臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

建置社區網路作為社區發展的工具是目前的發展趨勢，本文以台北市政府網路新都發展計劃當中的民輝寬頻社區為研究對象，透過問卷調查瞭解居民使用社區網路對於他們社會資本的影響。本研究發現資訊科技對於社會資本的影響主要來自於成員是否能夠從中得到有效的社群參與管道，真實世界的活動參與雖然重要，但若搭配線上社群互動的效果，對於成員社會資本的累積有更明顯的提升效果。若僅單獨注重在社區網站的建置，在網站內容上無法與社區居民之日常生活相結合，吸引居民參與使用，對社會資本的提升效果相當有限，另一方面，若僅注重提升居民參與社區活動，在提升社會資本上雖有幫助，但效果仍然沒有網路社區結合社區活動來得好。

Setting up community networks as a tool for community development is a trend of development nowadays. Through survey by questionnaire, the researcher of this study picks the residents of Ming-Whei Wide Band Community in a program named New Cyber City Development Plan by Taipei Municipal Government to study the influence that their community network has on their social capital. This study finds out that influence of information technology on social capital mainly lies in whether or not the members can obtain effective channels for participating in social groups. Important as it is to participate activities in the real world, when members are given access for interaction with social groups on the networks, the accumulation of their social capital is found to increase significantly. If a community website is established without including contents that can be related to the daily life of the residents, or without attracting the residents to participate or use it, the effect of accumulating social capital is very limited. On the other hand, if the residents are encouraged to participate in community activities, it may help in improving their social capital, but the extent of the effect is not as much, compared with that achieved by online community that connects the community with activities.

第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………1
第二節 研究背景…………………………………………………2
1-2-1.從社群到虛擬社群 …………………………………………2
1-2-2.當真實遇到虛擬：地理社區中的虛擬社群 ………………3
1-2-3.台灣社區網路發展現況 ……………………………………5
第三節 研究架構…………………………………………………8
第四節 研究問題……………………………………………… 10
1-4-1.民輝社區居民運用社區網路之現況………………………10
1-4-2.傳統社區參與及網路社區參與之比較……………………10
1-4-3.社區網路對於居民社會資本的影響………………………10
第二章 文獻討探 ………………………………………………11
第一節 市民社會與社群發展 …………………………………11
第二節 社會資本的定義……………………………………… 12
第三節 社會資本之來源與功能 ………………………………12
第四節 社會資本的組成要訴及內涵 …………………………14
第五節 資訊科技與社會資本之關係 …………………………15
第六節 社會資本的測量 ………………………………………17
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………… 20
第一節 抽樣架構……………………………………………… 20
3-1-1.民輝里(民輝社區)簡介 ………………………………… 20
第二節 操作化定義…………………………………………… 21
3-2-1.人口變項………………………………………………… 21
3-2-2.使用社區網路行為……………………………………… 22
3-2-3.參與社區活動行為 ……………………………………… 23
3-2-4.網絡資本 ………………………………………………… 24
3-2-5.參與資本 ………………………………………………… 24
3-2-6.社區認同 ………………………………………………… 25
第四章 分析與討論…………………………………………… 26
第一節 樣本描述……………………………………………… 26
第二節 人口變項與社群參與及社會資本之差異性分析…… 28
4-2-1.人口變項對於社群活動參與程度之差異分析 ………… 28
4-2-2.人口變項與受訪者社會資本之差異分析 ……………… 30
4-2-3.小結 ……………………………………………………… 31
第三節 相關性分析 ………………………………………… 33
第四節 族群差異分析………………………………………… 33
第五節 迴歸分析……………………………………………… 36
第六節 訪談分析……………………………………………… 37
第五章 結論與研究限制……………………………………… 39
第一節 結論與建議…………………………………………… 39
5-1-1.人口變項對社群參與的影響…………………………… 39
5-1-2.社群參與對於社會資本的影響 ………………………… 39
5-1-3.社區發展機制與社會資本 ……………………………… 40
第二節 研究限制與未來展望 …………………………………42
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………… 43
附錄一：問卷調查表 …………………………………………… 46
附錄二：社區網路相關人員深度訪談大綱 …………………… 51
附錄三：統計結果資料表 ……………………………………… 52

英文部份
Alkalimat A. & Williams K.(2001). “Social Capital and Cyberpower in the African American Community”. Alliance for Community Technology. University of Michigan.
Avis, A. (1995). Pubic Space on the Information Highway: The role of Community Network. http://www.ucalgary.ca/Uofc/faculities/GNST/theses/avis/theis.html
Bourdieu, P (1985). “The Forms of Capital”, Chapter 9 in Richardson JG (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
Brehm, J. and W. Rahn (1997). “Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital”. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 999-1024.
Bullen P. & Onyx J. (1998) Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities in NSW, [Online] Available：http://www.mapl.com.au/A2.htm.
Calabrese, A. & Borchert, M. (1996). “Prospects for electronic democracy in the United States: Re-thinking communication and social policy”. Media, Culture and Society, 18, 249-268.
Coleman, J. (1988). “Social capital in the creation of human capital”. American Journal of Sociology 94 (supplement), s95—s120.
Cox E.(1995). A Truly Civil Society. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney.
De Kerckhove, D. (1997). Connected intelligence: The arrival of the web society. Toronto: Somerville House.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity, London, Hamish Hamilton.
Fukuyama, F. (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. The Free Press: New York.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., and McGuire, T. (1991) “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication” Dunlop, C. and Kling, R. (eds.) Computerisation and Controversy: Value conflicts and social choices, Sydney:Academic Press Inc.
Levy, P. (1997). Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Perseus Books: Cambridge, Mass.
Narayan, D. and Pritchett, L. (1997). "Cents and Sociability: Households Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania." The World Bank Development Research Group, May 1997, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1796, Washington D.C.
Putnam, R.D. (1993a). “The Prosperous Community,” The American Prospect vol. 4 no. 13.
Putnam, R. D., with R. Leonardi and R. Y. Nanetti (1993b). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). “Bowling alone: America''''s declining social capital”. Journal of Democracy 6: 65-78.
Putnam, R. D. (1996). ‘The strange disappearance of civic America”. The American Prospect, 24, 34-48.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. NY: Simon & Schuster.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Slouka, M. (1995). War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech assault on reality. New York: Basic Books.
Stein, M. R. (1960). The eclipse of community. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stoll, C. R. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
Smith, M. H., L. J. Beaulieu, and Seraphine, A. (1995). “Social capital, place of residence and college attendance”. Rural Sociology 60(3): 363-381.
Smith, T. W. (1997). “Factors relating to misanthropy in contemporary American society”. Social Science Research 26(2): 176-197.
Teachman, J. D., K. Paasch, and K. Carver (1996). “Social capital and dropping out of school early”. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(9): 773-784.
Turkle, S. (1996). Life on Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Brockman Inc.
Wellman, B.& Wetherell, C.(1996). “Social Network Analysis of Historical Communities: Some Questions from the Present to the Past”.History of the Family 1, 1 (1996): 97-121.
Hampton K. & Wellman B. (2000). “Examining Community in the Digital Neighborhood. Early Results From Canada’s Wired Suburb”. Digital Cities: Technologies, Experiences, and Future Perspectives.
Wellman, B. (2001a). “Physical place and cyber place: The rise of personalized networking”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25.
Wellman, B. (2001b). “Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment”. American Behavioral Scientist, vol 45, November, 2001
Wellman, B., & Frank, K. (2001c).” Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support from personal communities”. In N. Lin, R. Burt , & K. Cook (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research. Chicago, MI: Aldine de Gruyter.
中文部份
吳齊殷（1998）＜虛擬社區vs.真實生活＞，《科學月刊》，29(8):668-674。
莊道明（1998）＜從臺灣學術網路使用調查解析網路虛擬社群價值觀＞，《資訊傳播與圖書館學＞，5(1):52-61
黃厚銘（1997）＜虛擬社區中的人格認同與信賴關係＞，《國家政策雙週刊》，168:5-7。
詹子瑩（1998）＜推行網路住宅社區課題之研究＞，國立中山大資訊管理碩士班論文。
張世佩（1998）＜社區網路的運作與困境，以UCOM社區網站建置計畫為例＞，國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
彭博文（2001）＜社區網路：嘯潛山莊個案研究＞，國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。