臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來因人類活動發展和人口增長，都市地區人口聚集等因素，造成自然資源折耗和環境質損、以及其他社會問題發生，吾人意識到在追求經濟發展的同時，亦應考量與其他發展面向之間的平衡與世代公平性，將永續發展視為追求目標。本文之研究目的為應用都市永續發展之五重底線評估架構，來探討在聯合國永續發展目標發布後對臺灣縣市之永續發展影響。
本研究以永續發展之五重底線為架構，考量「社會」、「環境」、「經濟」、「治理與和平」、「多元化參與」五構面，進行都市永續性評估，討論和分析結果有二，一為本研究認為推廣社區大學、關注便利商店販售菸酒之情形、鼓勵志工參與和社區發展協會成立四者之間存在相互關聯，透過結合志工、組織團體、以及其他利害關係人共同參與社會或環境議題，可進而協助都市邁向永續發展；二為在本研究之永續性評估結果中，臺北市和新北市的表現為最佳，而屏東縣則呈現背離永續的狀態。然而，由於指標系統的建置除了會受到指標系統建構時的基礎概念、引用的文獻與系統影響外，還會受到筆者主觀意識等因素干擾，因此本文嘗試以天下雜誌的幸福城市調查來與本研究成果比較。經比較後發現，有的縣市的名次於二個研究調查存在差距，這是受到指標的選擇影響，因當選用的指標項為某幾個縣市的優勢、劣勢項目時，便會影響到各縣市評估值計算結果。因此本文建議未來進行此相關研究者可以透過先思考什麼樣的都市才是具永續性的，或是根據都市決策者欲追求的都市發展方向，再進一步進行研究探討。

In recent years, human activities, population growth and the concentration of population in urban areas have been accompanied by natural resource depletion, environmental degradation and other social problems. We realize that while pursuing economic development, we should also consider the balance between the development orientation and the fairness of the generations, and regard sustainable development as the pursuit of goals. The purpose of this paper is to apply the quintuple bottom line assessment framework to explore sustainable development of Taiwan Counties and Cities, compare the impact of sustainable development goals on sustainability assessment.
Based on the quintuple bottom line of sustainable development, this study considers the five dimensions – Society, Environment, Economy, Governance and Peace, and Diversity Participation to conduct city sustainability assessment. The main results of this paper are as follows: First and foremost, there is a correlation between promoting community colleges, paying attention to convenience stores selling liquor and tobacco, encouraging volunteer participation, and establishing community development associations. We can help the city move towards sustainable development through engaging volunteers, organizations, and other stakeholders in social or environmental issues. Besides, in the sustainability assessment of this study, the sustainability scores of Taipei City and New Taipei City were the best, and Pingtung County was deviating from sustainability. Last but not least, there are many factors that affect the establishment of the indicator system, such as the basic concepts of the index system construction, the cited literature, the author's subjective consciousness, and so on. Therefore, this paper compares the results with the relevant survey results to discuss the impact of using different indicators on the city development evaluation. In addition, the study suggests that thinking about what kind of city is sustainable, or according to the urban governance policy to explore urban development.

目錄 i
表目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構與流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 永續發展與發展目標 5
第二節 三重底線理論與延伸應用 10
第三節 都市發展與永續都市 19
第四節 永續性評估與永續發展指標原則 28
第三章 研究方法 49
第一節 評估架構 49
第二節 評估指標說明與計算 55
第四章 結果與分析 73
第一節 評估案例與議題探討 73
第二節 臺灣六都永續發展成效評估 81
第三節 全台縣市永續性評估 91
第五章 結論與建議 95
第一節 研究結論 95
第二節 研究建議 104
參考文獻 106

中文
1. 內政部統計處 (2017)。105 年簡易生命表提要分析。檢自https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/node.aspx?Z=1&sn=6450 (18 May 2019)
2. 王培勳 (2002)。我國社區發展工作之回顧。社區發展季刊，(100)，頁44–60。
3. 王彬墀 (2015)。永續性之包容暨整合評估架構—延伸生命週期評估與IPAT分解分析之應用。博士論文，臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所。
4. 华强森、张英杰、马海涛、徐一平、张耕田 (2017)。城市可持续发展指数2016。城市中国计划：中國北京。
5. 行政院國家永續發展委員會 (2018)。2016年永續發展指標系統評量結果報告。行政院國家永續發展委員會：臺北。檢自https://nsdn.epa.gov.tw/Nsdn_ListA1_Page.aspx?midnb1=DD&midnb2=D1&midnb3=D13&midnb4=0
6. 林嘉蓉 (2013)。推動公私夥伴關係PPP之省思。當代財政，(36)，頁72–79。
7. 姚名鴻、林倩如 (2014)。我國地方財政努力及其影響因素之實證研究。財稅研究，43(4)，頁43–71。
8. 胡守任、魏健宏、羅淑賢、朱禮伶 (2008)。酒後駕車之取締數與酒測值對交通肇事之影響-以臺南市為例。九十七年道路交通安全與執法研討會論文集，頁91–103。
9. 胡憲倫、程大哲、許家偉 (2011)。建構永續性平衡計分卡之研究—以半導體產業為例。中山管理評論，19(3)，頁709–741。
10. 唐永青 (2011)。亞洲綠色城市評比：臺北僅次新加坡。臺北產經，(5)，頁46–53。
11. 孫韻惇、尤碧霞 (2008)。志工的社會價值分析。網路社會學通訊期刊，(72)。檢自http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/72/72/72-15.htm
12. 張子超、駱尚廉、馬鴻文、李永展、蔡慧敏 (2014)。第二章　永續環境評量系統指標之建立。在國家教育研究院編，環境與資源管理 (頁26–62)。五南：臺中。
13. 教育部 (1998)。邁向學習社會白皮書 (民87年3月)。
14. 陳依靈 (2017)。「社區發展」到「永續社區」之探討。社區發展季刊，(158)，頁328–338。
15. 陳品樺、方文宗 (2018)。酒駕行為及違規人特性之分析─以臺北市為例。交通學報，18(1)，頁65–89。
16. 陳畊麗 (2012)。臺灣經濟成長、收入差距與貧窮之分析與對策。臺灣經濟論衡，10(1)，頁46–79。
17. 黄燕玲 (2018)。“城市繁荣指数”体系：指标、分析及政策的联结 (张丞国譯)。国际城市规划，33(3)，頁48–54。
18. 黃靖文、李勇輝、潘姵如 (2017)。環境連結對於綠建築技術與組織績效之中介效果探討。中原企管評論，15(2)，頁55–74。
19. 經濟部水利署 (2018)。106年各標的用水統計年報。經濟部水利署：臺中。
20. 經濟部統計處 (2018)。批發、零售及餐飲業經營實況調查報告2018。經濟部統計處：臺北。
21. 詹火生 (2018)。和平、正義與強大機構。載於蔣本基 (主編)，聯合國永續發展目標：策略、理論與實踐 (頁255–268)。財團法人中鼎教育基金會：臺北。
22. 臺北市政府 (2001)。都市指標對衡量台北市永續發展之適用性及評估手冊研擬。臺北市政府委託專案計畫報告書。
23. 劉漢榆、陳文姿 (2012)。從綠色智慧資本探討我國銀行業永續經營導向之效益。輔仁管理評論，19(1)，頁73–94。
24. 蔡中志 (2010)。酒後駕車肇事防制對策之研究。交通學報，10(1)，頁39–58。
25. 衛生福利部 (2017)。105年志願服務調查研究報告。衛生福利部：臺北。檢自https://vol.mohw.gov.tw/vol2/downdata/show/A5PPlv6
26. 衛生福利部國民健康署菸害防制組 (2019)。2018臺灣菸害防制年報。衛生福利部國民健康署菸害防制組：臺北。
27. 嚴徳芬、江惠櫻 (2018)。促進目標實現的夥伴關係。載於蔣本基 (主編)，聯合國永續發展目標：策略、理論與實踐 (頁269–283)。財團法人中鼎教育基金會：臺北。
英文
1.Alshuwaikhat, H.; Mohammed, I. (2017). Sustainability Matters in National Development Visions—Evidence from Saudi Arabia’s Vision for 2030. Sustainability, 9(3), 408. doi:10.3390/su9030408
2.Baculáková, K. (2016). Application of Creative Ecology Theory to Concepts of Smart and Sustainable City as Possible Solution to Urban Development Problems – Case of Riga. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 4(16), 594–600. doi:10.14505/jemt.v7.4(16).05
3.Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. The Environmentalist, 19(2), 145–161. doi:10.1023/A:1006697118620
4.Bendell, J.; Kearins, K. (2005). The political bottom line: the emerging dimension to corporate responsibility for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(6), 372–383. doi:10.1002/bse.439
5.Boyer, R.; Peterson, N.; Arora, P.; Caldwell, K. (2016). Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward. Sustainability, 8(9), 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878
6.Dizdaroglu, D. (2017). The Role of Indicator-Based Sustainability Assessment in Policy and the Decision-Making Process: A Review and Outlook. Sustainability, 9(6), 1018. doi:10.3390/su9061018
7.Ehnert, F.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Barnes, J.; Borgström, S.; Gorissen, L.; Kern, F.; Strenchock, L.; Egermann, M. (2018). The Acceleration of Urban Sustainability Transitions: A Comparison of Brighton, Budapest, Dresden, Genk, and Stockholm. Sustainability, 10(3), 612. doi:10.3390/su10030612
8.Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the Triple Bottom Line. In The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up?: assessing the sustainability of business and CSR. (1st ed.) Henriques, A. & Richardson, J. (Eds.). Routledge: Sterling, VA, London, UK, pp. 1–16.
9.Erickson, P.; Tempest, K. (2015). Keeping cities green: Avoiding carbon lock-in due to urban development. Paper presented at the SEI Working Paper No. 2015-11.
10.Errichiello, L.; Micera, R. (2018). Leveraging Smart Open Innovation for Achieving Cultural Sustainability: Learning from a New City Museum Project. Sustainability, 10(6), 1964. doi:10.3390/su10061964
11.Hugé, J.; Mukherjee, N.; Fertel, C.; Waaub, J.-P.; Block, T.; Waas, T.; Koedam, N.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2015). Conceptualizing the Effectiveness of Sustainability Assessment in Development Cooperation. Sustainability, 7(5), 5735–5751. doi:10.3390/su7055735
12.Hunter, G.; Vettorato, D.; Sagoe, G. (2018). Creating Smart Energy Cities for Sustainability through Project Implementation: A Case Study of Bolzano, Italy. Sustainability, 10(7), 2167. doi:10.3390/su10072167
13.Labus, A. (2013). Urban development of cities in the 21st century in the context of theory of aging. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 6(4), 21–26.
14.Leaver, L. H. T.; Samuelson, R.; Leaver, J. D. (2012). Potential for low transport energy use in developing Asian cities through compact urban development. Paper presented at the 3rd IAEE Asian Conference, Kyoto, Japan. https://eneken.ieej.or.jp/3rd_IAEE_Asia/con_sessions5.html
15.Longo, S.; Clark, B.; Shriver, T.; Clausen, R. (2016). Sustainability and Environmental Sociology: Putting the Economy in its Place and Moving Toward an Integrative Socio-Ecology. Sustainability, 8(5), 437. doi:10.3390/su8050437
16.Mould, O. (2016). A Limitless Urban Theory? A Response to Scott and Storper's ‘The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory'. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 157–163. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12288
17.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD: Paris, France.
18.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012). Compact city policies: a comparative assessment. OECD: Paris, France.
19.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018). Rethinking Urban Sprawl: Moving Towards Sustainable Cities. In. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/rethinking-urban-sprawl_9789264189881-en
20.Ren, J.; Luger, J. (2015). Comparative Urbanism and the ‘Asian City': Implications for Research and Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 145–156. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12140
21.Revi, A.; Satterthwaite, D. E.; Aragón-Durand, F.; Corfee-Morlot, J.; Kiunsi, R. B. R.; Pelling, M.; Roberts, D. C.; Solecki, W. (2014). Urban areas. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C. B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)] (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 535–612.
22.Russo, F.; Rindone, C.; Panuccio, P. (2016). European plans for the smart city: from theories and rules to logistics test case. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1709–1726. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1182120
23.Rysz, K.; Mazurek, K. (2015). Contemporary foundations of the theory of urban development – case study smart, slow and compact city theory. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 3(4), 39–46. doi:10.1515/environ-2015-0072
24.Satterthwaite, D. (2008). Cities' contribution to global warming: notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions. Environment and urbanization, 20(2), 539–549. doi:10.1177/0956247808096127
25.Sherman, W. R.; DiGuilio, L. (2010). The Second Round Of G3 Reports: Is Triple Bottom Line Reporting Becoming More Comparable? Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 8(9), 59. doi:10.19030/jber.v8i9.759
26.Siemens (2011). Asian Green City Index. Siemens: Munich, Germany.
27.Slaper, T. F.; Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: what is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4–8.
28.Sood, S.; Tulchin, D.; Social Enterprise Associates. (n.d.). Tip Sheet #13: Introducing the Quadruple Bottom Line (QBL). Retrieved from http://www.socialenterprise.net/publications/tip-sheets.html (accessed on 4 September 2018)
29.Sustainable Seattle (1998). Indictors of Sustainable Community. Sustainable Seattle: Washington, USA.
30.Teriman, S.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Mayere, S. (2009). Sustainable urban development : a quadruple bottom line assessment framework. Paper presented at the Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering, The Second Infrastructure Theme Postgraduate Conference, Brisbane, Qld., Australia. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/29546/
31.Tu, L.; Padovani, E. (2018). A Research on the Debt Sustainability of China’s Major City Governments in Post-Land Finance Era. Sustainability, 10(5), 1606. doi:10.3390/su10051606
32.United Nations (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (FCCC/INFORMAL/84). United Nations,: New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
33.United Nations (2007). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies (Third ed.). United Nations: New York, NY, USA.
34.United Nations (2015a). Paris Agreement. United Nations: Paris, France. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement.
35.United Nations (2015b). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations: New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
36.United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS) (2001). The State of the World’s Cities. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat): Nairobi, Kenya.
37.United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) (1992). Agenda 21. UNCED: Rio de Janerio, Brazil. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21.
38.United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (n.d.). Human Development Reports. 2018 Annex Technical Notes. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2018_technical_notes.pdf (accessed on 6 April 2019)
39.United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2011). Cities and climate change: global report on human settlements. UN-Habitat: Nairobi, Kenya.
40.United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2016). Measurement of City Prosperity: Methodology and Metadata. UN-Habitat: Nairobi, Kenya.
41.United Nations. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations: Kyoto, Japan. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process/the-kyoto-protocol.
42.Valkering, P.; Yücel, G.; Gebetsroither-Geringer, E.; Markvica, K.; Meynaerts, E.; Frantzeskaki, N. (2017). Accelerating Transition Dynamics in City Regions: A Qualitative Modeling Perspective. Sustainability, 9(7), 1254.
43.Walters, F.; Takamura, J. (2015). The Decolonized Quadruple Bottom Line: A Framework for Developing Indigenous Innovation. Wicazo Sa Review, 30(2), 77–99. doi:10.5749/wicazosareview.30.2.0077
44.Wang, F.; Wang, K. (2017). Assessing the Effect of Eco-City Practices on Urban Sustainability Using an Extended Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study in Xi’an, China. Sustainability, 9(9), 1591. doi:10.3390/su9091591
45.Milne, M. J.; Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? the triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
46.Mulamoottil, A. (2018). MACFAST Quintuple Bottom Line of Education, Innovation and Sustainability. Paper presented at the Iajbs 2018 Annual World Forum, Seattle, Washington, 23 July 2018. https://www.ignited.global/conferences/24th-annual-iajbs-world-forum-2018-cjbe-annual-meeting/sessions/macfast-quintuple-bottom-line-education-innovation-and-sustainability
網路資源
1.公平交易委員會資訊及經濟分析室 (2018)。有關辦理「106年連鎖式便利商店經營概況調查」案。檢自https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=126&docid=15589 (19 May 2019)
2.天下雜誌 (2015)。2015《天下》縣市調查之幸福城市：完整指標下載 (天下雜誌/第580期)。檢自http://topic.cw.com.tw/580/citysurveyupdate.pdf (10 July 2019)
3.天下雜誌 (2018)。2018《天下》縣市調查之幸福城市：完整指標下載 (天下雜誌/第656期)。檢自http://topic.cw.com.tw/cw/pdf/656-city.pdf (27 May 2019)
4.全國法規資料庫。販賣或購買菸酒。檢自https://law.moj.gov.tw/SmartSearch/Theme.aspx?T=15&O=2.1 (19 May 2019)
5.行政院主計總處 (無日期)。何謂人類發展指數（HDI）？如何查詢我國資料？檢自https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=2389&CtUnit=1088&BaseDSD=7&mp=1 (30 March 2019)
6.行政院新聞傳播處 (2018)。《社區大學發展條例》—制定專法 促進社區大學永續發展。檢自https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/18d62010-10bb-4263-82f4-59194f9e4ae3 (18 May 2019)
7.林新雅、李振北 (2016)。【2016，永續新禧年】17項永續發展目標(SDGs)。CSRone永續報告平台，檢自http://www.csronereporting.com/topic_2225 (18 March 2019)
8.城市中国计划 (無日期)。城市可持续发展指数(USI)。檢自http://www.urbanchinainitiative.org/zh/research/usi.html (9 April 2019)
9.联合国 (無日期)。联合国人居三会议。檢自https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/zh/habitat3/ (28 March 2019)
10.衛生福利部社會救助及社工司 (2017a)。社區發展。檢自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-88-229-1-39.html (30 May 2019)
11.衛生福利部社會救助及社工司 (2017b)。社區發展工作推動現況。檢自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOSAASW/cp-554-4789-103.html (30 May 2019)
12.衛生福利部國民健康署 (2019)。打造無菸世界 從你我開始。健康促進瞭望專欄主題報導，檢自https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1253&pid=7300 (18 May 2019)
13.衛生福利部國民健康署癌症防治組 (2016)。別再用檳榔來驅寒，小心引發口腔癌!檢自https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1136&pid=3046 (19 May 2019)
14.闕士淵 (2015)。義美門市四月開始不賣菸了！統一、全家等超商不跟進。The News Lens關鍵評論，檢自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/14208 (22 April 2019)
15.17Goals. THE 17GOALS BASIC SLIDE SET. Retrieved from http://17goals.org (accessed on 18 March 2019)
16.C40 cities. HISTORY OF THE C40. Retrieved from https://www.c40.org/history (accessed on 29 August 2018)
17.Elkington, J. (2012). Going Green. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/22/opinion/global-agenda-magazine-going-green.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1& (accessed on 3 September 2018)
18.Elkington, J. (2018). 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” Here’s Why It’s Time to Rethink It. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it (accessed on 3 September 2018)
19.Greenhouse Gas Protocol. GHG Protocol for Cities. Retrieved from https://ghgprotocol.org/greenhouse-gas-protocol-accounting-reporting-standard-cities (accessed on 27 August 2018)
20.Habitat Ⅲ. THE NEW URBAN AGENDA. Retrieved from http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda (accessed on 28 March 2019)
21.Joan Clos (2016). Habitat III Is the Citizens’ Conference of the United Nations. UN Chronicle, 53(3). Retrieved from https://unchronicle.un.org/article/habitat-iii-citizens-conference-united-nations (accessed on 28 March 2019)
22.Measure of America. About Human Development. Retrieved from http://measureofamerica.org/human-development/ (accessed on 14 April 2019)
23.Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/intgovmental.html (accessed on 29 MAy 2018)
24.United Nations (2015). UN Sustainable Development Summit (25-27 September). Retrieved from https://un.org.au/2015/09/02/un-sustainable-development-summit-25-27-september/ (accessed on 1 October 2018)
25.United Nations (n.d.). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 4 September 2018)
26.United Nations Center for Human Settlements (UNCHS) (n.d.). THE STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES REPORT 2001. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/Istanbul+5/ (accessed on 28 March 2019)
27.United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Reports. Human Development Index (HDI). Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi (accessed on 6 April 2019)
28.United Nations Environment Programme (n.d.). Cities and climate change. Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/cities/cities-and-climate-change (accessed on 24 August 2018)
29.United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (n.d.). History, mandate & role in the UN system. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/history-mandate-role-in-the-un-system/ (accessed on 26 March 2019)
數據資料
1.中央選舉委員會選舉資料庫網站。檢自http://db.cec.gov.tw/
2.中華民國統計資訊網。檢自https://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp
3.中華民國醫師公會全國聯合會。醫療統計。檢自http://www.tma.tw/stats/index_AllPDF.asp
4.內政部統計處。歷年簡易生命表。檢自https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/node.aspx?cate_sn=&belong_sn=5992&sn=6028
5.內政部營建署。全國污水下水道用戶接管普及率及整體污水處理率統計表。檢自https://www.cpami.gov.tw/%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0%E6%B6%88%E6%81%AF/%E6%A5%AD%E5%8B%99%E6%96%B0%E8%A8%8A/51-%E4%B8%8B%E6%B0%B4%E9%81%93%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E8%99%95/9995-%E5%85%A8%E5%9C%8B%E6%B1%A1%E6%B0%B4%E4%B8%8B%E6%B0%B4%E9%81%93%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B6%E6%8E%A5%E7%AE%A1%E6%99%AE%E5%8F%8A%E7%8E%87%E5%8F%8A%E6%95%B4%E9%AB%94%E6%B1%A1%E6%B0%B4%E8%99%95%E7%90%86%E7%8E%87%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E8%A1%A8.html
6.台灣電力公司。各縣市售電資訊。檢自https://www.taipower.com.tw/tc/page.aspx?mid=101
7.交通部公路總局 統計查詢網。檢自https://stat.thb.gov.tw/hb01/webMain.aspx?sys=100&funid=11100
8.社團法人社區大學全國促進會。各社大介紹。檢自http://www.napcu.org.tw/college_list.html#
9.財政部地方財政資料庫。檢自http://web02.mof.gov.tw/njswww/WebProxy.aspx?sys=100&funid=defjspf3
10.教育部終身教育司。成人教育調查統計報告。檢自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2400/News_Content.aspx?n=3783ED6E5EB0B437&sms=707ED96D12B73148&s=E6C4BEA26B435B1C
11.教育部統計處。性別統計指標彙總性資料--教育成果。檢自https://depar
t.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=3B5CF278333EAB11
12.經濟部水利署。公務統計報表-自來水生活用水量統計。檢自https://www.wra.gov.tw/6950/7169/7316/7324/24040/
13.經濟部能源局。各縣市汽車加油站汽柴油銷售統計月資料。檢自https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/populace/content/wfrmStatistics.aspx?type=2&menu_id=1300
14.衛生福利部。社區發展。檢自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-88-229-1-39.html
15.衛生福利部志願服務資訊網際網路系統。檢自https://vol.mohw.gov.tw/vol2/
16.衛生福利部國民健康署。菸害防治-監測與統計 (國人吸菸行為調查ASBS、青少年吸菸行為調查GYTS)。檢自https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=181
17.衛生福利部國民健康署Open data。102年18歲以上人口目前嚼檳榔率-依縣市別分。檢自http://data.hpa.gov.tw/dataset?q=%E6%AA%B3%E6%A6%94&res_format=CSV&sort=score+desc%2C+metadata_modified+desc
18.衛生福利部國民健康署Open data。18歲以上人口每日吸菸率。檢自http://data.hpa.gov.tw/dataset?sort=score+desc%2C+metadata_modified+desc&q=%E5%90%B8%E8%8F%B8&res_format=CSV
19.環保署統計資料庫系統。執行機關垃圾產生量。檢自https://statis91.epa.gov.tw/epa/stmain.jsp?sys=210&kind=21&type=1&funid=11050&rdm=rarrbd9j
20.環保署環境資源資料庫。空氣品質指標(AQI)概況。檢自https://erdb.epa.gov.tw/DataRepository/Statistics/AirQualityIndicators.aspx
21.警政統計查詢網。檢自https://ba.npa.gov.tw/npa/stmain.jsp?sys=100