臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

過去針對明星高中的研究中，大多探討明星高中在學業成就上能帶來正向效果，但明星高中學生壓力問題也時有所聞。就讀明星高在升學道路上看似俱有優勢的收獲，但真的只有得沒有失嗎？明星高中的競爭與升學壓力所帶來的心理健康的負面影響，無疑也是一種代價。本研究主要探討就讀明星學校對心理健康所可能帶來的負面效果。透過大魚小池(The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect，BFLPE)的概念，來探討就讀明星高中與一般高中，以及個人所處位置的差異在心理健康上的表現。使用「臺灣青少年成長歷程研究」(Taiwan Youth Project，簡稱 TYP)長期追蹤資料，採用反事實分析方法，進一步排除進入明星學校選擇性的效果。研究結果顯示大魚小池效應的存在，本研究也同時考慮魚與池的互動效果，發現就讀明星學校確實也有學校的負面效果存在，個人位置不同其效果也有所差異。過去研究大多只關注明星高中學業成就，或只就中學生心理健康進行探討，本研究則直接檢驗明星高中選擇對心理健康帶來的影響。

The existence of prestigious high schools in Taiwan is an important phenomenon. Every junior high school graduate needs to take the entrance examination and goes to different senior high schools according to their scores. Entering a prestigious school means the students are the best of the best. Most of the past research about Taiwan’s prestigious schools focused on students’ academic performance. Although studying at a prestigious school seems to have its advantages, the gain may come with costs. Past research has shown that studying at a prestigious school has positive effects on academic performance; however, other research found that under the pressure of constant exams executed at the prestigious schools and peer’s competition studying at a prestigious school showed negative effects on students’ mental health. In the present study, we examined the association between studying at a prestigious school and students’ mental health. Adopting the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE) perspective, the study set to find out the effects of different levels of academic performances (i.e. students’ academic abilities; the Fish) in different types of schools (prestigious vs. regular; the Pond). With longitudinal data from Taiwan Youth Project (TYP) and counterfactual analysis (i.e. IPTW) to estimate the treatment effect of entering prestigious schools, the results showed that studying at a prestigious school was associated with low mental health of students. At different levels of academic performances, the impact of being at a prestigious school had different effects on students’ mental health.

目錄

第一章 前言 2
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 十二年國教 7
第二節 明星高中 9
第三節 明星高中與學業成就 10
第四節 大魚小池效應(Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect) 12
第五節 對比效應(Contrast effect)與光榮感(reflected glory effect) 15
第六節 明星高中與心理健康 18
第七節 小結及研究假設 20
第三章 研究方法 24
第一節 資料及樣本 24
第二節 變項測量 25
（一） 心理健康 25
（二） 明星高中 26
（三） 班級排名 27
（四） 基測分數 27
（五） 控制變項 28
第三節 分析方法 31
第四章 研究結果 33
第一節 學校與個人位置的主效果 34
第二節 個人位置與學校的互動效果 35
第三節 個人位置變動的效果 37
第五章 結論與討論 42
第一節 大魚小池效應 42
第二節 適性入學還是追求名校？ 44
第三節 研究限制 47
參考文獻 49
附錄 54

參考文獻
今日新聞 (2014)大學指考放榜　北市公私立明星高中包辦台大半數新生名額。今日新聞網。取自http://www.nownews.com/n/2014/08/06/1357519。
林以正 (1999) 華人的社會比較：比較什么？與誰比較？為何比較？。本土心理學研究 11：93–125。
林志成（2015）台師大心測中心調查：中段生升學壓力最大。中時電子報。取自http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20151019003905-260405。
林國明 (2014) 十二年國教入學制度的問題與改革【巷仔口社會學】。取自http://twstreetcorner.org/2014/07/07/linkuoming/。
自由時報 (2014) 有夠扯！會考0分 輕鬆上成功高中。自由時報。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1085547
宋柏誼、喻文玟、廖珮妤 (2014) 5A、作文5級分…績優生填50志願落榜。聯合報。取自http://goo.gl/1aaBzw。
呂玉瑕、周玉慧（2015）性別角色態度的形成與變遷：從青少年到成年。台灣社會學刊 58：95–155。
宋曜廷、 黃瓅瑩、 郭念平、曾芬蘭（2012）以縱貫學業表現檢驗大魚小池效應與見賢思齊效應。中華心理學刊 54(3):315–30。
林以正 (1999) 華人的社會比較：比較什么？與誰比較？為何比較？。本土心理學研究 11：93–125。
侯雅齡 (2010) 科學自我概念之大魚小池效應探究： 資優生教育安置方式的思考。教育科學研究期刊 55(3)：61–87。
洪亞岑 ( 2009) 明星高中學生的學業成就、社會比較與學業自我效能之關係。 國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
張郁雯（2008）對比效應對學業自我概念之影響－發展的觀點。教育心理學報 40(1)：23–37。
莊玉鈴、秦夢群 ( 2010) 十二年基本國民教育政策之分析與建議。台灣教育。662：2–9。
黃雅容 (2009) 從上課方式、補習與課外閱讀比較就讀明星高中與一般高中的學習經驗。教育實踐與研究 22(1)：113–38。
楊孟麗 (2005) 教育成就的價值與青少年的心理健康。中華心理衛生學刊 18(2)：75–99。
鄭皓駿 (2013) 試探同儕因素對個人未來來學業表現的影響。國立臺北大學，新北市。
駱明慶 (2002) 誰是台大學生？－性別、省籍與城鄉差異。經濟論文叢刊 30(1)：113–47。
駱明慶 (印製中) 誰是台大學生?(2001-2014)— 多元入學的影響。經濟論文叢刊。
謝雨生、周孟嫻 (2013年11月) 臺灣青少年及青年補習有效嗎?反事實因果推論之檢驗。臺灣青少年成長歷程研究第五次學術研討會，中央研究院人文社會科學館。
魏琦芳、黃毅志( 2011) 學業成就與心理健康因果順序的貫時性分析：以 TEPS 資料做分析。中華心理衛生學刊 24(1)：97–130。
魏琦芳 (2008) 青少年心理健康的影響因素_貫時性研究。醫護科技學刊 10(4)：251–66。
譚康榮 (2004) 誰家小孩學習成就最高？哪群學生心理最不健康？「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」的初步發現。中央研究院學術諮詢總會通訊 13(1)：86–91。
關秉寅、李敦義 (2008) 補習數學有用嗎？一個「反事實」的分析。臺灣社會學刊 41：97–148。
Byun, Soo-yong, and Kyung-keun Kim. 2010. “Education Inequality in South Korea : The Widening Socioeconomic Gap in Student Achievement.” Research in Sociology of Education 17:155–82.
Carrell, Scott E., Richard L. Fullerton, and James E. West. 2009. “Does Your Cohort Matter Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(3):439–64.
Dai, David Yun, and Anne N. Rinn. 2008. “The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here? ” Educational Psychology Review 20:283-317.
Espenshade, Thomas J., Lauren E. Hale, and Chang Y. Chung. 2014. “The Frog Pond Revisited : High School Academic Context , Class Rank , and Elite College Admission.” Sociology of Education 78(4):269–93.
F, Lê-Scherban, Diez Roux AV, Li Y, and Morgenstern H. 2014. “Does Academic Achievement during Childhood and Adolescence Benefit Later Health?” Annals of Epidermiology 24:344–55.
Goldsmith, P. R. 2010. “Coleman Revisited: School Segregation, Peers, and Frog Ponds.” American Educational Research Journal 48(3):508–35. Retrieved July 7, 2014 (http://aer.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.3102/0002831210392019).
Gonçalves, Vânia, Amani Zidan, Mona Issa, and Faraj Barah. 2012. “A Longitudinal Investigation of Depressive Symptoms in Undergraduate Students of Pharmacy in Syria.” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 200(5):395–400.
Jablonska, Beata et al. 2014. “School Effects on Risk of Non-Fatal Suicidal Behaviour: A National Multilevel Cohort Study.” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 49(4):609–18.
Jackson, C. 2003. “Transitions into Higher Education: Gendered Implications for Academic Self-Concept.” Oxford Review of Education 29(3):331–46. Retrieved July 7, 2014 (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03054980307448).
Kang, Changhui. 2007. “Classroom Peer Effects and Academic Achievement: Quasi-Randomization Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Urban Economics 61(3):458–95. Retrieved (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0094119006000751).
Marsh, Herbert W., and Kit-Tai Hau. 2003. “Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Cross-Cultural (26-Country) Test of the Negative Effects of Academically Selective Schools.” The American Psychologist 58(5):364–76.
Marsh, Herbert W., Ulrich Trautwein, Oliver Lüdtke, Jürgen Baumert, and Olaf Köller. 2014. “The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Persistent Negative Effects of Selective High Schools on Self-Concept after Graduation.” American Educational Research Journal 44(3):631–69.
Marsh, Herbert W. 1990. “The Structure of Academic Self-Concept: The Marsh/Shavelson Model.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82(4):623–36.
Marsh, Herbert W., and John W. Parker. 1984. “Determinants of Student Self-Concept: Is It Better to Be a Relatively Large Fish in a Small Pond Even If You Don’t Learn to Swim as Well?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(1):213–31.
Marsh, Herbert W. et al. 2008. “The Big-Fish–little-Pond-Effect Stands Up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology, and Future Research.” Educational Psychology Review 20(3):319–50.
Marsh, HW, O. Köller, and J. Baumert. 2001. “Reunification of East and West German School Systems : Longitudinal Multilevel Modeling Study of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept.” American Educational Research Journal 38(2):321–50. Retrieved July 7, 2014 (http://aer.sagepub.com/content/38/2/321.short).
Marsh, W. Herbert. 1987. “The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept.” Journal of Educational Psychology 79(3):280–95.
Milkie, Melissa a, and Catharine H. Warner. 2011. “Classroom Learning Environments and the Mental Health of First Grade Children.” Journal of health and social behavior 52(1):4–22. Retrieved June 8, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21362609).
Thijs, J., M. Verkuyten, and P. Helmond. 2010. “A Further Examination of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Perceived Position in Class, Class Size, and Gender Comparisons.” Sociology of Education 83(4):333–45. Retrieved June 6, 2014 (http://soe.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0038040710383521).
Trautwein, Ulrich, Oliver Lüdtke, Herbert W. Marsh, and Gabriel Nagy. 2009. “Within-School Social Comparison: How Students Perceive the Standing of Their Class Predicts Academic Self-Concept.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101(4):853–66.