臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在全球產業結構與分工下，台灣電子產業一直以代工生產為主要業務，然而在科技迅速進步與需求日益分歧的全球競爭市場，企業面對經營環境的激烈競爭，唯有縮短產品上市周期才可以讓組織生存與成功，以及企業才能擴大與成長(Langerak and Hultink, 2006)。所以越來越多企業體認到加速產品開發時程、降低成本與改善產品開發績效，進而提高企業獲利來建立競爭優勢。
由於產品開發績效與產品開發過程以及整合有相當大的關係，其中產品設計階段與生產製造整合之同步工程作業確實對產品開發績效之提升有所貢獻。如果在產品開發早期階段就已經考慮可製造性之問題，對產品開發成功機率有優異的表現(Swink,2003)。另外，創新性高的產品可以為企業帶來高利潤，但是創新產品之技術與市場環境不確定性較高，導致產品之開發特性也因此而有所差異，企業面對不同開發特性之產品，使用不同之管理機制可得到滿意之產品開發績效(伍家德，2000)
本研究探討可製造性設計審查、產品開發特性與產品開發績效之間的關聯，以個案公司之產品開發專案相關資料與透過對產品開發專案相關人員之訪談進行實證分析，探討產品開發過程中，在RD產品開發階段導入可製造性設計審查之影響。根據個案公司之產品開發特性分為全新平台、延伸性與改良性之產品開發專案，研究結果顯示全新平台之產品開發專案，提早可製造性設計審查至RD產品開發階段可獲得滿意之產品開發績效。

Under the global industrial structure and specialization, the electronics industry in Taiwan has been OEM-oriented. However, when an enterprise faces aggressive competition in the business environment in the global competitive market where technology is rapidly progressing and demands are different day by day, organization survival and success can only be achieved by shortening the product listing cycle. The enterprise can in turn be expanded and developed (Langerak and Hultink, 2006). Thus, more and more enterprises realize that by accelerating the product development speed, reducing the cost and improving the product development performance, the profit would be increased and the competitive advantages would be established.
As product development performance is highly related to product development process and integration, the product design stage and the concurrent engineering of production and integration in particular contribute to the improvement in product development performance. If the design for manufacturability issue is considered in early product development stage, it would have positive impact on the success rate of the product development (Swink, 2003). In addition, product with high innovativeness brings high profit to the enterprise. Yet the technology and market environment for innovative product are highly uncertain which lead to varied product development features. When facing products with different development features, the application of different management mechanisms would result in satisfied product development performance (Jia-De Wu, 2000).
In the research, the connection between designs for manufacturability review, product development feature and product development performance is discussed. Empirical analysis is carried out using information relating to the product development projects of the case company and interview with the staff involved in the projects. The impact of introducing design for manufacturability review in the development stage of RD product during the product development process is discussed. Based on the product development feature of the case company, the research is divided into New Platform, Extensibility and Improved product development projects. The research result shows that New Platform product development project, in which the design for manufacturability review is brought forward to the RD product development stage, would result in satisfied product development performance.

書頁名............ i
論文口試委員審定書 ii
授權書............ iii
中文摘要.......... iv
英文摘要.......... v
誌 謝.......... vii
目 錄.......... viii
表 目 錄.......... x
圖 目 錄.......... xi
第一章、 緒 論.......... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機.... 1
第二節 研究目的.......... 2
第三節 研究架構.......... 3
第二章、 文獻探討.......... 6
第一節 產品開發流程...... 6
第二節 產品開發特性...... 8
第三節 製造早期介入...... 10
第四節 產品開發績效...... 12
壹、 產品開發績效...... 12
貳、 產品開發特性與產品開發績效關係.......13
參、 製造早期介入與產品開發績效...........13
第三章、 研究設計.......... 14
第一節 研究架構與假說.... 14
第二節 研究方法.......... 17
第三節 研究範圍與資料蒐集 20
壹、 研究範圍.......... 20
貳、 資料蒐集.......... 21
第四章、 個案分析.......... 24
第一節 個案公司簡介...... 24
第二節 個案公司之產品開發流程......25
壹、 產品開發流程...... 25
貳、 可製造性設計與審查流程......29
第三節 資料分析.......... 35
壹、 全新平台產品開發之績效分析. 35
貳、 延伸性產品開發之績效分析... 37
參、 改良性產品開發之績效分析... 39
第四節 研究結果.......... 41
第五章、 研究結論與建議.... 44
第一節 研究結論.......... 44
第二節 研究限制.......... 45
第三節 未來研究建議...... 46
參 考 文 獻.......... 47

1.王旺來、匡乃彭 (2009)，「新產品開發過程中行銷與研發的互動及高階管理者的支持對新產品市場之影響」，《工程科技與教育學刊》第6卷第2期，226-237。
2.伍家德 (2000)，「新產品開發特性與新產品開發管理機制相關研究」，《東海管理論壇》，第2卷第1期，95-118。
3.林明杰、蔣宜哲、黃錦華 (2007)，「新產品開發加速機制與新產品開發績效指標對專案成功影響之研究」，《科技管理學刊》，第12卷第4期，101-144。
4.楊長林 (2002)，「新產品開發：設計與定位、流程、績效評估之整合性管理研究」，博士學位論文，國立台灣科技大學。
5.管倖生、董皇志、阮綠茵 etc. (2007)，《設計研究方法》，台北：全華科技圖書，15-32、 129-144。
6.賴士葆 (1990)，《研究發展/行銷/製造三部門互動與新產品開發績效相關之研究》，台北：華泰書局。
7.賴士葆 (1995)，《生產作業管理-理論與實務》，台北：華泰文化事業有限公司。
8.邊守仁 (1999)，《產品創新設計-工業設計專案的解構與重建》，台北：全華科技圖書，46-47。
9.Ulrich, Karl T and Steven D. Eppinger, (2005)，《產品設計與開發》，第三版，張書文、戴華亭譯，台北：美商麥格羅希爾。
10.Adler, P.S., (1995), “Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface,” Organization Science, Vol.6, No. 2, 147-167.
11.Atuahene-Gima, K., (1995), “An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance: A contingency approach,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, 275-293.
12.Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku, (1996), “Market Orientation and Innovation,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, 93-103.
13.Cooper, R., (1988), “Benchmarking New Product Performance: Results of the Best Practices Study,” European Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1-17.
14.Cooper, R.G., (1984), “The Strategy Performance Linking Product Innovation,” R&;D Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 247-259.
15.Cooper, R.G., (1984), “New Product Strategies What Distinguishes the Top Performers?” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, 169-184.
16.Crawford C. M., (1997), New Products Management, IRWIN, New York.
17.Driva, H., Pawar, K. S. and U. Menon, (2000), “Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organizations,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 63, No. 2, 147-159.
18.Eisenhardt, K. M., and B. N. Tabrizi,(1995), “Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.40, 84-110.
19.Firth, R. W. and V. K. Narayanan, (1996),”New Product Strategies of Large, Dominant Product Manufacturing Firm: An Exploration Analysis,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13, 334-347.
20.Gerwin, D., (1993), “Integrating Manufacturing into the Strategic Phases of New Product Development,” California Management Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 123-136.
21.Khurana, A. and S. R. Rosenthal, (1997), “Integrating Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 2,103-120.
22.Langerak, F. and E. J. Hultink, (2006), “The Impact of Product Innovativeness on the Link between Development Speed and New Product Profitability,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, 203-214.
23.Leenders Mark and Wierenga Berend, (2002), “The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&;D,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 19, 305-317.
24.Liker, J. K., Collins, P. D. and F. M. Hull (1990), “Flexibility and Standardization: Test of a Contingency Model of Product Design-Manufacturing Integration,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, 248-267.
25.McIvor, R. and P. Humphreys, (2004), “Early supplier involvement in the design process: lessons from the electronics industry,” Omega, Vol. 32, 179-199.
26.Sbragia, R. (1984), “Clarity of Manager Roles and Performance on R&;D Multidisciplinary Projects in Matrix Structures,” R&;D Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, 113-126.
27.Swink, M., (2003),”Completing projects on-time: how project acceleration affects new product development,”Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, 319-344.
28.Thomas J. R., (1993), New Product Development – Managing and Forecasting for Strategic Success, John Wiley &; Sons, N.Y., N.Y.