內政部 (2013)。人口政策白皮書: 少子女化, 高齡化及移民..
內政部戶政司 (2014)。育齡婦女生育率、一般生育率、總生育率、有偶婦女生育率。
方婷玉 (2010)。我國育嬰留職停薪津貼政策之探討: 以台北縣市女性申請者為例.臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文, 1-137。
王舒芸 (2007)。向左走? 向右走? 兒童照顧政策之[去] 或[再] 家庭化初探。論文發表於台灣女性學學會(主辦),《[家庭與工作:變遷現象與多元想像] 研討會》(10 月6 日-7 日)。舉辦地點: 國立高雄師範大學。
王舒芸 (2012)。台灣托育公共化之研究。台灣智庫十週年紀念專輯(3) 邁向社會投資型國家─就業與社會安全重大議題研究論文集。台灣智庫出版。
江柏嫻 (2013)。支持母職, 還是支持性別平等? 台灣親職假的設計、落實與影響。暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系學位論文, 1-141。
李佳玟 (2014)。經歷育嬰留職停薪津貼停薪之女性公務人員生涯適應經驗探究。國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商學系學位論文, 1-168。
吳孟蓉&;黃志隆(2011)。育嬰留職停薪制度落實難題與出路─以高雄市中小企業為例。
易永嘉 (2008),OECD國家對育兒父母推行友善家庭與職場政策、作法及借鏡。台灣勞工季刊,14,118-131。
馬財專 (2007)。回首來時路:台灣育嬰留職津貼的初探。社區發展季刊119,428-446。陳姵璇 (2012)。影響申請育嬰留職停薪者重返原職場之相關因素探討-以女性醫療從業人員為例。元智大學管理碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-52。許惠安(2006)。「育嬰假」全面實施中小企業反彈,取自http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/6/10/27/n1500721.htm。
黃志隆 (2013)。就業與家庭政策整合途徑的探討: 以人口政策白皮書的政策目標檢視為例。聯合勸募論壇,2(1),67-102。楊顓芙 (2007)。計畫行為理論主要趨勢之研究-使用文獻共引分析方法。
傅立葉 (2010)。從性別觀點看台灣的國家福利體制。臺灣社會研究, (80), 207-236.傅立葉, &;王兆慶(2011)。照顧公共化的改革與挑戰-以保母托育體系的改革為例。女學學誌, (29), 79-120。劉婉珍 (2010)。反制宰制——博物館人的能動性與政治行動。博物館學季刊,24(3),5-19。Andersson, G., Hoem, J. M., &; Duvander, A. Z. (2006b). Social differentials in speed-premium effects in childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 14(4), 51–70.
Ang, X. L. (2014). The Effects of Cash Transfer Fertility Incentives and Parental Leave Benefits on Fertility and Labor Supply: Evidence from Two Natural Experiments. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 1-26.
Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., &; Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 29(1), 1-38.
Baizan, P. (2005). Couples’ career and fertility. An event history analysis of the ECHP samples of Denmark, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom. Paper presented at the XXV International Population Conference, Tours, France, July 18-23, 2005.
Behrman, J. R., &; Rosenzweig, M. R. (2002). Does increasing women’s schooling raise the schooling of the next generation? American Economic Review, 92(1), 323–334.
Billingsley, S., &; Ferrarini, T. (2014). Family Policy and Fertility Intentions in 21 European Countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 428-445.
Brewer, M., &; Ratcliffe, A. (2012). Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1), 245-266.doi:10.1007/s00148-010-0332-x
Conti, M., &; Sette, E. (2013). Type of employer and fertility of working women: does working in the public sector or in a large private firm matter? Cambridge journal of economics, 37(6), 1303-1333.
Cygan-Rehm, K. (2013). Earnings-Dependent Parental Leave Benefit and Fertility: Evidence from Germany.
Erosa A, Fuster L, Restuccia D. (2010). A general equilibrium analysis of parental leave policies. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13(4), 42–58.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women's new roles. Polity.
Hoem, J. M., Prskawetz, A., &; Neyer, G. (2001). Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria, 1975-96. Population Studies, 55(3), 249-261.
Icek Ajzen. (1995). Behavioral Interventions Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior
Iacovou, M., &; Tavares, L. P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 89–123.
Klerman, J. A., Leibowitz, A., &; Leibowitz, A. (1998). FMLA and the labor supply of new mothers: Evidence from the June CPS. In Population Association of America Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL.
Korpi, Walter. (2000). Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States. Social Politics, 7, 127-191.
Lalive, R., &; Zweimüller, J. (2009). How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1363-1402.
Lappegård, T. (2010). Family policies and fertility in Norway. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 26(1), 99-116.
Lee, R., Mason, A., Amporfu, E., An, C. B., Bixby, L. R., Bravo, J., &; Vaittinen, R. (2014). Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption. Science, 346(6206), 229-234.
Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 25(4), 363-386.
Hobson, B., &; Oláh, L. S. (2006). Birthstrikes? Agency and capabilities in the reconciliation of employment and family. Marriage &; family review, 39(3-4), 197-227.
Morgan, S. P., &; Rackin, H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36(1), 91–118.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review,,20, 293–342.
Rønsen, M. (2004). Fertility and public policies-Evidence from Norway and Finland. Demographic Research, 10(6), 143-170.
Rovny, A. E. (2011). Welfare state policy determinants of fertility level: A comparative analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 335-347.
Santarelli, E. (2011). Economic resources and the first child in Italy: A focus on income and job stability. Demographic Research, 25(9), 311-336.
Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., &; Fields, J. M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 790-799.
Shreffler, K., &; Johnson, D. (2012). Fertility intentions, career considerations and subsequent births: The moderating effects of women’s work hours. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33, 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10834-012-9331-2
Solera, C., &; Bettio, F. (2013). Women's Continuous Careers in Italy: The Education and Public Sector Divide. Population Review, 52(1)
Spe´der, Z., &; Kapita´ny, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population, 25, 503–523.
Waldfogel J. (1998).The family gap for young women in the United States and britain: can maternity leave make a difference? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(3), 505–546
61