臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

瀏覽行為是網路使用者普遍表現的行為，網路環境成為新興瀏覽行為研究場域。然而，經由文獻探討發現，目前網路瀏覽類別相關研究，較少有系統性的探討。此外，目前文獻脈絡中，網路環境中新的因素對瀏覽行為的影響，仍然處於模糊狀態。因此，本研究假定使用者在網路環境脈絡，與實體環境脈絡中的瀏覽體驗可能會有所差異。Chang (1995) 在實體圖書館進行瀏覽的實徵研究，發展出多面向的瀏覽架構，歸納出十種瀏覽類別，提供描述不同層次瀏覽的分析性語言。故本研究選擇同樣以書籍為主體的博客來網路書店作為研究場域，試圖從行為面、動機面、認知面、資源面與脈絡面五個面向，在網路書店環境中，驗證Chang (1995) 的瀏覽架構，並比較使用者在實體環境中與網路書店環境中的瀏覽行為差異。
根據上述研究目的，本研究招募14位具有使用網路書店經驗者，參考Chang (1995) 研究架構，探究網路書店使用者的瀏覽行為。本研究採用實驗觀察法，瞭解研究對象的行為面、資源面與脈絡面，並搭配半結構訪談，擷取其認知與動機面。從五個瀏覽面向分析網路書店瀏覽因素，驗證網路書店使用者，是否會展現出Chang (1995) 的十種瀏覽類別，以及類別的行為特徵為何，同時討論影響瀏覽類別的網路書店因素。希冀比較網路書店瀏覽行為和實體圖書館瀏覽行為的差異。
本研究結果顯示，網路書店使用者會展現出這十種瀏覽類別，只是行為表現方式有所不同。網路書店使用者的尋求意圖，可分為尋找特定商品、尋找共同特性商品、意外發現商品、追蹤、學習及無特定目標瀏覽。網路書店瀏覽最重要的影響因素是移動，網路書店使用者利用多種網頁連結的進入點，以及自身擁有的路徑知識，快速穿梭於網頁，成功尋求符合目的的商品位置，以評估商品部份的資訊。網路書店使用者多半，僅能評估短且片段的內容，缺乏真實感，但是，網路書店也提供多媒體、書評等網路特有功能。此外，博客來網路書店在同一介面上，併陳豐富的內容資訊，容易喚起或形塑使用者的瀏覽動機，造成使用者瀏覽對象的改變。
本研究綜合網路書店的影響因素發現，導致網路書店瀏覽行為與實體瀏覽行為最大的不同是，網路書店使用者於瀏覽歷程中，頻繁發生瀏覽類別轉換或交叉展現的行為。總結來說，網路書店瀏覽行為是一種，使用者瀏覽網站豐富資訊的過程中，不時產生尋求新對象的動機，並且透過同一介面上的多元連結與搜尋功能，快速地移動至目標網頁，檢視商品部分資訊，以滿足新動機的行為。
依據本研究結果，建議網站介面設計，應於同一介面上併陳豐富多元的資訊與網頁連結形式，譬如使用詮釋資訊連結，多重屬性聚集相似商品、首頁擺放豐富的資訊塑造使用者的隨意瀏覽路徑。另外，善用廣告及特別區塊能夠，支持瀏覽者目的及潛在興趣。建議圖書館於入口處擺設多元書籍區域、建立資源指引網頁，並且可以在其線上目錄提供詮釋資訊連結、評估資訊、書籍推薦等功能。

Browsing is a common information behavior of web users, thus the Internet is a new popular research context of browsing. However, the browsing patterns of web users have not been systematically studied. In addition, the impact of the Internet factors on browsing is not well understood. Accordingly, this study assumes that browsing experience in the web environment may different from the physical environment. Chang (1995) developed a multidimensional framework to describe ten browsing patterns. Chang (1995) identified five dimensions of browsing, including behavior, motivation, cognition, resource and context. Although Chang (1995) provided a systematically taxonomy of browsing pattens, the empirical research was conducted in the physical library. Therefore, the purpose of this research aims to verify the browsing framework of Chang (1995) in an online bookstore, comparing the differences between the web browsing and the physical browsing behavior.
To discover browsing patterns in an online bookstore, total of 14 subjects whom has online bookstore experience were recruited. Bookland online bookstore was selected as the research website, because it contains abundant books. The experimental observation was conducted to observe the behavior, resource and context three dimensions. Meanwhile, following a semi-structured interview was employed to collect data from cognition and motivation two dimensions. Finally, online bookstore user’s browsing factors and behavioral characteristics of patterns were identified in the research.
The results revealed that online bookstore users will exhibit these ten browsing patterns. The seeking intention of browser can be divided into the following types: looking for a specific item, looking for something with common characteristics, keeping up-to-date, learning and goal-free browsing. Online bookstore browsing patterns are influenced by a number of factors, especially movement factor. Users rely on diverse webpage links as an entry point, and their pathway knowledge, moving rapidly through online bookstore, examining parts of information objects (commodity). Most of the online bookstore information content is short and fragmented, and lack of the physicality of printed books. Nevertheless, online bookstore provides specific web features such as multimedia and book reviews. Moreover, abundant information displayed on the interface, which stimulates or shapes the user’s motivation easily, leading to the changes of seeking objects.
It was discovered that the main difference between physical and online bookstore browsing, which is that users frequently change or cross their browsing patterns. In conclusion, online bookstore users often attracted by the new seeking objects when they browsing a website which has wealthy information. Therefore, users rapidly move to the target webpage, through the links or the search function on the website interface. Finally, products information has been examined, in order to satisfy user’s new motivations of browsing.
The research gives some suggestions for website design and library service. Website interface could display diverse information and webpage links, for instance, using metadata links to aggregate items in multiple attributes or displaying rich information on homepage to shape browsing paths. Also, advertisements and special section could support user’s browsing purposes and arouse potential interests. On the other hand, it is suggested that library could set a multiple themes book area beside the entrance, design web guidelines for collections, and provide metadata links, abstract of books, recommendations on its online catalog.

摘要 i
Abstract iii
目次 vi
表次 viii
圖次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 6
第三節 研究範圍與限制 7
第四節 名詞解釋 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 瀏覽行為研究脈絡 9
第二節 瀏覽形式與瀏覽類別 19
第三節 網路瀏覽行為研究 37
第三章 研究設計與實施 45
第一節 研究架構 45
第二節 研究方法與工具 47
第三節 研究實施 51
第四節 資料處理與分析 58
第四章 研究分析與結果 61
第一節 研究對象背景資訊 61
第二節 尋找特定項目 66
第三節 尋找共同特性項目 78
第四節 保持跟上新知 115
第五節 學習 120
第六節 無特定目標瀏覽 127
第七節 瀏覽對象及類別的轉變行為 134
第五章 綜合討論 144
第一節 網路書店瀏覽和實體瀏覽的行為差異 144
第二節 研究結果與網路瀏覽行為相關研究探討 152
第三節 網路書店瀏覽行為 159
第六章 結論與建議 162
第一節 結論 162
第二節 建議 169
第三節 未來研究建議 174
參考文獻 176
附錄一 招募網站畫面 183
附錄二 研究同意書 184
附錄三 實驗前輔助問卷 185
附錄四 任務說明 189
附錄五 使用者瀏覽習慣訪談大綱 192
附錄六 網路瀏覽情形訪談大綱 194

Apted, S. M. (1971). General purposive browsing. Library Association Record, 73(12), 228-230
Adkisson, H. P. (2005). Web design practices: use of faceted classification. Retrieved from http://www.webdesignpractices.com/navigation/facets.html.
Ayris, P. (1986). The stimulation of creativity: A review of the literature concerning the concept of browsing, 1970-1985. Center for Research on User Studies, 5
Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-424
Bates, M. J. (2002). Toward an integrated model of information seeking and searching. New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 1-15.
Bates, M. J. (2007). What is browsing really? A model drawing from behavioural science research. Information research, 12(4). Retrieved from http:// http://www.informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper330.html.
Benevenuto, F., Rodrigues,T., Cha, M., & Almeida,V. (2012). Characterizing user navigation and interactions in online social networks. Information Sciences,195, 1-24.
Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). Shopping without purchase: an investigation of consumer browsing behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 543-548
Bodner, R.C., Chignell, M.H., Charoenkitkarn, N., Golovchinsky, G., & Kopak, R.W. (2001). The impact of text browsing on text retrieval performance. Information Processing and Management, 37, 507-520
Boll, J. J. (1985). Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries. Occasional papers, 169, 260-721
Borgman, C. L. (1996). Why are online catalogs still hard to use?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 493-503
Breeding, M. (2007). The Birth of a New Generation of Library Interfaces. Computers in Libraries, 27(9), 34-37
Broughton,V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval . Aslib proceedings , 58(1/2), 49-72
Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information seeking, needs and behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Capra, R., Marchionini, G., Oh, J. S., Stutzman, F., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Effects of structure and interaction style on distinct search tasks. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL ''07), Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 18 - 23, 2007.
Chang, S. J. L., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Browsing: A Multidimensional Framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28, 231-276
Chang, S. J. L. (1995). Toward a Multidimensional Framework for Understand Browsing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (2000). Information seeking on the Web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, 5(2), 67-78
Cooper, L. Z. (2002). A case study of information-seeking behavior in 7-year-old children in a semistructured situation. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 904-922
Cove, J. F., & Walsh, B. C. (1988). Online text retrieval via browsing. Information Processing & Management, 24(1), 31-37
Cronin, B., & Hert, C. A. (1995). Scholarly foraging and network discovery tools. Journal of Documentation, 51(4), 388-403
Egan, D. E., Lesk, M.E., Ketchum, R.D., Lochbaum, J.R., Littman, M., & Landauer, T. K. (1991). Hypertext for the electronic library? CORE sample results. Hypertext 91 Proceedings, 1-14
Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal Management Review, 14(4), 532-550
Evans, B. M., & Chi, E. H. (2009). An elaborated model of social search. Information Processing and Management, 46, 656-678
Fagan, J. C. (2010). Usability Studies of Faceted Browsing: A Literature Review. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(2), 58-66.
Foster, A., & Urquhart, C. (2012). Modelling nonlinear information behavior: transferability and progression. Journal of Documentation, 68(6), 784-805
Hearst, M., Elliott, A., English, J., Sinha, R., Swearingen, K., & Yee, P. (2002). Finding the Flow in Web Site Search. Communications of the ACM, 45(9), 45-49.
Hildreth, C. R. (1982). The concept and mechanics of browsing in an online library catalog. Proceeding of the 3rd National Online Meeting, 181-196
Herner, S. (1970). Browsing. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 3 ,408-415
Hillesund, T. (2010). Digital reading spaces: How expert readers handle books, the web and electronic paper. First Monday, 15(4).
Hjorland, B. (2011). The importance of theories of knowledge: Browsing as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(3), 594–603.
Hyman, R. J. (1972). Access to library collections: An inquiry into the validity of the direct shelf approach, with special reference to browsing. Metuchen, NJ: TheScarecrow Press.
Jiang, J., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Huang, P., Sha, W., Dai, Y., & Zhao, B. Y. (2010). Understanding Latent Interactions in Online Social Networks. In Proceedings of The 10th ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC 2010), Melbourne, Australia.
Jiang, T. (2013). An exploratory study on social library system users'' information seeking modes. Journal of Documentation, 69(1), 6-26.
Kules, B., & Capra, R. (2008). Creating Exploratory Tasks for a Faceted Search Interface. In Proceedings of Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (pp.18-21), Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA.
Kules, B., Capra, R., Banta, M., & Sierra, T. (2009). What do exploratory searchers look at in a faceted search interface? In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL ''09), Austin, TX, June 15-19.
Large, A., & Beheshti, B. (1997). OPACs : A research review. Library & Information Science Research, 19(2), 111-133
Leite, J. C., Hadad, G., Doorn, J., & Kaplan, G. (2000). A Scenario Construction Process. Requirements Engineering Journal, 5(1), 38-61
Lin, X. (1997). Map Displays for Information Retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(1), 40-54
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behaviour in the digital environment: changes in reading behaviour over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712.
Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 404-419
Marchionini, G. (1987). An invitation to browse: designing full-text systems for novice users. The Canadian Journal of Information Science, 12(3/4), 69-79
Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge ,UK: Cambridge University Express
Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 41-46.
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., & Dobrowolski, T. (2007). Characterising and evaluating information seeking behavior in a digital environment: Spotlight on the “bouncer”. Information Processing and Management, 43 ,1085-1102
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., Rowlands, I., & Dobrowolski, T. (2008). Viewing and Reading Behaviour in a Virtual Environment: The full-text download and what can be read into it. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(3), 185-198.
Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to Library Classification. London: Asia Publishing House.
Rice, R. E., McCreadie, M., & Chang, S. J. L. (2001). Accessing and Browsing Information and Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Root, R. W. (1988). Design of a multi-media vehicle for social browsing. Proceedings of the 1988 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 25-38.
Sandstorm, P. E. (1994). An Optimal foraging approach to information seeking and use. The Library Quarterly, 64(4), 414-449.
Schacter, J., Chung ,G.K.W.K., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children’s Internet Searching on Complex Problems:Performance and Process Analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(9), 840-849
Tan, G. W., & Wei, K. K.(2006). An empirical study of Web browsing behaviour: Towards an effective Website design. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 5, 261-271.
Tam, W., Cox, A.M., & Bussey, A. (2009). Student user preferences for features of next-generation OPACs. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 43(4), 349-374
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194
Toms, E. G. (2000). Understanding and facilitating the browsing of electronic text. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 52, 423-452
Tuori, M. I. (1987). A framework for browsing in the relational data model(Doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
White, R., Muresan, G., & Marchionini, G. (2008). Evaluating exploratory search systems. Information Processing Management, 44(2),433-436
Wiesman F., van den Herik, H. J., & Hasman, A. (2004). Information retrieval by metabrowsing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology ,55(7), 565-578
Wilkinson, S. C., Reader, W., & Payne, S. J. (2012). Adaptive browsing: Sensitivity to time pressure and task difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 14-25
Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L.T. (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220
Yang, S. Q. & Hofmann, M. A. (2011). Next generation or current generation?: A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. Library Hi Tech, 29(2),266 – 300
Yee, K.P., Swearingen, K., Li, K., & Hearst, M. A. (2003). Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 401-408). Florida, USA.
Yuan, X., & Belkin, N. J. (2010). Evaluating an integrated system supporting multiple information-seeking strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 1987–2010.
Zhang, J., & Marchionini, G. (2005). Evaluation and evolution of a browse and search interface: relation browser. In Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on Digital government research, 89, 179-188. Digital Government Society of North America
古嘉馨（民100）。使用者判斷開放性知識分享平台資訊品質之研究─以Yahoo!奇摩知識+為例。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林珊如（民90）。書籍網站資訊組織架構與瀏覽介面設計的考量：以亞馬遜網路書店為例。大學圖書館，5(1)，16-32
林珊如（民99）。數位時代的閱讀：青少年網路閱讀的爭議與未來。圖書資訊學刊，8(2)，29-53
林雯瑤（民95）。層面分類的概念與應用。教育資料與圖書館學，44(2)，153-171
陳微麗（民94）。網路書店書目資訊使用研究。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
博客來網路書店（民103）。上網日期：民103年7月18日。檢自：http://www.books.com.tw/
粘芸蓁（民98）。Amazon.com圖書資料檢索結果中所呈現之書目連結關係探討。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
溫柏格 (David Weinberger)（民103）。TOO BIG TO KNOW：網路思想先驅溫柏格重新定義知識的意義與力量。（王年愷譯）。台北市：貓頭鷹出版。（原著出版年2011）
潘莉娟（民95）。網路書評與購書意願之關聯性研究。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。