understanding tagging and folksonomies. In Pro web 2.0 mashups (pp. 61-75).
Zollers, A. (2007, May 8-12). Emerging motivations for tagging: Expression, performance, and activism. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th International WWW Conference.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top