臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文初步整理蠅類的嗅覺系統與一些嗅覺相關研究文獻，並簡介一般肉品工廠在產品製造過程上防治蠅類的化學性或物理性方法。由於家蠅類的嗅覺十分靈敏，因此如何有效地管理肉品工廠的環境衛生、驅離與防治蠅類進入工廠是很重要的任務，以進一步為食品衛生與安全把關。基於家蠅對於肉品廠內的血水有偏好性，研究設計為簡易的網籠實驗，於血水中添加不同添加物質，進行家蠅取食偏好實驗，每次以50隻家蠅進行實驗，觀察時間為6至24小時，並進行三重複。以探討不同添加物質促使家蠅遠離血水的防治效果。實驗對照組為單純血水， 添加5g糖於血水(5%糖血水)則會顯著地吸引家蠅。不同添加物質，包含漂白水、 洗碗精、小蘇打、薄荷精、薰衣草精、與蒜泥等。當家蠅對其取食偏好性降低時，則視該添加物有防蠅抑制的效果。實驗數據顯示結果發現這些添加物質會不同程度地降低家蠅的取食偏好，且與血水或糖血水溶液的取食結果有顯著差異。相較於血水，24時候的觀察結果顯示:5%小蘇打血水(防蠅率98%) = 5%薄荷精血水(防蠅率98%) = 5%薰衣草精血水(防蠅率98%) ＞ 5%漂白水血水(防蠅率96%) = 5%蒜泥血水(防蠅率96%)＞ 5%洗碗精血水(防蠅率90%)＞5%糖血水(防蠅率0%)=100%血水(防蠅率0%)。當進一步進行不同濃度的漂白水、 小蘇打或清潔劑實驗，發現達到50%防蠅率的各添加物濃度均在0.5-1%之間。根據本論文的初步結果，以及成本與食品安全性考量，建議肉品工廠內添加小蘇打於血水中，以避免血水吸引家蠅入侵。而其防治機制尚不清楚，推測或許與其降低血水酸性有關。

This paper preliminarily collate the research literature on the olfactory system of flies and some of the olfactory sense, and briefly introduces the chemical or physical methods for the control of flies in the production process of the meat factory. The sense of smell of houseflies is very sensitive, so it is an im-portant task to manage the environmental hygiene of meat factory effectively, drive away and prevent flies into the factory, so as to further protect the food hygiene and safety. Based on the preference of housefly to the blood and water in the meat factory, the study was designed as a simple net cage experiment. The experiment was carried out on the feeding preference experiment of the housefly with the addition of different substances in the blood water. The experiment was carried out with 50 houseflies at a time of 6 to 24 hours, and repeated three. To explore the control effect of different additives on Housefly from blood and water. The experimental control group was simply blood water, adding 5g sugar to blood water (5% sugar blood water) would significantly attract housefly. Different added substances include bleach water, dishwashing liquid, baking soda, peppermint, lavender extract, and garlic paste. When the housefly reduced its feeding preference, the additive had the effect of preventing flies. The experimental data showed that the addition of these substances could reduce the feeding preference of Musca domestica to varying degrees, and was significantly different from the results of the feeding of blood water or glycemic water solution. Compared with blood water, the observation results at the time of 24 hours showed: 5% the blood water of soda (anti-fly suppression rate of 98%) = 5% peppermint blood (anti-fly suppression rate of 98%) = 5% Lavender blood (anti-fly suppression rate of 98%) > 5% bleached water (anti-fly suppression rate of 96%) = 5% garlic mud blood water (anti-fly suppression rate of 96%) > 5% dishwashing high blood water (anti-fly suppression rate of 90%) > 5% sugar Blood water (anti-fly suppression rate of 0%) =100% blood water (anti-fly suppression rate of 0%). When further concentration of bleach, bicarbonate or detergent was tested, the concentration of each additive that reached 50% inhibition rate was 0.5-1%. According to the preliminary results of this paper, as well as the cost and food safety considerations, it is suggested that the meat factory be added to the blood in order to avoid the blood water attracting the housefly invasion. The mechanism of its prevention and treatment is not clear. Presumably, it may be related to lowering the acidity of blood water.

中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………… ii
誌謝 ……………………………………………………………………… iii
目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… iv
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… vi
圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… Vii
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………1
1.1 前言.............................1
1.2 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………3
第二章 肉品工廠的防治蠅類…………………………………………………5
2.1 環境設施方面的防治蠅類方法………………………………………6
2.2 產品製造過程上防治蠅類方法………………………………………8
2.3 防蠅器具介紹…………………………………………………………10
第三章 家蠅之介紹……………………………………………………………14
3.1 家蠅的體型結構………………………………………………………14
3.2 家蠅的分佈……………………………………………………………16
3.3 家蠅嗅覺的產生過程…………………………………………………17
3.4 防蠅相關研究…………………………………………………………22
第四章 不同添加物加入血水之防蠅率的探討………………………………29
4.1 家蠅對血水的嗅覺試驗方法…………………………………………29
4.2 家蠅嗅覺對加入不同添加物質於血水的反應………………………30
4.3 不同添加物加於血水誘引家蠅的試驗分析…………………………32
4.4 不同添加物之防蠅率…………………………………………………33

4.5 不同濃度之添加物(漂白水.小蘇打.洗碗精)對驅離家蠅的效果……34
4.6 不同濃度之添加物(漂白水.小蘇打.洗碗精)之防蠅率分析比較……37
4.7 不同添加物防治家蠅應用討論…………………………………………40
4.8 野外試驗 ………………………………………………………………41
第五章 結論………………………………………………………………………45
第六章 未來展望…………………………………………………………………46
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………………………47
英文論文大綱 …………………………………………………………………………59

〔1〕李學進。畜牧場蠅類之發生生態。家禽世界。2001;29(3):64-71。
〔2〕李學進。垃圾場家蠅棲群之研究。興大昆蟲學報。1985;18:65-73。
〔3〕耿玉梅 (1993)。Pyriproxyfen對家蠅預成蟲的形態、蛋白質圖譜及蛹期酯活性的影響。國立臺灣大學植物病蟲害學系研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔4〕黃冠霖 (2017)。普通家蠅取食牛隻排泄物及高粱酒糟進行生物轉換之研究。國立金門大學食品科學系研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔5〕黃威銘(2012)。食物誘引劑與誘引器顏色對家蠅防治效果評估。嘉南藥理科技大學生物科技系暨研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔6〕唐立正、馮誠萬、侯豐男。畜牧場家蠅之物理防除。畜牧半月刊。2002;68(1):87-94。
〔7〕魏登賢、賴鎮棋、王正雄。台北市家蠅類之月消長調查報告。公共衛生。1978;5(2):160-165。〔8〕邱姿理 (2018)。果蠅拓譜異構酶Ⅲβ蛋白與其N端刪除突變株的純化。國立中興大學生物化學研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔9〕謝雨成(2011)。家蠅和斜紋夜盜羟性費洛蒙合成及其應用。朝陽科技大學民生化工產業研發碩士專班碩士論文。
〔10〕杜武俊、唐立正、郭美華、侯豐男。養雞場家蠅(Musca domestica L.)成蟲之聚集行為。中華昆蟲。1991;11:130-139。
〔11〕莫建初、庄佩君。誘殺-21世紀蠅類的主要控制技術。中國媒介生物學及控制。2008;19(2):163-165。
〔12〕程暄生。家蠅引誘劑的出現及其發展。中華衛生殺蟲藥械。1997;3(1):1-4
〔13〕莫建初、尉吉乾、林望、王小姣。家蠅成蟲對不同食物氣味的反應。中國媒介生物學。2008;19(1):12-13。
〔14〕徐之明、劉衛、周廣平、黃清臻、邵新璽。家蠅的誘殺防治進展。醫學動物防治。2000;16(3):159-160。
〔15〕戴小杰。家蠅引誘劑的研究。中華衛生殺蟲藥械。1995;1(1):26-29。
〔16〕王正雄、侯豐男、唐立正、李學進。垃圾堆積場蒼蠅生態之調查研究及防治方法芻議。台灣環境保護。1984;3:44-71。
〔17〕吳國強。不同顏色對家蠅引誘效果的實驗觀察。中國媒介生物學及控制。2001;12(1):75。
〔18〕趙揚、張力波、陳奕新、陳小麟。不同顏色對比對家蠅(Musca domestica vicina)引誘效果的比較。廈門大學學報。2004;43(2):278-280。
〔19〕楊士穆 (1988)。普通家蠅對撲滅松－－四滅寧及其他殺蟲劑之抗藥性研究。國立臺灣大學植物病蟲害研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔20〕楊青坡 (2004)。探討果蠅dhlp基因與細胞週期調控與果蠅眼睛發育的關係。東海大學生物學系研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔21〕衛生管理，Haccp社團法人中華食品安全管制系統發展協會。
http://www.chinese-haccp.org.tw/
〔22〕王鶯璇 (2008)。一、果蠅早期眼睛發育過程中Jak/STAT抑制Notch訊息傳遞是受到PI3K/Akt所調控二、果蠅醣蛋白Risk為一種新的細胞黏著分子。國立中正大學分子生物研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔23〕溫榮崑 (2012)。增加雄果蠅大腦內特定多巴胺神經元之多巴胺合成可提高老齡化雄果蠅之性活動力與性衝動。國立暨南國際大學應用化學系研究所碩士班碩士論文。
〔24〕Albarrak AS. Comparative studies on house fly, Musca domestica L., population in different animal farms in relation to attractants and control at hail province, Saudi Arabia. Pak Entomol. 2009;31(2):142-148.
〔25〕Christopher JG, Daniel ES, Todd WW. Evaluation of commercial and field-expedient baited traps for house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Vector Ecology. 2009;34(1):99-103.
〔26〕Aniebo, A. O.; Owen, O. J. Effects of age and method of drying on the proximate composition of housefly larvae (Musca domestica Linnaeus) meal (HFLM). Pak. J. Nutr. 2010, 9, 485-487.
〔27〕Brown AW, West AS, Lockley AS. Chemical attractants for the adult house fly. J Econ Entomol. 1961;54:670-674.
〔28〕Brian PQ, Ulrich RB, Christopher JG, Jerome AH, David AG. Analysis of extracted and volatile components in blackstrap molasses feed as candidate house fly attractants. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1139:279-284.
〔29〕Bellingham J. A comparative study of the spectral sensitivity , antennal sensilla , and landing prefe-rences of the housefly , Musca domestica ( L. ) ( Diptera : Muscidae ) , and the lesser housefly , Fannia ca-nicularis ( L. ) ( Diptera : Fanniidae ) . PhD thesis. Univ Birmingham uk . 1994.
〔30〕Burg JG, Axtell RC. Monitoring house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), populations in caged-layer poultry house using a baited jug-trap. Environ Entomol. 1984;13(4):1083-1090.
〔31〕Carlson DA, Mayer MS, Silhacek DL, James JD, Beroza M, Bierl BA. Sex attractant pheromone of the house fly: isolation, identification and synthetic. Sci.1971;174:76-78.
〔32〕.Chanpman JW, Knapp JJ, Goulson D. Visual responses of Musca domestica to pheromone impreg-nated targets in poultry units. Bio Ecol. 1999;13:132-138.
〔33〕Dethier VG. Adaptation to chemical stimuli of the tarsal receptors of the blowfly. Biol Bull. 1952;103: 178-189.
〔34〕Cervantes-Sandoval I, Martin-Pena A, Berry JA, Davis RL. 2013. System-like consolidation of ol-factory memories in Drosophila. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuros-cience 33: 9846-54
〔35〕Chiang AS, Lin CY, Chuang CC, Chang HM, Hsieh CH, et, al. 2011. Three-dimensional reconstruc-tion of brain-wide wiring networks in Drosophila at single-cell resolution. Current biology : CB 21: 1-11
〔36〕Connolly JB, Roberts IJ, Armstrong JD, Kaiser K, Forte M, et al. 1996. Associative learning disrupted by impaired Gs signaling in Drosophila mushroom bodies. Science 274: 2104-7
〔37〕Crittenden JR, Skoulakis EMC, Han KA, Kalderon D, Davis RL. 1998. Tripartite mushroom body architecture revealed by antigenic markers. Learn Memory 5: 38-51
〔38〕Choi, W. H.; Jiang, M. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of hexanedioic acid isolated from Hermetia illucens larvae. J. Appl. Biomed. 2014, 12, 179-188.
〔39〕Davis RL. 2005. Olfactory memory formation in drosophila: from molecular to systems neuroscience. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 275-301
〔40〕De Belle JS, Heisenberg M. 1994. Associative odor learning in Drosophila abolished by chemical ablation of mushroom bodies. Science 263: 692-5
〔41〕De Bruyne, M., Clyne, P., and Carlson, J. (1999). Odor coding in a model olfactory organ: the Dro-sophila maxillary palp. J. Neurosci. 19, 4520–4531.
〔42〕De Bruyne, M., Foster, K., and Carlson, J. (2001). Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna. Neuron 30, 537–551.
〔43〕Deary IJ, Sommerfield AJ, McAulay V, Frier BM. 2003. Moderate hypoglycaemia obliterates working memory in humans with and without insulin treated diabetes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74: 278-9
〔44〕Dubnau J, Grady L, Kitamoto T, Tully T. 2001. Disruption of neurotransmission in Drosophila mu-shroom body blocks retrieval but not acquisition of memory. Nature 411: 476-80
〔45〕Farkas, R. Hogsette, J. A. Börzsönyi, L. Development of Hydrotaea aenescens and Musca domestica (diptera: Muscidae) in poultry and pig manures of different moisture content. Environ. Entomol. 1998, 27, 695-698
〔46〕Evans HE. Life on a Little Known Planet. New York: E. P. Dutton and Co. 1966: 318 .
〔47〕Green CH. A comparison of phototactic responses to red and green light in Glossina morsitans and Musca domestica. Physiol Entomol. 1984;16:165-172.
〔48〕Haines TW. Breeding media of common flies.II. In rural areas. J Trop Med and Hyg. 1955;4: 1125-1130.
〔49〕Hanley ME, Cruikshanks KL, Dunn D, et al. Luring houseflies(Musca domestica) to traps: do cuti-cular hydrocarbons and visual cues increase catch? Med Vet Entomol. 2008:1-8.
〔50〕Howard JJ, Wall R. Effects of constrast on attraction of the housefly, Musca domestica, to visual targets. Med Vet Entomol. 1998;12:322-324.
〔51〕Jason WC, Jennifer JK, Philip EH, Dave G. An evaluation of (z)-9-tricosene and food odours for at-tracting house flies, Musca domestica, to baited targets in deep-pit poultry units. Entomol Exp Appl. 1998;89:183-192.
〔52〕Hui, A.; Furong, W.; Yuqian, X.; Xiaomin, C.; Chaoliang, L. Antioxidant, antifungal and antiviral acticities of chitosan from the larvae of housefly, Musca domestica L. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 493-498.
〔53〕Hou, L.; Shi, Y.; Zhai, P.; Le, G. Antibacterial activity and in vitro anti-tumor activity of the extract of the larvae of the housefly (Musca domestica). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 111, 227-31.
〔54〕Hanley ME, Cruikshanks KL, Dunn D, et al. Luring houseflies(Musca domestica) to traps: do cuti-cular hydrocarbons and visual cues increase catch? Med Vet Entomol. 2008:1-8.
〔55〕Haines TW. Breeding media of common flies.II. In rural areas. J Trop Med and Hyg. 1955;4: 1125-1130.
〔56〕Hui, A.; Furong, W.; Qiusheng, Y.; Fen, Z.; Chaoliang, L. Preparation and biological activities of chitosan from the larvae of housefly, Musca domestica. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 72, 419-423.
〔57〕Hui, A.; Furong, W.; Yuqian, X.; Xiaomin, C.; Chaoliang, L. Antioxidant, antifungal and antiviral acticities of chitosan from the larvae of housefly, Musca domestica L. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 493-498.
〔58〕Hou, L.; Shi, Y.; Zhai, P.; Le, G. Antibacterial activity and in vitro anti-tumor activity of the extract of the larvae of the housefly (Musca domestica). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 111, 227-31.
〔59〕Ito K, Awano W, Suzuki K, Hiromi Y, Yamamoto D. 1997. The drosophila mushroom body is a quadruple structure of dendritic fields each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells. Development 124(4):761-771.
〔60〕Jang S, Nelson JC, Bend EG, Rodriguez-Laureano L, Tueros FG, et al. 2016. Glycolytic Enzymes Localize to Synapses under〔61〕Jefferis GS, Vyas RM, Berdnik D, Ramaekers A, Stocker RF, Tanaka NK, Ito K, Luo L. 2004.
Developmental origin of wiring specificity in the olfactory system of Drosophila. Development
131(1):117-129.
〔62〕Komiyama T, Johnson WA, Luo L, Jefferis GS. 2003. From lineage to wiring specificity. POU domain transcription factors control precise connections of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons. Cell
112(2):157-166.
〔63〕Kettle, D. S. Muscidae (Houseflies, Stableflies); Medical and veterinary entomology; Choom Helm Ltd: London, United Kingdom. 1984; 203-221.
〔64〕Kettle, D. S. Muscidae (Houseflies, Stableflies); Medical and veterinary entomology; Choom Helm Ltd: London, United Kingdom. 1984; 203-221.
〔65〕Kapogiannis D, Mattson MP. 2011. Disrupted energy metabolism and neuronal circuit dysfunction in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol 10: 187-98
〔66〕Krashes MJ, Keene AC, Leung B, Armstrong JD, Waddell S. 2007. Sequential use of mushroom body neuron subsets during drosophila odor memory processing. Neuron 53: 103-15
〔67〕Kaupp, U. (2010). Olfactory signaling in vertebrates and insects: differences and commonalities. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 188–199.
〔68〕Kettle, D. S. Muscidae (Houseflies, Stableflies); Medical and veterinary entomology; Choom Helm Ltd: London, United Kingdom. 1984; 203-221.
〔69〕Khan, H. A.; Shad, S. A.; Akram, W. Effect of livestock manures on the fitness of house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasitol Res. 2012, 111, 1165-1171.
〔70〕Kramer, S. D. The effect of temperature on the life cycle of Musca domestica and Culex pipiens. Se-cience 1915, 41, 874-876.
〔71〕Mulla MS, Axelrod H. Evaluation of the IGR Larvadex, as feed through treatment for the control of pestiferous flies in poultry ranches. J Econ Entomol. 1983;76:515-519.
〔72〕Mulla MS, Hwang YS, Axelrod H. Attractants for synanthropic flies: chemical attractants for domestic flies. J Econ Entomol. 1977;70:644-648.
Energy Stress to Support Synaptic Function. Neuron 90: 278-91
〔73〕Madwar S, Zahar AR. Preliminary studies on housefilies in Egypt. World Hlth Org.1951;3:621-636.
〔74〕Sacca G. Comparative bionomics in the genus Musca. Annu Rev Entomol.1964;9:341-358.
〔75〕Shen J, Plapp FW. Cyromazine resistance in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae): Genetics and cross resistance to difluobenzuron. J Econ Entomol. 1990;83(5):1689-1697.
〔76〕Tilak R, Verma AK, Urmila B. Wankhade. Effectiveness of Diflubenzuron in the control of houseflies. J Vector Borne Dis. 2010;47:97-102.
〔77〕McGuire SE, Le PT, Davis RL. 2001. The role of Drosophila mushroom body signaling in olfactory memory. Science 293: 1330-3
〔78〕McNay EC, Fries TM, Gold PE. 2000. Decreases in rat extracellular hippocampal glucose concentra-tion associated with cognitive demand during a spatial task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97: 2881-5
〔79〕Marin EC, Jefferis GS, Komiyama T, Zhu H, Luo L. 2002. Representation of the glomerular olfactory map in the Drosophila brain. Cell 109(2):243-255.
〔80〕Patricia, L. S.; Claudio, S. F. House Fly ( Musca domestica L.) (Diptera: Muscidae) development in different types of manure. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 2008, 68, 192-19
〔81〕Park, S. O.; Shin, J. H.; Choi, W. K.; Park, B. S.; Oh, J. S.; Jang, A. Antibacterial activity of house fly-maggot extracts against MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and VRE (Vancomy-cin-resistant enterococci). J. Environ. Biol. 2010, 31, 865-870.
〔82〕Pavillard, E. R.; Wright, E. A. An antiviotic from maggots. Nature 1957, 180, 916-917.
〔83〕Pieterse, E.; Pretorius, Q. Nutritional ecaluation of larvae and pupae meal of the housefly (Musca
domestica) using chemical- and broiler-based biological assays. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2013, 54, 347-355.
〔84〕Patterson GH, Lippincott-Schwartz J. 2002. A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling
of proteins and cells. Science 297(5588):1873-1876.
〔85〕Pascual JM, Wang D, Hinton V, Engelstad K, Saxena CM, et al. 2007. Brain glucose supply and
the syndrome of infantile neuroglycopenia. Archives of neurology 64: 507-13
〔86〕Qin H, Cressy M, Li W, Coravos JS, Izzi SA, Dubnau J. 2012. Gamma neurons mediate dopaminergic input during aversive olfactory memory formation in Drosophila. Current biology : CB 22: 608-14
〔87〕Rorth P. 1996. A modular misexpression screen in Drosophila detecting tissue-specific phenotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93: 12418-22
〔88〕Shih HW, Wu CL, Chang SW, Liu TH, Sih-Yu Lai J, et al. 2015. Parallel circuits control temper
ature preference in Drosophila during ageing. Nature communications 6: 7775
〔89〕Strausfeld NJ, Sinakevitch I, Vilinsky I. 2003. The mushroom bodies of Drosophila melanogaster: an immunocytological and golgi study of Kenyon cell organization in the calyces and lobes. Microsc Res Tech 62(2):151-168.
〔90〕Sacca G. Comparative bionomics in the genus Musca. Annu Rev Entomol.1964;9:341-358.
〔91〕Schoof HF, Savage EP, Dodge HR. Comparative studies of urban fly populations in Arizona, Kansas, Michigan, New York, and West Virginia II. Seasonal abundance of minor species. Ann Entomol Soc Am.1956;49(8):59-65.
〔92〕Teotia, J. S. Miller, B. F. Nutritive content of house fly pupae and manure residue. Br. Poult. Sci. 1974, 15, 177-182.
〔93〕Tamura T, Chiang AS, Ito N, Liu HP, Horiuchi J, et al. 2003. Aging specifically impairs amne-siac-dependent memory in Drosophila. Neuron 40: 1003-11
〔94〕Vosshall, L., Amrein, H., Morozov, P., Rzhetsky, A., and Axel, R. (1999). A spatial map of ol
factory receptor expression in the drosophila antenna. Cell 96, 726–735.
〔95〕Wang P, Saraswati S, Guan Z, Watkins CJ, Wurtman RJ, Littleton JT. 2004. A Drosophila tem
perature-sensitive seizure mutant in phosphoglycerate kinase disrupts ATP generation and alters synaptic
fu〔96〕Wang Y, Guo HF, Pologruto TA, Hannan F, Hakker I, Svoboda K, Zhong Y. 2004. Stereotyped
odor-evoked activity in the mushroom body of drosophila revealed by green fluorescent protein-based
Ca2+ imaging. J Neurosci 24(29):6508-6513.
〔97〕Yu D, Ponomarev A, Davis RL. 2004. Altered representation of the spatial code for odors after ol-factory classical conditioning; memory trace formation by synaptic recruitment. Neuron 42(3):439-448.
〔98〕Mann RS, Kaufman PE, Butler JF (2010) Evaluation of semiochemical toxicity to houseflies and stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae). Pest Manage Sci 66:816–824
〔99〕Khan HAA, Shad SA, Akram W (2012) Effect of livestock manures on the fitness of house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasitol Res 111:1165–1171
〔100〕Moon R, Hinton J, O’Rourke S, Schmidt D (2001b) Nutritional value of fresh and composted poultry manure for house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) larvae. J Econ Entomol 94:1308–1317
〔101〕Abbas N, Khan HAA, Shad SA (2014) Cross-resistance, genetics, and realized heritability of resistance to fipronil in the house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae): a potential vector for disease trans- mission. Parasitol Res 113:1343–1352
〔102〕AbbasN,ShadSA,IsmailM(2015)ResistancetoConventionalandNew Insecticides in House Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) From Poultry Facilities in Punjab, Pakistan. J Econ Entomol 108:826–833
〔103〕AndersonP, Alborn H (1999)Effects onovipositionbehaviour and larval development of Spodoptera littoralis by herbivore-induced changes in cotton plants. Entomol Exp Appl 92:45–51
〔104〕Ascher KR (1958) The attraction of the Levant housefly Musca vicinaMacq. to natural breeding media. Acta Trop 15:1–14
〔105〕Azeem M, Rajarao GK, Nordenhem H, Nordlander G, Borg-Karlson AK (2013) Penicillium ex-pansum volatiles reduce pine weevil attraction to host plants. J Chem Ecol 39:120–128
〔106〕Azeem M et al (2015) A fungal metabolite masks the host plant odor forthe pine weevil (Hylobius abietis). Fungal Ecol 13:103–111
〔107〕Becher PG et al (2012) Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction,
nction. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 24: 4518-29
oviposition and development. Funct Ecol 26:822–828
〔108〕BellHA,RobinsonKA,WeaverRJ(2010)Firstreportofcyromazineresis- tance in a population of UKhousefly(Muscadomestica) associated withintensivelivestockproduction.PestManageSci66:693–695
〔109〕BntonR (2006) On the origin ofsmell: odorantreceptors in insects.CellMol Life Sci 63:1579–1585
〔110〕Butler SM, Gerry AC, Mullens BA (2007) House fly (Diptera: Muscidae) activity near baits con-taining (Z)-9-tricosene and efficacy of commercial toxic fly baits on a southern California dairy. J Econ En-tomol 100:1489–1495
〔111〕Darbro JM, Mullens BA (2004) Assessing insecticide resistance and aversion to methomyl-treated toxic baits in Musca domestica L (Diptera: Muscidae) populations in southern California. Pest Manag Sci 60:901–908
〔112〕De Jesus AJ, Olsen AR, Bryce JR, Whiting RC (2004) Quantitative contamination and transfer of Escherichia coli from foods by houseflies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Int J Food Microbiol 93:259–262
〔113〕Förster M, Klimpel S, Mehlhorn H, Sievert K, Messler S, Pfeffer K (2007) Pilot study on synanth-ropic flies (e.g. Musca, Sarcophaga, Calliphora, Fannia, Lucilia, Stomoxys) as vectors of pathogenic micro-organisms. Parasitol Res 101:243–246
〔114〕Gravalos C, Fernandez E, Belando A, Moreno I, Ros C, Bielza P (2014) Cross-resistance and baseline susceptibility of Mediterranean strains of Bemisia tabaci to cyantraniliprole. Pest Manag Sci
〔115〕Howard JJ, Wall R (1998) Effects of contrast on attraction of the housefly, Musca domestica, to visual targets. Med Vet Entomol 12:322–324
〔116〕Keiding J (1999) Review of the global status and recent development of insecticide resistance in field populations of the housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Bull Entomol Res 89:1–67
〔117〕Legner EF, Dietrick EJ (1974) Effectiveness of supervised control practices in lowering population densities of synanthropic flies on poultry ranches. Entomophaga 19:467–478
〔118〕Liu N, Yue X (2000) Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J Econ Entomol 93:1269–1275
〔119〕Mullens BA, Gerry AC, Diniz AN (2010) Field and laboratory trials of a novel metaflumizone house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) bait in California. J Econ Entomol 103:550–556
〔120〕Murillo AC, Gerry AC, Gallagher NT, Peterson NG, Mullens BA (2014) Laboratory and field as-sessment of cyantraniliprole relative to existing fly baits. Pest Manag S
〔121〕Nayduch D, Noblet GP, Stutzenberger FJ (2002) Vector potential of houseflies for the bacterium Aeromonas caviae. Med Vet Entomol 16:193–198
〔122〕SAC (2009) Standardization Administration of China (SAC) Laboratory efficacy test methods and criterions of public health insecticides for pesticide registration—Part 7: Bait. http://down.foodmate.net/standard/sort/3/19848.html
〔123〕Sattelle DB, Cordova D, Cheek TR (2008) Insect ryanodine receptors: molecular targets for novel pest control chemicals. Invert Neurosci 8:107–119
〔124〕Selby TP, Lahm GP, Stevenson TM, Hughes KA, Cordova D, Annan IB, Barry JD, Benner EA, Currie MJ, Pahutski TF (2013) Discovery of cyantraniliprole, a potent and selective anthranilic diamide ryanodine receptor activator with cross-spectrum insecticidal activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 23:6341–6345
〔125〕Shi MA, Yuan JZ, Wu J, Zhuang PJ, Wu XF, Tang ZH (2002) Kinetic analysis of acetylcholinesterase in a propoxur-resistant strain of housefly (Musca domestica) from Shanghai, China. Pestic Biochem Physiol 72:72–82
〔126〕Wanaratana S, Panyim S, Pakpinyo S (2011) The potential of house flies to act as a vector of avian influenza subtype H5N1 under experimental conditions. Med Vet Entomol 25:58–63
〔127〕Wei XQ, Lu YH, Li ZL, Zhang SF, Bai YG, Pan JH (2013) Deltamethrin-resistance development rule and cross-resistance of Musca domestica. Chin J Hyg Insecticides Equip 19:313–317
〔128〕White WH, McCoy CM, Meyer JA, Winkle JR, Plummer PR, Kemper CJ, Starkey R, Snyder DE (2007) Knockdown and mortality comparisons among spinosad-, imidacloprid-, and methomyl-containing baits against susceptible Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) under laboratory conditions. J Econ Entomol 100:155–163
〔129〕Zhang L, Shi J, Gao X (2008) Inheritance of beta-cypermethrin resistance in the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Pest Manag Sci 64:185–190
〔130〕Zhang R, He S, Chen J (2014) Monitoring of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) resistance to cyantraniliprole in the south of China. J Econ Entomol 107:1233–1238
〔131〕Amano K. 1985. Breeding of the house fly, Musca domestica, (Diptera; Muscidae) in fresh dung of cattle fed on pasture grass. Applied Entomological Zoology 20: 143-150.
〔132〕Lysyk TJ (1991) Effects of temperature, food, and sucrose feeding on longevity of the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). Environ Entomol 20:1176–1180
〔133〕Identification and expression profiling of putative odorant-binding proteins in the malaria mos
quitoes, Anopheles gambiae and A. arabiensis[J];Science in China(Series C:Life Sciences);2004-06
〔134〕ZHU Bin-bin,JIANG Yong,NIU Chang-ying,ZHANG Chang-yu,LEI Chao-liang. Construction of a cDNA Library of the Antenna of Housefly, Musca domestica. ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 26(2): 203-208.
〔135〕Lu Yajuan; Population differentiation of Liriomyza sativae ; Yangzhou University; 2003