臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來由於我國經濟穩定成長，教育水準大幅提高，生活水準亦有明顯之改善，使得社會呈現繁榮富庶的景象。但是隨著社會進步變遷的過程，民眾對生活品質的要求逐年提升，為了瞭解民眾對目前各項生活層面滿意度的情況，以及各項生活層面對整體生活滿意度之影響，本研究使用行政院內政部於民國九十六年所蒐集的國民生活狀況調查之資料，以交叉分析與Ridit分析瞭解各項生活層面與整體生活滿意度之關聯性，再以卡方互動檢視法與比例勝算模型，尋找出較為影響整體生活滿意度之因素。本研究結果可以提供政府與相關單位擬定提升國民生活品質之措施之參考依據。

Because of the stable increasing of economy in our country and the progress of the level of education and life in recent years, the society has scenery of prosperity. But with the transition of the society, the requests of good quality of life increase along with the time. In order to understand the situation in satisfaction about recent life of citizens and the effect on the level of satisfaction of whole life of citizens, we use the data collected by Ministry of Interior, Executive Yuan in 2007. Using the cross tables and Ridit analysis, we obtain relationship between levels of satisfaction of each layer of life and of the whole life. We study layers of life which have more influence on the whole life by CHAID and proportional odds model. The results can provide some related agents to make more appropriatepolicies in the future.

摘要.................................................. i
Abstract ............................................. ii
誌謝辭 ....... ....................................... iii
目錄 ................................................. iv
圖目錄 ............................................... v
表目錄 ............................................... vi
第一章 緒論........................................ 1
第一節 研究背景與動機.............................. 1
第二節 研究問題與目的.............................. 2
第三節 研究流程.................................... 2
第二章 文獻探討.................................... 3
第一節 生活品質.................................... 3
第二節 滿意度...................................... 4
第三節 研究假設.................................... 6
第三章 研究方法.................................... 7
第一節 研究範圍及對象.............................. 7
第二節 研究架構.................................... 8
第三節 資料分析方法................................ 10
第四章 資料分析.................................... 17
第一節 基本資料分析................................ 17
第二節 滿意度分析.................................. 20
第三節 CHAID 分析.................................. 34
第四節 比例勝算模型................................ 39
第五章 結論與建議.................................. 52
第一節 結論........................................ 52
第二節 建議........................................ 53
參考文獻.............................................. 54
附錄.................................................. 56

一、中文部份
1.行政院內政部(民96)，國民生活狀況調查，台北市：行政院。
2.陳膺強(民83)，應用抽樣調查，台北市：台灣商務圖書公司。
3.楊懋春(民70)，當代社會學說，台北市：黎明文化事業公司，444頁。
4.侯錦雄(民79)，遊憩區遊憩動機與遊憩認知間關係之研究。國立台灣大學園藝研究所博士論文。
5.邱皓政(民99)，量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(初版)，台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

二、英文部分
1.Agresti, A. (2007). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd Edition. New York：Wiley.
2.Brandmeyer, D. D. (1987). Higher education activity and life satisfaction in the older adult. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia.
3.Bross , I.D.J. (1958). How to use ridit analysis. Biometric, 14(1), 18-38.
4.Bulltena, C. L. and Klessing, L. L. (1969). Satisfaction in Camping: A Conceptualization and Guide at Social Research. Journal of Leisure Research, 5(2), 348-364.
5.Camagni, R., R. Capello, and P. Nijkamp (1997). Towards Sustainable City Policy: an Economy-environment. Technology Nexus, Ecological Economics, 24 (1), 103-118.
6.Cheung, C. (1997). Toward a Theoretically Based Measurement Model of the Good Life. Journal of General Psychology, 158 (2), 200-215.
7.Coate, L.E .and Bonner P.A. (1973). Comprehensive Indicator: Quality of Life. Regional Environment Management. San Diego, CA.: Wiley.

8.Gregg, J. P. (1996). Psychological implications and personal perceptions of lifelong learning for adults in life satisfaction and self-esteem. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.
9.Henry, N. J. (1989). A Qualitative Study about Perceptions of Lifestyle and Life Satisfaction among Older Adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Syracuse University.
10.Hollis, L. A. (1998). Sex comparisons in life satisfaction and psychosocial adjustment scores with an older adult sample: Examining the effect of sex role differences in older cohorts(On-Line). Available, http://global.umi.com/pqdweb?Did=000000032218426&Fmt.
11.Kelly, J. R. (1992). Leisure, 2nd Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice- Hall.
12.Lehman, A.F. (1983). The effects of psychiatric symptoms on quality of life assessments among the chronic mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6 (2), 143-151.
13.Mitchell, G., A. Namdeo, and D. Kay (2000). A New Disease-burden Method for Estimating the Impact of Outdoor Air Quality on Human Health. The Science of the Total Environment, 246 (2-3), 153-163.
14.Veenhoven, R. (2000). The Four Qualities of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1 (1), 1-39.
15.Zhu, J. (2001). Multidimensional Quality-of-life Measure with an Application to Fortune’s Best Cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35 (2), 263–284.