臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

為因應京都機制高交易成本問題及擴大後京都全球減量能量，聯合國氣候變化綱要公約（United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNFCCC)刻正推動多元途徑架構 (Framework for Various Approaches, FVA)。日本政府是目前全球最積極推動FVA的國家，稱為聯合減量額度機制 (Joint Crediting Mechanism, JCM)，已獲得很大成效。爰此，本研究目的在於建立交易成本理論模型，探討不同交易成本下，比較JCM與CDM之減碳投資與減量潛力。獲得本研究成果如下：(1)簡化制度設計為國際趨勢，其中額外性檢定是關鍵流程；(2)影響廠商產量與減量投資的三個關鍵因子為，交易成本、碳價以及核配率，例如JCM因交易成本低，而減量潛力大於CDM；(3)本研究結果完全呼應Coggan et al.,(2013)所提出的概念，制度設計為影響交易成本的關鍵因子；(4) 本研究結果亦與McCann et al.,(2013)的研究有所應證，制度設計與交易成本為互相影響之概念，且分析出六項影響制度設計之因子。

To response to reducing high transaction cost of the Kyoto mechanism as well as to expanding the capacity of greenhouse gas mitigation around the world, the Framework for Various Approaches (FVA) was launched by the United Nations Framework Convention on Cliamte Change (UNFCCC) in 2013. The Japanese Government is the most active country who initiated the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) under the concept of the FVA, it has been a great result. Therefore, the purpose of this research is created a transaction cost model, compares the mititgation investment and the mitigation potential between JCM and CDM under the different transaction cost. The main results are obtained as follows：(1)Simplify policy design is the trend, especially the additionality process; (2)The key factors of influence Manufacturer’s product and mitigation investment are transaction cost, carbon price, and issue rate, for example, because the transaction cost of the JCM is lower, so the mitigation potential of the JCM is higher; (3)This result is completely correspond to Coggan et al.,(2013), the policy design is the key factor of influence transaction cost; (4)This result is completely correspond to McCann et al.,(2013), the policy design and transaction cost will influence each other, and propose six factors of influence policy design.

目錄
摘要 I
目錄 III
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1-1
第一節 研究緣起 1-1
第二節 研究動機與目的 1-3
第三節 研究內容與方法 1-6
第二章 UNFCCC減量市場機制發展現況與趨勢 2-1
第一節 氣候會議與減量市場機制發展 2-2
第二節 CDM減量機制 2-7
第三節 NMM與FVA發展 2-21
第四節 JCM新減量機制 2-35
第五節 JCM方法學之實際案例 2-50
第六節 CDM與JCM之比較 2-59
第七節 本章小結 2-63
第三章 交易成本之學理研究回顧 3-1
第一節 成本有效性分析 3-1
第二節 交易成本研究 3-4
第三節 交易成本影響因子及制度設計 3-11
第四節 CDM交易成本 3-27
第五節 CDM交易成本理論模型 3-35
第六節 本章小結 3-37
第四章 廠商與政府減量管制決策行為分析 4-1
第一節 廠商面臨減量管制與JCM減量機制之最適決策 4-2
第二節 JCM與CDM之比較 4-11
第三節 政府社會福利最大化之最適決策 4-19
第四節 本章小結 4-25
第五章 結論與建議 5-1
第一節 結論 5-1
第二節 政策建議與研究限制 5-3
參考文獻 R-1
中文文獻 R-1
英文文獻 R-1
附錄 A-1
附錄一 廠商面臨減量管制與JCM減量機制之最適決策 A-1

中文文獻
石俊賢. (2004). 排放交易、環境績效與政府執行策略分析. 國立台北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所.
李堅明. (2002). 抑制溫室氣體之良方─清潔發展機制的最新發展分析. 台灣綜合展望, 頁 113-125.
李堅明、施欣羽. (2013). UNFCCC 新市場機制發展現況與趨勢. 碳經濟, 頁 25-41.
馬公勉. (2008). 燃料酒精CDM計畫與國家永續發展策略之研究. 國立台北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所.
張若儀. (2010). 企業因應低碳經濟之碳資產管理策略. 國立台北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所.
陳柏瑞. (2009). 纖維素酒精CDM計畫與永續能源發展之研究. 國立台北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所.

英文文獻
Anthea Coggan, Edwin Buitelaar, Stuart Whitten, Jeff Bennett. (2013). Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why? Ecological Economics, 222-231.
Ecological Economics Editorial. (2013). Transaction costs and environmental policy: Taking stock, looking forward. Ecological Economics, 182-184.
Global Environment Centre Fundation (GEC). (2014). JCM The Joint Crediting Mechanism. Available at: http://gec.jp/jcm/index.html
Government of Japan. (2015). Recent Development of The Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM).
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. (2014). One Hundred Questions & Answers about MRV in Developing Countries.
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. (2015). New Market Mechanisms in CHARTS.
International Emissions Trading Association(IETA). (2013). Response to the Call for Inputs on FVA, NMM and non-market based approcahes.
Laura McCann. (2013). Transaction costs and environmental policy design. Ecological Economics.
Lithuania and European Union. (2013). Submission by Lithuania and the European commission on behalf of the European union and its member states.
Michaelowa, A. (2014). New market mechanisms. Perspectives and University of Zurich.
Michaelowa, A., M. Stronzik, F. Eckermann, A. Hunt. (2003). Transaction costs of the Kyoto Mechanisms. Climate Policy, 261-278.
Ministry of the environment, Japan (MOEJ). (2015). New Mechanism Information Platform. Available at: http://www.mmechanisms.org/e/
Ministry of the Environment, Japan (MOEJ) and Global Environment Centre Foundation (GEC). (2013). Findings of New Mechanism MRV Demonstration Study & Feasibility Study Programme on GHG Mitigation Projects in 2012.
Ministry of the Environment, Japan (MOEJ) and Global Environment Centre Foundation (GEC). (2014). JCM(Joint Crediting Mechanism) booklet 2014.
Montero, J. P. (1997). Marketable pollution permits with uncertainly and transaction costs. Resource and Energy Economics, 27-50.
OECD. (2013). Elaborating the “framework for various approaches” under the UNFCCC.
Stavins, R.N. (1995). Transaction Costs and Tradable Permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 133-148.
Woerdman, E. (2001). Emissions trading and transaction costs:analyzing the flaws in the discussion. Ecological Economics 38, 293-304.
World Bank. (2013). Mapping Carbon Pricing Initiatives Developments and Prospects.
World Bank. (2014). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing.